Current Events > School bans Parents from viewing pro-LGBT Videos they showed to kids

Topic List	Page List: 1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
Abyssea 07/02/18 7:23:14 PM #303:	Kazi1212 posted... Did the school decide to present what the students put together or did the students present their video in a student club or something? sounds to me like it got played on a student run tv station. that's how my school gave out the morning announcements at least. they'd go over the basics and then show some stuff the students had made. barely anyone paid attention to it though. :v --- https://imgur.com/F2h5rw2 <cite>Abyssea posted [p:904381350] in School ban... [t:76769957]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kazi1212 posted...</cite> <quote>Did the school decide to present what the students put together or did the students present their video in a student club or something?</quote> sounds to me like it got played on a student run tv station. that's how my school gave out the morning announcements at least. they'd go over the basics and then show some stuff the students had made. barely anyone paid attention to it though. :v</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Abyssea 07/02/18 7:24:27 PM #304:	SageHarpuia posted... Abyssea posted... Semantics. It was a presentation put together by students. Whatever you want to call it, the students were the ones behind it. Abyssea posted... It was a selection of videos picked out by the students. SageHarpuia posted... Imagine trying to continue an argument after you've been called out on blatant bs and? I said both those things. they're both true if you read the article instead of flailing around in here like a fish on a hook. --- https://imgur.com/F2h5rw2 <cite>Abyssea posted [p:904381432] in School ban... [t:76769957]...</cite> <quote><cite>SageHarpuia posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Abyssea posted...</cite> <quote>Semantics. It was a presentation put together by students. Whatever you want to call it, the students were the ones behind it. </quote> <cite>Abyssea posted...</cite> <quote>It was a selection of videos picked out by the students.</quote> <cite>SageHarpuia posted...</cite> <quote>Imagine trying to continue an argument after you've been called out on blatant bs </quote></quote> and? I said both those things. they're both true if you read the article instead of flailing around in here like a fish on a hook.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Darmik 07/02/18 7:27:10 PM #305:	Kazi1212 posted... Did the school decide to present what the students put together or did the students present their video in a student club or something? Sounds like the student group organized to show their project to the school. --- Kind Regards, Darmik <cite>Darmik posted [p:904381598] in School ban... [t:76769957]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kazi1212 posted...</cite> <quote>Did the school decide to present what the students put together or did the students present their video in a student club or something?</quote> Sounds like the student group organized to show their project to the school.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SageHarpuia 07/02/18 7:27:20 PM #306:	Keep repeating it, maybe it will eventually be true! --- "You will pay dearly for your futile resistance!" <cite>SageHarpuia posted [p:904381607] in School ban... [t:76769957]...</cite> <quote>Keep repeating it, maybe it will eventually be true!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Abyssea 07/02/18 7:29:31 PM #307:	SageHarpuia posted... Keep repeating it, maybe it will eventually be true! likewise :v --- https://imgur.com/F2h5rw2 <cite>Abyssea posted [p:904381752] in School ban... [t:76769957]...</cite> <quote><cite>SageHarpuia posted...</cite> <quote>Keep repeating it, maybe it will eventually be true!</quote> likewise :v</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ImTheMacheteGuy 07/02/18 7:32:20 PM #308:	UnfairRepresent posted... darkjedilink posted... UnfairRepresent posted... KamenRiderBlade posted... If there is nothing to "Hide", then why are they going out of their way to deny the parents a very simple request? Because it's the students project. Parents don't just get to read other kids' stuff, that's horrible The YouTube videos they spliced together are public. How do you know? You never saw what they made lmao fucking rekt --- Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/ <cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted [p:904381942] in School ban... [t:76769957]...</cite> <quote><cite>UnfairRepresent posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>UnfairRepresent posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KamenRiderBlade posted...</cite> <quote> If there is nothing to "Hide", then why are they going out of their way to deny the parents a very simple request?</quote> Because it's the students project. Parents don't just get to read other kids' stuff, that's horrible</quote> The YouTube videos they spliced together are public.</quote> How do you know? You never saw what they made</quote> lmao fucking rekt</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
tainted_emerald 07/02/18 7:37:27 PM #309:	A_Good_Boy posted... tainted_emerald posted... SageHarpuia posted... Abyssea posted... What matters is that the school is within their rights to not release the videos because it was created by the students. Abyssea posted... SageHarpuia posted... I've never heard of students getting a grade for listening to morning announcements :u Do you remember that? I thought it was a student project??? Nope, just some videos (picked out by students) that got played alongside the morning announcements. That's what you're laying an egg about Harpuia. :v Anyone else see the glaring contradiction? I too am annoyed that kids nowadays can just edit together a bunch of YouTube vids and call it a media presentation of sorts. Wait till you find out they don't actually have to step foot inside of a library to do research projects. Times are a changing, old man. Madness. Next you'll be telling me that kids no longer have to print out their papers for teachers to read and mark. --- "Evil is what you make of it. Bind it to a higher purpose and you would have altered its nature. We use what tools we must." - Gerald Tarrant <cite>tainted_emerald posted [p:904382224] in School ban... [t:76769957]...</cite> <quote><cite>A_Good_Boy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>tainted_emerald posted...</cite> <quote><cite>SageHarpuia posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>Abyssea posted...</cite> <quote> What matters is that the school is within their rights to not release the videos because it was created by the students. </quote> <cite>Abyssea posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>SageHarpuia posted...</cite> <quote> <quote> I've never heard of students getting a grade for listening to morning announcements :u Do you remember that? </quote> I thought it was a student project??? </quote> Nope, just some videos (picked out by students) that got played alongside the morning announcements. That's what you're laying an egg about Harpuia. :v </quote> Anyone else see the glaring contradiction?</quote> I too am annoyed that kids nowadays can just edit together a bunch of YouTube vids and call it a media presentation of sorts.</quote> Wait till you find out they don't actually have to step foot inside of a library to do research projects. Times are a changing, old man.</quote> Madness. Next you'll be telling me that kids no longer have to print out their papers for teachers to read and mark.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Funbazooka 07/02/18 8:24:31 PM #310:	Abyssea posted... They probably were, but regardless, it was the students who put them together. If it was the faculty behind it that would be a different story. Do you really think the school is going to sic a bunch of angry religious nutjobs on a bunch of high schoolers for making a video playlist? The school faculty is responsible, for allowing SJW brand hate-speech and ideological indoctrination. And if the shoe was on the other foot (homophobic hate speech), these students would have been in trouble for even assembling it and bringing into the school. --- "Don't trade your authenticity for approval." -Kanye West <cite>Funbazooka posted [p:904384955] in School ban... [t:76769957]...</cite> <quote><cite>Abyssea posted...</cite> <quote>They probably were, but regardless, it was the students who put them together. If it was the faculty behind it that would be a different story. Do you really think the school is going to sic a bunch of angry religious nutjobs on a bunch of high schoolers for making a video playlist?</quote> The school faculty is responsible, for allowing SJW brand hate-speech and ideological indoctrination. And if the shoe was on the other foot (homophobic hate speech), these students would have been in trouble for even assembling it and bringing into the school.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ImTheMacheteGuy 07/02/18 8:35:11 PM #311:	SageHarpuia posted... Abyssea posted... Oh my, now you're just arguing semantics. It was a selection of videos picked out by the students. It was something the students themselves did, a student presentation. Releasing it to the parents would be unfair to the students. You can't have it both ways. Either the students created the content and therefore the school is under no obligation to allow the parents to review it, or there was no student participation, it wasn't a project, and therefore perfectly acceptable for parental review. There aren't enough cards to play it both ways. Sounds like it was project from a school-sponsored student club, as opposed to a school-assigned project. It's a technical detail as opposed to a glaring contradiction. --- Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/ <cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted [p:904385594] in School ban... [t:76769957]...</cite> <quote><cite>SageHarpuia posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Abyssea posted...</cite> <quote> Oh my, now you're just arguing semantics. It was a selection of videos picked out by the students. It was something the students themselves did, a student presentation. Releasing it to the parents would be unfair to the students. </quote> You can't have it both ways. Either the students created the content and therefore the school is under no obligation to allow the parents to review it, or there was no student participation, it wasn't a project, and therefore perfectly acceptable for parental review. There aren't enough cards to play it both ways.</quote> Sounds like it was project from a school-sponsored student club, as opposed to a school-assigned project. It's a technical detail as opposed to a glaring contradiction.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Raikuro 07/02/18 8:40:02 PM #312:	Still not sure how acknowledging the existence of gay people is partisan indoctrination and requires a trigger warning. <cite>Raikuro posted [p:904385901] in School ban... [t:76769957]...</cite> <quote>Still not sure how acknowledging the existence of gay people is partisan indoctrination and requires a trigger warning.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FrisbeeDude 07/02/18 8:41:04 PM #313:	Raikuro posted... Still not sure how acknowledging the existence of gay people is partisan indoctrination and requires a trigger warning. --- If you're not voting like a black woman, your opinion doesn't matter to me <cite>FrisbeeDude posted [p:904385971] in School ban... [t:76769957]...</cite> <quote><cite>Raikuro posted...</cite> <quote>Still not sure how acknowledging the existence of gay people is partisan indoctrination and requires a trigger warning.</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FrisbeeDude 07/02/18 8:42:45 PM #314:	Funbazooka posted... UnfairRepresent posted... The videos ranged from 9 Questions Gay People Have About Straight People to a compilation of clips celebrating marriage equality. There was also a video educating students about gender fluidity the idea there is no such thing as male or female. My son expressed to me that he felt bullied by the administration for being a heterosexual man and being forced to listen to LGBT advocacy on a daily basis, one parent wrote in a letter to the school district. The 9 Questions Gay People Have About Straight People was most likely bigoted sexist heterophobic crap and gender fluidity the idea there is no such thing as male or female, is literally anti-science baloney on par with creationism. lmao is this a real person --- If you're not voting like a black woman, your opinion doesn't matter to me <cite>FrisbeeDude posted [p:904386089] in School ban... [t:76769957]...</cite> <quote><cite>Funbazooka posted...</cite> <quote><cite>UnfairRepresent posted...</cite> <quote>The videos ranged from 9 Questions Gay People Have About Straight People to a compilation of clips celebrating marriage equality. There was also a video educating students about gender fluidity the idea there is no such thing as male or female. My son expressed to me that he felt bullied by the administration for being a heterosexual man and being forced to listen to LGBT advocacy on a daily basis, one parent wrote in a letter to the school district.</quote> The 9 Questions Gay People Have About Straight People was most likely bigoted sexist heterophobic crap and gender fluidity the idea there is no such thing as male or female, is literally anti-science baloney on par with creationism.</quote> lmao is this a real person</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ImTheMacheteGuy 07/02/18 8:45:24 PM #315:	SageHarpuia posted... Abyssea posted... Semantics. It was a presentation put together by students. Whatever you want to call it, the students were the ones behind it. Abyssea posted... It was a selection of videos picked out by the students. SageHarpuia posted... Imagine trying to continue an argument after you've been called out on blatant bs I know this is "whataboutism," but you once called a trans woman "he" and got warned for it, then complained to the mods in a long rant of a dispute, stating that you "didn't know the user's gender" which was bullshit... and when called out, you changed your story to "it was a typo. I meant she, but I accidentally left out the s" which was also bullshit, so when you were called out on that, you changed your story to "well I have the right to call someone by the pronoun that corresponds to the gender that my christianity directs me to believe they are." That was a fun shitshow to watch. --- Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/ <cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted [p:904386282] in School ban... [t:76769957]...</cite> <quote><cite>SageHarpuia posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Abyssea posted...</cite> <quote>Semantics. It was a presentation put together by students. Whatever you want to call it, the students were the ones behind it. </quote> <cite>Abyssea posted...</cite> <quote>It was a selection of videos picked out by the students.</quote> <cite>SageHarpuia posted...</cite> <quote>Imagine trying to continue an argument after you've been called out on blatant bs </quote></quote> I know this is "whataboutism," but you once called a trans woman "he" and got warned for it, then complained to the mods in a long rant of a dispute, stating that you "didn't know the user's gender" which was bullshit... and when called out, you changed your story to "it was a typo. I meant she, but I accidentally left out the s" which was also bullshit, so when you were called out on that, you changed your story to "well I have the right to call someone by the pronoun that corresponds to the gender that my christianity directs me to believe they are." That was a fun shitshow to watch.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Darmik 07/02/18 8:45:58 PM #316:	Funbazooka posted... The school faculty is responsible, for allowing SJW brand hate-speech and ideological indoctrination. And if the shoe was on the other foot (homophobic hate speech), these students would have been in trouble for even assembling it and bringing into the school. I must have missed the hate speech referenced in the article. --- Kind Regards, Darmik <cite>Darmik posted [p:904386311] in School ban... [t:76769957]...</cite> <quote><cite>Funbazooka posted...</cite> <quote>The school faculty is responsible, for allowing SJW brand hate-speech and ideological indoctrination. And if the shoe was on the other foot (homophobic hate speech), these students would have been in trouble for even assembling it and bringing into the school.</quote> I must have missed the hate speech referenced in the article.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kazi1212 07/02/18 8:46:07 PM #317:	Raikuro posted... Still not sure how acknowledging the existence of gay people is partisan indoctrination and requires a trigger warning. That would have been fine, but you and I know both know the video was not only about acknowledging the existence of gay people, the article states they were espousing their ideas on gender and marriage. Which certainly sounds ideological, I mean, I wouldnt allow some Christian kids using the school as a platform to say what they think of gender or marriage to my kids because children are impressionable - I dont think thats so unreasonable --- I don't know my gimmick "Does that sound reasonable to you?" <cite>Kazi1212 posted [p:904386326] in School ban... [t:76769957]...</cite> <quote><cite>Raikuro posted...</cite> <quote>Still not sure how acknowledging the existence of gay people is partisan indoctrination and requires a trigger warning.</quote> That would have been fine, but you and I know both know the video was not only about acknowledging the existence of gay people, the article states they were espousing their ideas on gender and marriage. Which certainly sounds ideological, I mean, I wouldnt allow some Christian kids using the school as a platform to say what they think of gender or marriage to my kids because children are impressionable - I dont think thats so unreasonable</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
tri sapphire 07/02/18 8:47:55 PM #318:	KamenRiderBlade posted... tri sapphire posted... Just imagine if all student presentations/speeches/papers had to be reviewed by all parents before being shown/discussed in class. Don't you see how fucking idiotic this would be? But according to you it's necessary, since some kid might do a speech on why the Confederacy was bad, which might offend those who grew up in the south. It having to do with sexuality/gender is 100% unrelated. Such subjects are lawfully taught in schools with zero parental input/notification. Presentations like this are probably common in health ed classes by some students, without any choice being given to other students in the class to cut class because it offends them. When I was a kid, the "Sex Ed" course was required to have a Parent Approval form and they were notified a week in advance. Literally 1/3 of my class went to the Cafeteria during "Sex Ed" so that they would "Opt Out" because of the parents request. Anything Controversial was required to "Notify the Parents" first and have them sign approval forms. So no, it's not idiotic. It's called having common decency to inform parents on topics that may be "Controversial". And any "Gender" courses didn't even exist when I went to school. Really? I never had to have my projects and speeches approved by other parents before presenting them. Do you really think it's feasible or sensible to screen every single student project before every single parent before a student is allowed to present it? And high school required no parental notification for sex ed classes when I attended. Could be a regional or generational thing I suppose, though I doubt I'm that much younger than you (wish I was still under 30). --- "If history is to change, let it change! If the world is to be destroyed, so be it! If my fate is to be destroyed...I must simply laugh!!."- Magus <cite>tri sapphire posted [p:904386461] in School ban... [t:76769957]...</cite> <quote><cite>KamenRiderBlade posted...</cite> <quote><cite>tri sapphire posted...</cite> <quote>Just imagine if all student presentations/speeches/papers had to be reviewed by all parents before being shown/discussed in class. Don't you see how fucking idiotic this would be? But according to you it's necessary, since some kid might do a speech on why the Confederacy was bad, which might offend those who grew up in the south. It having to do with sexuality/gender is 100% unrelated. Such subjects are lawfully taught in schools with zero parental input/notification. Presentations like this are probably common in health ed classes by some students, without any choice being given to other students in the class to cut class because it offends them.</quote>When I was a kid, the "Sex Ed" course was required to have a Parent Approval form and they were notified a week in advance. Literally 1/3 of my class went to the Cafeteria during "Sex Ed" so that they would "Opt Out" because of the parents request. Anything Controversial was required to "Notify the Parents" first and have them sign approval forms. So no, it's not idiotic. It's called having common decency to inform parents on topics that may be "Controversial". And any "Gender" courses didn't even exist when I went to school.</quote> Really? I never had to have my projects and speeches approved by other parents before presenting them. Do you really think it's feasible or sensible to screen every single student project before every single parent before a student is allowed to present it? And high school required no parental notification for sex ed classes when I attended. Could be a regional or generational thing I suppose, though I doubt I'm that much younger than you (wish I was still under 30).</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lorenzo_2003 07/02/18 9:13:56 PM #319:	Raikuro posted... Still not sure how acknowledging the existence of gay people is partisan indoctrination and requires a trigger warning. Youre being partisan right now, and so are a lot of other people in this thread. If the students had put together a presentation titled Heterosexual Lives Matter or LGBT Supporters For Trump, you could bet your last dollar that parents would be screaming for the principal and teachers to be fired and at the absolute very least they would demand to see what is in that presentation. Inb4 no no thats totally different and the videos arent political at all --- ... <cite>Lorenzo_2003 posted [p:904387991] in School ban... [t:76769957]...</cite> <quote><cite>Raikuro posted...</cite> <quote>Still not sure how acknowledging the existence of gay people is partisan indoctrination and requires a trigger warning.</quote> Youre being partisan right now, and so are a lot of other people in this thread. If the students had put together a presentation titled Heterosexual Lives Matter or LGBT Supporters For Trump, you could bet your last dollar that parents would be screaming for the principal and teachers to be fired and at the absolute very least they would demand to see what is in that presentation. Inb4 no no thats totally different and the videos arent political at all</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
A_Good_Boy 07/02/18 9:15:19 PM #320:	Lorenzo_2003 posted... Raikuro posted... Still not sure how acknowledging the existence of gay people is partisan indoctrination and requires a trigger warning. Youre being partisan right now, and so are a lot of other people in this thread. If the students had put together a presentation titled Heterosexual Lives Matter or LGBT Supporters For Trump, you could bet your last dollar that parents would be screaming for the principal and teachers to be fired and at the absolute very least they would demand to see what is in that presentation. Inb4 no no thats totally different and the videos arent political at all And there'd still be no grounds for a lawsuit and those students would still be entitled to their privacy. Thanks for being nonpartisan. --- Who is? I am! <cite>A_Good_Boy posted [p:904388070] in School ban... [t:76769957]...</cite> <quote><cite>Lorenzo_2003 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Raikuro posted...</cite> <quote> Still not sure how acknowledging the existence of gay people is partisan indoctrination and requires a trigger warning.</quote> Youre being partisan right now, and so are a lot of other people in this thread. If the students had put together a presentation titled Heterosexual Lives Matter or LGBT Supporters For Trump, you could bet your last dollar that parents would be screaming for the principal and teachers to be fired and at the absolute very least they would demand to see what is in that presentation. Inb4 no no thats totally different and the videos arent political at all</quote> And there'd still be no grounds for a lawsuit and those students would still be entitled to their privacy. Thanks for being nonpartisan.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ImTheMacheteGuy 07/02/18 9:18:56 PM #321:	tri sapphire posted... KamenRiderBlade posted... tri sapphire posted... Just imagine if all student presentations/speeches/papers had to be reviewed by all parents before being shown/discussed in class. Don't you see how fucking idiotic this would be? But according to you it's necessary, since some kid might do a speech on why the Confederacy was bad, which might offend those who grew up in the south. It having to do with sexuality/gender is 100% unrelated. Such subjects are lawfully taught in schools with zero parental input/notification. Presentations like this are probably common in health ed classes by some students, without any choice being given to other students in the class to cut class because it offends them. When I was a kid, the "Sex Ed" course was required to have a Parent Approval form and they were notified a week in advance. Literally 1/3 of my class went to the Cafeteria during "Sex Ed" so that they would "Opt Out" because of the parents request. Anything Controversial was required to "Notify the Parents" first and have them sign approval forms. So no, it's not idiotic. It's called having common decency to inform parents on topics that may be "Controversial". And any "Gender" courses didn't even exist when I went to school. Really? I never had to have my projects and speeches approved by other parents before presenting them. Do you really think it's feasible or sensible to screen every single student project before every single parent before a student is allowed to present it? And high school required no parental notification for sex ed classes when I attended. Could be a regional or generational thing I suppose, though I doubt I'm that much younger than you (wish I was still under 30). I'm 35 and I have no idea what Kamen is talking about. I remember having a brief extended lesson in 5th grade that was a basic sort of sex ed thing. All I remember from it was one day we got to ask sex-related questions anonymously. I asked how lesbians have sex. My question was not read aloud or answered >_> Real sex ed was in health class, which was in 8th and 10th grade, with the latter being more in depth. I don't recall any parental permission or whatever other stuff being involved. Also they had free condoms available at the health office in both Jr. High and High School. There was a also a gay-straight alliance type club. I think it was called "students of diverse sexualities" or something. None of this ever seemed new or "recently established" at the time, and I'm talking 20-25 years ago. --- Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/ <cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted [p:904388306] in School ban... [t:76769957]...</cite> <quote><cite>tri sapphire posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KamenRiderBlade posted...</cite> <quote><cite>tri sapphire posted...</cite> <quote>Just imagine if all student presentations/speeches/papers had to be reviewed by all parents before being shown/discussed in class. Don't you see how fucking idiotic this would be? But according to you it's necessary, since some kid might do a speech on why the Confederacy was bad, which might offend those who grew up in the south. It having to do with sexuality/gender is 100% unrelated. Such subjects are lawfully taught in schools with zero parental input/notification. Presentations like this are probably common in health ed classes by some students, without any choice being given to other students in the class to cut class because it offends them.</quote>When I was a kid, the "Sex Ed" course was required to have a Parent Approval form and they were notified a week in advance. Literally 1/3 of my class went to the Cafeteria during "Sex Ed" so that they would "Opt Out" because of the parents request. Anything Controversial was required to "Notify the Parents" first and have them sign approval forms. So no, it's not idiotic. It's called having common decency to inform parents on topics that may be "Controversial". And any "Gender" courses didn't even exist when I went to school.</quote> Really? I never had to have my projects and speeches approved by other parents before presenting them. Do you really think it's feasible or sensible to screen every single student project before every single parent before a student is allowed to present it? And high school required no parental notification for sex ed classes when I attended. Could be a regional or generational thing I suppose, though I doubt I'm that much younger than you (wish I was still under 30).</quote> I'm 35 and I have no idea what Kamen is talking about. I remember having a brief extended lesson in 5th grade that was a basic sort of sex ed thing. All I remember from it was one day we got to ask sex-related questions anonymously. I asked how lesbians have sex. My question was not read aloud or answered >_> Real sex ed was in health class, which was in 8th and 10th grade, with the latter being more in depth. I don't recall any parental permission or whatever other stuff being involved. Also they had free condoms available at the health office in both Jr. High and High School. There was a also a gay-straight alliance type club. I think it was called "students of diverse sexualities" or something. None of this ever seemed new or "recently established" at the time, and I'm talking 20-25 years ago.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kaliesto 07/02/18 10:17:41 PM #322:	creativerealms posted... Sorry about some of my recent comments. I don't trust the liberty Counsel. They are known to twist the truth to make the LGBT community seem worse. To make it look like they are doing things to hurt Christians, or parents, or children when really they are not. Given that this is a report from a far right reporter known to twist the news to make his side look better and this is the liberty counsel a far right hate group known to oppose LGBT rights I will take his report with a huge grain of salt. Should parents be allowed to know what their kids are learning at school and have access to school videos? Yes. Does that change hat we are only seeing one side of the story? The far right side? No, I wish this was pointed out sooner. : / --- It's not stupidity, it's something much worse. It's... the GameSpot comment section!-Stebsis Gimme dat, gimme dat, gimme dat DramaFAQs-misterbum <cite>Kaliesto posted [p:904391893] in School ban... [t:76769957]...</cite> <quote><cite>creativerealms posted...</cite> <quote>Sorry about some of my recent comments. I don't trust the liberty Counsel. They are known to twist the truth to make the LGBT community seem worse. To make it look like they are doing things to hurt Christians, or parents, or children when really they are not. Given that this is a report from a far right reporter known to twist the news to make his side look better and this is the liberty counsel a far right hate group known to oppose LGBT rights I will take his report with a huge grain of salt. Should parents be allowed to know what their kids are learning at school and have access to school videos? Yes. Does that change hat we are only seeing one side of the story? The far right side? No,</quote> I wish this was pointed out sooner. : /</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
JohnLennonTrump 07/02/18 10:21:26 PM #323:	Disgraceful, school should definitely be sued. --- Trump/Pence 2020: Make America Great Again! <cite>JohnLennonTrump posted [p:904392136] in School ban... [t:76769957]...</cite> <quote>Disgraceful, school should definitely be sued.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ImTheMacheteGuy 07/02/18 10:40:14 PM #324:	JohnLennonTrump posted... Disgraceful, school should definitely be sued. Hi hoth!! :D --- Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/ <cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted [p:904393255] in School ban... [t:76769957]...</cite> <quote><cite>JohnLennonTrump posted...</cite> <quote>Disgraceful, school should definitely be sued.</quote> Hi hoth!! :D</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
A_Good_Boy 07/02/18 10:40:35 PM #325:	Kaliesto posted... creativerealms posted... Sorry about some of my recent comments. I don't trust the liberty Counsel. They are known to twist the truth to make the LGBT community seem worse. To make it look like they are doing things to hurt Christians, or parents, or children when really they are not. Given that this is a report from a far right reporter known to twist the news to make his side look better and this is the liberty counsel a far right hate group known to oppose LGBT rights I will take his report with a huge grain of salt. Should parents be allowed to know what their kids are learning at school and have access to school videos? Yes. Does that change hat we are only seeing one side of the story? The far right side? No, I wish this was pointed out sooner. : / It has been, since the first page. People keep on ignoring it. --- Who is? I am! <cite>A_Good_Boy posted [p:904393274] in School ban... [t:76769957]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kaliesto posted...</cite> <quote><cite>creativerealms posted...</cite> <quote> Sorry about some of my recent comments. I don't trust the liberty Counsel. They are known to twist the truth to make the LGBT community seem worse. To make it look like they are doing things to hurt Christians, or parents, or children when really they are not. Given that this is a report from a far right reporter known to twist the news to make his side look better and this is the liberty counsel a far right hate group known to oppose LGBT rights I will take his report with a huge grain of salt. Should parents be allowed to know what their kids are learning at school and have access to school videos? Yes. Does that change hat we are only seeing one side of the story? The far right side? No,</quote> I wish this was pointed out sooner. : /</quote> It has been, since the first page. People keep on ignoring it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
JohnLennonTrump 07/02/18 10:41:11 PM #326:	A_Good_Boy posted... Kaliesto posted... creativerealms posted... Sorry about some of my recent comments. I don't trust the liberty Counsel. They are known to twist the truth to make the LGBT community seem worse. To make it look like they are doing things to hurt Christians, or parents, or children when really they are not. Given that this is a report from a far right reporter known to twist the news to make his side look better and this is the liberty counsel a far right hate group known to oppose LGBT rights I will take his report with a huge grain of salt. Should parents be allowed to know what their kids are learning at school and have access to school videos? Yes. Does that change hat we are only seeing one side of the story? The far right side? No, I wish this was pointed out sooner. : / It has been, since the first page. People keep on ignoring it. You do realise almost every source has an inherent bias right? --- Trump/Pence 2020: Make America Great Again! <cite>JohnLennonTrump posted [p:904393308] in School ban... [t:76769957]...</cite> <quote><cite>A_Good_Boy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kaliesto posted...</cite> <quote><cite>creativerealms posted...</cite> <quote> Sorry about some of my recent comments. I don't trust the liberty Counsel. They are known to twist the truth to make the LGBT community seem worse. To make it look like they are doing things to hurt Christians, or parents, or children when really they are not. Given that this is a report from a far right reporter known to twist the news to make his side look better and this is the liberty counsel a far right hate group known to oppose LGBT rights I will take his report with a huge grain of salt. Should parents be allowed to know what their kids are learning at school and have access to school videos? Yes. Does that change hat we are only seeing one side of the story? The far right side? No,</quote> I wish this was pointed out sooner. : /</quote> It has been, since the first page. People keep on ignoring it.</quote> You do realise almost every source has an inherent bias right?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Darmik 07/02/18 10:43:36 PM #327:	ImTheMacheteGuy posted... JohnLennonTrump posted... Disgraceful, school should definitely be sued. Hi hoth!! :D I think it's Madfoot that tends to use the John Lennon usernames --- Kind Regards, Darmik <cite>Darmik posted [p:904393439] in School ban... [t:76769957]...</cite> <quote><cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>JohnLennonTrump posted...</cite> <quote>Disgraceful, school should definitely be sued.</quote> Hi hoth!! :D</quote> I think it's Madfoot that tends to use the John Lennon usernames</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
A_Good_Boy 07/02/18 10:46:04 PM #328:	JohnLennonTrump posted... A_Good_Boy posted... Kaliesto posted... creativerealms posted... Sorry about some of my recent comments. I don't trust the liberty Counsel. They are known to twist the truth to make the LGBT community seem worse. To make it look like they are doing things to hurt Christians, or parents, or children when really they are not. Given that this is a report from a far right reporter known to twist the news to make his side look better and this is the liberty counsel a far right hate group known to oppose LGBT rights I will take his report with a huge grain of salt. Should parents be allowed to know what their kids are learning at school and have access to school videos? Yes. Does that change hat we are only seeing one side of the story? The far right side? No, I wish this was pointed out sooner. : / It has been, since the first page. People keep on ignoring it. You do realise almost every source has an inherent bias right? Fuck off Hoth --- Who is? I am! <cite>A_Good_Boy posted [p:904393593] in School ban... [t:76769957]...</cite> <quote><cite>JohnLennonTrump posted...</cite> <quote><cite>A_Good_Boy posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>Kaliesto posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>creativerealms posted...</cite> <quote> Sorry about some of my recent comments. I don't trust the liberty Counsel. They are known to twist the truth to make the LGBT community seem worse. To make it look like they are doing things to hurt Christians, or parents, or children when really they are not. Given that this is a report from a far right reporter known to twist the news to make his side look better and this is the liberty counsel a far right hate group known to oppose LGBT rights I will take his report with a huge grain of salt. Should parents be allowed to know what their kids are learning at school and have access to school videos? Yes. Does that change hat we are only seeing one side of the story? The far right side? No, </quote> I wish this was pointed out sooner. : / </quote> It has been, since the first page. People keep on ignoring it.</quote> You do realise almost every source has an inherent bias right?</quote> Fuck off Hoth</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
JohnLennonTrump 07/02/18 11:38:25 PM #329:	A_Good_Boy posted... JohnLennonTrump posted... A_Good_Boy posted... Kaliesto posted... creativerealms posted... Sorry about some of my recent comments. I don't trust the liberty Counsel. They are known to twist the truth to make the LGBT community seem worse. To make it look like they are doing things to hurt Christians, or parents, or children when really they are not. Given that this is a report from a far right reporter known to twist the news to make his side look better and this is the liberty counsel a far right hate group known to oppose LGBT rights I will take his report with a huge grain of salt. Should parents be allowed to know what their kids are learning at school and have access to school videos? Yes. Does that change hat we are only seeing one side of the story? The far right side? No, I wish this was pointed out sooner. : / It has been, since the first page. People keep on ignoring it. You do realise almost every source has an inherent bias right? Fuck off Hoth I'm not Hoth. Hoth lives in California and I live on the East Coast. --- Trump/Pence 2020: Make America Great Again! <cite>JohnLennonTrump posted [p:904396298] in School ban... [t:76769957]...</cite> <quote><cite>A_Good_Boy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>JohnLennonTrump posted...</cite> <quote><cite>A_Good_Boy posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>Kaliesto posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>creativerealms posted...</cite> <quote> Sorry about some of my recent comments. I don't trust the liberty Counsel. They are known to twist the truth to make the LGBT community seem worse. To make it look like they are doing things to hurt Christians, or parents, or children when really they are not. Given that this is a report from a far right reporter known to twist the news to make his side look better and this is the liberty counsel a far right hate group known to oppose LGBT rights I will take his report with a huge grain of salt. Should parents be allowed to know what their kids are learning at school and have access to school videos? Yes. Does that change hat we are only seeing one side of the story? The far right side? No, </quote> I wish this was pointed out sooner. : / </quote> It has been, since the first page. People keep on ignoring it.</quote> You do realise almost every source has an inherent bias right?</quote> Fuck off Hoth</quote> I'm not Hoth. Hoth lives in California and I live on the East Coast.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnfairRepresent 07/03/18 1:54:28 AM #330:	JohnLennonTrump posted... A_Good_Boy posted... JohnLennonTrump posted... A_Good_Boy posted... Kaliesto posted... creativerealms posted... Sorry about some of my recent comments. I don't trust the liberty Counsel. They are known to twist the truth to make the LGBT community seem worse. To make it look like they are doing things to hurt Christians, or parents, or children when really they are not. Given that this is a report from a far right reporter known to twist the news to make his side look better and this is the liberty counsel a far right hate group known to oppose LGBT rights I will take his report with a huge grain of salt. Should parents be allowed to know what their kids are learning at school and have access to school videos? Yes. Does that change hat we are only seeing one side of the story? The far right side? No, I wish this was pointed out sooner. : / It has been, since the first page. People keep on ignoring it. You do realise almost every source has an inherent bias right? Fuck off Hoth I'm not Hoth. Hoth lives in California and I live on the East Coast. ok --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair. https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:904401390] in School ban... [t:76769957]...</cite> <quote><cite>JohnLennonTrump posted...</cite> <quote><cite>A_Good_Boy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>JohnLennonTrump posted...</cite> <quote><cite>A_Good_Boy posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>Kaliesto posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>creativerealms posted...</cite> <quote> Sorry about some of my recent comments. I don't trust the liberty Counsel. They are known to twist the truth to make the LGBT community seem worse. To make it look like they are doing things to hurt Christians, or parents, or children when really they are not. Given that this is a report from a far right reporter known to twist the news to make his side look better and this is the liberty counsel a far right hate group known to oppose LGBT rights I will take his report with a huge grain of salt. Should parents be allowed to know what their kids are learning at school and have access to school videos? Yes. Does that change hat we are only seeing one side of the story? The far right side? No, </quote> I wish this was pointed out sooner. : / </quote> It has been, since the first page. People keep on ignoring it.</quote> You do realise almost every source has an inherent bias right?</quote> Fuck off Hoth</quote> I'm not Hoth. Hoth lives in California and I live on the East Coast.</quote> ok</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ImTheMacheteGuy 07/03/18 2:02:01 AM #331:	UnfairRepresent posted... JohnLennonTrump posted... A_Good_Boy posted... JohnLennonTrump posted... A_Good_Boy posted... Kaliesto posted... creativerealms posted... Sorry about some of my recent comments. I don't trust the liberty Counsel. They are known to twist the truth to make the LGBT community seem worse. To make it look like they are doing things to hurt Christians, or parents, or children when really they are not. Given that this is a report from a far right reporter known to twist the news to make his side look better and this is the liberty counsel a far right hate group known to oppose LGBT rights I will take his report with a huge grain of salt. Should parents be allowed to know what their kids are learning at school and have access to school videos? Yes. Does that change hat we are only seeing one side of the story? The far right side? No, I wish this was pointed out sooner. : / It has been, since the first page. People keep on ignoring it. You do realise almost every source has an inherent bias right? Fuck off Hoth I'm not Hoth. Hoth lives in California and I live on the East Coast. ok R E K T E K T --- Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/ <cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted [p:904401622] in School ban... [t:76769957]...</cite> <quote><cite>UnfairRepresent posted...</cite> <quote><cite>JohnLennonTrump posted...</cite> <quote><cite>A_Good_Boy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>JohnLennonTrump posted...</cite> <quote><cite>A_Good_Boy posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>Kaliesto posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>creativerealms posted...</cite> <quote> Sorry about some of my recent comments. I don't trust the liberty Counsel. They are known to twist the truth to make the LGBT community seem worse. To make it look like they are doing things to hurt Christians, or parents, or children when really they are not. Given that this is a report from a far right reporter known to twist the news to make his side look better and this is the liberty counsel a far right hate group known to oppose LGBT rights I will take his report with a huge grain of salt. Should parents be allowed to know what their kids are learning at school and have access to school videos? Yes. Does that change hat we are only seeing one side of the story? The far right side? No, </quote> I wish this was pointed out sooner. : / </quote> It has been, since the first page. People keep on ignoring it.</quote> You do realise almost every source has an inherent bias right?</quote> Fuck off Hoth</quote> I'm not Hoth. Hoth lives in California and I live on the East Coast.</quote> ok</quote> R E K T E K T</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

Current Events > School bans Parents from viewing pro-LGBT Videos they showed to kids (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > School bans Parents from viewing pro-LGBT Videos they showed to kids