Current Events > Who Will Google Silence Next?

Topic List	Page List: 1
HypnoCoosh 08/08/18 2:30:57 PM #1:	http://www.stoponlinecensorship.com/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=giNJwXiktZ0" data-time=" --- We make men without chests and expect from them virtue and enterprise. We laugh at honor and are shocked to find traitors in our midst. - C.S. Lewis <cite>HypnoCoosh posted [p:906503140] in Who Will G... [t:76883368]...</cite> <quote>http://www.stoponlinecensorship.com/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=giNJwXiktZ0" data-time="</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Caution999 08/08/18 2:31:33 PM #2:	Google isn't silencing any- [this post has been silenced by Google.] --- "No it doesn't. Abortion has never killed a single baby." - Russian Rocket <cite>Caution999 posted [p:906503185] in Who Will G... [t:76883368]...</cite> <quote>Google isn't silencing any- [this post has been silenced by Google.]</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ImTheMacheteGuy 08/08/18 2:37:10 PM #3:	Hopefully the tc and poster #2 --- Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/ <cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted [p:906503575] in Who Will G... [t:76883368]...</cite> <quote>Hopefully the tc and poster #2</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CruelBuffalo 08/08/18 2:38:15 PM #4:	ImTheMacheteGuy posted... Hopefully the tc and poster #2 Literally what I came to post <cite>CruelBuffalo posted [p:906503645] in Who Will G... [t:76883368]...</cite> <quote><cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted...</cite> <quote>Hopefully the tc and poster #2</quote> Literally what I came to post</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SmidgeIsntBack 08/08/18 2:38:28 PM #5:	Hopefully anyone else who calls Sandy Hook a false flag, starting with you. --- Audio Theater: For discussion of podcasts, radio, audiobooks, and the like https://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1364- <cite>SmidgeIsntBack posted [p:906503658] in Who Will G... [t:76883368]...</cite> <quote>Hopefully anyone else who calls Sandy Hook a false flag, starting with you.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dash_Harber 08/08/18 2:38:29 PM #6:	So Google has a moral or legal responsibility to publish all content that is submitted to them regardless of content or quality? Doesn't that also include purposely misleading or poorly researched 'fake news'? <cite>Dash_Harber posted [p:906503660] in Who Will G... [t:76883368]...</cite> <quote>So Google has a moral or legal responsibility to publish all content that is submitted to them regardless of content or quality? Doesn't that also include purposely misleading or poorly researched 'fake news'?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Chicken 08/08/18 2:38:35 PM #7:	AskJeeves is the hero the internet needs. --- https://imgur.com/2FgO73L <cite>Chicken posted [p:906503666] in Who Will G... [t:76883368]...</cite> <quote>AskJeeves is the hero the internet needs.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BWLurker 08/08/18 2:39:34 PM #8:	"We love the free market, except when it doesn't work in our favor" <cite>BWLurker posted [p:906503739] in Who Will G... [t:76883368]...</cite> <quote>"We love the free market, except when it doesn't work in our favor"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kolibri X 08/08/18 2:43:49 PM #9:	Google really stinks. Using Bing to unironically look up information that's been buried by Google instead using it just for porn is a change that had to be made though. --- Platinum GameFAQs Member https://imgur.com/VgwI8qO <cite>Kolibri X posted [p:906504053] in Who Will G... [t:76883368]...</cite> <quote>Google really stinks. Using Bing to unironically look up information that's been buried by Google instead using it just for porn is a change that had to be made though.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
VectorChaos 08/08/18 2:44:34 PM #10:	wtf we love censorship now --- "Donald Trump has the most presidential penis of all time" - DifferentialEquation <cite>VectorChaos posted [p:906504113] in Who Will G... [t:76883368]...</cite> <quote>wtf we love censorship now</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dash_Harber 08/08/18 2:45:20 PM #11:	VectorChaos posted... wtf we love censorship now It's not censorship. <cite>Dash_Harber posted [p:906504164] in Who Will G... [t:76883368]...</cite> <quote><cite>VectorChaos posted...</cite> <quote>wtf we love censorship now</quote> It's not censorship.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkphoenix181 08/08/18 2:47:08 PM #12:	Dash_Harber posted... So Google has a moral or legal responsibility to publish all content that is submitted to them regardless of content or quality? Doesn't that also include purposely misleading or poorly researched 'fake news'? If google doesn't want to be responsible for the content then yes, they shouldn't censor anything. Because when you remove some things and not others, that now means you are for the others not removed. That makes you complicit. This is why up until now these services have just let people do whatever. When you become an editorial and reviewer who selects what the content is.... YOU...ARE...RESPONSIBLE. --- chill02 to me: you are beautiful <cite>darkphoenix181 posted [p:906504293] in Who Will G... [t:76883368]...</cite> <quote><cite>Dash_Harber posted...</cite> <quote>So Google has a moral or legal responsibility to publish all content that is submitted to them regardless of content or quality? Doesn't that also include purposely misleading or poorly researched 'fake news'?</quote> If google doesn't want to be responsible for the content then yes, they shouldn't censor anything. Because when you remove some things and not others, that now means you are for the others not removed. That makes you complicit. This is why up until now these services have just let people do whatever. When you become an editorial and reviewer who selects what the content is.... YOU...ARE...RESPONSIBLE.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dash_Harber 08/08/18 2:50:53 PM #13:	darkphoenix181 posted... If google doesn't want to be responsible for the content then yes, they shouldn't censor anything. It's not censorship to refuse to publish content. You literally agree to this when you sign up for any of their services. So you think that all book publishing houses must publish anything submitted to them at their own expense? <cite>Dash_Harber posted [p:906504553] in Who Will G... [t:76883368]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkphoenix181 posted...</cite> <quote>If google doesn't want to be responsible for the content then yes, they shouldn't censor anything.</quote> It's not censorship to refuse to publish content. You literally agree to this when you sign up for any of their services. So you think that all book publishing houses must publish anything submitted to them at their own expense?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#14	Post #14 was unavailable or deleted.
darkphoenix181 08/08/18 2:52:43 PM #15:	Dash_Harber posted... darkphoenix181 posted... If google doesn't want to be responsible for the content then yes, they shouldn't censor anything. It's not censorship to refuse to publish content. You literally agree to this when you sign up for any of their services. So you think that all book publishing houses must publish anything submitted to them at their own expense? Who signed up for google to scour the web with their bots? You understand how a search engine works right? --- chill02 to me: you are beautiful <cite>darkphoenix181 posted [p:906504685] in Who Will G... [t:76883368]...</cite> <quote><cite>Dash_Harber posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkphoenix181 posted...</cite> <quote>If google doesn't want to be responsible for the content then yes, they shouldn't censor anything.</quote> It's not censorship to refuse to publish content. You literally agree to this when you sign up for any of their services. So you think that all book publishing houses must publish anything submitted to them at their own expense?</quote> Who signed up for google to scour the web with their bots? You understand how a search engine works right?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dash_Harber 08/08/18 2:53:48 PM #16:	darkphoenix181 posted... Dash_Harber posted... darkphoenix181 posted... If google doesn't want to be responsible for the content then yes, they shouldn't censor anything. It's not censorship to refuse to publish content. You literally agree to this when you sign up for any of their services. So you think that all book publishing houses must publish anything submitted to them at their own expense? Who signed up for google to scour the web with their bots? You understand how a search engine works right? https://policies.google.com/terms By using our Services, you are agreeing to these terms. Please read them carefully. <cite>Dash_Harber posted [p:906504767] in Who Will G... [t:76883368]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkphoenix181 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Dash_Harber posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkphoenix181 posted...</cite> <quote>If google doesn't want to be responsible for the content then yes, they shouldn't censor anything.</quote> It's not censorship to refuse to publish content. You literally agree to this when you sign up for any of their services. So you think that all book publishing houses must publish anything submitted to them at their own expense?</quote> Who signed up for google to scour the web with their bots? You understand how a search engine works right?</quote> https://policies.google.com/terms <quote>By using our Services, you are agreeing to these terms. Please read them carefully.</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
glitteringfairy 08/08/18 2:55:43 PM #17:	Just ban everyone that's not a liberal. --- "How come you can believe in God but not Bigfoot?" V-E-G-Y https://imgur.com/AqR3aeX https://imgur.com/vvuUXpp https://imgur.com/r9xK2NR <cite>glitteringfairy posted [p:906504902] in Who Will G... [t:76883368]...</cite> <quote>Just ban everyone that's not a liberal.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkphoenix181 08/08/18 2:55:55 PM #18:	Dash_Harber posted... darkphoenix181 posted... Dash_Harber posted... darkphoenix181 posted... If google doesn't want to be responsible for the content then yes, they shouldn't censor anything. It's not censorship to refuse to publish content. You literally agree to this when you sign up for any of their services. So you think that all book publishing houses must publish anything submitted to them at their own expense? Who signed up for google to scour the web with their bots? You understand how a search engine works right? https://policies.google.com/terms By using our Services, you are agreeing to these terms. Please read them carefully. So was that a no? If google removes all links to gamefaqs, explain where gamefaqs had ever agreed or signed anything in the first place. One day google just said "hey, ppl visit this site, so we will publish links of them on our own because....that is what a search engine does." --- chill02 to me: you are beautiful <cite>darkphoenix181 posted [p:906504916] in Who Will G... [t:76883368]...</cite> <quote><cite>Dash_Harber posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkphoenix181 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Dash_Harber posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkphoenix181 posted...</cite> <quote>If google doesn't want to be responsible for the content then yes, they shouldn't censor anything.</quote> It's not censorship to refuse to publish content. You literally agree to this when you sign up for any of their services. So you think that all book publishing houses must publish anything submitted to them at their own expense?</quote> Who signed up for google to scour the web with their bots? You understand how a search engine works right?</quote> https://policies.google.com/terms <quote>By using our Services, you are agreeing to these terms. Please read them carefully.</quote></quote> So was that a no? If google removes all links to gamefaqs, explain where gamefaqs had ever agreed or signed anything in the first place. One day google just said "hey, ppl visit this site, so we will publish links of them on our own because....that is what a search engine does."</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dash_Harber 08/08/18 2:56:48 PM #19:	darkphoenix181 posted... So was that a no? That depends. Do you not understand how "Terms of Service" work? <cite>Dash_Harber posted [p:906504964] in Who Will G... [t:76883368]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkphoenix181 posted...</cite> <quote> So was that a no?</quote> That depends. Do you not understand how "Terms of Service" work?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkphoenix181 08/08/18 3:05:47 PM #20:	Dash_Harber posted... darkphoenix181 posted... So was that a no? That depends. Do you not understand how "Terms of Service" work? So you don't understand how a search engine works lmao. Tos is for the people searching and the sites paying to be on the top of the list. Everyone else is placed on the list... Without consent. Besides, the tos is for actual services like gmail and google plus. Like, you could make a site today and it be one google tomorrow without you knowing because their bots found it. What tos did you agree to? Meanwhile, the draw of google is they are the best, most accurate, expansive search engine. Fyi, there was more than google and bing back in the day. --- chill02 to me: you are beautiful <cite>darkphoenix181 posted [p:906505578] in Who Will G... [t:76883368]...</cite> <quote><cite>Dash_Harber posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkphoenix181 posted...</cite> <quote> So was that a no?</quote> That depends. Do you not understand how "Terms of Service" work?</quote> So you don't understand how a search engine works lmao. Tos is for the people searching and the sites paying to be on the top of the list. Everyone else is placed on the list... Without consent. Besides, the tos is for actual services like gmail and google plus. Like, you could make a site today and it be one google tomorrow without you knowing because their bots found it. What tos did you agree to? Meanwhile, the draw of google is they are the best, most accurate, expansive search engine. Fyi, there was more than google and bing back in the day.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dash_Harber 08/08/18 3:06:43 PM #21:	darkphoenix181 posted... Without consent. https://policies.google.com/terms By using our Services, you are agreeing to these terms. Please read them carefully. <cite>Dash_Harber posted [p:906505641] in Who Will G... [t:76883368]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkphoenix181 posted...</cite> <quote>Without consent.</quote> https://policies.google.com/terms <quote>By using our Services, you are agreeing to these terms. Please read them carefully.</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkphoenix181 08/08/18 3:08:53 PM #22:	Dash_Harber posted... darkphoenix181 posted... Without consent. https://policies.google.com/terms By using our Services, you are agreeing to these terms. Please read them carefully. Try googling how a site is added to the search engine. It will help you alot. --- chill02 to me: you are beautiful <cite>darkphoenix181 posted [p:906505794] in Who Will G... [t:76883368]...</cite> <quote><cite>Dash_Harber posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkphoenix181 posted...</cite> <quote>Without consent.</quote> https://policies.google.com/terms <quote>By using our Services, you are agreeing to these terms. Please read them carefully.</quote></quote> Try googling how a site is added to the search engine. It will help you alot.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dash_Harber 08/08/18 3:13:34 PM #23:	darkphoenix181 posted... Dash_Harber posted... darkphoenix181 posted... Without consent. https://policies.google.com/terms By using our Services, you are agreeing to these terms. Please read them carefully. Try googling how a site is added to the search engine. It will help you alot. Yeah, that would be the last holdout of someone who doesn't understand what is going on. Having actually been involved in getting a site listed for Google News before, I'm pretty certain there are a number of rules and agreements that must be passed to actually get listed. Again, it's their business. If they want to be fucking scummy about it, it is their choice. They are not a public service. They could make every single link on their entire index link to a Rick Roll if they wanted. Whether it is scummy or not to abuse their role to gather information is an actual debate, but the legality of it is not. You agree to their terms and willingly submit your information to them. They get to choose how they organize that information and what information they will and won't publish. You agree to it in their fucking terms of service. Edit: As for sites you create being indexed ... pretty sure your problem would be with the service that you are creating the site on, then, who automatically index sites, as most sites offer a 'no index' option for content specifically so it isn't listed on google. Again, though, I'd imagine that sites like Wordpress specifically have clauses for this in their terms of service. <cite>Dash_Harber posted [p:906506141] in Who Will G... [t:76883368]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkphoenix181 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Dash_Harber posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkphoenix181 posted...</cite> <quote>Without consent.</quote> https://policies.google.com/terms <quote>By using our Services, you are agreeing to these terms. Please read them carefully.</quote></quote> Try googling how a site is added to the search engine. It will help you alot.</quote> Yeah, that would be the last holdout of someone who doesn't understand what is going on. Having actually been involved in getting a site listed for Google News before, I'm pretty certain there are a number of rules and agreements that must be passed to actually get listed. Again, it's their business. If they want to be fucking scummy about it, it is their choice. They are not a public service. They could make every single link on their entire index link to a Rick Roll if they wanted. Whether it is scummy or not to abuse their role to gather information is an actual debate, but the legality of it is not. You agree to their terms and willingly submit your information to them. They get to choose how they organize that information and what information they will and won't publish. You agree to it in their fucking terms of service. Edit: As for sites you create being indexed ... pretty sure your problem would be with the service that you are creating the site on, then, who automatically index sites, as most sites offer a 'no index' option for content specifically so it isn't listed on google. Again, though, I'd imagine that sites like Wordpress specifically have clauses for this in their terms of service.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Paper_Okami 08/08/18 3:19:57 PM #24:	Alex Jones Peddles lies that causes people to get death threats. Parents of a sandy hook victim have moved several times due to death threats by the wackos who watch his dumb shit. He does not deserve a platform. --- "Conceit, arrogance and egotism are the essentials of patriotism"- Emma Goldman "Wimmy Wham Wham Wozzle!" -Slurms MacKenzie <cite>Paper_Okami posted [p:906506597] in Who Will G... [t:76883368]...</cite> <quote>Alex Jones Peddles lies that causes people to get death threats. Parents of a sandy hook victim have moved several times due to death threats by the wackos who watch his dumb shit. He does not deserve a platform.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
bob742omb 08/08/18 3:19:59 PM #25:	censorship being apart of the terms of service still doesn't make it ok, especially with google's dominance of the industry but i'll willingly admit to being a hypocrite. if google focused more on removing left-wing media and content creators than right-wing ones, i'd be doing your line of argument byron. --- bob the buster mr freeze is my spirit animal <cite>bob742omb posted [p:906506599] in Who Will G... [t:76883368]...</cite> <quote>censorship being apart of the terms of service still doesn't make it ok, especially with google's dominance of the industry but i'll willingly admit to being a hypocrite. if google focused more on removing left-wing media and content creators than right-wing ones, i'd be doing your line of argument byron.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkphoenix181 08/08/18 3:21:22 PM #26:	Dash_Harber posted... Yeah, that would be the last holdout of someone who doesn't understand what is going on. Having actually been involved in getting a site listed for Google News before, I'm pretty certain there are a number of rules and agreements that must be passed to actually get listed So you actually are ignorant about what I refer to then. I thought you were just being dense. https://www.theleverageway.com/blog/how-long-does-it-take-google-to-index-a-new-site/ It takes between 4 days and 4 weeks for your brand new website to be crawled and indexed by Google. Google has a.i. that does this automatically. You don't do anything. It does it without your consent. What you are referring to is speeding up the process and possibly getting a higher rank. darkphoenix181 posted... If google doesn't want to be responsible for the content then yes, they shouldn't censor anything Btw I should rephrase this. They shouldn't censor anything not blatantly illegal. Links to torrents and cp obviously get them into legal hot water. --- chill02 to me: you are beautiful <cite>darkphoenix181 posted [p:906506696] in Who Will G... [t:76883368]...</cite> <quote><cite>Dash_Harber posted...</cite> <quote>Yeah, that would be the last holdout of someone who doesn't understand what is going on. Having actually been involved in getting a site listed for Google News before, I'm pretty certain there are a number of rules and agreements that must be passed to actually get listed</quote> So you actually are ignorant about what I refer to then. I thought you were just being dense. https://www.theleverageway.com/blog/how-long-does-it-take-google-to-index-a-new-site/ <quote>It takes between 4 days and 4 weeks for your brand new website to be crawled and indexed by Google.</quote> Google has a.i. that does this automatically. You don't do anything. It does it without your consent. What you are referring to is speeding up the process and possibly getting a higher rank. <cite>darkphoenix181 posted...</cite> <quote>If google doesn't want to be responsible for the content then yes, they shouldn't censor anything</quote> Btw I should rephrase this. They shouldn't censor anything not blatantly illegal. Links to torrents and cp obviously get them into legal hot water.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkphoenix181 08/08/18 3:24:41 PM #27:	Dash_Harber posted... Edit: As for sites you create being indexed ... pretty sure your problem would be with the service that you are creating the site on, then, who automatically index sites, as most sites offer a 'no index' option for content specifically so it isn't listed on google. Again, though, I'd imagine that sites like Wordpress specifically have clauses for this in their terms of service. So your argument is now that by not explicitly preventing their bots, you enter into an...agreement...with google and consent to google's tos? --- chill02 to me: you are beautiful <cite>darkphoenix181 posted [p:906506955] in Who Will G... [t:76883368]...</cite> <quote><cite>Dash_Harber posted...</cite> <quote>Edit: As for sites you create being indexed ... pretty sure your problem would be with the service that you are creating the site on, then, who automatically index sites, as most sites offer a 'no index' option for content specifically so it isn't listed on google. Again, though, I'd imagine that sites like Wordpress specifically have clauses for this in their terms of service.</quote> So your argument is now that by not explicitly preventing their bots, you enter into an...agreement...with google and consent to google's tos?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
0AbsoluteZero0 08/08/18 3:26:22 PM #28:	Wariodorf posted... BWLurker posted... "We love the free market, except when it doesn't work in our favor" --- -The Admirable <cite>0AbsoluteZero0 posted [p:906507078] in Who Will G... [t:76883368]...</cite> <quote><cite>Wariodorf posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BWLurker posted...</cite> <quote>"We love the free market, except when it doesn't work in our favor"</quote></quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 08/08/18 3:37:47 PM #29:	Dash_Harber posted... VectorChaos posted... wtf we love censorship now It's not censorship. It literally is. It's just not government mandated. --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:906507952] in Who Will G... [t:76883368]...</cite> <quote><cite>Dash_Harber posted...</cite> <quote><cite>VectorChaos posted...</cite> <quote>wtf we love censorship now</quote> It's not censorship.</quote> It literally is. It's just not government mandated.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HypnoCoosh 08/09/18 8:54:32 AM #30:	up --- We make men without chests and expect from them virtue and enterprise. We laugh at honor and are shocked to find traitors in our midst. - C.S. Lewis <cite>HypnoCoosh posted [p:906554095] in Who Will G... [t:76883368]...</cite> <quote>up</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CableZL 08/09/18 8:56:22 AM #31:	He got banned from the platforms because he called for drag queens to be burned alive. Alex Jones has no one to blame for getting banned but himself. --- https://imgur.com/ByKGlJb https://imgur.com/nZdaA8D https://imgur.com/VBLBILg <cite>CableZL posted [p:906554163] in Who Will G... [t:76883368]...</cite> <quote>He got banned from the platforms because he called for drag queens to be burned alive. Alex Jones has no one to blame for getting banned but himself.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
WrkHrdPlayHrdr 08/09/18 9:00:04 AM #32:	From Wikipedia... On October 23, 2017, PragerU filed a federal lawsuit against Google claiming that 37 of its videos were unfairly demonetized or flagged so that they could only be viewed with restricted mode disabled.[8] The restricted mode filter "limits views based on certain characteristics, including the age of the viewer".[8] On March 26, 2018, the case was dismissed by U.S. District Court Judge Lucy Koh, who ruled that because Google was a private company PragerU had failed to show that it had infringed its free speech rights So how is it different this time? --- "I also advised their executives through e-mail that further behavior could result in a cyber attack[...]" https://imgur.com/cSxy3Od <cite>WrkHrdPlayHrdr posted [p:906554315] in Who Will G... [t:76883368]...</cite> <quote>From Wikipedia... <cite>On October 23, 2017, PragerU filed a federal lawsuit against Google claiming that 37 of its videos were unfairly demonetized or flagged so that they could only be viewed with restricted mode disabled.[8] The restricted mode filter "limits views based on certain characteristics, including the age of the viewer".[8] On March 26, 2018, the case was dismissed by U.S. District Court Judge Lucy Koh, who ruled that because Google was a private company PragerU had failed to show that it had infringed its free speech rights</cite> So how is it different this time?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Roshon 08/09/18 9:07:14 AM #33:	Conservatives support and defend the most vile people. What the Republican Party has become is downright atrocious. I dont see the Republican Party getting decency anytime soon either. I dont agree at all with the party, but I wish they were at a point where they werent so evil and toxic so people wouldnt have to worry about them. --- ANORA! https://imgur.com/WvXvQIA <cite>Roshon posted [p:906554609] in Who Will G... [t:76883368]...</cite> <quote>Conservatives support and defend the most vile people. What the Republican Party has become is downright atrocious. I dont see the Republican Party getting decency anytime soon either. I dont agree at all with the party, but I wish they were at a point where they werent so evil and toxic so people wouldnt have to worry about them.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NinjaBreakfast 08/09/18 9:10:20 AM #34:	Lmfao prageru --- https://imgur.com/nGZeEqw Do you really think you can beat me? <cite>NinjaBreakfast posted [p:906554728] in Who Will G... [t:76883368]...</cite> <quote>Lmfao prageru</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
King_Hellebuyck 08/09/18 9:15:25 AM #35:	Acceptable: refusing service to gay people Unacceptable: not hosting hate speech Just checking to see if we got this right, is this how you want it, TC? --- All Hail King Connor! Official Connor Hellebuyck fanboy <cite>King_Hellebuyck posted [p:906554910] in Who Will G... [t:76883368]...</cite> <quote>Acceptable: refusing service to gay people Unacceptable: not hosting hate speech Just checking to see if we got this right, is this how you want it, TC?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SweetieBelle462 08/09/18 9:17:44 AM #36:	Libruls censoring the facts yet still blame Russia lmao --- https://tinyurl.com/ycc5ot6r / https://tinyurl.com/yc6ax76a / https://tinyurl.com/ybe2xl7s http://error1355.com/ce/SweetieBelle462.html <cite>SweetieBelle462 posted [p:906554984] in Who Will G... [t:76883368]...</cite> <quote>Libruls censoring the facts yet still blame Russia lmao</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HypnoCoosh 08/09/18 9:35:36 AM #37:	NinjaBreakfast posted... Lmfao prageru What do you have against Dennis Prager? Did your corporate overlords tell you he's an evil hate speech conspirator too? --- We make men without chests and expect from them virtue and enterprise. We laugh at honor and are shocked to find traitors in our midst. - C.S. Lewis <cite>HypnoCoosh posted [p:906555717] in Who Will G... [t:76883368]...</cite> <quote><cite>NinjaBreakfast posted...</cite> <quote>Lmfao prageru</quote> What do you have against Dennis Prager? Did your corporate overlords tell you he's an evil hate speech conspirator too?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
King_Hellebuyck 08/09/18 9:38:14 AM #38:	HypnoCoosh posted... NinjaBreakfast posted... Lmfao prageru What do you have against Dennis Prager? Did your corporate overlords tell you he's an evil hate speech conspirator too? Its funny how little you try to make sense. --- All Hail King Connor! Official Connor Hellebuyck fanboy <cite>King_Hellebuyck posted [p:906555834] in Who Will G... [t:76883368]...</cite> <quote><cite>HypnoCoosh posted...</cite> <quote><cite>NinjaBreakfast posted...</cite> <quote>Lmfao prageru</quote> What do you have against Dennis Prager? Did your corporate overlords tell you he's an evil hate speech conspirator too?</quote> Its funny how little you try to make sense.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ImTheMacheteGuy 08/09/18 12:45:56 PM #39:	SweetieBelle462 posted... Libruls censoring the facts yet still blame Russia lmao Facts? List everything that Waaaaaaaaaaahlex Jones has said that is factual. --- Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/ <cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted [p:906565642] in Who Will G... [t:76883368]...</cite> <quote><cite>SweetieBelle462 posted...</cite> <quote>Libruls censoring the facts yet still blame Russia lmao</quote> Facts? List everything that Waaaaaaaaaaahlex Jones has said that is factual.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HypnoCoosh 08/09/18 6:58:56 PM #40:	bump --- We make men without chests and expect from them virtue and enterprise. We laugh at honor and are shocked to find traitors in our midst. - C.S. Lewis <cite>HypnoCoosh posted [p:906588211] in Who Will G... [t:76883368]...</cite> <quote>bump</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ImTheMacheteGuy 08/09/18 7:36:59 PM #41:	darkjedilink posted... Dash_Harber posted... VectorChaos posted... wtf we love censorship now It's not censorship. It literally is. It's just not government mandated. Okay so then it's not covered in the first amendment. Cool. --- Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/ <cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted [p:906590468] in Who Will G... [t:76883368]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Dash_Harber posted...</cite> <quote><cite>VectorChaos posted...</cite> <quote>wtf we love censorship now</quote> It's not censorship.</quote> It literally is. It's just not government mandated.</quote> Okay so then it's not covered in the first amendment. Cool.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#42	Post #42 was unavailable or deleted.
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > Who Will Google Silence Next? (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Who Will Google Silence Next?