Current Events > So what happens when Cohen "flips" on Trump

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2
KhanJohnny 08/23/18 3:24:58 PM #1:	and then any evidence obtained is inadmissible because it's covered by attorney-client privilege? Big nothingburger <cite>KhanJohnny posted [p:907419461] in So what ha... [t:76930445]...</cite> <quote>and then any evidence obtained is inadmissible because it's covered by attorney-client privilege? Big nothingburger</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
VipaGTS 08/23/18 3:26:00 PM #2:	you tried. --- "I devour urine just like my Portland Trailblazers, with piss poor defense." <cite>VipaGTS posted [p:907419532] in So what ha... [t:76930445]...</cite> <quote>you tried.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Muffinz0rz 08/23/18 3:26:23 PM #3:	Nothing because nothing will happen --- Not removing this until Pat Benatar is in Super Smash Bros. (Started 8/31/2010) 2018 NFLB Summersim (7-8): https://imgur.com/7cjNtgQ <cite>Muffinz0rz posted [p:907419556] in So what ha... [t:76930445]...</cite> <quote>Nothing because nothing will happen</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Were_Wyrm 08/23/18 3:29:28 PM #4:	Trump launches nukes. If he's going down he's taking all of us with him. --- I was a God, Valeria. I found it...beneath me. - Dr. Doom https://imgur.com/M1TnV8w <cite>Were_Wyrm posted [p:907419732] in So what ha... [t:76930445]...</cite> <quote>Trump launches nukes. If he's going down he's taking all of us with him.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ScazarMeltex 08/23/18 3:31:51 PM #5:	Attorney client priveliege doesn't apply in here, but you already know that. --- "If you wish to converse with me define your terms" Voltaire <cite>ScazarMeltex posted [p:907419863] in So what ha... [t:76930445]...</cite> <quote>Attorney client priveliege doesn't apply in here, but you already know that.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
JE19426 08/23/18 3:33:49 PM #6:	One of the exceptions to the attorney-client privilege is attempting to commit crimes. If you direct your attorney to commit a crime, attorney-client privilege doesn't exist for that request. <cite>JE19426 posted [p:907419956] in So what ha... [t:76930445]...</cite> <quote>One of the exceptions to the attorney-client privilege is attempting to commit crimes. If you direct your attorney to commit a crime, attorney-client privilege doesn't exist for that request.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KhanJohnny 08/23/18 3:34:15 PM #7:	I think some of y'all didn't read the OP <cite>KhanJohnny posted [p:907419977] in So what ha... [t:76930445]...</cite> <quote>I think some of y'all didn't read the OP</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
_BIueMonk 08/23/18 3:36:08 PM #8:	JE19426 posted... One of the exceptions to the attorney-client privilege is attempting to commit crimes. If you direct your attorney to commit a crime, attorney-client privilege doesn't exist for that request. yes yes BUT BUT!!!! no crime was committed here. violating campaign finance law isn't a crime. LOOK TRUTH ISNT TRUTH HERE OKAY HILLARY CLINTONS EMAILS --- DAHYUN = <3 https://i.imgtc.com/sNuiMQr.gif <cite>_BIueMonk posted [p:907420079] in So what ha... [t:76930445]...</cite> <quote><cite>JE19426 posted...</cite> <quote>One of the exceptions to the attorney-client privilege is attempting to commit crimes. If you direct your attorney to commit a crime, attorney-client privilege doesn't exist for that request.</quote> yes yes BUT BUT!!!! no crime was committed here. violating campaign finance law isn't a crime. LOOK TRUTH ISNT TRUTH HERE OKAY HILLARY CLINTONS EMAILS</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Webmaster4531 08/23/18 3:39:19 PM #9:	KhanJohnny posted... I think some of y'all didn't read the OP I'm surprised you function at all. --- Ad Hominem. <cite>Webmaster4531 posted [p:907420278] in So what ha... [t:76930445]...</cite> <quote><cite>KhanJohnny posted...</cite> <quote>I think some of y'all didn't read the OP</quote> I'm surprised you function at all.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KhanJohnny 08/23/18 4:47:10 PM #10:	JE19426 posted... One of the exceptions to the attorney-client privilege is attempting to commit crimes. If you direct your attorney to commit a crime, attorney-client privilege doesn't exist for that request. But investigating that will likely require sorting through a bunch of communications that are protected and it's rarely clear cut. It's also extremely rare for this type of case to even occur, which means courts are likely to be reluctant to issue any far reaching ruling on it, even if they could get the President into court in the first place. <cite>KhanJohnny posted [p:907424029] in So what ha... [t:76930445]...</cite> <quote><cite>JE19426 posted...</cite> <quote>One of the exceptions to the attorney-client privilege is attempting to commit crimes. If you direct your attorney to commit a crime, attorney-client privilege doesn't exist for that request.</quote> But investigating that will likely require sorting through a bunch of communications that are protected and it's rarely clear cut. It's also extremely rare for this type of case to even occur, which means courts are likely to be reluctant to issue any far reaching ruling on it, even if they could get the President into court in the first place.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Funbazooka 08/23/18 4:52:38 PM #11:	--- "Don't trade your authenticity for approval." -Kanye West <cite>Funbazooka posted [p:907424339] in So what ha... [t:76930445]...</cite> <quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
gp1829 08/23/18 4:56:19 PM #12:	Funbazooka posted... So so dumb. <cite>gp1829 posted [p:907424550] in So what ha... [t:76930445]...</cite> <quote><cite>Funbazooka posted...</cite> <quote></quote> So so dumb.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Webmaster4531 08/23/18 4:57:01 PM #13:	Funbazooka posted... Stupidity in flow chart form. --- Ad Hominem. <cite>Webmaster4531 posted [p:907424585] in So what ha... [t:76930445]...</cite> <quote><cite>Funbazooka posted...</cite> <quote></quote> Stupidity in flow chart form.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BWing 08/23/18 4:57:45 PM #14:	Webmaster4531 posted... Funbazooka posted... Stupidity in flow chart form. <cite>BWing posted [p:907424611] in So what ha... [t:76930445]...</cite> <quote><cite>Webmaster4531 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Funbazooka posted...</cite> <quote></quote> Stupidity in flow chart form.</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Eat More Beef 08/23/18 5:01:31 PM #15:	KhanJohnny posted... JE19426 posted... One of the exceptions to the attorney-client privilege is attempting to commit crimes. If you direct your attorney to commit a crime, attorney-client privilege doesn't exist for that request. But investigating that will likely require sorting through a bunch of communications that are protected and it's rarely clear cut. It's also extremely rare for this type of case to even occur, which means courts are likely to be reluctant to issue any far reaching ruling on it, even if they could get the President into court in the first place. And if they sift theough these communications, they will put everything inadmissible in one pile, and everything admissible in another and then submit them. If Trump asked Cohen to do things that are crimes, ACP won't cover it. Surely you understand this and aren't just acting a fool, right? --- I wrote a horror short story collection. You can check it out, and other free short stories at http://www.aarondeck.com <cite>Eat More Beef posted [p:907424786] in So what ha... [t:76930445]...</cite> <quote><cite>KhanJohnny posted...</cite> <quote><cite>JE19426 posted...</cite> <quote>One of the exceptions to the attorney-client privilege is attempting to commit crimes. If you direct your attorney to commit a crime, attorney-client privilege doesn't exist for that request.</quote> But investigating that will likely require sorting through a bunch of communications that are protected and it's rarely clear cut. It's also extremely rare for this type of case to even occur, which means courts are likely to be reluctant to issue any far reaching ruling on it, even if they could get the President into court in the first place.</quote> And if they sift theough these communications, they will put everything inadmissible in one pile, and everything admissible in another and then submit them. If Trump asked Cohen to do things that are crimes, ACP won't cover it. Surely you understand this and aren't just acting a fool, right?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Metua 08/23/18 5:03:58 PM #16:	KhanJohnny posted... But investigating that will likely require sorting through a bunch of communications that are protected and it's rarely clear cut. Pretty sure this already happened. --- https://imgur.com/yKMR7 https://imgur.com/Xd4gmmR <cite>Metua posted [p:907424902] in So what ha... [t:76930445]...</cite> <quote><cite>KhanJohnny posted...</cite> <quote>But investigating that will likely require sorting through a bunch of communications that are protected and it's rarely clear cut. </quote> Pretty sure this already happened.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#17	Post #17 was unavailable or deleted.
KhanJohnny 08/23/18 5:10:01 PM #18:	Eat More Beef posted... KhanJohnny posted... JE19426 posted... One of the exceptions to the attorney-client privilege is attempting to commit crimes. If you direct your attorney to commit a crime, attorney-client privilege doesn't exist for that request. But investigating that will likely require sorting through a bunch of communications that are protected and it's rarely clear cut. It's also extremely rare for this type of case to even occur, which means courts are likely to be reluctant to issue any far reaching ruling on it, even if they could get the President into court in the first place. And if they sift theough these communications, they will put everything inadmissible in one pile, and everything admissible in another and then submit them. If Trump asked Cohen to do things that are crimes, ACP won't cover it. Surely you understand this and aren't just acting a fool, right? You think it's that clear what is admissible or inadmissible? There might not be any physical evidence at all! <cite>KhanJohnny posted [p:907425202] in So what ha... [t:76930445]...</cite> <quote><cite>Eat More Beef posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KhanJohnny posted...</cite> <quote><cite>JE19426 posted...</cite> <quote>One of the exceptions to the attorney-client privilege is attempting to commit crimes. If you direct your attorney to commit a crime, attorney-client privilege doesn't exist for that request.</quote> But investigating that will likely require sorting through a bunch of communications that are protected and it's rarely clear cut. It's also extremely rare for this type of case to even occur, which means courts are likely to be reluctant to issue any far reaching ruling on it, even if they could get the President into court in the first place.</quote> And if they sift theough these communications, they will put everything inadmissible in one pile, and everything admissible in another and then submit them. If Trump asked Cohen to do things that are crimes, ACP won't cover it. Surely you understand this and aren't just acting a fool, right?</quote> You think it's that clear what is admissible or inadmissible? There might not be any physical evidence at all!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#19	Post #19 was unavailable or deleted.
KhanJohnny 08/23/18 5:16:02 PM #20:	shockthemonkey posted... KhanJohnny posted... Eat More Beef posted... KhanJohnny posted... JE19426 posted... One of the exceptions to the attorney-client privilege is attempting to commit crimes. If you direct your attorney to commit a crime, attorney-client privilege doesn't exist for that request. But investigating that will likely require sorting through a bunch of communications that are protected and it's rarely clear cut. It's also extremely rare for this type of case to even occur, which means courts are likely to be reluctant to issue any far reaching ruling on it, even if they could get the President into court in the first place. And if they sift theough these communications, they will put everything inadmissible in one pile, and everything admissible in another and then submit them. If Trump asked Cohen to do things that are crimes, ACP won't cover it. Surely you understand this and aren't just acting a fool, right? You think it's that clear what is admissible or inadmissible? There might not be any physical evidence at all! Are you still going to say all this dumb shit when your summer vacation ends? So are you aware of any evidence besides Cohen's say so? I may have missed it in the media frenzy. <cite>KhanJohnny posted [p:907425468] in So what ha... [t:76930445]...</cite> <quote><cite>shockthemonkey posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KhanJohnny posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Eat More Beef posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KhanJohnny posted...</cite> <quote><cite>JE19426 posted...</cite> <quote>One of the exceptions to the attorney-client privilege is attempting to commit crimes. If you direct your attorney to commit a crime, attorney-client privilege doesn't exist for that request.</quote> But investigating that will likely require sorting through a bunch of communications that are protected and it's rarely clear cut. It's also extremely rare for this type of case to even occur, which means courts are likely to be reluctant to issue any far reaching ruling on it, even if they could get the President into court in the first place.</quote> And if they sift theough these communications, they will put everything inadmissible in one pile, and everything admissible in another and then submit them. If Trump asked Cohen to do things that are crimes, ACP won't cover it. Surely you understand this and aren't just acting a fool, right?</quote> You think it's that clear what is admissible or inadmissible? There might not be any physical evidence at all!</quote> Are you still going to say all this dumb shit when your summer vacation ends?</quote> So are you aware of any evidence besides Cohen's say so? I may have missed it in the media frenzy.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#21	Post #21 was unavailable or deleted.
KhanJohnny 08/23/18 5:18:05 PM #22:	shockthemonkey posted... KhanJohnny posted... shockthemonkey posted... KhanJohnny posted... Eat More Beef posted... KhanJohnny posted... JE19426 posted... One of the exceptions to the attorney-client privilege is attempting to commit crimes. If you direct your attorney to commit a crime, attorney-client privilege doesn't exist for that request. But investigating that will likely require sorting through a bunch of communications that are protected and it's rarely clear cut. It's also extremely rare for this type of case to even occur, which means courts are likely to be reluctant to issue any far reaching ruling on it, even if they could get the President into court in the first place. And if they sift theough these communications, they will put everything inadmissible in one pile, and everything admissible in another and then submit them. If Trump asked Cohen to do things that are crimes, ACP won't cover it. Surely you understand this and aren't just acting a fool, right? You think it's that clear what is admissible or inadmissible? There might not be any physical evidence at all! Are you still going to say all this dumb shit when your summer vacation ends? So are you aware of any evidence besides Cohen's say so? I may have missed it in the media frenzy. ...is that a yes? So you have nothing more than words. <cite>KhanJohnny posted [p:907425568] in So what ha... [t:76930445]...</cite> <quote><cite>shockthemonkey posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KhanJohnny posted...</cite> <quote><cite>shockthemonkey posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KhanJohnny posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Eat More Beef posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KhanJohnny posted...</cite> <quote><cite>JE19426 posted...</cite> <quote>One of the exceptions to the attorney-client privilege is attempting to commit crimes. If you direct your attorney to commit a crime, attorney-client privilege doesn't exist for that request.</quote> But investigating that will likely require sorting through a bunch of communications that are protected and it's rarely clear cut. It's also extremely rare for this type of case to even occur, which means courts are likely to be reluctant to issue any far reaching ruling on it, even if they could get the President into court in the first place.</quote> And if they sift theough these communications, they will put everything inadmissible in one pile, and everything admissible in another and then submit them. If Trump asked Cohen to do things that are crimes, ACP won't cover it. Surely you understand this and aren't just acting a fool, right?</quote> You think it's that clear what is admissible or inadmissible? There might not be any physical evidence at all!</quote> Are you still going to say all this dumb shit when your summer vacation ends?</quote> So are you aware of any evidence besides Cohen's say so? I may have missed it in the media frenzy.</quote> ...is that a yes?</quote> So you have nothing more than words.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Bat178 08/23/18 5:19:03 PM #23:	Were_Wyrm posted... Trump launches nukes. If he's going down he's taking all of us with him. The military would disobey his orders. --- Awww, isn't that cute? He thinks he can beat me! <cite>Bat178 posted [p:907425614] in So what ha... [t:76930445]...</cite> <quote><cite>Were_Wyrm posted...</cite> <quote>Trump launches nukes. If he's going down he's taking all of us with him.</quote> The military would disobey his orders.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Webmaster4531 08/23/18 5:20:22 PM #24:	Bat178 posted... Were_Wyrm posted... Trump launches nukes. If he's going down he's taking all of us with him. The military would disobey his orders. Might even get executed on the spot. --- Ad Hominem. <cite>Webmaster4531 posted [p:907425680] in So what ha... [t:76930445]...</cite> <quote><cite>Bat178 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Were_Wyrm posted...</cite> <quote>Trump launches nukes. If he's going down he's taking all of us with him.</quote> The military would disobey his orders.</quote> Might even get executed on the spot.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Funbazooka 08/23/18 5:23:37 PM #25:	BWing posted... Webmaster4531 posted... Funbazooka posted... Stupidity in flow chart form. Shook! --- "Don't trade your authenticity for approval." -Kanye West <cite>Funbazooka posted [p:907425837] in So what ha... [t:76930445]...</cite> <quote><cite>BWing posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Webmaster4531 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Funbazooka posted...</cite> <quote></quote> Stupidity in flow chart form.</quote></quote> Shook!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Webmaster4531 08/23/18 5:29:43 PM #26:	Funbazooka posted... --- Ad Hominem. <cite>Webmaster4531 posted [p:907426185] in So what ha... [t:76930445]...</cite> <quote><cite>Funbazooka posted...</cite> <quote></quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BWing 08/23/18 5:36:07 PM #27:	Funbazooka posted... I'm Shook! We're well aware <cite>BWing posted [p:907426568] in So what ha... [t:76930445]...</cite> <quote><cite>Funbazooka posted...</cite> <quote>I'm Shook!</quote> We're well aware</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KhanJohnny 08/23/18 8:50:04 PM #28:	All silent now, huh? <cite>KhanJohnny posted [p:907436438] in So what ha... [t:76930445]...</cite> <quote>All silent now, huh?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KhanJohnny 08/23/18 9:11:09 PM #29:	I think some of y'all didn't read the OP <cite>KhanJohnny posted [p:907437672] in So what ha... [t:76930445]...</cite> <quote>I think some of y'all didn't read the OP</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Anteaterking 08/23/18 9:16:12 PM #30:	KhanJohnny posted... But investigating that will likely require sorting through a bunch of communications that are protected and it's rarely clear cut. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/10/us/politics/trump-cohen-raids-legal-issues.html --- http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b136/Anteaterking/scan00021.jpg http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b136/Anteaterking/scan00021.jpg <cite>Anteaterking posted [p:907437957] in So what ha... [t:76930445]...</cite> <quote><cite>KhanJohnny posted...</cite> <quote>But investigating that will likely require sorting through a bunch of communications that are protected and it's rarely clear cut. </quote> https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/10/us/politics/trump-cohen-raids-legal-issues.html</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Smashingpmkns 08/23/18 9:19:06 PM #31:	KhanJohnny posted... I think some of y'all didn't read the OP You really think "attorney client privilege" would be the shit that ends this investigation? Lol if that were the case Mueller wouldn't have even gotten this far. --- Clean Butt Crew <cite>Smashingpmkns posted [p:907438110] in So what ha... [t:76930445]...</cite> <quote><cite>KhanJohnny posted...</cite> <quote>I think some of y'all didn't read the OP</quote> You really think "attorney client privilege" would be the shit that ends this investigation? Lol if that were the case Mueller wouldn't have even gotten this far.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KhanJohnny 08/23/18 9:40:34 PM #32:	Smashingpmkns posted... KhanJohnny posted... I think some of y'all didn't read the OP You really think "attorney client privilege" would be the shit that ends this investigation? Lol if that were the case Mueller wouldn't have even gotten this far. I don't think anything up until this point involved an attorney flipping on his cliemt. <cite>KhanJohnny posted [p:907439206] in So what ha... [t:76930445]...</cite> <quote><cite>Smashingpmkns posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KhanJohnny posted...</cite> <quote>I think some of y'all didn't read the OP</quote> You really think "attorney client privilege" would be the shit that ends this investigation? Lol if that were the case Mueller wouldn't have even gotten this far.</quote> I don't think anything up until this point involved an attorney flipping on his cliemt.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Complete_Idi0t 08/23/18 9:41:21 PM #33:	Darn, I knew we shouldn't have taken that plea deal before asking CE for legal advice! <cite>Complete_Idi0t posted [p:907439245] in So what ha... [t:76930445]...</cite> <quote>Darn, I knew we shouldn't have taken that plea deal before asking CE for legal advice!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KhanJohnny 08/23/18 9:54:02 PM #34:	Complete_Idi0t posted... Darn, I knew we shouldn't have taken that plea deal before asking CE for legal advice! Yeah we should listen to the wild speculations of those CEmen who have no legal knowledge and ignore those who do!! <cite>KhanJohnny posted [p:907439949] in So what ha... [t:76930445]...</cite> <quote><cite>Complete_Idi0t posted...</cite> <quote>Darn, I knew we shouldn't have taken that plea deal before asking CE for legal advice!</quote> Yeah we should listen to the wild speculations of those CEmen who have no legal knowledge and ignore those who do!!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hockeybub89 08/23/18 9:58:01 PM #35:	Damn Bob Mueller is going to feel so silly when his investigation is killed by such a blatantly obvious issue that even a shitposter on a dying message board saw! --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png http://www.last.fm/user/hockeybub89/ <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:907440156] in So what ha... [t:76930445]...</cite> <quote>Damn Bob Mueller is going to feel so silly when his investigation is killed by such a blatantly obvious issue that even a shitposter on a dying message board saw!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KhanJohnny 08/23/18 10:15:26 PM #36:	hockeybub89 posted... Damn Bob Mueller is going to feel so silly when his investigation is killed by such a blatantly obvious issue that even a shitposter on a dying message board saw! He has nothing on Trump. That much is quite obvious fam. <cite>KhanJohnny posted [p:907440974] in So what ha... [t:76930445]...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote>Damn Bob Mueller is going to feel so silly when his investigation is killed by such a blatantly obvious issue that even a shitposter on a dying message board saw!</quote> He has nothing on Trump. That much is quite obvious fam.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Phantom_Nook 08/23/18 10:17:13 PM #37:	didn't they already go over everything taken in the raid on Cohen and find that a vast majority of it is not privileged? --- When a girl has sex with a bunch of guys, they call her a slut, but when a guy does it, they call him gay. ~ Antifar <cite>Phantom_Nook posted [p:907441055] in So what ha... [t:76930445]...</cite> <quote>didn't they already go over everything taken in the raid on Cohen and find that a vast majority of it is not privileged?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hockeybub89 08/23/18 10:17:58 PM #38:	KhanJohnny posted... hockeybub89 posted... Damn Bob Mueller is going to feel so silly when his investigation is killed by such a blatantly obvious issue that even a shitposter on a dying message board saw! He has nothing on Trump. That much is quite obvious fam. Damn. You're a leaker on his staff even. --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png http://www.last.fm/user/hockeybub89/ <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:907441090] in So what ha... [t:76930445]...</cite> <quote><cite>KhanJohnny posted...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote>Damn Bob Mueller is going to feel so silly when his investigation is killed by such a blatantly obvious issue that even a shitposter on a dying message board saw!</quote> He has nothing on Trump. That much is quite obvious fam.</quote> Damn. You're a leaker on his staff even.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
sktgamer_13dude 08/23/18 10:25:21 PM #39:	Im sure a shitposter on CE totally knows more about the investigation than the Justice Department. --- https://imgur.com/jWVrg9U https://imgur.com/g2efUtT https://imgur.com/5dOwhaP https://imgur.com/LVdqu8J Go Cougs and M's #DI4B <cite>sktgamer_13dude posted [p:907441407] in So what ha... [t:76930445]...</cite> <quote>Im sure a shitposter on CE totally knows more about the investigation than the Justice Department.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KhanJohnny 08/23/18 10:28:18 PM #40:	sktgamer_13dude posted... Im sure a shitposter on CE totally knows more about the investigation than the Justice Department. The Justice Department brought a case against Trump when I wasn't looking? <cite>KhanJohnny posted [p:907441540] in So what ha... [t:76930445]...</cite> <quote><cite>sktgamer_13dude posted...</cite> <quote>Im sure a shitposter on CE totally knows more about the investigation than the Justice Department.</quote> The Justice Department brought a case against Trump when I wasn't looking?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
sktgamer_13dude 08/23/18 10:30:03 PM #41:	KhanJohnny posted... sktgamer_13dude posted... Im sure a shitposter on CE totally knows more about the investigation than the Justice Department. The Justice Department brought a case against Trump when I wasn't looking? I mean theyre the ones who are running the investigation. Try and keep up. --- https://imgur.com/jWVrg9U https://imgur.com/g2efUtT https://imgur.com/5dOwhaP https://imgur.com/LVdqu8J Go Cougs and M's #DI4B <cite>sktgamer_13dude posted [p:907441619] in So what ha... [t:76930445]...</cite> <quote><cite>KhanJohnny posted...</cite> <quote><cite>sktgamer_13dude posted...</cite> <quote>Im sure a shitposter on CE totally knows more about the investigation than the Justice Department.</quote> The Justice Department brought a case against Trump when I wasn't looking?</quote> I mean theyre the ones who are running the investigation. Try and keep up.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KhanJohnny 08/23/18 10:31:42 PM #42:	sktgamer_13dude posted... KhanJohnny posted... sktgamer_13dude posted... Im sure a shitposter on CE totally knows more about the investigation than the Justice Department. The Justice Department brought a case against Trump when I wasn't looking? I mean theyre the ones who are running the investigation. Try and keep up. Did they bring a case or not? An investigation is not a case. <cite>KhanJohnny posted [p:907441705] in So what ha... [t:76930445]...</cite> <quote><cite>sktgamer_13dude posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KhanJohnny posted...</cite> <quote><cite>sktgamer_13dude posted...</cite> <quote>Im sure a shitposter on CE totally knows more about the investigation than the Justice Department.</quote> The Justice Department brought a case against Trump when I wasn't looking?</quote> I mean theyre the ones who are running the investigation. Try and keep up.</quote> Did they bring a case or not? An investigation is not a case.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
JE19426 08/24/18 4:28:50 AM #43:	KhanJohnny posted... Did they bring a case or not? An investigation is not a case. Let's see what they said before: sktgamer_13dude posted... Im sure a shitposter on CE totally knows more about the investigation than the Justice Department. <cite>JE19426 posted [p:907453416] in So what ha... [t:76930445]...</cite> <quote><cite>KhanJohnny posted...</cite> <quote>Did they bring a case or not? An investigation is not a case. </quote> Let's see what they said before: <cite>sktgamer_13dude posted...</cite> <quote>Im sure a shitposter on CE totally knows more about the investigation than the Justice Department.</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#44	Post #44 was unavailable or deleted.
#45	Post #45 was unavailable or deleted.
TheRealDill2000 08/24/18 6:35:31 AM #46:	If Cohen "flips", I can see two outcomes. 1) Perjury - Any sensible US citizens know that Trump is innocent of any criminal activity. If Cohen makes any accusations, they are clearly lies. 2) Treason - If Cohen turns on Trump, he is essentially betraying our nation and government. That comes with harsh consequences. --- CE's source of sagely advice #BLM <cite>TheRealDill2000 posted [p:907455636] in So what ha... [t:76930445]...</cite> <quote>If Cohen "flips", I can see two outcomes. 1) Perjury - Any sensible US citizens know that Trump is innocent of any criminal activity. If Cohen makes any accusations, they are clearly lies. 2) Treason - If Cohen turns on Trump, he is essentially betraying our nation and government. That comes with harsh consequences.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KhanJohnny 08/24/18 9:08:30 AM #47:	27_Sandman_40 posted... KhanJohnny posted... JE19426 posted... One of the exceptions to the attorney-client privilege is attempting to commit crimes. If you direct your attorney to commit a crime, attorney-client privilege doesn't exist for that request. But investigating that will likely require sorting through a bunch of communications that are protected and it's rarely clear cut. It's also extremely rare for this type of case to even occur, which means courts are likely to be reluctant to issue any far reaching ruling on it, even if they could get the President into court in the first place. Actually it would be fairly easy. All conversations are relevant in a criminal conspiracy investigation. That doesn't mean that they are admissible evidence. <cite>KhanJohnny posted [p:907459422] in So what ha... [t:76930445]...</cite> <quote><cite>27_Sandman_40 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KhanJohnny posted...</cite> <quote><cite>JE19426 posted...</cite> <quote>One of the exceptions to the attorney-client privilege is attempting to commit crimes. If you direct your attorney to commit a crime, attorney-client privilege doesn't exist for that request.</quote> But investigating that will likely require sorting through a bunch of communications that are protected and it's rarely clear cut. It's also extremely rare for this type of case to even occur, which means courts are likely to be reluctant to issue any far reaching ruling on it, even if they could get the President into court in the first place.</quote> Actually it would be fairly easy. All conversations are relevant in a criminal conspiracy investigation.</quote> That doesn't mean that they are admissible evidence.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#48	Post #48 was unavailable or deleted.
KhanJohnny 08/24/18 9:16:36 AM #49:	27_Sandman_40 posted... KhanJohnny posted... 27_Sandman_40 posted... KhanJohnny posted... JE19426 posted... One of the exceptions to the attorney-client privilege is attempting to commit crimes. If you direct your attorney to commit a crime, attorney-client privilege doesn't exist for that request. But investigating that will likely require sorting through a bunch of communications that are protected and it's rarely clear cut. It's also extremely rare for this type of case to even occur, which means courts are likely to be reluctant to issue any far reaching ruling on it, even if they could get the President into court in the first place. Actually it would be fairly easy. All conversations are relevant in a criminal conspiracy investigation. That doesn't mean that they are admissible evidence. Except the admissable evidence would be evidence of a criminal conspiracy with Trump that isnt protected by privilege... 1) you're assuming that there is physical evidence that exists in the first place that can be admissible. If Trump did break the law and acted wisely, there would be very little evidence. 2) you're assuming that there is some clear smoking gun where Trump tells Cohen to break the law and then releases a maniacal laugh. It is more than reasonable to suppose that the evidence, if any exists, is far more ambiguous than that and that it will take significant effort to separate what should be considered privileged or not. <cite>KhanJohnny posted [p:907459719] in So what ha... [t:76930445]...</cite> <quote><cite>27_Sandman_40 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KhanJohnny posted...</cite> <quote><cite>27_Sandman_40 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KhanJohnny posted...</cite> <quote><cite>JE19426 posted...</cite> <quote>One of the exceptions to the attorney-client privilege is attempting to commit crimes. If you direct your attorney to commit a crime, attorney-client privilege doesn't exist for that request.</quote> But investigating that will likely require sorting through a bunch of communications that are protected and it's rarely clear cut. It's also extremely rare for this type of case to even occur, which means courts are likely to be reluctant to issue any far reaching ruling on it, even if they could get the President into court in the first place.</quote> Actually it would be fairly easy. All conversations are relevant in a criminal conspiracy investigation.</quote> That doesn't mean that they are admissible evidence.</quote> Except the admissable evidence would be evidence of a criminal conspiracy with Trump that isnt protected by privilege...</quote> 1) you're assuming that there is physical evidence that exists in the first place that can be admissible. If Trump did break the law and acted wisely, there would be very little evidence. 2) you're assuming that there is some clear smoking gun where Trump tells Cohen to break the law and then releases a maniacal laugh. It is more than reasonable to suppose that the evidence, if any exists, is far more ambiguous than that and that it will take significant effort to separate what should be considered privileged or not.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Shinobi120 08/24/18 9:22:40 AM #50:	Were_Wyrm posted... Trump launches nukes. If he's going down he's taking all of us with him. You honestly think that the military would allow that to happen? To allow millions of people including their own families to die because of his ass? Get real. <cite>Shinobi120 posted [p:907459911] in So what ha... [t:76930445]...</cite> <quote><cite>Were_Wyrm posted...</cite> <quote>Trump launches nukes. If he's going down he's taking all of us with him.</quote> You honestly think that the military would allow that to happen? To allow millions of people including their own families to die because of his ass? Get real.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2

Current Events > So what happens when Cohen "flips" on Trump (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > So what happens when Cohen "flips" on Trump