Current Events > What don't you get about evolution?

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4
YoshitoKikuchi 09/02/18 11:07:59 AM #1:	How did particular very first features emerge, like the first eyeball? --- Dont be ridiculous. I think FIVE evil steps ahead https://imgur.com/YQpeyD3 <cite>YoshitoKikuchi posted [p:907974507] in What don't... [t:76959750]...</cite> <quote>How did particular very first features emerge, like the first eyeball?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#2	Post #2 was unavailable or deleted.
treewojima 09/02/18 11:11:37 AM #3:	my creationist friend likes to make the "irreducible complexity" argument. it gets really old after a while <cite>treewojima posted [p:907974652] in What don't... [t:76959750]...</cite> <quote>my creationist friend likes to make the "irreducible complexity" argument. it gets really old after a while</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
PoopPotato 09/02/18 11:14:58 AM #4:	There is a parasite that can only reproduce inside of a cats intestines, but in order to get there, it has to first hijack a rat and get purposely eaten by the cat. That's not evolution, thats a demon. --- http://i.minus.com/i5EWBMXTN4ERv.gif <cite>PoopPotato posted [p:907974781] in What don't... [t:76959750]...</cite> <quote>There is a parasite that can only reproduce inside of a cats intestines, but in order to get there, it has to first hijack a rat and get purposely eaten by the cat. That's not evolution, thats a demon.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#5	Post #5 was unavailable or deleted.
iPhone_7 09/02/18 11:17:42 AM #6:	Why cant Leafeon evolve from a Leaf Stone? --- Sig User Logic https://imgur.com/lA5fm7w <cite>iPhone_7 posted [p:907974874] in What don't... [t:76959750]...</cite> <quote>Why cant Leafeon evolve from a Leaf Stone?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
YoshitoKikuchi 09/02/18 11:17:52 AM #7:	dolomedes posted... an eyeball didn't just show up out of nowhere. it began as a single cell that could respond to light stimulus. That doesn't answer how it came to take the shape and form it currently has. Or, how did sight develop in the first place? --- Dont be ridiculous. I think FIVE evil steps ahead https://imgur.com/YQpeyD3 <cite>YoshitoKikuchi posted [p:907974880] in What don't... [t:76959750]...</cite> <quote><cite>dolomedes posted...</cite> <quote>an eyeball didn't just show up out of nowhere. it began as a single cell that could respond to light stimulus.</quote> That doesn't answer how it came to take the shape and form it currently has. Or, how did sight develop in the first place?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DK9292 09/02/18 11:18:41 AM #8:	https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wdi_u1ZenRw" data-time=" --- A hero's role is one that cannot be forsaken, Caring for those with hearts that are breaking. <cite>DK9292 posted [p:907974913] in What don't... [t:76959750]...</cite> <quote> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wdi_u1ZenRw" data-time="</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DirkDiggles 09/02/18 11:18:52 AM #9:	https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nXMOvMba2bM" data-time=" --- https://imgtc.com/i/5CTKeaL.jpg https://imgtc.com/i/G9w39yE.gif <cite>DirkDiggles posted [p:907974919] in What don't... [t:76959750]...</cite> <quote> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nXMOvMba2bM" data-time="</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#10	Post #10 was unavailable or deleted.
iPhone_7 09/02/18 11:23:38 AM #11:	Not an explanation but interesting image concerning the different eyes of some water species. From flat receptors to spherical. http://www.adamsapple.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/F1.large_-700x325.jpg --- Sig User Logic https://imgur.com/lA5fm7w <cite>iPhone_7 posted [p:907975127] in What don't... [t:76959750]...</cite> <quote>Not an explanation but interesting image concerning the different eyes of some water species. From flat receptors to spherical. http://www.adamsapple.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/F1.large_-700x325.jpg</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
YoshitoKikuchi 09/02/18 12:26:29 PM #12:	iPhone_7 posted... Not an explanation but interesting image concerning the different eyes of some water species. From flat receptors to spherical. http://www.adamsapple.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/F1.large_-700x325.jpg Interesting --- Dont be ridiculous. I think FIVE evil steps ahead https://imgur.com/YQpeyD3 <cite>YoshitoKikuchi posted [p:907977511] in What don't... [t:76959750]...</cite> <quote><cite>iPhone_7 posted...</cite> <quote>Not an explanation but interesting image concerning the different eyes of some water species. From flat receptors to spherical. http://www.adamsapple.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/F1.large_-700x325.jpg</quote> Interesting</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hockeybub89 09/02/18 12:31:29 PM #13:	How some people don't "believe" in it --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png http://www.last.fm/user/hockeybub89/ <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:907977736] in What don't... [t:76959750]...</cite> <quote>How some people don't "believe" in it</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
PokemonExpert44 09/02/18 12:32:48 PM #14:	evolution isn't true --- I might just 6-0 you in Pokemon. Watch out for my teams. <cite>PokemonExpert44 posted [p:907977792] in What don't... [t:76959750]...</cite> <quote>evolution isn't true</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OwlRammer 09/02/18 12:35:13 PM #15:	why hasn't that monkey evolved into a human yet? --- https://imgur.com/ji9KF3f https://imgur.com/p3G1Hvd http://puu.sh/ovZuS/97325c05b3.jpg http://puu.sh/ovZB2/eeee237f49.jpg <cite>OwlRammer posted [p:907977895] in What don't... [t:76959750]...</cite> <quote>why hasn't that monkey evolved into a human yet?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Herugrim 09/02/18 12:40:30 PM #16:	If humans evolved from Apes, then why are Apes still Apes? --- John Watson: "Well it isn't obvious to me." Sherlock Holmes: "The world is full of obvious things that nobody notices." <cite>Herugrim posted [p:907978109] in What don't... [t:76959750]...</cite> <quote>If humans evolved from Apes, then why are Apes still Apes?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kobe8Bryant24 09/02/18 12:43:07 PM #17:	Herugrim posted... If humans evolved from Apes, then why are Apes still Apes? Well, the monkeys that they theorize about don't even exist anymore. I'm not sure why popular culture takes to thinking it's the monkeys we see today. That would be insane if someone actually believed that. --- I was just letting the shots fly. You know, I don't leave any bullets in the chamber <cite>Kobe8Bryant24 posted [p:907978229] in What don't... [t:76959750]...</cite> <quote><cite>Herugrim posted...</cite> <quote> If humans evolved from Apes, then why are Apes still Apes?</quote> Well, the monkeys that they theorize about don't even exist anymore. I'm not sure why popular culture takes to thinking it's the monkeys we see today. That would be insane if someone actually believed that.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#18	Post #18 was unavailable or deleted.
LinksLiege 09/02/18 12:45:56 PM #19:	treewojima posted... my creationist friend likes to make the "irreducible complexity" argument. it gets really old after a while "Irreducibly complex" is my favorite argument because it's literally someone claiming their ignorance is proof that it isn't true. "I don't know it, so nobody can know it" is a lot easier to mock. --- This is LinksLiege's signature. It is fantastic. <cite>LinksLiege posted [p:907978363] in What don't... [t:76959750]...</cite> <quote><cite>treewojima posted...</cite> <quote>my creationist friend likes to make the "irreducible complexity" argument. it gets really old after a while</quote> "Irreducibly complex" is my favorite argument because it's literally someone claiming their ignorance is proof that it isn't true. "I don't know it, so nobody can know it" is a lot easier to mock.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
PokemonExpert44 09/02/18 12:47:41 PM #20:	LinksLiege posted... treewojima posted... my creationist friend likes to make the "irreducible complexity" argument. it gets really old after a while "Irreducibly complex" is my favorite argument because it's literally someone claiming their ignorance is proof that it isn't true. "I don't know it, so nobody can know it" is a lot easier to mock. Irreducible complexity is still a valid type of argument. --- I might just 6-0 you in Pokemon. Watch out for my teams. <cite>PokemonExpert44 posted [p:907978445] in What don't... [t:76959750]...</cite> <quote><cite>LinksLiege posted...</cite> <quote><cite>treewojima posted...</cite> <quote>my creationist friend likes to make the "irreducible complexity" argument. it gets really old after a while</quote> "Irreducibly complex" is my favorite argument because it's literally someone claiming their ignorance is proof that it isn't true. "I don't know it, so nobody can know it" is a lot easier to mock.</quote> Irreducible complexity is still a valid type of argument.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
I Like Toast 09/02/18 12:48:30 PM #21:	dolomedes posted... you don't evolve out of a group If life began with a single cell then you do though --- If you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all <cite>I Like Toast posted [p:907978473] in What don't... [t:76959750]...</cite> <quote><cite>dolomedes posted...</cite> <quote> you don't evolve out of a group</quote> If life began with a single cell then you do though</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Romes187 09/02/18 12:50:25 PM #22:	Just remember Populations evolve, not organisms <cite>Romes187 posted [p:907978562] in What don't... [t:76959750]...</cite> <quote>Just remember Populations evolve, not organisms</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
treewojima 09/02/18 12:54:34 PM #23:	PokemonExpert44 posted... LinksLiege posted... treewojima posted... my creationist friend likes to make the "irreducible complexity" argument. it gets really old after a while "Irreducibly complex" is my favorite argument because it's literally someone claiming their ignorance is proof that it isn't true. "I don't know it, so nobody can know it" is a lot easier to mock. Irreducible complexity is still a valid type of argument. it's just not an especially good one <cite>treewojima posted [p:907978755] in What don't... [t:76959750]...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>LinksLiege posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>treewojima posted...</cite> <quote> my creationist friend likes to make the "irreducible complexity" argument. it gets really old after a while </quote> "Irreducibly complex" is my favorite argument because it's literally someone claiming their ignorance is proof that it isn't true. "I don't know it, so nobody can know it" is a lot easier to mock.</quote> Irreducible complexity is still a valid type of argument.</quote> it's just not an especially good one</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#24	Post #24 was unavailable or deleted.
LinksLiege 09/02/18 12:58:57 PM #25:	PokemonExpert44 posted... Irreducible complexity is still a valid type of argument. Not when it comes from someone who obviously has made zero effort to understand what they're arguing against. At that point it's just shorthand for "Welp - I don't get it, so it's bullshit." --- This is LinksLiege's signature. It is fantastic. <cite>LinksLiege posted [p:907978990] in What don't... [t:76959750]...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote>Irreducible complexity is still a valid type of argument.</quote> Not when it comes from someone who obviously has made zero effort to understand what they're arguing against. At that point it's just shorthand for "Welp - I don't get it, so it's bullshit."</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#26	Post #26 was unavailable or deleted.
#27	Post #27 was unavailable or deleted.
YoshitoKikuchi 09/02/18 2:07:59 PM #28:	How did the last common ancestor branch off into so many species? --- Dont be ridiculous. I think FIVE evil steps ahead https://imgur.com/YQpeyD3 <cite>YoshitoKikuchi posted [p:907982289] in What don't... [t:76959750]...</cite> <quote>How did the last common ancestor branch off into so many species?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kobe8Bryant24 09/02/18 2:11:14 PM #29:	YoshitoKikuchi posted... How did the last common ancestor branch off into so many species? It was 13 million years ago and most of the evidence is sparse. It's going to be hard to confirm anything more than what was figured out from the existing remains. --- I was just letting the shots fly. You know, I don't leave any bullets in the chamber <cite>Kobe8Bryant24 posted [p:907982426] in What don't... [t:76959750]...</cite> <quote><cite>YoshitoKikuchi posted...</cite> <quote>How did the last common ancestor branch off into so many species?</quote> It was 13 million years ago and most of the evidence is sparse. It's going to be hard to confirm anything more than what was figured out from the existing remains.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#30	Post #30 was unavailable or deleted.
LinksLiege 09/02/18 2:21:38 PM #31:	dolomedes posted... Goats posted... How something so beautiful can come about by purely random chance cubone. billions of years of ever-changing selective pressure is hardly 'purely random chance' Yeah, characterizing it as random chance is absurd. Not to mention the fact that we evolved to have that ability to perceive things as beautiful. --- This is LinksLiege's signature. It is fantastic. <cite>LinksLiege posted [p:907982916] in What don't... [t:76959750]...</cite> <quote><cite>dolomedes posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Goats posted...</cite> <quote>How something so beautiful can come about by purely random chance cubone.</quote> billions of years of ever-changing selective pressure is hardly 'purely random chance'</quote> Yeah, characterizing it as random chance is absurd. Not to mention the fact that we evolved to have that ability to perceive things as beautiful.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
YoshitoKikuchi 09/02/18 7:16:19 PM #32:	Up --- Dont be ridiculous. I think FIVE evil steps ahead https://imgur.com/YQpeyD3 <cite>YoshitoKikuchi posted [p:907997291] in What don't... [t:76959750]...</cite> <quote>Up</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dragonblade01 09/02/18 7:20:10 PM #33:	Taxonomy is all about us trying to give names to what are essentially just new versions of the same, original creature. <cite>Dragonblade01 posted [p:907997476] in What don't... [t:76959750]...</cite> <quote>Taxonomy is all about us trying to give names to what are essentially just new versions of the same, original creature.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#34	Post #34 was unavailable or deleted.
YoshitoKikuchi 09/03/18 10:59:00 AM #35:	RoadsterUFO posted... Its a mystery and full of change that no one sees. --- Dont be ridiculous. I think FIVE evil steps ahead https://imgur.com/YQpeyD3 <cite>YoshitoKikuchi posted [p:908027319] in What don't... [t:76959750]...</cite> <quote><cite>RoadsterUFO posted...</cite> <quote>Its a mystery and full of change that no one sees.</quote> </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Flockaveli 09/03/18 10:59:25 AM #36:	Why my meat small. --- Chicago, greatest city in the world! <cite>Flockaveli posted [p:908027329] in What don't... [t:76959750]...</cite> <quote>Why my meat small.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
bknight 09/03/18 11:01:12 AM #37:	If we evolved from apes, how come there are still apes around? <cite>bknight posted [p:908027403] in What don't... [t:76959750]...</cite> <quote>If we evolved from apes, how come there are still apes around?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mareen 09/03/18 11:02:06 AM #38:	bknight posted... If we evolved from apes, how come there are still apes around? We didn't evolve from the current apes but from a common ancestor. <cite>Mareen posted [p:908027448] in What don't... [t:76959750]...</cite> <quote><cite>bknight posted...</cite> <quote>If we evolved from apes, how come there are still apes around?</quote> We didn't evolve from the current apes but from a common ancestor.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
bknight 09/03/18 11:07:58 AM #39:	Mareen posted... bknight posted... If we evolved from apes, how come there are still apes around? We didn't evolve from the current apes but from a common ancestor. So can we force common apes to evolve if we like created a drug to make them smarter, since they already share enough of our DNA? <cite>bknight posted [p:908027713] in What don't... [t:76959750]...</cite> <quote><cite>Mareen posted...</cite> <quote><cite>bknight posted...</cite> <quote>If we evolved from apes, how come there are still apes around?</quote> We didn't evolve from the current apes but from a common ancestor.</quote> So can we force common apes to evolve if we like created a drug to make them smarter, since they already share enough of our DNA?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Cheese_Crackers 09/03/18 11:18:21 AM #40:	YoshitoKikuchi posted... How did particular very first features emerge, like the first eyeball? There are functional intermediates between creatures with no sight and human eyes or bird eyes (with the most advanced sight). There are sea creatures with extremely rudimentary eyes that allow them to see (at least a little bit) in the minimal light environments that exist in the ocean. Besides the origin of life itself, which isn't even covered by evolution, the hardest part for me to wrap my head around is the time scale. Life seems so unchanging in our experience of 80 years, but since evolution usually takes place across millions of years, it feels impossible to visualize. --- Though the fear of death is a common one, the fear of life is a more rational one. <cite>Cheese_Crackers posted [p:908028189] in What don't... [t:76959750]...</cite> <quote><cite>YoshitoKikuchi posted...</cite> <quote>How did particular very first features emerge, like the first eyeball?</quote> There are functional intermediates between creatures with no sight and human eyes or bird eyes (with the most advanced sight). There are sea creatures with extremely rudimentary eyes that allow them to see (at least a little bit) in the minimal light environments that exist in the ocean. Besides the origin of life itself, which isn't even covered by evolution, the hardest part for me to wrap my head around is the time scale. Life seems so unchanging in our experience of 80 years, but since evolution usually takes place across millions of years, it feels impossible to visualize.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
RoboLaserGandhi 09/03/18 11:53:27 AM #41:	YoshitoKikuchi posted... dolomedes posted... an eyeball didn't just show up out of nowhere. it began as a single cell that could respond to light stimulus. That doesn't answer how it came to take the shape and form it currently has. Or, how did sight develop in the first place? Well it happened over a very very long time with gradual improvements. With something so important as sight (and basic senses in general), the better an individual can orient themselves to the world, which is a significant advantage that is certain to be passed down in animals that rely on it. The first "eyes" were little bumps on the surface of an organism's head that simply reacted to light. These organisms couldn't really "see" but more like they were able to sense very vague shadows. Over time, eventually there arose organisms with greater visual definition with more clumps of cells. Then some had a bulb of translucent skin over those cells, focusing the light a little better. Eventually, more and more improvements kept adding up, until it reached a high level of complexity. Also remember, the eye didn't have to evolve independently in every single creature that has them today. For example, all vertebrates (fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds, mammals) come from a common ancestor, who would have developed the groundwork for the basic eye blueprint we all share. <cite>RoboLaserGandhi posted [p:908029771] in What don't... [t:76959750]...</cite> <quote><cite>YoshitoKikuchi posted...</cite> <quote><cite>dolomedes posted...</cite> <quote>an eyeball didn't just show up out of nowhere. it began as a single cell that could respond to light stimulus.</quote> That doesn't answer how it came to take the shape and form it currently has. Or, how did sight develop in the first place?</quote> Well it happened over a very very long time with gradual improvements. With something so important as sight (and basic senses in general), the better an individual can orient themselves to the world, which is a significant advantage that is certain to be passed down in animals that rely on it. The first "eyes" were little bumps on the surface of an organism's head that simply reacted to light. These organisms couldn't really "see" but more like they were able to sense very vague shadows. Over time, eventually there arose organisms with greater visual definition with more clumps of cells. Then some had a bulb of translucent skin over those cells, focusing the light a little better. Eventually, more and more improvements kept adding up, until it reached a high level of complexity. Also remember, the eye didn't have to evolve independently in every single creature that has them today. For example, all vertebrates (fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds, mammals) come from a common ancestor, who would have developed the groundwork for the basic eye blueprint we all share.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
YoshitoKikuchi 09/03/18 12:11:53 PM #42:	RoboLaserGandhi posted... YoshitoKikuchi posted... dolomedes posted... an eyeball didn't just show up out of nowhere. it began as a single cell that could respond to light stimulus. That doesn't answer how it came to take the shape and form it currently has. Or, how did sight develop in the first place? Well it happened over a very very long time with gradual improvements. With something so important as sight (and basic senses in general), the better an individual can orient themselves to the world, which is a significant advantage that is certain to be passed down in animals that rely on it. The first "eyes" were little bumps on the surface of an organism's head that simply reacted to light. These organisms couldn't really "see" but more like they were able to sense very vague shadows. Over time, eventually there arose organisms with greater visual definition with more clumps of cells. Then some had a bulb of translucent skin over those cells, focusing the light a little better. Eventually, more and more improvements kept adding up, until it reached a high level of complexity. Also remember, the eye didn't have to evolve independently in every single creature that has them today. For example, all vertebrates (fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds, mammals) come from a common ancestor, who would have developed the groundwork for the basic eye blueprint we all share. Thanks. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_of_the_eye Looked it up as well, very fascinating read. --- Dont be ridiculous. I think FIVE evil steps ahead https://imgur.com/YQpeyD3 <cite>YoshitoKikuchi posted [p:908030693] in What don't... [t:76959750]...</cite> <quote><cite>RoboLaserGandhi posted...</cite> <quote><cite>YoshitoKikuchi posted...</cite> <quote><cite>dolomedes posted...</cite> <quote>an eyeball didn't just show up out of nowhere. it began as a single cell that could respond to light stimulus.</quote> That doesn't answer how it came to take the shape and form it currently has. Or, how did sight develop in the first place?</quote> Well it happened over a very very long time with gradual improvements. With something so important as sight (and basic senses in general), the better an individual can orient themselves to the world, which is a significant advantage that is certain to be passed down in animals that rely on it. The first "eyes" were little bumps on the surface of an organism's head that simply reacted to light. These organisms couldn't really "see" but more like they were able to sense very vague shadows. Over time, eventually there arose organisms with greater visual definition with more clumps of cells. Then some had a bulb of translucent skin over those cells, focusing the light a little better. Eventually, more and more improvements kept adding up, until it reached a high level of complexity. Also remember, the eye didn't have to evolve independently in every single creature that has them today. For example, all vertebrates (fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds, mammals) come from a common ancestor, who would have developed the groundwork for the basic eye blueprint we all share.</quote> Thanks. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_of_the_eye Looked it up as well, very fascinating read.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheOlJollyRoger 09/03/18 12:16:12 PM #43:	I dont get why evolution kicked out Randy Orton for winning the world title that was just dumb --- https://imgur.com/CYLlcLv <cite>TheOlJollyRoger posted [p:908030872] in What don't... [t:76959750]...</cite> <quote>I dont get why evolution kicked out Randy Orton for winning the world title that was just dumb</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheOlJollyRoger 09/03/18 12:18:09 PM #44:	https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nXMOvMba2bM" data-time=" --- https://imgur.com/CYLlcLv <cite>TheOlJollyRoger posted [p:908030957] in What don't... [t:76959750]...</cite> <quote> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nXMOvMba2bM" data-time="</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
rikasa 09/03/18 12:21:05 PM #45:	Humans evolved into obese pleasure sponges in like 100 years so imagine what happens in billions of years --- you are not alone <cite>rikasa posted [p:908031097] in What don't... [t:76959750]...</cite> <quote>Humans evolved into obese pleasure sponges in like 100 years so imagine what happens in billions of years</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
PokemonExpert44 09/03/18 12:31:11 PM #46:	Evolution = Dumb --- I might just 6-0 you in Pokemon. Watch out for my teams. <cite>PokemonExpert44 posted [p:908031565] in What don't... [t:76959750]...</cite> <quote>Evolution = Dumb</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
YoshitoKikuchi 09/03/18 2:58:06 PM #47:	PokemonExpert44 posted... Evolution = Dumb Why? --- Dont be ridiculous. I think FIVE evil steps ahead https://imgur.com/YQpeyD3 <cite>YoshitoKikuchi posted [p:908038829] in What don't... [t:76959750]...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote>Evolution = Dumb</quote> Why?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Herugrim 09/03/18 6:41:23 PM #48:	dolomedes posted... Herugrim posted... If humans evolved from Apes, then why are Apes still Apes? humans are still apes, for the record. you don't evolve out of a group. we are apes, we are mammals, we are vertebrates, we are deuterostomes, we are animals, we are alive. So humans can mate with apes then? I mean, if we're the same species, shouldn't that be a thing? Cause I'm pretty sure Humans and Apes are Anthropoids, not that Humans are Apes. --- John Watson: "Well it isn't obvious to me." Sherlock Holmes: "The world is full of obvious things that nobody notices." <cite>Herugrim posted [p:908051446] in What don't... [t:76959750]...</cite> <quote><cite>dolomedes posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Herugrim posted...</cite> <quote>If humans evolved from Apes, then why are Apes still Apes?</quote> humans are still apes, for the record. you don't evolve out of a group. we are apes, we are mammals, we are vertebrates, we are deuterostomes, we are animals, we are alive.</quote> So humans can mate with apes then? I mean, if we're the same species, shouldn't that be a thing? Cause I'm pretty sure Humans and Apes are Anthropoids, not that Humans are Apes.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
RoboLaserGandhi 09/03/18 6:43:00 PM #49:	Herugrim posted... dolomedes posted... Herugrim posted... If humans evolved from Apes, then why are Apes still Apes? humans are still apes, for the record. you don't evolve out of a group. we are apes, we are mammals, we are vertebrates, we are deuterostomes, we are animals, we are alive. So humans can mate with apes then? I mean, if we're the same species, shouldn't that be a thing? Cause I'm pretty sure Humans and Apes are Anthropoids, not that Humans are Apes. Ape isn't a species <cite>RoboLaserGandhi posted [p:908051539] in What don't... [t:76959750]...</cite> <quote><cite>Herugrim posted...</cite> <quote><cite>dolomedes posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Herugrim posted...</cite> <quote>If humans evolved from Apes, then why are Apes still Apes?</quote> humans are still apes, for the record. you don't evolve out of a group. we are apes, we are mammals, we are vertebrates, we are deuterostomes, we are animals, we are alive.</quote> So humans can mate with apes then? I mean, if we're the same species, shouldn't that be a thing? Cause I'm pretty sure Humans and Apes are Anthropoids, not that Humans are Apes.</quote> Ape isn't a species</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kobe8Bryant24 09/03/18 6:44:16 PM #50:	No, we cannot mate with them. Liken the common ancestor to a tree with one branch being us and other branches being other mammals, if that helps. There's no basis for a millions-year old relation being strong enough for that level of compatibility today. Do remember that other types of branched humans, like Neanderthals, are extinct, as well. --- I was just letting the shots fly. You know, I don't leave any bullets in the chamber <cite>Kobe8Bryant24 posted [p:908051614] in What don't... [t:76959750]...</cite> <quote>No, we cannot mate with them. Liken the common ancestor to a tree with one branch being us and other branches being other mammals, if that helps. There's no basis for a millions-year old relation being strong enough for that level of compatibility today. Do remember that other types of branched humans, like Neanderthals, are extinct, as well.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4

Current Events > What don't you get about evolution? (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > What don't you get about evolution?