Current Events > Report: Google staffers discussed ways to prevent Trump from winning again

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4
A_Good_Boy 11/30/18 3:39:00 PM #154:	Funbazooka posted... A_Good_Boy posted... Funbazooka posted... I suspect that people who don't believe in the existence of left-wing fake news feed upon a steady diet of fake left-wing news. Extremely gullible, extremely brainwashed. Woah now, the dude that lives and breathes in right wing troll memes is here to lecture us about the proliferation of divisive political news! Calm down. Memes aren't news. They're just memes. And not even a hint of irony. --- Who is? I am! <cite>A_Good_Boy posted [p:913315132] in Report: Go... [t:77255080]...</cite> <quote><cite>Funbazooka posted...</cite> <quote><cite>A_Good_Boy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Funbazooka posted...</cite> <quote>I suspect that people who don't believe in the existence of left-wing fake news feed upon a steady diet of fake left-wing news. Extremely gullible, extremely brainwashed.</quote> Woah now, the dude that lives and breathes in right wing troll memes is here to lecture us about the proliferation of divisive political news!</quote> Calm down. Memes aren't news. They're just memes.</quote> And not even a hint of irony.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tyranthraxus 11/30/18 3:40:18 PM #155:	Bobemmo posted... So most people here think it's clearly not ok for google to show only certain news articles to manipulate people to vote a certain way. Yet I suspect most people would be fine with say, an acquaintance linking them only news articles with a certain slant with the intention of motivating them to vote a certain way. At what point does it become not ok? Is it because google is a company, and not just a person? Is it because google is too big of a company? not trying to just be inflammatory here this is actually a serious question If you think this isn't okay for Google, then we should probably block Sinclair from doing must runs and let the local station management decide what to air on their own. --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:913315204] in Report: Go... [t:77255080]...</cite> <quote><cite>Bobemmo posted...</cite> <quote>So most people here think it's clearly not ok for google to show only certain news articles to manipulate people to vote a certain way. Yet I suspect most people would be fine with say, an acquaintance linking them only news articles with a certain slant with the intention of motivating them to vote a certain way. At what point does it become not ok? Is it because google is a company, and not just a person? Is it because google is too big of a company? not trying to just be inflammatory here this is actually a serious question</quote> If you think this isn't okay for Google, then we should probably block Sinclair from doing must runs and let the local station management decide what to air on their own.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FLUFFYGERM 11/30/18 3:40:54 PM #156:	Giant_Aspirin posted... andel posted... another "totally moderate that doesnt support trump" yet somehow echoes all of his talking points and shills for him constantly that's not true. PC is openly opposed to Trump and most of the GOP when it comes to climate change, for example. thanks brother Antifar posted... Google's power and influence has to be challenged and ultimately limited. imagine Antifar having the right take for once but andel just flailing around. wtf is going on today? --- Do good. Eat communists. <cite>FLUFFYGERM posted [p:913315243] in Report: Go... [t:77255080]...</cite> <quote><cite>Giant_Aspirin posted...</cite> <quote><cite>andel posted...</cite> <quote>another "totally moderate that doesnt support trump" yet somehow echoes all of his talking points and shills for him constantly</quote> that's not true. PC is openly opposed to Trump and most of the GOP when it comes to climate change, for example.</quote> thanks brother <cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote>Google's power and influence has to be challenged and ultimately limited.</quote> imagine Antifar having the right take for once but andel just flailing around. wtf is going on today?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FLUFFYGERM 11/30/18 3:41:15 PM #157:	A_Good_Boy posted... It's just downright bizarre that he feels as if the solution to ameliorating man's effects on the climate isn't to actually do anything about it, but for SpaceX to build us rockets that'll have us living in space instead. What in the Good Lord's name are you blabbering about, buddy? --- Do good. Eat communists. <cite>FLUFFYGERM posted [p:913315258] in Report: Go... [t:77255080]...</cite> <quote><cite>A_Good_Boy posted...</cite> <quote>It's just downright bizarre that he feels as if the solution to ameliorating man's effects on the climate isn't to actually do anything about it, but for SpaceX to build us rockets that'll have us living in space instead. </quote> What in the Good Lord's name are you blabbering about, buddy?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tmaster148 11/30/18 3:41:38 PM #158:	Bobemmo posted... At what point does it become not ok? Is it because google is a company, and not just a person? Is it because google is too big of a company? The US has ruled corporations are people. --- https://imgur.com/BBcZDLJ <cite>Tmaster148 posted [p:913315281] in Report: Go... [t:77255080]...</cite> <quote><cite>Bobemmo posted...</cite> <quote>At what point does it become not ok? Is it because google is a company, and not just a person? Is it because google is too big of a company?</quote> The US has ruled corporations are people.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
cmiller4642 11/30/18 3:41:51 PM #159:	And nothing of value was lost.... <cite>cmiller4642 posted [p:913315293] in Report: Go... [t:77255080]...</cite> <quote>And nothing of value was lost....</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Funbazooka 11/30/18 3:43:54 PM #160:	A_Good_Boy posted... Funbazooka posted... A_Good_Boy posted... Funbazooka posted... I suspect that people who don't believe in the existence of left-wing fake news feed upon a steady diet of fake left-wing news. Extremely gullible, extremely brainwashed. Woah now, the dude that lives and breathes in right wing troll memes is here to lecture us about the proliferation of divisive political news! Calm down. Memes aren't news. They're just memes. And not even a hint of irony. Heretical and outrageous memes. --- MAGA <cite>Funbazooka posted [p:913315410] in Report: Go... [t:77255080]...</cite> <quote><cite>A_Good_Boy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Funbazooka posted...</cite> <quote><cite>A_Good_Boy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Funbazooka posted...</cite> <quote>I suspect that people who don't believe in the existence of left-wing fake news feed upon a steady diet of fake left-wing news. Extremely gullible, extremely brainwashed.</quote> Woah now, the dude that lives and breathes in right wing troll memes is here to lecture us about the proliferation of divisive political news!</quote> Calm down. Memes aren't news. They're just memes.</quote> And not even a hint of irony.</quote> Heretical and outrageous memes.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
A_Good_Boy 11/30/18 3:47:14 PM #161:	FLUFFYGERM posted... A_Good_Boy posted... It's just downright bizarre that he feels as if the solution to ameliorating man's effects on the climate isn't to actually do anything about it, but for SpaceX to build us rockets that'll have us living in space instead. What in the Good Lord's name are you blabbering about, buddy? Eh, must have been something you were posting about half heartedly some time ago. --- Who is? I am! <cite>A_Good_Boy posted [p:913315601] in Report: Go... [t:77255080]...</cite> <quote><cite>FLUFFYGERM posted...</cite> <quote><cite>A_Good_Boy posted...</cite> <quote>It's just downright bizarre that he feels as if the solution to ameliorating man's effects on the climate isn't to actually do anything about it, but for SpaceX to build us rockets that'll have us living in space instead. </quote> What in the Good Lord's name are you blabbering about, buddy?</quote> Eh, must have been something you were posting about half heartedly some time ago.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tmaster148 11/30/18 3:48:25 PM #162:	A_Good_Boy posted... FLUFFYGERM posted... A_Good_Boy posted... It's just downright bizarre that he feels as if the solution to ameliorating man's effects on the climate isn't to actually do anything about it, but for SpaceX to build us rockets that'll have us living in space instead. What in the Good Lord's name are you blabbering about, buddy? Eh, must have been something you were posting about half heartedly some time ago. Proudclad stated in another topic he denies that capatalism had any effect on climate change. --- https://imgur.com/BBcZDLJ <cite>Tmaster148 posted [p:913315670] in Report: Go... [t:77255080]...</cite> <quote><cite>A_Good_Boy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>FLUFFYGERM posted...</cite> <quote><cite>A_Good_Boy posted...</cite> <quote>It's just downright bizarre that he feels as if the solution to ameliorating man's effects on the climate isn't to actually do anything about it, but for SpaceX to build us rockets that'll have us living in space instead. </quote> What in the Good Lord's name are you blabbering about, buddy?</quote> Eh, must have been something you were posting about half heartedly some time ago.</quote> Proudclad stated in another topic he denies that capatalism had any effect on climate change.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FLUFFYGERM 11/30/18 3:48:26 PM #163:	A_Good_Boy posted... FLUFFYGERM posted... A_Good_Boy posted... It's just downright bizarre that he feels as if the solution to ameliorating man's effects on the climate isn't to actually do anything about it, but for SpaceX to build us rockets that'll have us living in space instead. What in the Good Lord's name are you blabbering about, buddy? Eh, must have been something you were posting about half heartedly some time ago. I'm pretty much the only person on this board who is consistently sharing articles about electric vehicles, solar panels, innovations in carbon sequestration, market movements, etc. --- Do good. Eat communists. <cite>FLUFFYGERM posted [p:913315671] in Report: Go... [t:77255080]...</cite> <quote><cite>A_Good_Boy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>FLUFFYGERM posted...</cite> <quote><cite>A_Good_Boy posted...</cite> <quote>It's just downright bizarre that he feels as if the solution to ameliorating man's effects on the climate isn't to actually do anything about it, but for SpaceX to build us rockets that'll have us living in space instead. </quote> What in the Good Lord's name are you blabbering about, buddy?</quote> Eh, must have been something you were posting about half heartedly some time ago.</quote> I'm pretty much the only person on this board who is consistently sharing articles about electric vehicles, solar panels, innovations in carbon sequestration, market movements, etc.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tyranthraxus 11/30/18 3:51:16 PM #164:	Tmaster148 posted... A_Good_Boy posted... FLUFFYGERM posted... A_Good_Boy posted... It's just downright bizarre that he feels as if the solution to ameliorating man's effects on the climate isn't to actually do anything about it, but for SpaceX to build us rockets that'll have us living in space instead. What in the Good Lord's name are you blabbering about, buddy? Eh, must have been something you were posting about half heartedly some time ago. Proudclad stated in another topic he denies that capatalism had any effect on climate change. aside from all the articles he's posted about how capitalist markets have created industries for clean energy because of the demand for it? --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:913315851] in Report: Go... [t:77255080]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>A_Good_Boy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>FLUFFYGERM posted...</cite> <quote><cite>A_Good_Boy posted...</cite> <quote>It's just downright bizarre that he feels as if the solution to ameliorating man's effects on the climate isn't to actually do anything about it, but for SpaceX to build us rockets that'll have us living in space instead. </quote> What in the Good Lord's name are you blabbering about, buddy?</quote> Eh, must have been something you were posting about half heartedly some time ago.</quote> Proudclad stated in another topic he denies that capatalism had any effect on climate change.</quote> aside from all the articles he's posted about how capitalist markets have created industries for clean energy because of the demand for it?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FLUFFYGERM 11/30/18 3:53:45 PM #165:	Tmaster is just displaying his inability to comprehend basic English. Can disregard. --- Do good. Eat communists. <cite>FLUFFYGERM posted [p:913315990] in Report: Go... [t:77255080]...</cite> <quote>Tmaster is just displaying his inability to comprehend basic English. Can disregard.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HiddenLurker 11/30/18 3:55:53 PM #166:	So are they saying liberals are stupid as fuck that they to need to rely on facebook for news? --- [Insert tired meme here] <cite>HiddenLurker posted [p:913316123] in Report: Go... [t:77255080]...</cite> <quote>So are they saying liberals are stupid as fuck that they to need to rely on facebook for news?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tmaster148 11/30/18 3:56:42 PM #167:	Tyranthraxus posted... Tmaster148 posted... A_Good_Boy posted... FLUFFYGERM posted... A_Good_Boy posted... It's just downright bizarre that he feels as if the solution to ameliorating man's effects on the climate isn't to actually do anything about it, but for SpaceX to build us rockets that'll have us living in space instead. What in the Good Lord's name are you blabbering about, buddy? Eh, must have been something you were posting about half heartedly some time ago. Proudclad stated in another topic he denies that capatalism had any effect on climate change. aside from all the articles he's posted about how capitalist markets have created industries for clean energy because of the demand for it? Yes. https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/400-current-events/77252529/913264516 In before conflating capitalism and climate change. --- https://imgur.com/BBcZDLJ <cite>Tmaster148 posted [p:913316162] in Report: Go... [t:77255080]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tyranthraxus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>A_Good_Boy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>FLUFFYGERM posted...</cite> <quote><cite>A_Good_Boy posted...</cite> <quote>It's just downright bizarre that he feels as if the solution to ameliorating man's effects on the climate isn't to actually do anything about it, but for SpaceX to build us rockets that'll have us living in space instead. </quote> What in the Good Lord's name are you blabbering about, buddy?</quote> Eh, must have been something you were posting about half heartedly some time ago.</quote> Proudclad stated in another topic he denies that capatalism had any effect on climate change.</quote> aside from all the articles he's posted about how capitalist markets have created industries for clean energy because of the demand for it?</quote> Yes. https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/400-current-events/77252529/913264516 <quote>In before conflating capitalism and climate change.</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Nuffinz0rz 11/30/18 3:57:02 PM #168:	What's illegal about it? --- https://imgur.com/SyAXs2q <cite>Nuffinz0rz posted [p:913316172] in Report: Go... [t:77255080]...</cite> <quote>What's illegal about it?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tyranthraxus 11/30/18 3:57:40 PM #169:	Tmaster148 posted... Tyranthraxus posted... Tmaster148 posted... A_Good_Boy posted... FLUFFYGERM posted... A_Good_Boy posted... It's just downright bizarre that he feels as if the solution to ameliorating man's effects on the climate isn't to actually do anything about it, but for SpaceX to build us rockets that'll have us living in space instead. What in the Good Lord's name are you blabbering about, buddy? Eh, must have been something you were posting about half heartedly some time ago. Proudclad stated in another topic he denies that capatalism had any effect on climate change. aside from all the articles he's posted about how capitalist markets have created industries for clean energy because of the demand for it? Yes. https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/400-current-events/77252529/913264516 That is not even fucking remotely close to "capitalism has had no effect on climate change" --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:913316207] in Report: Go... [t:77255080]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tyranthraxus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>A_Good_Boy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>FLUFFYGERM posted...</cite> <quote><cite>A_Good_Boy posted...</cite> <quote>It's just downright bizarre that he feels as if the solution to ameliorating man's effects on the climate isn't to actually do anything about it, but for SpaceX to build us rockets that'll have us living in space instead. </quote> What in the Good Lord's name are you blabbering about, buddy?</quote> Eh, must have been something you were posting about half heartedly some time ago.</quote> Proudclad stated in another topic he denies that capatalism had any effect on climate change.</quote> aside from all the articles he's posted about how capitalist markets have created industries for clean energy because of the demand for it?</quote> Yes. https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/400-current-events/77252529/913264516</quote> That is not even fucking remotely close to "capitalism has had no effect on climate change"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Antifar 11/30/18 3:59:31 PM #170:	HiddenLurker posted... So are they saying liberals are stupid as fuck that they to need to rely on facebook for news? That claim wouldn't really mesh with the metrics we have available: https://twitter.com/kevinroose/status/1064633264416219136 --- kin to all that throbs <cite>Antifar posted [p:913316301] in Report: Go... [t:77255080]...</cite> <quote><cite>HiddenLurker posted...</cite> <quote>So are they saying liberals are stupid as fuck that they to need to rely on facebook for news?</quote> That claim wouldn't really mesh with the metrics we have available: https://twitter.com/kevinroose/status/1064633264416219136</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tmaster148 11/30/18 4:08:58 PM #171:	Tyranthraxus posted... Tmaster148 posted... Tyranthraxus posted... Tmaster148 posted... A_Good_Boy posted... FLUFFYGERM posted... A_Good_Boy posted... It's just downright bizarre that he feels as if the solution to ameliorating man's effects on the climate isn't to actually do anything about it, but for SpaceX to build us rockets that'll have us living in space instead. What in the Good Lord's name are you blabbering about, buddy? Eh, must have been something you were posting about half heartedly some time ago. Proudclad stated in another topic he denies that capatalism had any effect on climate change. aside from all the articles he's posted about how capitalist markets have created industries for clean energy because of the demand for it? Yes. https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/400-current-events/77252529/913264516 That is not even fucking remotely close to "capitalism has had no effect on climate change" If you are still not convinced https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/400-current-events/77252529/913264977 https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/400-current-events/77252529/913264977 Proudclad doesn't believe capitalism had any influence on climate change but will go out of his way to praise it for solving the issue it helped create. --- https://imgur.com/BBcZDLJ <cite>Tmaster148 posted [p:913316796] in Report: Go... [t:77255080]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tyranthraxus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tyranthraxus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>A_Good_Boy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>FLUFFYGERM posted...</cite> <quote><cite>A_Good_Boy posted...</cite> <quote>It's just downright bizarre that he feels as if the solution to ameliorating man's effects on the climate isn't to actually do anything about it, but for SpaceX to build us rockets that'll have us living in space instead. </quote> What in the Good Lord's name are you blabbering about, buddy?</quote> Eh, must have been something you were posting about half heartedly some time ago.</quote> Proudclad stated in another topic he denies that capatalism had any effect on climate change.</quote> aside from all the articles he's posted about how capitalist markets have created industries for clean energy because of the demand for it?</quote> Yes. https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/400-current-events/77252529/913264516</quote> That is not even fucking remotely close to "capitalism has had no effect on climate change"</quote> If you are still not convinced https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/400-current-events/77252529/913264977 https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/400-current-events/77252529/913264977 Proudclad doesn't believe capitalism had any influence on climate change but will go out of his way to praise it for solving the issue it helped create.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kineth 11/30/18 4:19:13 PM #172:	GreatEvilEmpire posted... I see all the CE-losers are advocating for propaganda has long as it suits their narrow agenda. Nice victimhood bruh. --- "I don't think anyone seriously thinks that Trump supporters orgasm when they see racism in the news." - Me, reassuring Ammonitida <cite>Kineth posted [p:913317302] in Report: Go... [t:77255080]...</cite> <quote><cite>GreatEvilEmpire posted...</cite> <quote>I see all the CE-losers are advocating for propaganda has long as it suits their narrow agenda.</quote> Nice victimhood bruh.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
andel 11/30/18 4:20:03 PM #173:	was proudclod also the one that was an open young earth creationist? --- I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis <cite>andel posted [p:913317341] in Report: Go... [t:77255080]...</cite> <quote>was proudclod also the one that was an open young earth creationist?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tmaster148 11/30/18 4:22:02 PM #174:	andel posted... was proudclod also the one that was an open young earth creationist? Idk about that, but he's stated he doesn't want to enforce vaccinations because of the government. --- https://imgur.com/BBcZDLJ <cite>Tmaster148 posted [p:913317441] in Report: Go... [t:77255080]...</cite> <quote><cite>andel posted...</cite> <quote>was proudclod also the one that was an open young earth creationist?</quote> Idk about that, but he's stated he doesn't want to enforce vaccinations because of the government.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tyranthraxus 11/30/18 4:22:31 PM #175:	Tmaster148 posted... If you are still not convinced https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/400-current-events/77252529/913264977 https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/400-current-events/77252529/913264977 Proudclad doesn't believe capitalism had any influence on climate change but will go out of his way to praise it for solving the issue it helped create. That's flat out not what he said, it's not even close to what he said. You can't even fucking accidentally misconstrue that as what he said you are just making shit up and saying he said it and then linking me to posts where he just didn't say that. --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:913317468] in Report: Go... [t:77255080]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote> If you are still not convinced https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/400-current-events/77252529/913264977 https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/400-current-events/77252529/913264977 Proudclad doesn't believe capitalism had any influence on climate change but will go out of his way to praise it for solving the issue it helped create.</quote> That's flat out not what he said, it's not even close to what he said. You can't even fucking accidentally misconstrue that as what he said you are just making shit up and saying he said it and then linking me to posts where he just didn't say that.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tyranthraxus 11/30/18 4:23:22 PM #176:	andel posted... was proudclod also the one that was an open young earth creationist? He was never a YEC but he doesn't believe that religion anymore at all. --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:913317517] in Report: Go... [t:77255080]...</cite> <quote><cite>andel posted...</cite> <quote>was proudclod also the one that was an open young earth creationist?</quote> He was never a YEC but he doesn't believe that religion anymore at all.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kineth 11/30/18 4:24:05 PM #177:	andel posted... was proudclod also the one that was an open young earth creationist? No, that was FlashofLight. --- "I don't think anyone seriously thinks that Trump supporters orgasm when they see racism in the news." - Me, reassuring Ammonitida <cite>Kineth posted [p:913317553] in Report: Go... [t:77255080]...</cite> <quote><cite>andel posted...</cite> <quote>was proudclod also the one that was an open young earth creationist?</quote> No, that was FlashofLight.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tmaster148 11/30/18 4:24:32 PM #178:	Tyranthraxus posted... Tmaster148 posted... If you are still not convinced https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/400-current-events/77252529/913264977 https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/400-current-events/77252529/913264977 Proudclad doesn't believe capitalism had any influence on climate change but will go out of his way to praise it for solving the issue it helped create. That's flat out not what he said, it's not even close to what he said. You can't even fucking accidentally misconstrue that as what he said you are just making shit up and saying he said it and then linking me to posts where he just didn't say that. It appears I messed up the copy paste. https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/400-current-events/77252529/913269042 This was suppose to be the second link. --- https://imgur.com/BBcZDLJ <cite>Tmaster148 posted [p:913317575] in Report: Go... [t:77255080]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tyranthraxus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote> If you are still not convinced https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/400-current-events/77252529/913264977 https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/400-current-events/77252529/913264977 Proudclad doesn't believe capitalism had any influence on climate change but will go out of his way to praise it for solving the issue it helped create.</quote> That's flat out not what he said, it's not even close to what he said. You can't even fucking accidentally misconstrue that as what he said you are just making shit up and saying he said it and then linking me to posts where he just didn't say that.</quote> It appears I messed up the copy paste. https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/400-current-events/77252529/913269042 This was suppose to be the second link.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tyranthraxus 11/30/18 4:26:27 PM #179:	Tmaster148 posted... Tyranthraxus posted... Tmaster148 posted... If you are still not convinced https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/400-current-events/77252529/913264977 https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/400-current-events/77252529/913264977 Proudclad doesn't believe capitalism had any influence on climate change but will go out of his way to praise it for solving the issue it helped create. That's flat out not what he said, it's not even close to what he said. You can't even fucking accidentally misconstrue that as what he said you are just making shit up and saying he said it and then linking me to posts where he just didn't say that. It appears I messed up the copy paste. https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/400-current-events/77252529/913269042 This was suppose to be the second link. That sure sounds like he's saying capitalism did have an effect on climate change--just that capitalism isn't unique in its share of blame for our current climate conditions. --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:913317682] in Report: Go... [t:77255080]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tyranthraxus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote> If you are still not convinced https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/400-current-events/77252529/913264977 https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/400-current-events/77252529/913264977 Proudclad doesn't believe capitalism had any influence on climate change but will go out of his way to praise it for solving the issue it helped create.</quote> That's flat out not what he said, it's not even close to what he said. You can't even fucking accidentally misconstrue that as what he said you are just making shit up and saying he said it and then linking me to posts where he just didn't say that.</quote> It appears I messed up the copy paste. https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/400-current-events/77252529/913269042 This was suppose to be the second link.</quote> That sure sounds like he's saying capitalism did have an effect on climate change--just that capitalism isn't unique in its share of blame for our current climate conditions.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tmaster148 11/30/18 4:30:49 PM #180:	Tyranthraxus posted... Tmaster148 posted... Tyranthraxus posted... Tmaster148 posted... If you are still not convinced https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/400-current-events/77252529/913264977 https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/400-current-events/77252529/913264977 Proudclad doesn't believe capitalism had any influence on climate change but will go out of his way to praise it for solving the issue it helped create. That's flat out not what he said, it's not even close to what he said. You can't even fucking accidentally misconstrue that as what he said you are just making shit up and saying he said it and then linking me to posts where he just didn't say that. It appears I messed up the copy paste. https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/400-current-events/77252529/913269042 This was suppose to be the second link. That sure sounds like he's saying capitalism did have an effect on climate change--just that capitalism isn't unique in its share of blame for our current climate conditions. Given how quick he was to jump at defending capatalism and climate change in post 2 of the communism topic and that post. I have the feeling he intentionally goes out of his way to ignore the failures of capitalism. And while I won't say capitalism is the only one at fault. Capitalism sure had a big impact due to the nature of the system and there was quite the push back from oil companies to work on renewables because they would lose money from it. --- https://imgur.com/BBcZDLJ <cite>Tmaster148 posted [p:913317942] in Report: Go... [t:77255080]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tyranthraxus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tyranthraxus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote> If you are still not convinced https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/400-current-events/77252529/913264977 https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/400-current-events/77252529/913264977 Proudclad doesn't believe capitalism had any influence on climate change but will go out of his way to praise it for solving the issue it helped create.</quote> That's flat out not what he said, it's not even close to what he said. You can't even fucking accidentally misconstrue that as what he said you are just making shit up and saying he said it and then linking me to posts where he just didn't say that.</quote> It appears I messed up the copy paste. https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/400-current-events/77252529/913269042 This was suppose to be the second link.</quote> That sure sounds like he's saying capitalism did have an effect on climate change--just that capitalism isn't unique in its share of blame for our current climate conditions.</quote> Given how quick he was to jump at defending capatalism and climate change in post 2 of the communism topic and that post. I have the feeling he intentionally goes out of his way to ignore the failures of capitalism. And while I won't say capitalism is the only one at fault. Capitalism sure had a big impact due to the nature of the system and there was quite the push back from oil companies to work on renewables because they would lose money from it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HHH is the game 11/30/18 4:36:29 PM #181:	Did anybody actually read the article? https://dailycaller.com/2018/11/29/google-censorship-conservative-media/ Its being totally misconstrued.... I dont see how people could have a problem with this convo which btw they didnt do anything it was just employees discussing their opinions internally in a company of thousands --- Shelton undoubtedly wants Cena's championship belt. And Cena undoubtedly wants Shelton's black heritage.- looseiver <cite>HHH is the game posted [p:913318288] in Report: Go... [t:77255080]...</cite> <quote>Did anybody actually read the article? https://dailycaller.com/2018/11/29/google-censorship-conservative-media/ Its being totally misconstrued.... I dont see how people could have a problem with this convo which btw they didnt do anything it was just employees discussing their opinions internally in a company of thousands</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tyranthraxus 11/30/18 4:40:48 PM #182:	Tmaster148 posted... Given how quick he was to jump at defending capatalism and climate change in post 2 of the communism topic and that post. I have the feeling he intentionally goes out of his way to ignore the failures of capitalism. And while I won't say capitalism is the only one at fault. Capitalism sure had a big impact due to the nature of the system and there was quite the push back from oil companies to work on renewables because they would lose money from it. I am nowhere near as invested in capitalism as he is, and don't really care to have a historical economic analysis over what and why the contributions to carbon dioxide were as large as they are, but ultimately the point remains that countries who were not capitalist also contributed to climate change, in some cases, a great deal. China's horrible smog conditions, which admittedly have improved only recently, are the result of heavy handed communist industrial practices. He ignores the faults of capitalism but the current state of climate isn't the fault of capitalism. What he was trying to say there is that saying Capitalism caused climate change doesn't make sense, and he's right--not that it had no impact on it. It not only had an impact, but it's also having a positive impact due to industrial opportunities in green energy only because of the free market demands. You're confusing the cause (namely, burning shit) with the tools to make it happen (capitalism). --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:913318547] in Report: Go... [t:77255080]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote>Given how quick he was to jump at defending capatalism and climate change in post 2 of the communism topic and that post. I have the feeling he intentionally goes out of his way to ignore the failures of capitalism. And while I won't say capitalism is the only one at fault. Capitalism sure had a big impact due to the nature of the system and there was quite the push back from oil companies to work on renewables because they would lose money from it.</quote> I am nowhere near as invested in capitalism as he is, and don't really care to have a historical economic analysis over what and why the contributions to carbon dioxide were as large as they are, but ultimately the point remains that countries who were not capitalist also contributed to climate change, in some cases, a great deal. China's horrible smog conditions, which admittedly have improved only recently, are the result of heavy handed communist industrial practices. He ignores the faults of capitalism but the current state of climate isn't the fault of capitalism. What he was trying to say there is that saying Capitalism caused climate change doesn't make sense, and he's right--not that it had no impact on it. It not only had an impact, but it's also having a positive impact due to industrial opportunities in green energy only because of the free market demands. You're confusing the cause (namely, burning shit) with the tools to make it happen (capitalism).</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Axiom 11/30/18 4:41:04 PM #183:	HHH is the game posted... Did anybody actually read the article? https://dailycaller.com/2018/11/29/google-censorship-conservative-media/ Its being totally misconstrued.... I dont see how people could have a problem with this convo which btw they didnt do anything it was just employees discussing their opinions internally in a company of thousands News organizations like them are fake news factories so of course it was misconstrued and the dailycaller is right at the top of the shit pile. Everyone that wants legitimate news should have no problem with them being buried <cite>Axiom posted [p:913318561] in Report: Go... [t:77255080]...</cite> <quote><cite>HHH is the game posted...</cite> <quote>Did anybody actually read the article? https://dailycaller.com/2018/11/29/google-censorship-conservative-media/ Its being totally misconstrued.... I dont see how people could have a problem with this convo which btw they didnt do anything it was just employees discussing their opinions internally in a company of thousands</quote> News organizations like them are fake news factories so of course it was misconstrued and the dailycaller is right at the top of the shit pile. Everyone that wants legitimate news should have no problem with them being buried</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HiddenLurker 11/30/18 4:41:08 PM #184:	Antifar posted... HiddenLurker posted... So are they saying liberals are stupid as fuck that they to need to rely on facebook for news? That claim wouldn't really mesh with the metrics we have available: https://twitter.com/kevinroose/status/1064633264416219136 Yeah well facebook employees disagree if they feel it necessary to push liberal articles and news to their members and hide or dismiss conservative articles. --- [Insert tired meme here] <cite>HiddenLurker posted [p:913318568] in Report: Go... [t:77255080]...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote><cite>HiddenLurker posted...</cite> <quote>So are they saying liberals are stupid as fuck that they to need to rely on facebook for news?</quote> That claim wouldn't really mesh with the metrics we have available: https://twitter.com/kevinroose/status/1064633264416219136</quote> Yeah well facebook employees disagree if they feel it necessary to push liberal articles and news to their members and hide or dismiss conservative articles.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HHH is the game 11/30/18 4:43:19 PM #185:	Tyranthraxus posted... Bobemmo posted... So most people here think it's clearly not ok for google to show only certain news articles to manipulate people to vote a certain way. Yet I suspect most people would be fine with say, an acquaintance linking them only news articles with a certain slant with the intention of motivating them to vote a certain way. At what point does it become not ok? Is it because google is a company, and not just a person? Is it because google is too big of a company? not trying to just be inflammatory here this is actually a serious question If you think this isn't okay for Google, then we should probably block Sinclair from doing must runs and let the local station management decide what to air on their own. A. The actual article with quotes doesnt show google almost did this but a private email thread with a google employee making suggestions. An employee making a suggestion that the company rejects is not almost doing something. B. If you actually read it they were talking about fixing their algorithms so fake news is not put up top with valid sources. Somebody disagreed with him that those opinion blogs were fake news but the motivation was not bury the right but dont let sensational articles that are spouting nonsense be pushed to the top. How is that bad? --- Shelton undoubtedly wants Cena's championship belt. And Cena undoubtedly wants Shelton's black heritage.- looseiver <cite>HHH is the game posted [p:913318700] in Report: Go... [t:77255080]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tyranthraxus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Bobemmo posted...</cite> <quote>So most people here think it's clearly not ok for google to show only certain news articles to manipulate people to vote a certain way. Yet I suspect most people would be fine with say, an acquaintance linking them only news articles with a certain slant with the intention of motivating them to vote a certain way. At what point does it become not ok? Is it because google is a company, and not just a person? Is it because google is too big of a company? not trying to just be inflammatory here this is actually a serious question</quote> If you think this isn't okay for Google, then we should probably block Sinclair from doing must runs and let the local station management decide what to air on their own.</quote> A. The actual article with quotes doesnt show google almost did this but a private email thread with a google employee making suggestions. An employee making a suggestion that the company rejects is not almost doing something. B. If you actually read it they were talking about fixing their algorithms so fake news is not put up top with valid sources. Somebody disagreed with him that those opinion blogs were fake news but the motivation was not bury the right but dont let sensational articles that are spouting nonsense be pushed to the top. How is that bad?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Antifar 11/30/18 4:43:50 PM #186:	HiddenLurker posted... Yeah well facebook employees disagree if they feel it necessary to push liberal articles and news to their members and hide or dismiss conservative articles. On what basis are you making this claim? --- kin to all that throbs <cite>Antifar posted [p:913318727] in Report: Go... [t:77255080]...</cite> <quote><cite>HiddenLurker posted...</cite> <quote>Yeah well facebook employees disagree if they feel it necessary to push liberal articles and news to their members and hide or dismiss conservative articles. </quote> On what basis are you making this claim?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
andel 11/30/18 4:44:17 PM #187:	HiddenLurker posted... Antifar posted... HiddenLurker posted... So are they saying liberals are stupid as fuck that they to need to rely on facebook for news? That claim wouldn't really mesh with the metrics we have available: https://twitter.com/kevinroose/status/1064633264416219136 Yeah well facebook employees disagree if they feel it necessary to push liberal articles and news to their members and hide or dismiss conservative articles. this lazy, tired talking point has been endlessly disproven and somehow the same people keep trotting it out --- I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis <cite>andel posted [p:913318758] in Report: Go... [t:77255080]...</cite> <quote><cite>HiddenLurker posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote><cite>HiddenLurker posted...</cite> <quote>So are they saying liberals are stupid as fuck that they to need to rely on facebook for news?</quote> That claim wouldn't really mesh with the metrics we have available: https://twitter.com/kevinroose/status/1064633264416219136</quote> Yeah well facebook employees disagree if they feel it necessary to push liberal articles and news to their members and hide or dismiss conservative articles.</quote> this lazy, tired talking point has been endlessly disproven and somehow the same people keep trotting it out</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tyranthraxus 11/30/18 4:46:01 PM #188:	HHH is the game posted... Tyranthraxus posted... Bobemmo posted... So most people here think it's clearly not ok for google to show only certain news articles to manipulate people to vote a certain way. Yet I suspect most people would be fine with say, an acquaintance linking them only news articles with a certain slant with the intention of motivating them to vote a certain way. At what point does it become not ok? Is it because google is a company, and not just a person? Is it because google is too big of a company? not trying to just be inflammatory here this is actually a serious question If you think this isn't okay for Google, then we should probably block Sinclair from doing must runs and let the local station management decide what to air on their own. A. The actual article with quotes doesnt show google almost did this but a private email thread with a google employee making suggestions. An employee making a suggestion that the company rejects is not almost doing something. B. If you actually read it they were talking about fixing their algorithms so fake news is not put up top with valid sources. Somebody disagreed with him that those opinion blogs were fake news but the motivation was not bury the right but dont let sensational articles that are spouting nonsense be pushed to the top. How is that bad? A: We are discussing a hypothetical situation in which Google manipulates what news you're even allowed to see through their search engines B: How is it good that sinclair broadcasting forces must run op eds on anchors who don't actually hold those opinions themselves? --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:913318850] in Report: Go... [t:77255080]...</cite> <quote><cite>HHH is the game posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tyranthraxus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Bobemmo posted...</cite> <quote>So most people here think it's clearly not ok for google to show only certain news articles to manipulate people to vote a certain way. Yet I suspect most people would be fine with say, an acquaintance linking them only news articles with a certain slant with the intention of motivating them to vote a certain way. At what point does it become not ok? Is it because google is a company, and not just a person? Is it because google is too big of a company? not trying to just be inflammatory here this is actually a serious question</quote> If you think this isn't okay for Google, then we should probably block Sinclair from doing must runs and let the local station management decide what to air on their own.</quote> A. The actual article with quotes doesnt show google almost did this but a private email thread with a google employee making suggestions. An employee making a suggestion that the company rejects is not almost doing something. B. If you actually read it they were talking about fixing their algorithms so fake news is not put up top with valid sources. Somebody disagreed with him that those opinion blogs were fake news but the motivation was not bury the right but dont let sensational articles that are spouting nonsense be pushed to the top. How is that bad?</quote> A: We are discussing a hypothetical situation in which Google manipulates what news you're even allowed to see through their search engines B: How is it good that sinclair broadcasting forces must run op eds on anchors who don't actually hold those opinions themselves?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HHH is the game 11/30/18 4:46:30 PM #189:	I mean judging how they talked about not showing this blog and then the blog completely warps and sensationalized the facts so everybody here believes something that didnt happen (when I can actually access the site without being directed to an inescapable mobile ad that wont even let me go back to the original page) I have to say that Im with google on this one and this blog is proving their point --- Shelton undoubtedly wants Cena's championship belt. And Cena undoubtedly wants Shelton's black heritage.- looseiver <cite>HHH is the game posted [p:913318884] in Report: Go... [t:77255080]...</cite> <quote>I mean judging how they talked about not showing this blog and then the blog completely warps and sensationalized the facts so everybody here believes something that didnt happen (when I can actually access the site without being directed to an inescapable mobile ad that wont even let me go back to the original page) I have to say that Im with google on this one and this blog is proving their point</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HHH is the game 11/30/18 4:48:19 PM #190:	Tyranthraxus posted... HHH is the game posted... Tyranthraxus posted... Bobemmo posted... So most people here think it's clearly not ok for google to show only certain news articles to manipulate people to vote a certain way. Yet I suspect most people would be fine with say, an acquaintance linking them only news articles with a certain slant with the intention of motivating them to vote a certain way. At what point does it become not ok? Is it because google is a company, and not just a person? Is it because google is too big of a company? not trying to just be inflammatory here this is actually a serious question If you think this isn't okay for Google, then we should probably block Sinclair from doing must runs and let the local station management decide what to air on their own. A. The actual article with quotes doesnt show google almost did this but a private email thread with a google employee making suggestions. An employee making a suggestion that the company rejects is not almost doing something. B. If you actually read it they were talking about fixing their algorithms so fake news is not put up top with valid sources. Somebody disagreed with him that those opinion blogs were fake news but the motivation was not bury the right but dont let sensational articles that are spouting nonsense be pushed to the top. How is that bad? A: We are discussing a hypothetical situation in which Google manipulates what news you're even allowed to see through their search engines B: How is it good that sinclair broadcasting forces must run op eds on anchors who don't actually hold those opinions themselves? a. Fine but Im saying that the hypothetical situation was never happening. This article IS fake news and it even quotes directly so you can see how theyre warping it in the article itself. B. I dont get what youre saying here. Im saying eliminating fake news is good. Legitimate right blogs should stay but articles like this one should not be put up with legitimate news sources --- Shelton undoubtedly wants Cena's championship belt. And Cena undoubtedly wants Shelton's black heritage.- looseiver <cite>HHH is the game posted [p:913318991] in Report: Go... [t:77255080]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tyranthraxus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>HHH is the game posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tyranthraxus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Bobemmo posted...</cite> <quote>So most people here think it's clearly not ok for google to show only certain news articles to manipulate people to vote a certain way. Yet I suspect most people would be fine with say, an acquaintance linking them only news articles with a certain slant with the intention of motivating them to vote a certain way. At what point does it become not ok? Is it because google is a company, and not just a person? Is it because google is too big of a company? not trying to just be inflammatory here this is actually a serious question</quote> If you think this isn't okay for Google, then we should probably block Sinclair from doing must runs and let the local station management decide what to air on their own.</quote> A. The actual article with quotes doesnt show google almost did this but a private email thread with a google employee making suggestions. An employee making a suggestion that the company rejects is not almost doing something. B. If you actually read it they were talking about fixing their algorithms so fake news is not put up top with valid sources. Somebody disagreed with him that those opinion blogs were fake news but the motivation was not bury the right but dont let sensational articles that are spouting nonsense be pushed to the top. How is that bad?</quote> A: We are discussing a hypothetical situation in which Google manipulates what news you're even allowed to see through their search engines B: How is it good that sinclair broadcasting forces must run op eds on anchors who don't actually hold those opinions themselves?</quote> a. Fine but Im saying that the hypothetical situation was never happening. This article IS fake news and it even quotes directly so you can see how theyre warping it in the article itself. B. I dont get what youre saying here. Im saying eliminating fake news is good. Legitimate right blogs should stay but articles like this one should not be put up with legitimate news sources</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HHH is the game 11/30/18 4:50:59 PM #191:	The evil guy theyre quoting literally says That happens at MSNBC, too. I dont want a political judgement. The desire is to break the myth feedback loop, the false equivalency, instead of the current amplification of it, Byer added. And that was the guy MOST in favor of this and the rest argued against him. The discussion was about sorting through the BS letting people see legitimate sources and decide for themselves whats true. But trying to de emphasize sensational opinion pieces like the one here that leads people astray. --- Shelton undoubtedly wants Cena's championship belt. And Cena undoubtedly wants Shelton's black heritage.- looseiver <cite>HHH is the game posted [p:913319175] in Report: Go... [t:77255080]...</cite> <quote>The evil guy theyre quoting literally says That happens at MSNBC, too. I dont want a political judgement. The desire is to break the myth feedback loop, the false equivalency, instead of the current amplification of it, Byer added. And that was the guy MOST in favor of this and the rest argued against him. The discussion was about sorting through the BS letting people see legitimate sources and decide for themselves whats true. But trying to de emphasize sensational opinion pieces like the one here that leads people astray.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tyranthraxus 11/30/18 4:55:19 PM #192:	I mean I don't really care about the contents of the article. I am discussing from a fundamental standpoint whether or not it's okay content delivery platforms to curate content on their own. Obviously it's within Google's right to deliver the content they want to deliver, which includes putting info wars on the 9th page of search results at best--but I was mostly pointing out how the people who are typically "not okay" with Google this tend to not care about what Sinclair does in regards to the opinion-as-news industry. --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:913319433] in Report: Go... [t:77255080]...</cite> <quote>I mean I don't really care about the contents of the article. I am discussing from a fundamental standpoint whether or not it's okay content delivery platforms to curate content on their own. Obviously it's within Google's right to deliver the content they want to deliver, which includes putting info wars on the 9th page of search results at best--but I was mostly pointing out how the people who are typically "not okay" with Google this tend to not care about what Sinclair does in regards to the opinion-as-news industry.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
refmon 11/30/18 4:58:12 PM #193:	Was this whole liberal thing just another way for the high ups to gain even more power? --- If you read this signature, then that meant that I had control of what you read for 5 SECONDS!! <cite>refmon posted [p:913319603] in Report: Go... [t:77255080]...</cite> <quote>Was this whole liberal thing just another way for the high ups to gain even more power?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dat_Cracka_Jax 11/30/18 6:31:51 PM #194:	Damn_Underscore posted... Doom_Art posted... The people who are against corporate personhood are now content that a corporation is behaving like a person Fixed From a 2010 ABC-Washington Post poll regarding the Citizens United ruling Exactly. He seems okay with it now when it suits his interests --- http://img826.imageshack.us/img826/8131/flame201010170949481638.jpg http://img705.imageshack.us/img705/5517/cateyes.gif Rams: 7-9 <cite>Dat_Cracka_Jax posted [p:913324577] in Report: Go... [t:77255080]...</cite> <quote><cite>Damn_Underscore posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Doom_Art posted...</cite> <quote>The people who are against corporate personhood are now content that a corporation is behaving like a person</quote> Fixed From a 2010 ABC-Washington Post poll regarding the Citizens United ruling </quote> Exactly. He seems okay with it now when it suits his interests</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4

Current Events > Report: Google staffers discussed ways to prevent Trump from winning again (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Report: Google staffers discussed ways to prevent Trump from winning again