Current Events > CNN: please do not listen to the climate change deniers we put on TV

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4
Antifar 12/11/18 11:49:51 AM #1:	https://twitter.com/JordanUhl/status/1072513382203428864 --- kin to all that throbs <cite>Antifar posted [p:913942941] in CNN: pleas... [t:77292035]...</cite> <quote>https://twitter.com/JordanUhl/status/1072513382203428864</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tmaster148 12/11/18 11:56:50 AM #2:	Don't put them on tv. --- https://imgur.com/BBcZDLJ <cite>Tmaster148 posted [p:913943277] in CNN: pleas... [t:77292035]...</cite> <quote>Don't put them on tv.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Antifar 12/11/18 11:59:34 AM #3:	Tmaster148 posted... Don't put them on tv. hmmm --- kin to all that throbs <cite>Antifar posted [p:913943404] in CNN: pleas... [t:77292035]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote>Don't put them on tv.</quote> hmmm</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Gheb 12/11/18 12:06:52 PM #4:	When 9 out of 10 dentists agree that a toothpaste works. We all accept that as fact and we don't have people giving voice to the one dentists that disagrees. We should treat client change the same way. --- S** I have to stop doing that," Gheb said, as he lay back down and died again.* - Forgotten Love Chiefs are going to win the Super Bowl <cite>Gheb posted [p:913943748] in CNN: pleas... [t:77292035]...</cite> <quote>When 9 out of 10 dentists agree that a toothpaste works. We all accept that as fact and we don't have people giving voice to the one dentists that disagrees. We should treat client change the same way.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Steve Nick 12/11/18 12:07:58 PM #5:	Gheb posted... When 9 out of 10 dentists agree that a toothpaste works. We all accept that as fact and we don't have people giving voice to the one dentists that disagrees. We should treat client change the same way. I've seen plenty of instances where the 1 is right and the 9 are wrong. --- This is my signature. <cite>Steve Nick posted [p:913943805] in CNN: pleas... [t:77292035]...</cite> <quote><cite>Gheb posted...</cite> <quote>When 9 out of 10 dentists agree that a toothpaste works. We all accept that as fact and we don't have people giving voice to the one dentists that disagrees. We should treat client change the same way.</quote> I've seen plenty of instances where the 1 is right and the 9 are wrong.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
0AbsoluteZero0 12/11/18 12:09:14 PM #6:	Steve Nick posted... Gheb posted... When 9 out of 10 dentists agree that a toothpaste works. We all accept that as fact and we don't have people giving voice to the one dentists that disagrees. We should treat client change the same way. I've seen plenty of instances where the 1 is right and the 9 are wrong. Such as? --- -The Admirable <cite>0AbsoluteZero0 posted [p:913943867] in CNN: pleas... [t:77292035]...</cite> <quote><cite>Steve Nick posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Gheb posted...</cite> <quote>When 9 out of 10 dentists agree that a toothpaste works. We all accept that as fact and we don't have people giving voice to the one dentists that disagrees. We should treat client change the same way.</quote> I've seen plenty of instances where the 1 is right and the 9 are wrong.</quote> Such as?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pinky0926 12/11/18 12:09:24 PM #7:	John Oliver and Bill Nye (regardless of what you think of them) were right when they pointed out that having a pro climate change and an anti climate change guy on a talking head show to duke it out is a pretty misappropriation of the scenario. --- CE's Resident Scotsman. https://imgur.com/ILz2ZbV <cite>pinky0926 posted [p:913943878] in CNN: pleas... [t:77292035]...</cite> <quote>John Oliver and Bill Nye (regardless of what you think of them) were right when they pointed out that having a pro climate change and an anti climate change guy on a talking head show to duke it out is a pretty misappropriation of the scenario.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnholyMudcrab 12/11/18 12:09:46 PM #8:	0AbsoluteZero0 posted... Steve Nick posted... Gheb posted... When 9 out of 10 dentists agree that a toothpaste works. We all accept that as fact and we don't have people giving voice to the one dentists that disagrees. We should treat client change the same way. I've seen plenty of instances where the 1 is right and the 9 are wrong. Such as? You just know he's going to say Trump's election --- https://imgur.com/VeNBg https://imgur.com/gd5jC8q https://imgur.com/PKIy7 https://imgur.com/3p29JqP <cite>UnholyMudcrab posted [p:913943904] in CNN: pleas... [t:77292035]...</cite> <quote><cite>0AbsoluteZero0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Steve Nick posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>Gheb posted...</cite> <quote> When 9 out of 10 dentists agree that a toothpaste works. We all accept that as fact and we don't have people giving voice to the one dentists that disagrees. We should treat client change the same way. </quote> I've seen plenty of instances where the 1 is right and the 9 are wrong.</quote> Such as?</quote> You just know he's going to say Trump's election</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zikten 12/11/18 12:10:17 PM #9:	0AbsoluteZero0 posted... Steve Nick posted... Gheb posted... When 9 out of 10 dentists agree that a toothpaste works. We all accept that as fact and we don't have people giving voice to the one dentists that disagrees. We should treat client change the same way. I've seen plenty of instances where the 1 is right and the 9 are wrong. Such as? What's his name that said the earth orbits the sun instead of the other way around. Nobody believed him in his time and he was executed <cite>Zikten posted [p:913943937] in CNN: pleas... [t:77292035]...</cite> <quote><cite>0AbsoluteZero0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Steve Nick posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Gheb posted...</cite> <quote>When 9 out of 10 dentists agree that a toothpaste works. We all accept that as fact and we don't have people giving voice to the one dentists that disagrees. We should treat client change the same way.</quote> I've seen plenty of instances where the 1 is right and the 9 are wrong.</quote> Such as?</quote> What's his name that said the earth orbits the sun instead of the other way around. Nobody believed him in his time and he was executed</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TomNook20 12/11/18 12:10:18 PM #10:	Gheb posted... When 9 out of 10 dentists agree that a toothpaste works. We all accept that as fact and we don't have people giving voice to the one dentists that disagrees. We should treat client change the same way. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7c-Cf6O0ogI" data-time=" --- http://fc02.deviantart.net/fs70/f/2011/098/7/4/tom_nook_by_themerce-d3dhi0q.png http://www.gameswagonline.com/uploads/9/0/8/9/9089979/1372277527.jpg <cite>TomNook20 posted [p:913943938] in CNN: pleas... [t:77292035]...</cite> <quote><cite>Gheb posted...</cite> <quote>When 9 out of 10 dentists agree that a toothpaste works. We all accept that as fact and we don't have people giving voice to the one dentists that disagrees. We should treat client change the same way.</quote> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7c-Cf6O0ogI" data-time="</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Caution999 12/11/18 12:10:29 PM #11:	It's almost like they want to illicit an emotional reaction out of their viewers... --- The best posts, believe me. <cite>Caution999 posted [p:913943949] in CNN: pleas... [t:77292035]...</cite> <quote>It's almost like they want to illicit an emotional reaction out of their viewers...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Gheb 12/11/18 12:11:17 PM #12:	Steve Nick posted... Gheb posted... When 9 out of 10 dentists agree that a toothpaste works. We all accept that as fact and we don't have people giving voice to the one dentists that disagrees. We should treat client change the same way. I've seen plenty of instances where the 1 is right and the 9 are wrong. But I'm guessing you've seen many more instances of the 9 being right and the 1 being a loon. And how often is the 1 being right also has the 1 receiving substantial financial backing from the fossil fuel industry. Also, 9/10 is actually downplaying the actual consensus. Climate change has far more than 90% support in the scientific community. --- S** I have to stop doing that," Gheb said, as he lay back down and died again.* - Forgotten Love Chiefs are going to win the Super Bowl <cite>Gheb posted [p:913943984] in CNN: pleas... [t:77292035]...</cite> <quote><cite>Steve Nick posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Gheb posted...</cite> <quote>When 9 out of 10 dentists agree that a toothpaste works. We all accept that as fact and we don't have people giving voice to the one dentists that disagrees. We should treat client change the same way.</quote> I've seen plenty of instances where the 1 is right and the 9 are wrong.</quote> But I'm guessing you've seen many more instances of the 9 being right and the 1 being a loon. And how often is the 1 being right also has the 1 receiving substantial financial backing from the fossil fuel industry. Also, 9/10 is actually downplaying the actual consensus. Climate change has far more than 90% support in the scientific community.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnholyMudcrab 12/11/18 12:12:37 PM #13:	Zikten posted... 0AbsoluteZero0 posted... Steve Nick posted... Gheb posted... When 9 out of 10 dentists agree that a toothpaste works. We all accept that as fact and we don't have people giving voice to the one dentists that disagrees. We should treat client change the same way. I've seen plenty of instances where the 1 is right and the 9 are wrong. Such as? What's his name that said the earth orbits the sun instead of the other way around. Nobody believed him in his time and he was executed Copernicus was not executed. Why do you post so much stuff that's proven false with an easy Google search? --- https://imgur.com/VeNBg https://imgur.com/gd5jC8q https://imgur.com/PKIy7 https://imgur.com/3p29JqP <cite>UnholyMudcrab posted [p:913944052] in CNN: pleas... [t:77292035]...</cite> <quote><cite>Zikten posted...</cite> <quote><cite>0AbsoluteZero0 posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>Steve Nick posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>Gheb posted...</cite> <quote> When 9 out of 10 dentists agree that a toothpaste works. We all accept that as fact and we don't have people giving voice to the one dentists that disagrees. We should treat client change the same way. </quote> I've seen plenty of instances where the 1 is right and the 9 are wrong. </quote> Such as?</quote> What's his name that said the earth orbits the sun instead of the other way around. Nobody believed him in his time and he was executed</quote> Copernicus was not executed. Why do you post so much stuff that's proven false with an easy Google search?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Gheb 12/11/18 12:15:14 PM #14:	Zikten posted... 0AbsoluteZero0 posted... Steve Nick posted... Gheb posted... When 9 out of 10 dentists agree that a toothpaste works. We all accept that as fact and we don't have people giving voice to the one dentists that disagrees. We should treat client change the same way. I've seen plenty of instances where the 1 is right and the 9 are wrong. Such as? What's his name that said the earth orbits the sun instead of the other way around. Nobody believed him in his time and he was executed Was it the scientific community who had problems with Copernicus? Or was it a different group of people who disliked what the science said because of the impact it would have on them? --- S** I have to stop doing that," Gheb said, as he lay back down and died again.* - Forgotten Love Chiefs are going to win the Super Bowl <cite>Gheb posted [p:913944184] in CNN: pleas... [t:77292035]...</cite> <quote><cite>Zikten posted...</cite> <quote><cite>0AbsoluteZero0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Steve Nick posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Gheb posted...</cite> <quote>When 9 out of 10 dentists agree that a toothpaste works. We all accept that as fact and we don't have people giving voice to the one dentists that disagrees. We should treat client change the same way.</quote> I've seen plenty of instances where the 1 is right and the 9 are wrong.</quote> Such as?</quote> What's his name that said the earth orbits the sun instead of the other way around. Nobody believed him in his time and he was executed</quote> Was it the scientific community who had problems with Copernicus? Or was it a different group of people who disliked what the science said because of the impact it would have on them?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zikten 12/11/18 12:16:05 PM #15:	UnholyMudcrab posted... Zikten posted... 0AbsoluteZero0 posted... Steve Nick posted... Gheb posted... When 9 out of 10 dentists agree that a toothpaste works. We all accept that as fact and we don't have people giving voice to the one dentists that disagrees. We should treat client change the same way. I've seen plenty of instances where the 1 is right and the 9 are wrong. Such as? What's his name that said the earth orbits the sun instead of the other way around. Nobody believed him in his time and he was executed Copernicus was not executed. Why do you post so much stuff that's proven false with an easy Google search? Because I could swear he was. This is why I sometimes believe in that thing about alernate universes or time travel changes to history. The theory about Berenstien bears <cite>Zikten posted [p:913944228] in CNN: pleas... [t:77292035]...</cite> <quote><cite>UnholyMudcrab posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zikten posted...</cite> <quote><cite>0AbsoluteZero0 posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>Steve Nick posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>Gheb posted...</cite> <quote> When 9 out of 10 dentists agree that a toothpaste works. We all accept that as fact and we don't have people giving voice to the one dentists that disagrees. We should treat client change the same way. </quote> I've seen plenty of instances where the 1 is right and the 9 are wrong. </quote> Such as?</quote> What's his name that said the earth orbits the sun instead of the other way around. Nobody believed him in his time and he was executed</quote> Copernicus was not executed. Why do you post so much stuff that's proven false with an easy Google search?</quote> Because I could swear he was. This is why I sometimes believe in that thing about alernate universes or time travel changes to history. The theory about Berenstien bears</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Antifar 12/11/18 12:17:13 PM #16:	Zikten posted... Because I could swear he was. This is why I sometimes believe in that thing about alernate universes or time travel changes to history. The theory about Berenstien bears "Maybe I was wrong...or maybe alternate universes caused me to be inaccurate. Who can really say for sure?" --- kin to all that throbs <cite>Antifar posted [p:913944293] in CNN: pleas... [t:77292035]...</cite> <quote><cite>Zikten posted...</cite> <quote>Because I could swear he was. This is why I sometimes believe in that thing about alernate universes or time travel changes to history. The theory about Berenstien bears </quote> "Maybe I was wrong...or maybe alternate universes caused me to be inaccurate. Who can really say for sure?"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The23rdMagus 12/11/18 12:19:24 PM #17:	Gheb posted... Zikten posted... 0AbsoluteZero0 posted... Steve Nick posted... Gheb posted... When 9 out of 10 dentists agree that a toothpaste works. We all accept that as fact and we don't have people giving voice to the one dentists that disagrees. We should treat client change the same way. I've seen plenty of instances where the 1 is right and the 9 are wrong. Such as? What's his name that said the earth orbits the sun instead of the other way around. Nobody believed him in his time and he was executed Was it the scientific community who had problems with Copernicus? Or was it a different group of people who disliked what the science said because of the impact it would have on them? The Catholic Church didn't have a problem with Copernicus - they sponsored him! - and his findings were even taught courtesy of the Church. After his death, the Protestants started denouncing his findings as heresy, and the Church joined in. --- ~Drewnami: The Drew abides.~ Gonads are useful for their purpose, but they are no substitute for brains. -Paul Harvey <cite>The23rdMagus posted [p:913944435] in CNN: pleas... [t:77292035]...</cite> <quote><cite>Gheb posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zikten posted...</cite> <quote><cite>0AbsoluteZero0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Steve Nick posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Gheb posted...</cite> <quote>When 9 out of 10 dentists agree that a toothpaste works. We all accept that as fact and we don't have people giving voice to the one dentists that disagrees. We should treat client change the same way.</quote> I've seen plenty of instances where the 1 is right and the 9 are wrong.</quote> Such as?</quote> What's his name that said the earth orbits the sun instead of the other way around. Nobody believed him in his time and he was executed</quote> Was it the scientific community who had problems with Copernicus? Or was it a different group of people who disliked what the science said because of the impact it would have on them?</quote> The Catholic Church didn't have a problem with Copernicus - they sponsored him! - and his findings were even taught courtesy of the Church. After his death, the Protestants started denouncing his findings as heresy, and the Church joined in.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Schwarz 12/11/18 12:21:56 PM #18:	Antifar posted... "Maybe I was wrong...or maybe alternate universes caused me to be inaccurate. Who can really say for sure?" fucking lol --- I'm a loner, Dottie. A rebel. <cite>Schwarz posted [p:913944562] in CNN: pleas... [t:77292035]...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote> "Maybe I was wrong...or maybe alternate universes caused me to be inaccurate. Who can really say for sure?"</quote> fucking lol</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kolibri X 12/11/18 12:23:52 PM #19:	They report, they decide. --- Platinum GameFAQs Member <cite>Kolibri X posted [p:913944666] in CNN: pleas... [t:77292035]...</cite> <quote>They report, they decide.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheRealDill2000 12/11/18 12:27:46 PM #20:	Why do people continue to buy into "global warming"? It's quite cold now where I am. How does that fit the global warming narrative? --- CE's source of sage-ly advice Not changing this signature until the Buffalo Bills win the 2019 Super Bowl <cite>TheRealDill2000 posted [p:913944893] in CNN: pleas... [t:77292035]...</cite> <quote>Why do people continue to buy into "global warming"? It's quite cold now where I am. How does that fit the global warming narrative?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Anteaterking 12/11/18 12:30:59 PM #21:	Zikten's willingness to believe anything he reads or hears combined with a tendency to forget where he read or heard it leads to a hodgepodge of assertions grounded in nothing. --- http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b136/Anteaterking/scan00021.jpg http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b136/Anteaterking/scan00021.jpg <cite>Anteaterking posted [p:913945075] in CNN: pleas... [t:77292035]...</cite> <quote>Zikten's willingness to believe anything he reads or hears combined with a tendency to forget where he read or heard it leads to a hodgepodge of assertions grounded in nothing.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ryuko_Chan 12/11/18 12:33:37 PM #22:	Schwarz posted... Antifar posted... "Maybe I was wrong...or maybe alternate universes caused me to be inaccurate. Who can really say for sure?" fucking lol lol --- https://i.imgtc.com/LCLKlZX.gif Life Fiber Kamui SENKETSU! <cite>Ryuko_Chan posted [p:913945203] in CNN: pleas... [t:77292035]...</cite> <quote><cite>Schwarz posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote> "Maybe I was wrong...or maybe alternate universes caused me to be inaccurate. Who can really say for sure?"</quote> fucking lol</quote> lol</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ryuko_Chan 12/11/18 12:34:22 PM #23:	Anteaterking posted... Zikten's willingness to believe anything he reads or hears combined with a tendency to forget where he read or heard it leads to a hodgepodge of assertions grounded in nothing. stfu stop with the personal attacks --- https://i.imgtc.com/LCLKlZX.gif Life Fiber Kamui SENKETSU! <cite>Ryuko_Chan posted [p:913945245] in CNN: pleas... [t:77292035]...</cite> <quote><cite>Anteaterking posted...</cite> <quote>Zikten's willingness to believe anything he reads or hears combined with a tendency to forget where he read or heard it leads to a hodgepodge of assertions grounded in nothing.</quote> stfu stop with the personal attacks</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
monkmith 12/11/18 12:34:53 PM #24:	is it odd that people shit on a news station trying to show both sides of a topic? especially when those people claim they show unfair bias? --- People die when they are killed. Quando il gioco e finito, il re e il pedone vanno nella stessa scatola <cite>monkmith posted [p:913945273] in CNN: pleas... [t:77292035]...</cite> <quote>is it odd that people shit on a news station trying to show both sides of a topic? especially when those people claim they show unfair bias?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tmaster148 12/11/18 12:35:44 PM #25:	monkmith posted... is it odd that people shit on a news station trying to show both sides of a topic? especially when those people claim they show unfair bias? Being unbias does not mean showing crackpot theories as legitimate. --- https://imgur.com/BBcZDLJ <cite>Tmaster148 posted [p:913945334] in CNN: pleas... [t:77292035]...</cite> <quote><cite>monkmith posted...</cite> <quote>is it odd that people shit on a news station trying to show both sides of a topic? especially when those people claim they show unfair bias?</quote> Being unbias does not mean showing crackpot theories as legitimate.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hockeybub89 12/11/18 12:35:58 PM #26:	We need to have people that argue in favor of breathing in asbestos. Really balance the arguments. --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png http://www.last.fm/user/hockeybub89/ <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:913945347] in CNN: pleas... [t:77292035]...</cite> <quote>We need to have people that argue in favor of breathing in asbestos. Really balance the arguments.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Sexypwnstar 12/11/18 12:36:52 PM #27:	Ryuko_Chan posted... Schwarz posted... Antifar posted... "Maybe I was wrong...or maybe alternate universes caused me to be inaccurate. Who can really say for sure?" fucking lol lol jesus man I'm trying to study in the library and this is not cool lmfao --- https://imgur.com/Su4g5 https://imgur.com/21DiJ <cite>Sexypwnstar posted [p:913945408] in CNN: pleas... [t:77292035]...</cite> <quote><cite>Ryuko_Chan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Schwarz posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote> "Maybe I was wrong...or maybe alternate universes caused me to be inaccurate. Who can really say for sure?"</quote> fucking lol</quote> lol</quote> jesus man I'm trying to study in the library and this is not cool lmfao</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hockeybub89 12/11/18 12:36:53 PM #28:	monkmith posted... is it odd that people shit on a news station trying to show both sides of a topic? especially when those people claim they show unfair bias? This implies there are always exactly 2 equal and opposite arguments on everything. --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png http://www.last.fm/user/hockeybub89/ <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:913945410] in CNN: pleas... [t:77292035]...</cite> <quote><cite>monkmith posted...</cite> <quote>is it odd that people shit on a news station trying to show both sides of a topic? especially when those people claim they show unfair bias?</quote> This implies there are always exactly 2 equal and opposite arguments on everything.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
monkmith 12/11/18 12:37:16 PM #29:	Tmaster148 posted... monkmith posted... is it odd that people shit on a news station trying to show both sides of a topic? especially when those people claim they show unfair bias? Being unbias does not mean showing crackpot theories as legitimate. there is no counter argument to climate change that isn't crackpot... --- People die when they are killed. Quando il gioco e finito, il re e il pedone vanno nella stessa scatola <cite>monkmith posted [p:913945440] in CNN: pleas... [t:77292035]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>monkmith posted...</cite> <quote>is it odd that people shit on a news station trying to show both sides of a topic? especially when those people claim they show unfair bias?</quote> Being unbias does not mean showing crackpot theories as legitimate.</quote> there is no counter argument to climate change that isn't crackpot...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
averagejoel 12/11/18 12:39:30 PM #30:	monkmith posted... is it odd that people shit on a news station trying to show both sides of a topic? especially when those people claim they show unfair bias? they are showing unfair bias in favour of climate change deniers --- peanut butter and dick <cite>averagejoel posted [p:913945554] in CNN: pleas... [t:77292035]...</cite> <quote><cite>monkmith posted...</cite> <quote>is it odd that people shit on a news station trying to show both sides of a topic? especially when those people claim they show unfair bias?</quote> they are showing unfair bias in favour of climate change deniers</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tmaster148 12/11/18 12:41:08 PM #31:	monkmith posted... Tmaster148 posted... monkmith posted... is it odd that people shit on a news station trying to show both sides of a topic? especially when those people claim they show unfair bias? Being unbias does not mean showing crackpot theories as legitimate. there is no counter argument to climate change that isn't crackpot... I mean. Showing climate change deniers to be present yourself as unbias is not a good way to do so. I'm just saying in regards to your comment about presenting both sides. Sometimes one side just doesn't deserve air time and not showing it doesn't make you bias. --- https://imgur.com/BBcZDLJ <cite>Tmaster148 posted [p:913945642] in CNN: pleas... [t:77292035]...</cite> <quote><cite>monkmith posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>monkmith posted...</cite> <quote>is it odd that people shit on a news station trying to show both sides of a topic? especially when those people claim they show unfair bias?</quote> Being unbias does not mean showing crackpot theories as legitimate.</quote> there is no counter argument to climate change that isn't crackpot...</quote> I mean. Showing climate change deniers to be present yourself as unbias is not a good way to do so. I'm just saying in regards to your comment about presenting both sides. Sometimes one side just doesn't deserve air time and not showing it doesn't make you bias.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Gheb 12/11/18 12:43:12 PM #32:	monkmith posted... is it odd that people shit on a news station trying to show both sides of a topic? especially when those people claim they show unfair bias? You can find scientists who will attest to cigarettes not being that bad for you. Do they deserve airtime if they are reporting on the dangers of cigarettes? --- S** I have to stop doing that," Gheb said, as he lay back down and died again.* - Forgotten Love Chiefs are going to win the Super Bowl <cite>Gheb posted [p:913945756] in CNN: pleas... [t:77292035]...</cite> <quote><cite>monkmith posted...</cite> <quote>is it odd that people shit on a news station trying to show both sides of a topic? especially when those people claim they show unfair bias?</quote> You can find scientists who will attest to cigarettes not being that bad for you. Do they deserve airtime if they are reporting on the dangers of cigarettes?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
monkmith 12/11/18 12:43:15 PM #33:	Tmaster148 posted... monkmith posted... Tmaster148 posted... monkmith posted... is it odd that people shit on a news station trying to show both sides of a topic? especially when those people claim they show unfair bias? Being unbias does not mean showing crackpot theories as legitimate. there is no counter argument to climate change that isn't crackpot... I mean. Showing climate change deniers to be present yourself as unbias is not a good way to do so. I'm just saying in regards to your comment about presenting both sides. Sometimes one side just doesn't deserve air time and not showing it doesn't make you bias. news groups need at least the illusion of discussion, otherwise they become fox news. --- People die when they are killed. Quando il gioco e finito, il re e il pedone vanno nella stessa scatola <cite>monkmith posted [p:913945759] in CNN: pleas... [t:77292035]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>monkmith posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>monkmith posted...</cite> <quote>is it odd that people shit on a news station trying to show both sides of a topic? especially when those people claim they show unfair bias?</quote> Being unbias does not mean showing crackpot theories as legitimate.</quote> there is no counter argument to climate change that isn't crackpot...</quote> I mean. Showing climate change deniers to be present yourself as unbias is not a good way to do so. I'm just saying in regards to your comment about presenting both sides. Sometimes one side just doesn't deserve air time and not showing it doesn't make you bias.</quote> news groups need at least the illusion of discussion, otherwise they become fox news.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
monkmith 12/11/18 12:44:02 PM #34:	Gheb posted... monkmith posted... is it odd that people shit on a news station trying to show both sides of a topic? especially when those people claim they show unfair bias? You can find scientists who will attest to cigarettes not being that bad for you. Do they deserve airtime if they are reporting on the dangers of cigarettes? ...you realize they got plenty of that when it was an actual discussion right? --- People die when they are killed. Quando il gioco e finito, il re e il pedone vanno nella stessa scatola <cite>monkmith posted [p:913945804] in CNN: pleas... [t:77292035]...</cite> <quote><cite>Gheb posted...</cite> <quote><cite>monkmith posted...</cite> <quote>is it odd that people shit on a news station trying to show both sides of a topic? especially when those people claim they show unfair bias?</quote> You can find scientists who will attest to cigarettes not being that bad for you. Do they deserve airtime if they are reporting on the dangers of cigarettes?</quote> ...you realize they got plenty of that when it was an actual discussion right?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
averagejoel 12/11/18 12:45:57 PM #35:	monkmith posted... Gheb posted... monkmith posted... is it odd that people shit on a news station trying to show both sides of a topic? especially when those people claim they show unfair bias? You can find scientists who will attest to cigarettes not being that bad for you. Do they deserve airtime if they are reporting on the dangers of cigarettes? ...you realize they got plenty of that when it was an actual discussion right? and climate change deniers have already gotten more than enough airtime --- peanut butter and dick <cite>averagejoel posted [p:913945889] in CNN: pleas... [t:77292035]...</cite> <quote><cite>monkmith posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Gheb posted...</cite> <quote><cite>monkmith posted...</cite> <quote>is it odd that people shit on a news station trying to show both sides of a topic? especially when those people claim they show unfair bias?</quote> You can find scientists who will attest to cigarettes not being that bad for you. Do they deserve airtime if they are reporting on the dangers of cigarettes?</quote> ...you realize they got plenty of that when it was an actual discussion right?</quote> and climate change deniers have already gotten more than enough airtime</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tmaster148 12/11/18 12:47:13 PM #36:	monkmith posted... Tmaster148 posted... monkmith posted... Tmaster148 posted... monkmith posted... is it odd that people shit on a news station trying to show both sides of a topic? especially when those people claim they show unfair bias? Being unbias does not mean showing crackpot theories as legitimate. there is no counter argument to climate change that isn't crackpot... I mean. Showing climate change deniers to be present yourself as unbias is not a good way to do so. I'm just saying in regards to your comment about presenting both sides. Sometimes one side just doesn't deserve air time and not showing it doesn't make you bias. news groups need at least the illusion of discussion, otherwise they become fox news. Some things don't deserve a discussion. There's no good reason to give air time to climate change deniers and focusing the debate on whether or not it exists is a problem. Good journalism would focus on the fact that climate change is a problem and the steps that can be done about it. Since basically the entire scientific community agrees it is happening. Also a discussion on whether or not humans are a main cause would also be a waste because it really doesn't matter. --- https://imgur.com/BBcZDLJ <cite>Tmaster148 posted [p:913945960] in CNN: pleas... [t:77292035]...</cite> <quote><cite>monkmith posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>monkmith posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>monkmith posted...</cite> <quote>is it odd that people shit on a news station trying to show both sides of a topic? especially when those people claim they show unfair bias?</quote> Being unbias does not mean showing crackpot theories as legitimate.</quote> there is no counter argument to climate change that isn't crackpot...</quote> I mean. Showing climate change deniers to be present yourself as unbias is not a good way to do so. I'm just saying in regards to your comment about presenting both sides. Sometimes one side just doesn't deserve air time and not showing it doesn't make you bias.</quote> news groups need at least the illusion of discussion, otherwise they become fox news.</quote> Some things don't deserve a discussion. There's no good reason to give air time to climate change deniers and focusing the debate on whether or not it exists is a problem. Good journalism would focus on the fact that climate change is a problem and the steps that can be done about it. Since basically the entire scientific community agrees it is happening. Also a discussion on whether or not humans are a main cause would also be a waste because it really doesn't matter.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
monkmith 12/11/18 12:47:28 PM #37:	averagejoel posted... monkmith posted... Gheb posted... monkmith posted... is it odd that people shit on a news station trying to show both sides of a topic? especially when those people claim they show unfair bias? You can find scientists who will attest to cigarettes not being that bad for you. Do they deserve airtime if they are reporting on the dangers of cigarettes? ...you realize they got plenty of that when it was an actual discussion right? and climate change deniers have already gotten more than enough airtime its still an active discussion (why, i have no idea). you shut out the other side and all you'll do is embolden them. --- People die when they are killed. Quando il gioco e finito, il re e il pedone vanno nella stessa scatola <cite>monkmith posted [p:913945974] in CNN: pleas... [t:77292035]...</cite> <quote><cite>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote><cite>monkmith posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Gheb posted...</cite> <quote><cite>monkmith posted...</cite> <quote>is it odd that people shit on a news station trying to show both sides of a topic? especially when those people claim they show unfair bias?</quote> You can find scientists who will attest to cigarettes not being that bad for you. Do they deserve airtime if they are reporting on the dangers of cigarettes?</quote> ...you realize they got plenty of that when it was an actual discussion right?</quote> and climate change deniers have already gotten more than enough airtime</quote> its still an active discussion (why, i have no idea). you shut out the other side and all you'll do is embolden them.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hockeybub89 12/11/18 12:47:56 PM #38:	monkmith posted... Tmaster148 posted... monkmith posted... Tmaster148 posted... monkmith posted... is it odd that people shit on a news station trying to show both sides of a topic? especially when those people claim they show unfair bias? Being unbias does not mean showing crackpot theories as legitimate. there is no counter argument to climate change that isn't crackpot... I mean. Showing climate change deniers to be present yourself as unbias is not a good way to do so. I'm just saying in regards to your comment about presenting both sides. Sometimes one side just doesn't deserve air time and not showing it doesn't make you bias. news groups need at least the illusion of discussion, otherwise they become fox news. Then do that where a discussion is warranted. We don't need to give airtime to people arguing in favor of sticking forks in power outlets. --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png http://www.last.fm/user/hockeybub89/ <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:913945998] in CNN: pleas... [t:77292035]...</cite> <quote><cite>monkmith posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>monkmith posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>monkmith posted...</cite> <quote>is it odd that people shit on a news station trying to show both sides of a topic? especially when those people claim they show unfair bias?</quote> Being unbias does not mean showing crackpot theories as legitimate.</quote> there is no counter argument to climate change that isn't crackpot...</quote> I mean. Showing climate change deniers to be present yourself as unbias is not a good way to do so. I'm just saying in regards to your comment about presenting both sides. Sometimes one side just doesn't deserve air time and not showing it doesn't make you bias.</quote> news groups need at least the illusion of discussion, otherwise they become fox news.</quote> Then do that where a discussion is warranted. We don't need to give airtime to people arguing in favor of sticking forks in power outlets.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Antifar 12/11/18 12:48:41 PM #39:	monkmith posted... you shut out the other side and all you'll do is embolden them. Not actually true. --- kin to all that throbs <cite>Antifar posted [p:913946043] in CNN: pleas... [t:77292035]...</cite> <quote><cite>monkmith posted...</cite> <quote> you shut out the other side and all you'll do is embolden them. </quote> Not actually true.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
monkmith 12/11/18 12:51:08 PM #40:	Tmaster148 posted... monkmith posted... Tmaster148 posted... monkmith posted... Tmaster148 posted... monkmith posted... is it odd that people shit on a news station trying to show both sides of a topic? especially when those people claim they show unfair bias? Being unbias does not mean showing crackpot theories as legitimate. there is no counter argument to climate change that isn't crackpot... I mean. Showing climate change deniers to be present yourself as unbias is not a good way to do so. I'm just saying in regards to your comment about presenting both sides. Sometimes one side just doesn't deserve air time and not showing it doesn't make you bias. news groups need at least the illusion of discussion, otherwise they become fox news. Some things don't deserve a discussion. There's no good reason to give air time to climate change deniers and focusing the debate on whether or not it exists is a problem. Good journalism would focus on the fact that climate change is a problem and the steps that can be done about it. Since basically the entire scientific community agrees it is happening. Also a discussion on whether or not humans are a main cause would also be a waste because it really doesn't matter. simple fact is humans dont change their mind easily, especially on topics they've dug their heels in over. you're not going to change minds by blasting dissenters with the same message over and over, you might change minds by debating the points of both sides of an argument. --- People die when they are killed. Quando il gioco e finito, il re e il pedone vanno nella stessa scatola <cite>monkmith posted [p:913946190] in CNN: pleas... [t:77292035]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>monkmith posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>monkmith posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>monkmith posted...</cite> <quote>is it odd that people shit on a news station trying to show both sides of a topic? especially when those people claim they show unfair bias?</quote> Being unbias does not mean showing crackpot theories as legitimate.</quote> there is no counter argument to climate change that isn't crackpot...</quote> I mean. Showing climate change deniers to be present yourself as unbias is not a good way to do so. I'm just saying in regards to your comment about presenting both sides. Sometimes one side just doesn't deserve air time and not showing it doesn't make you bias.</quote> news groups need at least the illusion of discussion, otherwise they become fox news.</quote> Some things don't deserve a discussion. There's no good reason to give air time to climate change deniers and focusing the debate on whether or not it exists is a problem. Good journalism would focus on the fact that climate change is a problem and the steps that can be done about it. Since basically the entire scientific community agrees it is happening. Also a discussion on whether or not humans are a main cause would also be a waste because it really doesn't matter.</quote> simple fact is humans dont change their mind easily, especially on topics they've dug their heels in over. you're not going to change minds by blasting dissenters with the same message over and over, you might change minds by debating the points of both sides of an argument.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Gheb 12/11/18 12:52:16 PM #41:	You know what. I would have no problem with CNN giving deniers a voice so long as it was done proportionally with the scientific community. So if they have a climate change denier on, it just needs to be balanced with 99 scientists who believe it's a problem. --- S** I have to stop doing that," Gheb said, as he lay back down and died again.* - Forgotten Love Chiefs are going to win the Super Bowl <cite>Gheb posted [p:913946236] in CNN: pleas... [t:77292035]...</cite> <quote>You know what. I would have no problem with CNN giving deniers a voice so long as it was done proportionally with the scientific community. So if they have a climate change denier on, it just needs to be balanced with 99 scientists who believe it's a problem.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tmaster148 12/11/18 12:53:18 PM #42:	monkmith posted... simple fact is humans dont change their mind easily, especially on topics they've dug their heels in over. you're not going to change minds by blasting dissenters with the same message over and over, you might change minds by debating the points of both sides of an argument. Or don't empower the stupid side by making their view seem legitimate by treating them the same. A lot of people believe stupid things but they are irrelevant when no one gives their view any legitimacy. --- https://imgur.com/BBcZDLJ <cite>Tmaster148 posted [p:913946293] in CNN: pleas... [t:77292035]...</cite> <quote><cite>monkmith posted...</cite> <quote>simple fact is humans dont change their mind easily, especially on topics they've dug their heels in over. you're not going to change minds by blasting dissenters with the same message over and over, you might change minds by debating the points of both sides of an argument.</quote> Or don't empower the stupid side by making their view seem legitimate by treating them the same. A lot of people believe stupid things but they are irrelevant when no one gives their view any legitimacy.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hockeybub89 12/11/18 12:53:55 PM #43:	monkmith posted... Tmaster148 posted... monkmith posted... Tmaster148 posted... monkmith posted... Tmaster148 posted... monkmith posted... is it odd that people shit on a news station trying to show both sides of a topic? especially when those people claim they show unfair bias? Being unbias does not mean showing crackpot theories as legitimate. there is no counter argument to climate change that isn't crackpot... I mean. Showing climate change deniers to be present yourself as unbias is not a good way to do so. I'm just saying in regards to your comment about presenting both sides. Sometimes one side just doesn't deserve air time and not showing it doesn't make you bias. news groups need at least the illusion of discussion, otherwise they become fox news. Some things don't deserve a discussion. There's no good reason to give air time to climate change deniers and focusing the debate on whether or not it exists is a problem. Good journalism would focus on the fact that climate change is a problem and the steps that can be done about it. Since basically the entire scientific community agrees it is happening. Also a discussion on whether or not humans are a main cause would also be a waste because it really doesn't matter. simple fact is humans dont change their mind easily, especially on topics they've dug their heels in over. you're not going to change minds by blasting dissenters with the same message over and over, you might change minds by debating the points of both sides of an argument. >Humans don't change their minds >A debate will change minds wut --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png http://www.last.fm/user/hockeybub89/ <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:913946324] in CNN: pleas... [t:77292035]...</cite> <quote><cite>monkmith posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>monkmith posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>monkmith posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>monkmith posted...</cite> <quote>is it odd that people shit on a news station trying to show both sides of a topic? especially when those people claim they show unfair bias?</quote> Being unbias does not mean showing crackpot theories as legitimate.</quote> there is no counter argument to climate change that isn't crackpot...</quote> I mean. Showing climate change deniers to be present yourself as unbias is not a good way to do so. I'm just saying in regards to your comment about presenting both sides. Sometimes one side just doesn't deserve air time and not showing it doesn't make you bias.</quote> news groups need at least the illusion of discussion, otherwise they become fox news.</quote> Some things don't deserve a discussion. There's no good reason to give air time to climate change deniers and focusing the debate on whether or not it exists is a problem. Good journalism would focus on the fact that climate change is a problem and the steps that can be done about it. Since basically the entire scientific community agrees it is happening. Also a discussion on whether or not humans are a main cause would also be a waste because it really doesn't matter.</quote> simple fact is humans dont change their mind easily, especially on topics they've dug their heels in over. you're not going to change minds by blasting dissenters with the same message over and over, you might change minds by debating the points of both sides of an argument.</quote> >Humans don't change their minds >A debate will change minds wut</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
monkmith 12/11/18 12:54:16 PM #44:	Antifar posted... monkmith posted... you shut out the other side and all you'll do is embolden them. Not actually true. bullshit, look at the history of "oppressed people" and tell me that marginalizing a group doesn't make them more rabid. hell the reason the republican party is the way it is today is because bush Sr. tried to marginalize the more radical elements. --- People die when they are killed. Quando il gioco e finito, il re e il pedone vanno nella stessa scatola <cite>monkmith posted [p:913946352] in CNN: pleas... [t:77292035]...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote><cite>monkmith posted...</cite> <quote> you shut out the other side and all you'll do is embolden them. </quote> Not actually true.</quote> bullshit, look at the history of "oppressed people" and tell me that marginalizing a group doesn't make them more rabid. hell the reason the republican party is the way it is today is because bush Sr. tried to marginalize the more radical elements.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Gheb 12/11/18 12:55:25 PM #45:	monkmith posted... simple fact is humans dont change their mind easily, especially on topics they've dug their heels in over. you're not going to change minds by blasting dissenters with the same message over and over, you might change minds by debating the points of both sides of an argument. Seeing a 1 on 1 client change debate doesn't persuade dissenters. It just lets them believe that their belief is an equally supported position. When it really isn't. What it does do is give people who are undecided on the issue the impression that either belief is reasonable. That's bad. --- S** I have to stop doing that," Gheb said, as he lay back down and died again.* - Forgotten Love Chiefs are going to win the Super Bowl <cite>Gheb posted [p:913946428] in CNN: pleas... [t:77292035]...</cite> <quote><cite>monkmith posted...</cite> <quote>simple fact is humans dont change their mind easily, especially on topics they've dug their heels in over. you're not going to change minds by blasting dissenters with the same message over and over, you might change minds by debating the points of both sides of an argument.</quote> Seeing a 1 on 1 client change debate doesn't persuade dissenters. It just lets them believe that their belief is an equally supported position. When it really isn't. What it does do is give people who are undecided on the issue the impression that either belief is reasonable. That's bad.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
monkmith 12/11/18 12:55:27 PM #46:	hockeybub89 posted... >Humans don't change their minds >A debate will change minds wut monkmith posted... simple fact is humans dont change their mind easily reading is hard huh? --- People die when they are killed. Quando il gioco e finito, il re e il pedone vanno nella stessa scatola <cite>monkmith posted [p:913946431] in CNN: pleas... [t:77292035]...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote>>Humans don't change their minds >A debate will change minds wut</quote> <cite>monkmith posted...</cite> <quote>simple fact is humans dont change their mind easily</quote> reading is hard huh?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
monkmith 12/11/18 12:57:46 PM #47:	Gheb posted... You know what. I would have no problem with CNN giving deniers a voice so long as it was done proportionally with the scientific community. So if they have a climate change denier on, it just needs to be balanced with 99 scientists who believe it's a problem. that gets back to my point about drowning out the opposition. discussions are supposed to make you think, not piss you off because you feel like your opinion is being criticized. --- People die when they are killed. Quando il gioco e finito, il re e il pedone vanno nella stessa scatola <cite>monkmith posted [p:913946550] in CNN: pleas... [t:77292035]...</cite> <quote><cite>Gheb posted...</cite> <quote>You know what. I would have no problem with CNN giving deniers a voice so long as it was done proportionally with the scientific community. So if they have a climate change denier on, it just needs to be balanced with 99 scientists who believe it's a problem.</quote> that gets back to my point about drowning out the opposition. discussions are supposed to make you think, not piss you off because you feel like your opinion is being criticized.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
monkmith 12/11/18 1:00:37 PM #48:	Gheb posted... monkmith posted... simple fact is humans dont change their mind easily, especially on topics they've dug their heels in over. you're not going to change minds by blasting dissenters with the same message over and over, you might change minds by debating the points of both sides of an argument. Seeing a 1 on 1 client change debate doesn't persuade dissenters. It just lets them believe that their belief is an equally supported position. When it really isn't. What it does do is give people who are undecided on the issue the impression that either belief is reasonable. That's bad. i'm generally of the opinion that undecided voters are a myth. what you really have are people that just dont give a fuck, and nothing you say will actually change their opinion. also, they're not watching the news... --- People die when they are killed. Quando il gioco e finito, il re e il pedone vanno nella stessa scatola <cite>monkmith posted [p:913946735] in CNN: pleas... [t:77292035]...</cite> <quote><cite>Gheb posted...</cite> <quote><cite>monkmith posted...</cite> <quote>simple fact is humans dont change their mind easily, especially on topics they've dug their heels in over. you're not going to change minds by blasting dissenters with the same message over and over, you might change minds by debating the points of both sides of an argument.</quote> Seeing a 1 on 1 client change debate doesn't persuade dissenters. It just lets them believe that their belief is an equally supported position. When it really isn't. What it does do is give people who are undecided on the issue the impression that either belief is reasonable. That's bad.</quote> i'm generally of the opinion that undecided voters are a myth. what you really have are people that just dont give a fuck, and nothing you say will actually change their opinion. also, they're not watching the news...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hockeybub89 12/11/18 1:01:24 PM #49:	monkmith posted... Gheb posted... You know what. I would have no problem with CNN giving deniers a voice so long as it was done proportionally with the scientific community. So if they have a climate change denier on, it just needs to be balanced with 99 scientists who believe it's a problem. that gets back to my point about drowning out the opposition. discussions are supposed to make you think, not piss you off because you feel like your opinion is being criticized. How will not criticizing someone's opinion persuade them to change that opinion? --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png http://www.last.fm/user/hockeybub89/ <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:913946783] in CNN: pleas... [t:77292035]...</cite> <quote><cite>monkmith posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Gheb posted...</cite> <quote>You know what. I would have no problem with CNN giving deniers a voice so long as it was done proportionally with the scientific community. So if they have a climate change denier on, it just needs to be balanced with 99 scientists who believe it's a problem.</quote> that gets back to my point about drowning out the opposition. discussions are supposed to make you think, not piss you off because you feel like your opinion is being criticized.</quote> How will not criticizing someone's opinion persuade them to change that opinion?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
monkmith 12/11/18 1:03:55 PM #50:	hockeybub89 posted... monkmith posted... Gheb posted... You know what. I would have no problem with CNN giving deniers a voice so long as it was done proportionally with the scientific community. So if they have a climate change denier on, it just needs to be balanced with 99 scientists who believe it's a problem. that gets back to my point about drowning out the opposition. discussions are supposed to make you think, not piss you off because you feel like your opinion is being criticized. How will not criticizing someone's opinion persuade them to change that opinion? how about unfairly criticize? lots of people from this discussion will come into it with the opinion that the other side is fucking stupid. if your open an argument with "you're stupid if you dont agree with me", where do you think it will go? --- People die when they are killed. Quando il gioco e finito, il re e il pedone vanno nella stessa scatola <cite>monkmith posted [p:913946909] in CNN: pleas... [t:77292035]...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>monkmith posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Gheb posted...</cite> <quote>You know what. I would have no problem with CNN giving deniers a voice so long as it was done proportionally with the scientific community. So if they have a climate change denier on, it just needs to be balanced with 99 scientists who believe it's a problem.</quote> that gets back to my point about drowning out the opposition. discussions are supposed to make you think, not piss you off because you feel like your opinion is being criticized.</quote> How will not criticizing someone's opinion persuade them to change that opinion?</quote> how about unfairly criticize? lots of people from this discussion will come into it with the opinion that the other side is fucking stupid. if your open an argument with "you're stupid if you dont agree with me", where do you think it will go?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4

Current Events > CNN: please do not listen to the climate change deniers we put on TV (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > CNN: please do not listen to the climate change deniers we put on TV