Current Events > 12,000 people or all cats. You must sacrifice one.

(+) Yeah! (+)

visualboy2003 posted...

kayoticdreamz posted...

visualboy2003 posted...

why, cause you can't arque with me, lol. that's why you can only ask me to stop, lol, cause you cant say anything to prove me wronq.

lol....your trolling skills are top notch. you keep ignoring facts like you're stevie wonder

really, but look like tc is on my side, too.

Yeah, as literally the only two in this debate still hanging on to your stance, despite your arguments being invalidated and voided over and over again by everyone else ITT. Good for you.
---

you are very sad to think that cats are more important than children.

there are many ways to solve this rats problem as both me and tc have been talkinq about earlier.

I hate people and love cats, so...
---

imagine letting yourself get all riled up about virtualboy
---

While I doubt it'll bring extinction levels to humans in 2-3 years, it'll certainly take its toll over time.

The way I see it, 12k is roughly a town/small city. It's a one and done. It sucks if you're included or you know someone in it, but at least you could say they made the sacrifice for the rest to carry on. In that lot could be a serious threat as well, you never know.

There's almost certainly at least 12k people with a pet cat. This is could be their companion and friend, sure they could replace it with a rat or something else. They even have some that comfort sick/dying people. However there's certainly those that can't cope with change/loss... now you wind up with potential suicides, depression, those that lose restraint and harm others because they want to know why their cluster of kitties are gone. This doesn't even include the ones without a cat, but still find them beneficial/amusing in other ways.

Due to the shift in balance above I'd estimate far more than 12k people(and their relatives) being affected or wiped out in the resulting eco/lifestyle shifts since so many panic and blow everything out of proportion. Crops might not yield as much and possible food shortage? Time to hoard it all and let no one have it, causing more unrest because now there really is a shortage. Not at the stores? better take it from some one else violently. The ones that remain will have to deal with a different, potentially garbage world(not that the current one is perfect/great), but I doubt it'll get better.

So yeah, I doubt the world would be wiped out in 2-3 years... but 12k~ instantly or probable landscape change with more casualties and pain for all, including the 12k that were initially saved. Save em now just so they can suffer over the span of a decade or until some paranoid person kills them during a looting spree for cornflakes.

The concern I have isn't so much the rats themselves as we'll probably just eat or tame them, but how the people will react to the sudden explosion of rats. Some think the internet being down for 2-3 hours is the end of the world. Now imagine the rats chews through all the network lines.

Damn, what was I thinking I change my vote to cats. That way we can all be Willard and have a big fat Ben to cuddle.
*
I don't know if they were mentioned, but just realised squirrels will probably run rampant as well. Shakin dat fluff
Still stand by the 12k tho, as isolated damage seems better than global longer term damage. The small bit above was due to a part of me not minding watching the world burn since I don't want to deny those that really dig the apocalyse life.

The world is entirely different than it was 10,000 years ago. Humans have a much higher population density, and rats thrive in the environments we created.
---

QwelzaarKane posted...

I'd kill 12,000 people over 12 cats.

That made me lol more than it probably should have :)
---

People. More people than that die everyday. Like, much more....
---

DarkChozoGhost posted...

The world is entirely different than it was 10,000 years ago. Humans have a much higher population density, and rats thrive in the environments we created.

Bullshit.

The entire argument has centered around the incredible birthing capacity of rats. And even your own shitty video points out that rats aren't picky and survive, thrive in brutal enviroments. They can live anywhere on Earth and live off the food or whatever the fuck is there in everywhere on Earth.

If they were threats to our food production NOW in 2018 they would have oblitered early man's food production. In fact as you said they would have caused the apolocypse before humanity existed

It makes no sense that for 160 million years rats stopped having sex and were picky eaters but the moment 200 years ago cats became more common, they went fuck crazy and ate everything. And if that was even true it implies cats fucking caused it

Stop digging a hole and just admit you got had because you WANTED to believe something.
---

That was worth melting down over? lol...

And he was never seen again.
---

12,000 is such a minor amount of people, easy sacrifice to make.
---

UnfairRepresent posted...

You must sacrifice one.

okay, one cat then.
but what do i get from the sacrifice tho?
---

Ricemills posted...

UnfairRepresent posted...

You must sacrifice one.

okay, one cat then.
but what do i get from the sacrifice tho?

Corpses
---

UnfairRepresent posted...

Ricemills posted...

UnfairRepresent posted...

You must sacrifice one.

okay, one cat then.
but what do i get from the sacrifice tho?

Corpses

multiple corpses from one dead cat? what is this, Meowrtal Kombat?
---

Quality Topic right here
---