Current Events > Lol that topic got deleted.

(+) Yeah! (+)

Kitt posted...

What did you get moderated for?

"offensive"
nkl
---

shockthemonkey posted...

So the moderators agree that you shouldnt make topics calling people gay based on how they look?

Good thing I've never done that.

It's almost as if you can't actually retort to anything I said so you're making random shit up instead to argue against that instead.

Almost like you were constructing a man made of straw... If only there was a term for that.

No one apart from you has called people gay based on how they look.

Well on CE in the past week anyway. I'm sure plenty of people around the world have.
---

UnfairRepresent posted...

Kitt posted...

What did you get moderated for?

"offensive"
nkl

idk, seems accurate to me.
---

I was wondering how long it would take before UR would blame Error.
---

UnfairRepresent posted...

shockthemonkey posted...

So the moderators agree that you shouldnt make topics calling people gay based on how they look?

Good thing I've never done that.

It's almost as if you can't actually retort to anything I said so you're making random shit up instead to argue against that instead.

Almost like you were constructing a man made of straw... If only there was a term for that.

No one apart from you has called people gay based on how they look.

Well on CE in the past week anyway. I'm sure plenty of people around the world have.

Do you firmly believe that Joan Jett and Richard Simmons are gay and this isn't just an assumption from you?
---

Funkydog posted...

I was wondering how long it would take before UR would blame Error.

I never mentioned Eror

Kitt posted...

Do you firmly believe that Joan Jett and Richard Simmons are gay

Yes

Or Bi.

shockthemonkey posted...

What was your argument as to why you think Richard Simmons is gay?

Have you ever met or seen Richard Simmons?
---

If your argument for Richard Simmons being gay is "look at him!" how are you not calling him gay based on how he looks?

I'd be confused if you were an actual human person, but you're Unfair so your position doesn't have to be logically sound.

my favorite thing about UR is how fuckers will AGREE with him in times where it's convenient.

this board is full of fake ass mentally weak "people."
---

shockthemonkey posted...

And he was never seen again

Such a shame.
I wouldn't be surprised if Joan Jett came out of the closet one day, but I'm not going sit here and argue tooth-and-nail over an assumption that the woman has never said about herself and treat it as facts. I'm wondering why @UnfairRepresent felt the need to do that very thing

All while saying people don't care about other's sexuality, while simultaneously preaching that these celebrities should clarify theirs. Pretty much the main reason why the topic was rightfully moderated for being offensive.
---

NibeIungsnarf posted...

If your argument for Richard Simmons being gay is "look at him!"

Strawman.

"If your argument for not being a Nazi is saying "I love Hitler!" then obviously you're a Nazi."
"but I never said that."
"OH SURE YOU DIDN'T!"

Man you can really tell who has no point when they solely have nothing but complete strawmen as their entire argument.

May as well accuse of me being pro racial segregation next. Has nothing to do with anything and I never said it, but that doesn't matter to you people.
---

Kitt posted...

All while saying people don't care about other's sexuality, while simultaneously preaching that these celebrities should clarify theirs.

Strawman.

I never said that. Let alone "preached" it.
---

Shock: "What's your argument for Richard Simmons being gay

Unfair: "Have you ever seen Richard Simmons"

NibeIungsnarf posted...

Shock: "What's your argument for Richard Simmons being gay

Unfair: "Have you ever seen Richard Simmons"

It's Unfair in a nutshell.
---

UnfairRepresent posted...

Kitt posted...

All while saying people don't care about other's sexuality, while simultaneously preaching that these celebrities should clarify theirs.

Strawman.

I never said that. Let alone "preached" it.

What did you say then?
---

Kitt posted...

UnfairRepresent posted...

Kitt posted...

All while saying people don't care about other's sexuality, while simultaneously preaching that these celebrities should clarify theirs.

Strawman.

I never said that. Let alone "preached" it.

What did you say then?

That it's irritating/weird when blatantly gay celebrities aren't either comfortable with their sexuality or just say "I don't want to talk about it." and instead act really condescendingly, saying things like "I'm not saying I am, but I'm not saying I'm not. I'm saying believe what you want. Assume away go ahead whatever you prefer! What helps you sleep at night!"

And it's irritating. Would be like if someone came into your house (wearing a Pepsi T-shirt and baseball cap) and you somewhat jokingly ask if they wanted a coke or a pepsi and they said "Maybe I want a pepsi, maybe I want a coke. I'm not saying I do, but I'm not saying I'm not. Maybe I want both! I'm saying believe what you want. Assume away go ahead whatever you prefer!"

No one cares one way or the other and no one cares if they do or don't want to talk about it.

But talking down to people or saying nonsense is weird, and very much a thing surrounding some gay celebs.

No different than it would be irritating if someone did the same thing about peanut butter and jelly sandwiches. However no one does so we're not talking about it.
---

Reading post #72 gave me cancer.

UnfairRepresent posted...

Kitt posted...

UnfairRepresent posted...

Kitt posted...

All while saying people don't care about other's sexuality, while simultaneously preaching that these celebrities should clarify theirs.

Strawman.

I never said that. Let alone "preached" it.

What did you say then?

That it's irritating/weird when blatantly gay celebrities aren't either comfortable with their sexuality or just say "I don't want to talk about it." and instead act really condescendingly, saying things like "I'm not saying I am, but I'm not saying I'm not. I'm saying believe what you want. Assume away go ahead whatever you prefer! What helps you sleep at night!"

And it's irritating. Would be like if someone came into your house (wearing a Pepsi T-shirt and baseball cap) and you somewhat jokingly ask if they wanted a coke or a pepsi and they said "Maybe I want a pepsi, maybe I want a coke. I'm not saying I do, but I'm not saying I'm not. Maybe I want both! I'm saying believe what you want. Assume away go ahead whatever you prefer!"

No one cares one way or the other and no one cares if they do or don't want to talk about it.

But talking down to people or saying nonsense is weird, and very much a thing surrounding some gay celebs.

No different than it would be irritating if someone did the same thing about peanut butter and jelly sandwiches. However no one does so we're not talking about it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hcB6xrJYh4M" data-time="
---

shockthemonkey posted...

Dude just stop calling people gay

Wow,

You're implying being gay is an insult.
---

some users are so emotionally invested they get a high when they see their mark acted on

its actually kind of sad...
---

UnfairRepresent posted...

Kitt posted...

UnfairRepresent posted...

Kitt posted...

All while saying people don't care about other's sexuality, while simultaneously preaching that these celebrities should clarify theirs.

Strawman.

I never said that. Let alone "preached" it.

What did you say then?

That it's irritating/weird when blatantly gay celebrities aren't either comfortable with their sexuality or just say "I don't want to talk about it." and instead act really condescendingly, saying things like "I'm not saying I am, but I'm not saying I'm not. I'm saying believe what you want. Assume away go ahead whatever you prefer! What helps you sleep at night!"

And it's irritating. Would be like if someone came into your house (wearing a Pepsi T-shirt and baseball cap) and you somewhat jokingly ask if they wanted a coke or a pepsi and they said "Maybe I want a pepsi, maybe I want a coke. I'm not saying I do, but I'm not saying I'm not. Maybe I want both! I'm saying believe what you want. Assume away go ahead whatever you prefer!"

No one cares one way or the other and no one cares if they do or don't want to talk about it.

But talking down to people or saying nonsense is weird, and very much a thing surrounding some gay celebs.

No different than it would be irritating if someone did the same thing about peanut butter and jelly sandwiches. However no one does so we're not talking about it.

And I say let them be. It's an irrelevant thing to ask them in the first place. Nobody is obligated to give a clear cut answer on something like that if they want to. But I have to say, what about them makes it "blatant"?
---

And note that without strawmen no one can actually respond to my point.

All they can do is deflect it or strawman.
---

ModLogic posted...

some users are so emotionally invested they get a high when they see their mark acted on

its actually kind of sad...

What are you even talking about?
---

UnfairRepresent posted...

And note that without strawmen no one can actually respond to my point.

All they can do is deflect it or strawman.

Can you respond to this, pls:

But I have to say, what about them makes it "blatant"?

---

Kitt posted...

And I say let them be. It's an irrelevant thing to ask them in the first place. Nobody is obligated to give a clear cut answer on something like that if they want to

No one is obligated to use a tissue when they sneeze or wipe their ass when they poop.

No one is obligated to wear a shirt or to not run around all day going "MWEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEP AMAHAHAHAHAEK WEPEEPA DUKA DUPA KURPLUNK WIBBLE!" at the top of their lungs.

No one said anything about obligation, they are pointing out something that's irritating.

Of course Simmons isn't "obligated" to do jackshit other than like pay taxes and not commit crimes. But still call a spade a spade.
---

UnfairRepresent posted...

And note that without strawmen no one can actually respond to my point.

All they can do is deflect it or strawman.

NibeIungsnarf posted...

Shock: "What's your argument for Richard Simmons being gay

Unfair: "Have you ever seen Richard Simmons"

Conflict posted...

I think Unfair just thinks everyone on CE is this

I'm so proud of my boy. I wish he'd stay away from that UnfairRepresent. He's up to no good.
---

UnfairRepresent posted...

Kitt posted...

And I say let them be. It's an irrelevant thing to ask them in the first place. Nobody is obligated to give a clear cut answer on something like that if they want to

[Strawman]

Pls answer the question:

But I have to say, what about them makes it "blatant"? What do you mean by "calling a spade a spade"?

---

Goats posted...

*Checks that site*

How did UR not get warned for that skarmory?

because he's quick to let the steel fly.
---

Kitt posted...

UnfairRepresent posted...

Kitt posted...

And I say let them be. It's an irrelevant thing to ask them in the first place. Nobody is obligated to give a clear cut answer on something like that if they want to

[Strawman]

Pls answer the question:

It's not a strawman.

"Theyre not obligated to not being irritating." isn't a defense, it's a non-statement. No one has ever said otherwise, no one is calling for arrests or fines.

But I have to say, what about them makes it "blatant"? What do you mean by "calling a spade a spade"?

I already answered this question in the other topic, which you read full well and I think even responded to.


I am not going to waste my time explaining how Richard Simmons, Kenneth Williams or Joan Jett are blatantly gay.

And you're not going to pretend you don't know that.

Now this is another example of intelligence insulting.
---

shockthemonkey posted...

Starting to think UR might be homophobic

Says the person who thinks being gay is an insult.
---

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u31wyXAk04c" data-time="
---