Current Events > Is "Shall not be infringed" in the second amendment absolute

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2
BaiusGaltar 08/04/19 1:14:49 PM #1:	Is it absolute? - Results (29 votes) It is 68.97% (20 votes) 20 It isn't 31.03% (9 votes) 9 Or are there limitations? --- Previously, on Gattelstar Balactica... <cite>BaiusGaltar posted [p:925608200] in Is "S... [t:77914195]...</cite> <quote> Is it absolute? - Results (29 votes) It is 68.97% (20 votes) 20 It isn't 31.03% (9 votes) 9 Or are there limitations?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Hexenherz 08/04/19 1:16:30 PM #2:	Like does it even fucking matter we can make amendments to the constitution. --- FFXIV: Herzog Erislieb (Cactaur) \| RS3: UltimaSuende . 99 WC/Fish/Cook/Fletch/Div/Mining <cite>Hexenherz posted [p:925608269] in Is "S... [t:77914195]...</cite> <quote>Like does it even fucking matter we can make amendments to the constitution.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DrizztLink 08/04/19 1:17:15 PM #3:	Depends on your well-regulated militia. --- http://guidesmedia.ign.com/guides/9846/images/slowpoke.gif https://imgur.com/6ezFwG1 <cite>DrizztLink posted [p:925608298] in Is "S... [t:77914195]...</cite> <quote>Depends on your well-regulated militia.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
glitteringfairy 08/04/19 1:17:40 PM #4:	Hexenherz posted... Like does it even fucking matter we can make amendments to the constitution. You will try --- "How come you can believe in God but not Bigfoot? V-E-G-Y https://imgur.com/AqR3aeX https://imgur.com/vvuUXpp https://i.imgtc.com/lyRboFN.jpg <cite>glitteringfairy posted [p:925608313] in Is "S... [t:77914195]...</cite> <quote>Hexenherz posted... </cite> <quote>Like does it even fucking matter we can make amendments to the constitution.</quote>You will try </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Hop103 08/04/19 1:18:45 PM #5:	It's absolute, the far left needs to give up. --- "In the name of the future moon I shall punish you"-Chibi Moon <cite>Hop103 posted [p:925608340] in Is "S... [t:77914195]...</cite> <quote>It's absolute, the far left needs to give up.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Verdekal 08/04/19 1:20:59 PM #6:	Can we bear nuclear arms? --- Don't tease the octopus, kids! <cite>Verdekal posted [p:925608427] in Is "S... [t:77914195]...</cite> <quote>Can we bear nuclear arms? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BaiusGaltar 08/04/19 1:22:10 PM #7:	Verdekal posted... Can we bear nuclear arms? You sprung my trap card before I could. --- Previously, on Gattelstar Balactica... <cite>BaiusGaltar posted [p:925608464] in Is "S... [t:77914195]...</cite> <quote>Verdekal posted...</cite> <quote>Can we bear nuclear arms? </quote> You sprung my trap card before I could.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Duncanwii 08/04/19 1:23:33 PM #8:	Hop103 posted... It's absolute, the far left needs to give up. The far left arent the ones getting massacured on an almost daily occurance. Something needs to be done and soon. --- Hello, I like video games and comedies. Let's be friends. :) <cite>Duncanwii posted [p:925608530] in Is "S... [t:77914195]...</cite> <quote>Hop103 posted...</cite> <quote>It's absolute, the far left needs to give up.</quote> The far left arent the ones getting massacured on an almost daily occurance. Something needs to be done and soon.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DrizztLink 08/04/19 1:25:07 PM #9:	BaiusGaltar posted... Verdekal posted... Can we bear nuclear arms? You sprung my trap card before I could. You can't hug your children with nuclear arms. --- http://guidesmedia.ign.com/guides/9846/images/slowpoke.gif https://imgur.com/6ezFwG1 <cite>DrizztLink posted [p:925608586] in Is "S... [t:77914195]...</cite> <quote>BaiusGaltar posted...</cite> <quote>Verdekal posted...</cite> <quote>Can we bear nuclear arms? </quote> You sprung my trap card before I could.</quote> You can't hug your children with nuclear arms.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
RescueBC 08/04/19 1:26:04 PM #10:	Right, mate. I totally care about what some old guys in the 1700s meant when they wrote something. Its totally applicable to today. We should follow it without questions..we Americans arent good at thinking too hard for ourselves anyway. Its better this way. Oh a new problem is happening...well lets refer to what these guys in the 1700s thought... --- 3DS friend code: 5455-9623-0727 <cite>RescueBC posted [p:925608626] in Is "S... [t:77914195]...</cite> <quote>Right, mate. I totally care about what some old guys in the 1700s meant when they wrote something. Its totally applicable to today. We should follow it without questions..we Americans arent good at thinking too hard for ourselves anyway. Its better this way. Oh a new problem is happening...well lets refer to what these guys in the 1700s thought...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Hicks233 08/04/19 1:30:19 PM #11:	Amendment - clue's in the name. Any of it can be subject to change. It's arguable that the mistake is that it was written as a set of rights without responsibilities. If you tell someone what they can do, but not what is expected of them, you run the risk of having people behave like entitled children. When you have people treating firearms like security blankets that then screech about their "rights", you're left arguing with adult children. --- http://s2.excoboard.com/exco/index.php?boardid=9458 So says Mr. Stewart. <cite>Hicks233 posted [p:925608799] in Is "S... [t:77914195]...</cite> <quote>Amendment - clue's in the name. Any of it can be subject to change. It's arguable that the mistake is that it was written as a set of rights without responsibilities. If you tell someone what they can do, but not what is expected of them, you run the risk of having people behave like entitled children. When you have people treating firearms like security blankets that then screech about their "rights", you're left arguing with adult children.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BaiusGaltar 08/04/19 1:30:41 PM #12:	DrizztLink posted... BaiusGaltar posted... Verdekal posted... Can we bear nuclear arms? You sprung my trap card before I could. You can't hug your children with nuclear arms. You can, they just get radiation burns. --- Previously, on Gattelstar Balactica... <cite>BaiusGaltar posted [p:925608812] in Is "S... [t:77914195]...</cite> <quote>DrizztLink posted...</cite> <quote>BaiusGaltar posted...</cite> <quote>Verdekal posted...</cite> <quote>Can we bear nuclear arms? </quote> You sprung my trap card before I could.</quote> You can't hug your children with nuclear arms.</quote> You can, they just get radiation burns.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
young_flip 08/04/19 1:32:26 PM #13:	It's not about guns mainly but mans natural right to self defense. --- playing: Shadow of War (PC) <cite>young_flip posted [p:925608873] in Is "S... [t:77914195]...</cite> <quote>It's not about guns mainly but mans natural right to self defense.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BaiusGaltar 08/04/19 1:34:52 PM #14:	young_flip posted... It's not about guns mainly but mans natural right to self defense. Should there be limitations in what someone can defend themselves with? --- Previously, on Gattelstar Balactica... <cite>BaiusGaltar posted [p:925608962] in Is "S... [t:77914195]...</cite> <quote>young_flip posted...</cite> <quote>It's not about guns mainly but mans natural right to self defense.</quote> Should there be limitations in what someone can defend themselves with?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Duncanwii 08/04/19 1:38:04 PM #16:	young_flip posted... It's not about guns mainly but mans natural right to self defense. But even then there are limits on what qualifies as self defense. If someone slaps you in the face you cant pull out an Ak47 and blow them away, thats manslaughter. --- Hello, I like video games and comedies. Let's be friends. :) <cite>Duncanwii posted [p:925609081] in Is "S... [t:77914195]...</cite> <quote>young_flip posted...</cite> <quote>It's not about guns mainly but mans natural right to self defense.</quote> But even then there are limits on what qualifies as self defense. If someone slaps you in the face you cant pull out an Ak47 and blow them away, thats manslaughter.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#17	Post #17 was unavailable or deleted.
tullock 08/04/19 1:39:24 PM #18:	Hop103 posted... It's absolute, the far left needs to give up. So is the first amendment then, but apparently the fuhrer is trying to kick people out of the country for exercising that right. --- ImgTC. <cite>tullock posted [p:925609135] in Is "S... [t:77914195]...</cite> <quote>Hop103 posted...</cite> <quote>It's absolute, the far left needs to give up.</quote> So is the first amendment then, but apparently the fuhrer is trying to kick people out of the country for exercising that right.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#19	Post #19 was unavailable or deleted.
BaiusGaltar 08/04/19 1:39:48 PM #20:	Duncanwii posted... young_flip posted... It's not about guns mainly but mans natural right to self defense. But even then there are limits on what qualifies as self defense. If someone slaps you in the face you cant pull out an Ak47 and blow them away, thats manslaughter. Depends where you live. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iDtzofAUSJI" data-time=" --- Previously, on Gattelstar Balactica... <cite>BaiusGaltar posted [p:925609149] in Is "S... [t:77914195]...</cite> <quote>Duncanwii posted...</cite> <quote>young_flip posted...</cite> <quote>It's not about guns mainly but mans natural right to self defense.</quote> But even then there are limits on what qualifies as self defense. If someone slaps you in the face you cant pull out an Ak47 and blow them away, thats manslaughter.</quote> Depends where you live. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iDtzofAUSJI" data-time="</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheMikh 08/04/19 1:40:15 PM #21:	i suppose the seeming ambiguity of the 2nd amendment makes the imperative of a constructionist interpretation that much more important --- https://imgur.com/A0TAfek <cite>TheMikh posted [p:925609164] in Is "S... [t:77914195]...</cite> <quote> i suppose the seeming ambiguity of the 2nd amendment makes the imperative of a constructionist interpretation that much more important</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
young_flip 08/04/19 1:42:03 PM #22:	Duncanwii posted... But even then there are limits on what qualifies as self defense. If someone slaps you in the face you cant pull out an Ak47 and blow them away, thats manslaughter. Eh...judging by your responses yesterday I don't think the Constitution and American history are strong suits of yours. --- playing: Shadow of War (PC) <cite>young_flip posted [p:925609237] in Is "S... [t:77914195]...</cite> <quote>Duncanwii posted...</cite> <quote>But even then there are limits on what qualifies as self defense. If someone slaps you in the face you cant pull out an Ak47 and blow them away, thats manslaughter. </quote> Eh...judging by your responses yesterday I don't think the Constitution and American history are strong suits of yours.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Funbazooka 08/04/19 1:44:08 PM #23:	Sounds kinda fascist if you want to take away peoples rights. Just saying. --- MAGA <cite>Funbazooka posted [p:925609321] in Is "S... [t:77914195]...</cite> <quote>Sounds kinda fascist if you want to take away peoples rights. Just saying.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
warnerbroman 08/04/19 1:44:13 PM #24:	Verdekal posted... Can we bear nuclear arms? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EFDZKaIT7ro" data-time="&start=32 --- 1478 4237 6903 Xavier Flying....you can't stop staring can you? <cite>warnerbroman posted [p:925609325] in Is "S... [t:77914195]...</cite> <quote>Verdekal posted...</cite> <quote>Can we bear nuclear arms? </quote> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EFDZKaIT7ro" data-time="&start=32</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Doom_Art 08/04/19 1:46:03 PM #25:	I don't know if the 2nd amendment says that you have the right to by an AR15 w mods with no waiting period or background checks The right needs to stop inventing laws and precedent where none exists --- Not removing this until Mega Man 64 is released on the Wii Virtual Console. Started on: 12/1/2009 https://imgur.com/mPvcy <cite>Doom_Art posted [p:925609387] in Is "S... [t:77914195]...</cite> <quote>I don't know if the 2nd amendment says that you have the right to by an AR15 w mods with no waiting period or background checks The right needs to stop inventing laws and precedent where none exists</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BaiusGaltar 08/04/19 1:48:34 PM #26:	Verdekal posted... Can we bear nuclear arms? Yes, we can. Bear doesn't mean hold in your hands/arms. --- Previously, on Gattelstar Balactica... <cite>BaiusGaltar posted [p:925609479] in Is "S... [t:77914195]...</cite> <quote>Verdekal posted...</cite> <quote>Can we bear nuclear arms? </quote> Yes, we can. Bear doesn't mean hold in your hands/arms.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Doom_Art 08/04/19 1:51:21 PM #27:	Also Iunno where this idea that waiting periods and background checks are forbidden by 2A came from when the 2A literally starts with "well regulated" --- Not removing this until Mega Man 64 is released on the Wii Virtual Console. Started on: 12/1/2009 https://imgur.com/mPvcy <cite>Doom_Art posted [p:925609590] in Is "S... [t:77914195]...</cite> <quote>Also Iunno where this idea that waiting periods and background checks are forbidden by 2A came from when the 2A literally starts with "well regulated"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Funbazooka 08/04/19 1:57:58 PM #28:	Doom_Art posted... I don't know if the 2nd amendment says that you have the right to by an AR15 Because it's a firearm. It doesn't have to specify each and every type of firearm. But I bet you already knew this. --- MAGA <cite>Funbazooka posted [p:925609850] in Is "S... [t:77914195]...</cite> <quote>Doom_Art posted...</cite> <quote>I don't know if the 2nd amendment says that you have the right to by an AR15</quote> Because it's a firearm. It doesn't have to specify each and every type of firearm. But I bet you already knew this.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Doom_Art 08/04/19 2:01:12 PM #29:	Funbazooka posted... Because it's a firearm. It doesn't have to specify each and every type of firearm. But I bet you already knew this. It doesn't say anything about firearms --- Not removing this until Mega Man 64 is released on the Wii Virtual Console. Started on: 12/1/2009 https://imgur.com/mPvcy <cite>Doom_Art posted [p:925609992] in Is "S... [t:77914195]...</cite> <quote>Funbazooka posted...</cite> <quote>Because it's a firearm. It doesn't have to specify each and every type of firearm. But I bet you already knew this. </quote> It doesn't say anything about firearms</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BaiusGaltar 08/04/19 2:01:17 PM #30:	Funbazooka posted... Doom_Art posted... I don't know if the 2nd amendment says that you have the right to by an AR15 Because it's a firearm. It doesn't have to specify each and every type of firearm. But I bet you already knew this. Why can't I have a nuke, then? --- Previously, on Gattelstar Balactica... <cite>BaiusGaltar posted [p:925609998] in Is "S... [t:77914195]...</cite> <quote>Funbazooka posted...</cite> <quote>Doom_Art posted...</cite> <quote>I don't know if the 2nd amendment says that you have the right to by an AR15</quote> Because it's a firearm. It doesn't have to specify each and every type of firearm. But I bet you already knew this.</quote> Why can't I have a nuke, then?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ThunderMuffin 08/04/19 2:02:07 PM #31:	if they change it I just hope they never change the first --- 1 line break(s), 121 characters allowed <cite>ThunderMuffin posted [p:925610036] in Is "S... [t:77914195]...</cite> <quote>if they change it I just hope they never change the first</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Funbazooka 08/04/19 2:06:53 PM #32:	BaiusGaltar posted... Funbazooka posted... Doom_Art posted... I don't know if the 2nd amendment says that you have the right to by an AR15 Because it's a firearm. It doesn't have to specify each and every type of firearm. But I bet you already knew this. Why can't I have a nuke, then? Are you saying a nuke, is a firearm? Just like an AR15? Who are you trying to kid with this utter nonsense --- MAGA <cite>Funbazooka posted [p:925610216] in Is "S... [t:77914195]...</cite> <quote>BaiusGaltar posted...</cite> <quote>Funbazooka posted...</cite> <quote>Doom_Art posted...</cite> <quote>I don't know if the 2nd amendment says that you have the right to by an AR15</quote> Because it's a firearm. It doesn't have to specify each and every type of firearm. But I bet you already knew this.</quote> Why can't I have a nuke, then?</quote> Are you saying a nuke, is a firearm? Just like an AR15? Who are you trying to kid with this utter nonsense</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BaiusGaltar 08/04/19 2:11:56 PM #33:	Funbazooka posted... BaiusGaltar posted... Funbazooka posted... Doom_Art posted... I don't know if the 2nd amendment says that you have the right to by an AR15 Because it's a firearm. It doesn't have to specify each and every type of firearm. But I bet you already knew this. Why can't I have a nuke, then? Are you saying a nuke, is a firearm? Just like an AR15? Who are you trying to kid with this utter nonsense I'm not. Where in the second amendment does it mention firearms? --- Previously, on Gattelstar Balactica... <cite>BaiusGaltar posted [p:925610430] in Is "S... [t:77914195]...</cite> <quote>Funbazooka posted...</cite> <quote>BaiusGaltar posted...</cite> <quote>Funbazooka posted...</cite> <quote>Doom_Art posted...</cite> <quote>I don't know if the 2nd amendment says that you have the right to by an AR15</quote> Because it's a firearm. It doesn't have to specify each and every type of firearm. But I bet you already knew this.</quote> Why can't I have a nuke, then?</quote> Are you saying a nuke, is a firearm? Just like an AR15? Who are you trying to kid with this utter nonsense</quote> I'm not. Where in the second amendment does it mention firearms?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Duncanwii 08/04/19 2:15:47 PM #34:	ThunderMuffin posted... if they change it I just hope they never change the first The first amendment isnt hazardous to public safety like the second. Words cant kill 9 people in 60 seconds like a gun can. --- Hello, I like video games and comedies. Let's be friends. :) <cite>Duncanwii posted [p:925610588] in Is "S... [t:77914195]...</cite> <quote>ThunderMuffin posted...</cite> <quote>if they change it I just hope they never change the first</quote> The first amendment isnt hazardous to public safety like the second. Words cant kill 9 people in 60 seconds like a gun can.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BaiusGaltar 08/04/19 2:18:54 PM #35:	Duncanwii posted... ThunderMuffin posted... if they change it I just hope they never change the first The first amendment isnt hazardous to public safety like the second. Words cant kill 9 people in 60 seconds like a gun can. YOL TOOR SHUL --- Previously, on Gattelstar Balactica... <cite>BaiusGaltar posted [p:925610707] in Is "S... [t:77914195]...</cite> <quote>Duncanwii posted...</cite> <quote>ThunderMuffin posted...</cite> <quote>if they change it I just hope they never change the first</quote> The first amendment isnt hazardous to public safety like the second. Words cant kill 9 people in 60 seconds like a gun can.</quote> YOL TOOR SHUL</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BaiusGaltar 08/04/19 2:33:03 PM #36:	And @Funbazooka was never seen again. --- Previously, on Gattelstar Balactica... <cite>BaiusGaltar posted [p:925611280] in Is "S... [t:77914195]...</cite> <quote>And @Funbazooka was never seen again.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheMikh 08/04/19 2:37:44 PM #37:	BaiusGaltar posted... Where in the second amendment does it mention firearms? do you mean to tell me the american revolution was fought with swords --- https://imgur.com/A0TAfek <cite>TheMikh posted [p:925611487] in Is "S... [t:77914195]...</cite> <quote>BaiusGaltar posted...</cite> <quote>Where in the second amendment does it mention firearms?</quote> do you mean to tell me the american revolution was fought with swords</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Doom_Art 08/04/19 2:40:17 PM #38:	TheMikh posted... do you mean to tell me the american revolution was fought with swords Why is that relevant? And it's odd how some folks don't bat an eye over restrictions on sword/knife ownership --- Not removing this until Mega Man 64 is released on the Wii Virtual Console. Started on: 12/1/2009 https://imgur.com/mPvcy <cite>Doom_Art posted [p:925611608] in Is "S... [t:77914195]...</cite> <quote>TheMikh posted...</cite> <quote>do you mean to tell me the american revolution was fought with swords</quote> Why is that relevant? And it's odd how some folks don't bat an eye over restrictions on sword/knife ownership</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BaiusGaltar 08/04/19 2:46:09 PM #39:	TheMikh posted... BaiusGaltar posted... Where in the second amendment does it mention firearms? do you mean to tell me the american revolution was fought with swords Well, swords were used. Why is the second amendment specifically about firearms, if firearms are never specified? --- Previously, on Gattelstar Balactica... <cite>BaiusGaltar posted [p:925611854] in Is "S... [t:77914195]...</cite> <quote>TheMikh posted...</cite> <quote>BaiusGaltar posted...</cite> <quote>Where in the second amendment does it mention firearms?</quote> do you mean to tell me the american revolution was fought with swords</quote> Well, swords were used. Why is the second amendment specifically about firearms, if firearms are never specified?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ButteryMales 08/04/19 2:48:43 PM #40:	TheMikh posted... BaiusGaltar posted... Where in the second amendment does it mention firearms? do you mean to tell me the american revolution was fought with swords Do you mean to imply it was fought with AR 15s? <cite>ButteryMales posted [p:925611967] in Is "S... [t:77914195]...</cite> <quote>TheMikh posted...</cite> <quote>BaiusGaltar posted...</cite> <quote>Where in the second amendment does it mention firearms?</quote> do you mean to tell me the american revolution was fought with swords</quote> Do you mean to imply it was fought with AR 15s?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#41	Post #41 was unavailable or deleted.
Paragon21XX 08/04/19 3:02:18 PM #42:	RescueBC posted... Right, mate. I totally care about what some old guys in the 1700s meant when they wrote something. Its totally applicable to today. We should follow it without questions..we Americans arent good at thinking too hard for ourselves anyway. Its better this way. Oh a new problem is happening...well lets refer to what these guys in the 1700s thought... Until the 2nd amendment is repealed, yes it fucking is. --- Hmm... <cite>Paragon21XX posted [p:925612582] in Is "S... [t:77914195]...</cite> <quote>RescueBC posted...</cite> <quote>Right, mate. I totally care about what some old guys in the 1700s meant when they wrote something. Its totally applicable to today. We should follow it without questions..we Americans arent good at thinking too hard for ourselves anyway. Its better this way. Oh a new problem is happening...well lets refer to what these guys in the 1700s thought...</quote> Until the 2nd amendment is repealed, yes it fucking is.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
yemmy 08/04/19 3:02:22 PM #43:	It has always been infringed upon. 1934, 1986, and 1994 were big ones. Stupid ass shit like a rifle has to have 16" barrel or you pay a tax stamp and fill out a shitload of paperwork or call it a "pistol". I'm pretty 2A but to say a person should be able to buy a rocket launcher at Cabelas in kinda insane. As far as people owning nukes; if you're rich enough to have a nuke then I bet someone will sell you one. Who the fuck wants a nuke other than some terrorist? --- p226 <cite>yemmy posted [p:925612586] in Is "S... [t:77914195]...</cite> <quote>It has always been infringed upon. 1934, 1986, and 1994 were big ones. Stupid ass shit like a rifle has to have 16" barrel or you pay a tax stamp and fill out a shitload of paperwork or call it a "pistol". I'm pretty 2A but to say a person should be able to buy a rocket launcher at Cabelas in kinda insane. As far as people owning nukes; if you're rich enough to have a nuke then I bet someone will sell you one. Who the fuck wants a nuke other than some terrorist? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Funbazooka 08/04/19 3:02:43 PM #44:	BaiusGaltar posted... Funbazooka posted... BaiusGaltar posted... Funbazooka posted... Doom_Art posted... I don't know if the 2nd amendment says that you have the right to by an AR15 Because it's a firearm. It doesn't have to specify each and every type of firearm. But I bet you already knew this. Why can't I have a nuke, then? Are you saying a nuke, is a firearm? Just like an AR15? Who are you trying to kid with this utter nonsense I'm not. Where in the second amendment does it mention firearms? Because that's what it's always referred to previously, even before the 2nd Amendment, before our constitution. Weapons that one could carry for personal defense. New weapons came along that used gunpowder.. they called those fire-arms. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution The Second Amendment was based partially on the right to keep and bear arms in English common law and was influenced by the English Bill of Rights of 1689. --- MAGA <cite>Funbazooka posted [p:925612598] in Is "S... [t:77914195]...</cite> <quote>BaiusGaltar posted...</cite> <quote>Funbazooka posted...</cite> <quote>BaiusGaltar posted...</cite> <quote>Funbazooka posted...</cite> <quote>Doom_Art posted...</cite> <quote>I don't know if the 2nd amendment says that you have the right to by an AR15</quote> Because it's a firearm. It doesn't have to specify each and every type of firearm. But I bet you already knew this.</quote> Why can't I have a nuke, then?</quote> Are you saying a nuke, is a firearm? Just like an AR15? Who are you trying to kid with this utter nonsense</quote> I'm not. Where in the second amendment does it mention firearms?</quote> Because that's what it's always referred to previously, even before the 2nd Amendment, before our constitution. Weapons that one could carry for personal defense. New weapons came along that used gunpowder.. they called those fire-arms. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution The Second Amendment was based partially on the right to keep and bear arms in English common law and was influenced by the English Bill of Rights of 1689.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Doom_Art 08/04/19 3:05:46 PM #45:	Very well so we'll say that citizens can own guns but it has to be well-regulated Sounds good to me --- Not removing this until Mega Man 64 is released on the Wii Virtual Console. Started on: 12/1/2009 https://imgur.com/mPvcy <cite>Doom_Art posted [p:925612726] in Is "S... [t:77914195]...</cite> <quote>Very well so we'll say that citizens can own guns but it has to be well-regulated Sounds good to me</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BaiusGaltar 08/04/19 3:07:53 PM #46:	Paragon21XX posted... RescueBC posted... Right, mate. I totally care about what some old guys in the 1700s meant when they wrote something. Its totally applicable to today. We should follow it without questions..we Americans arent good at thinking too hard for ourselves anyway. Its better this way. Oh a new problem is happening...well lets refer to what these guys in the 1700s thought... Until the 2nd amendment is repealed, yes it fucking is. So, they need to let me have nukes, unless the second amendment is repealed? --- Previously, on Gattelstar Balactica... <cite>BaiusGaltar posted [p:925612804] in Is "S... [t:77914195]...</cite> <quote>Paragon21XX posted...</cite> <quote>RescueBC posted...</cite> <quote>Right, mate. I totally care about what some old guys in the 1700s meant when they wrote something. Its totally applicable to today. We should follow it without questions..we Americans arent good at thinking too hard for ourselves anyway. Its better this way. Oh a new problem is happening...well lets refer to what these guys in the 1700s thought...</quote> Until the 2nd amendment is repealed, yes it fucking is.</quote> So, they need to let me have nukes, unless the second amendment is repealed?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Paragon21XX 08/04/19 3:09:30 PM #47:	BaiusGaltar posted... Paragon21XX posted... RescueBC posted... Right, mate. I totally care about what some old guys in the 1700s meant when they wrote something. Its totally applicable to today. We should follow it without questions..we Americans arent good at thinking too hard for ourselves anyway. Its better this way. Oh a new problem is happening...well lets refer to what these guys in the 1700s thought... Until the 2nd amendment is repealed, yes it fucking is. So, they need to let me have nukes, unless the second amendment is repealed? Only people with common sense may post in this topic. Please leave. --- Hmm... <cite>Paragon21XX posted [p:925612884] in Is "S... [t:77914195]...</cite> <quote>BaiusGaltar posted...</cite> <quote>Paragon21XX posted...</cite> <quote>RescueBC posted...</cite> <quote>Right, mate. I totally care about what some old guys in the 1700s meant when they wrote something. Its totally applicable to today. We should follow it without questions..we Americans arent good at thinking too hard for ourselves anyway. Its better this way. Oh a new problem is happening...well lets refer to what these guys in the 1700s thought...</quote> Until the 2nd amendment is repealed, yes it fucking is.</quote> So, they need to let me have nukes, unless the second amendment is repealed?</quote> Only people with common sense may post in this topic. Please leave.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Funbazooka 08/04/19 3:11:43 PM #48:	BaiusGaltar posted... Paragon21XX posted... RescueBC posted... Right, mate. I totally care about what some old guys in the 1700s meant when they wrote something. Its totally applicable to today. We should follow it without questions..we Americans arent good at thinking too hard for ourselves anyway. Its better this way. Oh a new problem is happening...well lets refer to what these guys in the 1700s thought... Until the 2nd amendment is repealed, yes it fucking is. So, they need to let me have nukes, unless the second amendment is repealed? lol "Yeah but what about nukes? The 2nd Amendment didn't say anything about nukes! Check-mate!" --- MAGA <cite>Funbazooka posted [p:925612986] in Is "S... [t:77914195]...</cite> <quote>BaiusGaltar posted...</cite> <quote>Paragon21XX posted...</cite> <quote>RescueBC posted...</cite> <quote>Right, mate. I totally care about what some old guys in the 1700s meant when they wrote something. Its totally applicable to today. We should follow it without questions..we Americans arent good at thinking too hard for ourselves anyway. Its better this way. Oh a new problem is happening...well lets refer to what these guys in the 1700s thought...</quote> Until the 2nd amendment is repealed, yes it fucking is.</quote> So, they need to let me have nukes, unless the second amendment is repealed?</quote> lol "Yeah but what about nukes? The 2nd Amendment didn't say anything about nukes! Check-mate!"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Doom_Art 08/04/19 3:13:47 PM #49:	yemmy posted... As far as people owning nukes; if you're rich enough to have a nuke then I bet someone will sell you one. Who the fuck wants a nuke other than some terrorist? So you're saying terrorists should be able to purchase nukes --- Not removing this until Mega Man 64 is released on the Wii Virtual Console. Started on: 12/1/2009 https://imgur.com/mPvcy <cite>Doom_Art posted [p:925613080] in Is "S... [t:77914195]...</cite> <quote>yemmy posted...</cite> <quote>As far as people owning nukes; if you're rich enough to have a nuke then I bet someone will sell you one. Who the fuck wants a nuke other than some terrorist? </quote> So you're saying terrorists should be able to purchase nukes</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BaiusGaltar 08/04/19 3:20:37 PM #50:	Funbazooka posted... BaiusGaltar posted... Funbazooka posted... BaiusGaltar posted... Funbazooka posted... Doom_Art posted... I don't know if the 2nd amendment says that you have the right to by an AR15 Because it's a firearm. It doesn't have to specify each and every type of firearm. But I bet you already knew this. Why can't I have a nuke, then? Are you saying a nuke, is a firearm? Just like an AR15? Who are you trying to kid with this utter nonsense I'm not. Where in the second amendment does it mention firearms? Because that's what it's always referred to previously, even before the 2nd Amendment, before our constitution. Weapons that one could carry for personal defense. New weapons came along that used gunpowder.. they called those fire-arms. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution The Second Amendment was based partially on the right to keep and bear arms in English common law and was influenced by the English Bill of Rights of 1689. An arm is a weapon, which is why guns were called fire-arms. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weapon A weapon, arm or armament is any implement or device that can be used with intent to inflict damage or harm. Weapons are used to increase the efficacy and efficiency of activities such as hunting, crime, law enforcement, self-defense, and warfare. In broader context, weapons may be construed to include anything used to gain a tactical, strategic, material or mental advantage over an adversary or enemy target. While ordinary objects sticks, rocks, bottles, chairs, vehicles can be used as weapons, many are expressly designed for the purpose; these range from simple implements such as clubs, axes and swords, to complicated modern firearms, tanks, intercontinental ballistic missiles, biological weapons, and cyberweapons. Something that has been re-purposed, converted, or enhanced to become a weapon of war is termed weaponized, such as a weaponized virus or weaponized laser. So why does the second amendment only mean firearms, whe it simply says arms? --- Previously, on Gattelstar Balactica... <cite>BaiusGaltar posted [p:925613346] in Is "S... [t:77914195]...</cite> <quote>Funbazooka posted...</cite> <quote>BaiusGaltar posted...</cite> <quote>Funbazooka posted...</cite> <quote>BaiusGaltar posted...</cite> <quote>Funbazooka posted...</cite> <quote>Doom_Art posted...</cite> <quote>I don't know if the 2nd amendment says that you have the right to by an AR15</quote> Because it's a firearm. It doesn't have to specify each and every type of firearm. But I bet you already knew this.</quote> Why can't I have a nuke, then?</quote> Are you saying a nuke, is a firearm? Just like an AR15? Who are you trying to kid with this utter nonsense</quote> I'm not. Where in the second amendment does it mention firearms?</quote> Because that's what it's always referred to previously, even before the 2nd Amendment, before our constitution. Weapons that one could carry for personal defense. New weapons came along that used gunpowder.. they called those fire-arms. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution The Second Amendment was based partially on the right to keep and bear arms in English common law and was influenced by the English Bill of Rights of 1689.</quote> An arm is a weapon, which is why guns were called fire-arms. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weapon A weapon, arm or armament is any implement or device that can be used with intent to inflict damage or harm. Weapons are used to increase the efficacy and efficiency of activities such as hunting, crime, law enforcement, self-defense, and warfare. In broader context, weapons may be construed to include anything used to gain a tactical, strategic, material or mental advantage over an adversary or enemy target. While ordinary objects sticks, rocks, bottles, chairs, vehicles can be used as weapons, many are expressly designed for the purpose; these range from simple implements such as clubs, axes and swords, to complicated modern firearms, tanks, intercontinental ballistic missiles, biological weapons, and cyberweapons. Something that has been re-purposed, converted, or enhanced to become a weapon of war is termed weaponized, such as a weaponized virus or weaponized laser. So why does the second amendment only mean firearms, whe it simply says arms?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BaiusGaltar 08/04/19 3:22:30 PM #51:	Funbazooka posted... BaiusGaltar posted... Paragon21XX posted... RescueBC posted... Right, mate. I totally care about what some old guys in the 1700s meant when they wrote something. Its totally applicable to today. We should follow it without questions..we Americans arent good at thinking too hard for ourselves anyway. Its better this way. Oh a new problem is happening...well lets refer to what these guys in the 1700s thought... Until the 2nd amendment is repealed, yes it fucking is. So, they need to let me have nukes, unless the second amendment is repealed? lol "Yeah but what about nukes? The 2nd Amendment didn't say anything about nukes! Check-mate!" An arm is a weapon, a nuke is a weapon. Should we interpret the second amendment as allowing us to have nukes? --- Previously, on Gattelstar Balactica... <cite>BaiusGaltar posted [p:925613440] in Is "S... [t:77914195]...</cite> <quote>Funbazooka posted...</cite> <quote>BaiusGaltar posted...</cite> <quote>Paragon21XX posted...</cite> <quote>RescueBC posted...</cite> <quote>Right, mate. I totally care about what some old guys in the 1700s meant when they wrote something. Its totally applicable to today. We should follow it without questions..we Americans arent good at thinking too hard for ourselves anyway. Its better this way. Oh a new problem is happening...well lets refer to what these guys in the 1700s thought...</quote> Until the 2nd amendment is repealed, yes it fucking is.</quote> So, they need to let me have nukes, unless the second amendment is repealed?</quote> lol "Yeah but what about nukes? The 2nd Amendment didn't say anything about nukes! Check-mate!"</quote> An arm is a weapon, a nuke is a weapon. Should we interpret the second amendment as allowing us to have nukes?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2

Current Events > Is "Shall not be infringed" in the second amendment absolute (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Is "Shall not be infringed" in the second amendment absolute