Current Events > Transgender celebrity agrees that not wanting to date trans people isn't...

(+) Yeah! (+)

JACKBUTTMOMMY posted...

ImmatureContent posted...

Attraction is a natural instinct but it is not based on anything as specific as genitals. Children don't instinctively know about anatomy. It is learned information. For instance, children assume everyone has the same genitalia as themselves. It is a surprise for them to learn that boys and girls are different in that regard. If you remove a boy from society, never teach him about the differences between the sexes, and then introduce him to a pretty girl after he reaches puberty, he would likely still have a natural attraction but he would expect the girl to have a penis because he has never learned about anything else.

Just because you don't actively notice society shaping your opinions doesn't mean it isn't constantly happening.

Lmao

I notice you have no actual response to facts. Unsurprising.
---

averagejoel posted...

I don't think difficulty grabbing attention and commanding respect in a room is at all the same as systemic disenfranchisement, and I also don't think it's unique to short men.

You don't think, despite it being well documented. Don't do this.
---

JACKBUTTMOMMY posted...

ImmatureContent posted...

JACKBUTTMOMMY posted...

ImmatureContent posted...

Attraction is a natural instinct but it is not based on anything as specific as genitals. Children don't instinctively know about anatomy. It is learned information. For instance, children assume everyone has the same genitalia as themselves. It is a surprise for them to learn that boys and girls are different in that regard. If you remove a boy from society, never teach him about the differences between the sexes, and then introduce him to a pretty girl after he reaches puberty, he would likely still have a natural attraction but he would expect the girl to have a penis because he has never learned about anything else.

Just because you don't actively notice society shaping your opinions doesn't mean it isn't constantly happening.

Lmao

I notice you have no actual response to facts. Unsurprising.

Im actually against transphobic nonsense. Assuming how every child develops and not citing your claims is whats funny.

There is nothing to cite. I didn't assume anything. I presented a hypothetical situation based on common knowledge. Children don't know about sexuality. They learn about it. It is the entire reason the birds and the bees talk exists. Maybe you don't personally remember the first time you discovered boys and girls had different equipment but you absolutely did not know it innately. There is no way for you to have known.
---

JACKBUTTMOMMY posted...

ImmatureContent posted...

JACKBUTTMOMMY posted...

ImmatureContent posted...

JACKBUTTMOMMY posted...

ImmatureContent posted...

Attraction is a natural instinct but it is not based on anything as specific as genitals. Children don't instinctively know about anatomy. It is learned information. For instance, children assume everyone has the same genitalia as themselves. It is a surprise for them to learn that boys and girls are different in that regard. If you remove a boy from society, never teach him about the differences between the sexes, and then introduce him to a pretty girl after he reaches puberty, he would likely still have a natural attraction but he would expect the girl to have a penis because he has never learned about anything else.

Just because you don't actively notice society shaping your opinions doesn't mean it isn't constantly happening.

Lmao

I notice you have no actual response to facts. Unsurprising.

Im actually against transphobic nonsense. Assuming how every child develops and not citing your claims is whats funny.

There is nothing to cite. I didn't assume anything. I presented a hypothetical situation based on common knowledge. Children don't know about sexuality. They learn about it. It is the entire reason the birds and the bees talk exists. Maybe you don't personally remember the first time you discovered boys and girls had different equipment but you absolutely did not know it innately. There is no way for you to have known.

All species outside of humans evolved without learning it, and if its a part of nature, that includes natural procreation with within us includes two sets of different genitals. We procreated before the societal definitions and knowledge. The claim that we dont know the difference without being taught simply needs more support and better definition. For now it was a generalization although for the most part I agree with the rest of the basic foundational logic youre applying.

Pheromones.

This may be incorrect, but I'm pretty sure all living beings secrete them, maybe not plants but they might too
---

JACKBUTTMOMMY posted...

ImmatureContent posted...

JACKBUTTMOMMY posted...

ImmatureContent posted...

JACKBUTTMOMMY posted...

ImmatureContent posted...

Attraction is a natural instinct but it is not based on anything as specific as genitals. Children don't instinctively know about anatomy. It is learned information. For instance, children assume everyone has the same genitalia as themselves. It is a surprise for them to learn that boys and girls are different in that regard. If you remove a boy from society, never teach him about the differences between the sexes, and then introduce him to a pretty girl after he reaches puberty, he would likely still have a natural attraction but he would expect the girl to have a penis because he has never learned about anything else.

Just because you don't actively notice society shaping your opinions doesn't mean it isn't constantly happening.

Lmao

I notice you have no actual response to facts. Unsurprising.

Im actually against transphobic nonsense. Assuming how every child develops and not citing your claims is whats funny.

There is nothing to cite. I didn't assume anything. I presented a hypothetical situation based on common knowledge. Children don't know about sexuality. They learn about it. It is the entire reason the birds and the bees talk exists. Maybe you don't personally remember the first time you discovered boys and girls had different equipment but you absolutely did not know it innately. There is no way for you to have known.

All species outside of humans evolved without learning it, and if its a part of nature, that includes natural procreation with within us includes two sets of different genitals. We procreated before the societal definitions and knowledge. The claim that we dont know the difference without being taught simply needs more support and better definition. For now it was a generalization although for the most part I agree with the rest of the basic foundational logic youre applying.

Baby animals often imitate the behavior of their parents. The animal kingdom operates largely on instinct but they are also capable of learning, the same as humans. I never said you necessarily had to be taught by someone else. You can learn through firsthand experience. As the other person said, pheromones exist. Attraction is definitely somewhat instinctual, but specific knowledge about anatomy is not. Instinct does not provide us with detailed knowledge. Instinct comes down to feelings and intuition. After all, a male doesn't need to know what a vagina is to figure out how to have sex. The point I was making is that people do not have an innate aversion to penises. That is just people misinterpreting biology in order to justify their opinions.
---

JACKBUTTMOMMY posted...

Correct. Some animals are orphans that make it on their own though. It is indeed nature and nature. It did seem that you said if you took away a boy that he would never learn but its whatever. The rest certainly stands.

I didn't say he would never learn. I was saying that until he learned he would just assume a girl has a penis, because that is what the boy has. His own body is the only thing he has to base it on. I remember looking at porn with my brother when we were kids. I was a couple of years older and he definitely didn't know what a vagina was because I remember him making a comment and he thought it was funny.
---

hey @BanjoBoomer just reminding you that I responded to you in detail
---

I guess BanjoBoomer isn't interested in having an actual conversation. oh well.
---

Banjo got rekt
---

I got bored. I might read and respond to your post in a couple days when I'm in the mood again.

BanjoBoomer posted...

I got bored. I might read and respond to your post in a couple days when I'm in the mood again.

jesus christ man. I should be billing you for my time
---

She agrees with anything that gets her views. This "chuck" is and always will be a nightmare.
---

should i send BanjoBoomer an invoice?
---