Board 8 > Zoe Quinn strikes again.

(+) Yeah! (+)

ExThaNemesis posted...

it's just the highest profile case we have and i kno it burns extra coz u went there and it should've been a slam dunk win for you but alas that darn extha

It's the only case you have. Every time you mention it, you dig that hole deeper. There is absolutely nothing I can do to you that's worse than your dedication here.
---

the title of the topic

Zoe Quinn strikes again.

---

it helps that I only brought cases here to argue about that I was fairly sure were false. Emma sulkowicz/mattress girl comes to mind as well

do u have any cases that I fervently argued where I was btfo the way you were bout UVA when that fell apart?
---

The title of the topic defends rapists?

Lmfao. That is your literal fucking argument?

Jcgamer defended rapists because he said Zoe Quinn strikes again?

L

O

L

How does that even fucking make sense.

---

ExThaNemesis posted...

it helps that I only brought cases here to argue about that I was fairly sure were false

And brought along the millions of other rape cases with them, all of which you are wrong about, all of which you are btfo over.

I'm not even gonna mention how I knew the rolling stone article was bad before you. It's my school and I had way more info.
---

Corrik7 posted...

The title of the topic defends rapists?

Lmfao. That is your literal fucking argument?

Jcgamer defended rapists because he said Zoe Quinn strikes again?

L

O

L

How does that even fucking make sense.

the idea is that Alec, the guy Zoe has struck is a rapist and that blaming Zoe for his suicide, like the title implies, is a defense of him because it places all of the blame on her for exposing him rather than on him for doing the thing that needed to be exposed

---

Corrik7 posted...

The title of the topic defends rapists?

Lmfao. That is your literal fucking argument?

Jcgamer defended rapists because he said Zoe Quinn strikes again?

L

O

L

How does that even fucking make sense.

Can I use this next time you ask why it's "so hard" to answer your "simple question"
---

5 posts down, 195 to go

Corrik's a master of this. Extha could learn a lot.

Oh wait only 100 left. Guess that's the end of it. Rape defenders will go back to their blissful life until the next opportunity pops up.
---

And brought along the millions of other rape cases with them, all of which you are wrong about, all of which you are btfo over.

I'm not even gonna mention how I knew the rolling stone article was bad before you. It's my school and I had way more info.
_foolmo_
2 + 2 = 4

are u tryina say that like I was arguing against every single rape case or somethin coz that's p absurd bro

and also yes foolmo-sama absolutely ahead of the curve on every single thing how could I not have known!!
---

also i was gonna point out how u were like "I am explicitly not going to spend a bunch of posts explaining this to u Corrik" and then proceeded to do just that
---

UltimaterializerX posted...

Who are you guys even talking to?

UItimaterializer posted...

TheRock1525 posted...

I have Ulti on ignore so I can't see what he's saying, but I thought you could also block the ability to see when he's quoted.

WATCH OUT WE HAVE AN EDGELORD

---

ExThaNemesis posted...

are u tryina say that like I was arguing against every single rape case or somethin coz that's p absurd bro

Oh no you are far too afraid to argue that. But you do deny every single rape case.
---

What ARE you arguing against, ExTha?

Because it seems like your argument is regularly "one or two people lied, therefore those bitches can NEVER be trusted".
---

ExThaNemesis posted...

also i was gonna point out how u were like "I am explicitly not going to spend a bunch of posts explaining this to u Corrik" and then proceeded to do just that

Like I said he's good

You're the only one in here pretending like I'm some perfect god, it's obviously not true
---

foolm0r0n posted...

Oh no you are far too afraid to argue that. But you do deny every single rape case.

lmfaooooooo
---

Inviso posted...

What ARE you arguing against, ExTha?

Because it seems like your argument is regularly "one or two people lied, therefore those bitches can NEVER be trusted".

the only reason I brought up those cases was to rub them in foolmo's face. the only other reason would be to highlight that ur "listen and believe at all costs" rhetoric can be and has been extremely damaging.
---

ExThaNemesis posted...

Inviso posted...

What ARE you arguing against, ExTha?

Because it seems like your argument is regularly "one or two people lied, therefore those bitches can NEVER be trusted".

the only reason I brought up those cases was to rub them in foolmo's face. the only other reason would be to highlight that ur "listen and believe at all costs" rhetoric can be and has been extremely damaging.

As opposed to..."shut up, never tell anyone when you get assaulted, and let guys like Bill Cosby and Harvey Weinstein continuously hurt other women"?
---

Inviso posted...

As opposed to..."shut up, never tell anyone when you get assaulted, and let guys like Bill Cosby and Harvey Weinstein continuously hurt other women"?

have literally never said that

You are the one who earlier in this topic said "No one has ever faced anything bad from being falsely accused" and when I told u to go look up Brian Banks you just kind of disappeared
---

anyway I'm like 4 years now removed from the red pill sphere online where I'd be following these cases every time they popped up and I'm sure back then everything I said with full invective gave off the vibe that I didn't believe a single word any SA victim said.

that ain't me anymore. i realize there's a middle ground where we gotta have a safe environment for victims to come forward without shame or fear. we also gotta realize that SA allegations are uniquely capable of ruining someone's life regardless the amount of evidence there is, and waiting to see that evidence emerge is important as well.

I admittedly popped off without regard for the full story in this thread and shouldn't have done so tbh
---

MoogleKupo141 posted...

the idea is that Alec, the guy Zoe has struck is a rapist and that blaming Zoe for his suicide, like the title implies, is a defense of him because it places all of the blame on her for exposing him rather than on him for doing the thing that needed to be exposed

He is a rapist? Where? She accused him of being abusive in a relationship and toxic. Not rape. Am I missing something?

---

The article I read mentioned sexual assault.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.polygon.com/platform/amp/2019/8/29/20835673/night-in-the-woods-alec-holowka-abuse-zoe-quinn

---

this thread is getting to 500 huh
---

MoogleKupo141 posted...

The article I read mentioned sexual assault.

The article you read was titled sexual assault but never states that in the article unless I missed it. He was her boyfriend and he would be mentally abusive to her to the best of my knowledge. She was responding to another person who said she was sexually assaulted or something.

Where the fuck did rape come into this?

Again, how is there a "rape apologists" argument going on here. I mean, fuck. Is it me not reading or yinz?

---

When I talk about how most normal people are anti-feminist, here is a wonderful example: https://np.reddit.com/r/AmItheAsshole/comments/cyj5v1/aita_for_telling_my_wife_that_if_she_quits_her/

The thread is locked now so there is no worry about you people invading like you tend to do. tl;dr version -- Wife wants to quit job and be a stay at home mom. Husband says this is only okay if she does 100% of the house work, because he has to pick up extra hours to compensate. She got pissy and played the feminist sexism card, but he was having none of it. (Side note: it's a MASSIVE red flag if a female ever does this, just FYI. Women all know they get more in a divorce if they're a stay at home mom, which is why you do not get married without a prenup.)

Anyway, Reddit almost universally sided with the husband. When I say normal people are anti-SJW and that SJWs like you find on Board 8 are an extreme outlier, I'm not talking out of my ass. I never make claims without knowing full well what the data is, and it's a big reason I spend far more time on Reddit than GameFAQs anymore.

I am not alone in this, either. Here is the data.

https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/reddit.com (ranked 15th)

https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/gamefaqs.com (ranked 17,250th, we used to be top 100 and tanked almost immediately once the site became leftist; there are other obvious factors there like the site refusing to modernize in time, but our message boards are famous across the internet for being a leftist joke)

https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/resetera.com (ranked 4,563rd)

https://theweek.com/speedreads/858632/verizon-reportedly-sells-tumblr-mindboggling-loss (tumblr sold for a 98% loss, a lot of which is due to them getting rid of porn but it's also due to them being known as an SJW web site)

The only big site I can think of with a large SJW presence is Twitter (https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/twitter.com), which ranks below Reddit and the SJWs there have all been boxed in anyway.

The data proves, as usual, SJWs are an extremist minority. Deal with it. Board 8 having a large SJW presence means absolutely nothing and is in no way indicative of how the real world thinks. I know that's impossible for the SJWs on here to believe, but it's the truth. Suck it up. People are almost universally against all of your positions and the second you guys show up, popularity dies. This is not an accident. Normal everyday people don't want to be around you. At all. Ever.

(Reuters) - Procter & Gamble Co's quarterly revenue and adjusted profit beat Wall Street expectations on Tuesday, sending shares to a record-high even as the world's No.1 personal goods company took an $8 billion charge on its Gillette shaving business.

P&G reported a net loss of about $5.24 billion, or $2.12 per share, for the quarter ended June 30, due to an $8 billion non-cash writedown of Gillette. For the same period last year, P&G's net income was $1.89 billion, or 72 cents per share.

And for the record, I actually defended that ad and didn't think it was bad. There was a 500 topic I made here about it. Still lost them 8 billion dollars. The Marvel Cinematic Universe needs to be very, very careful here because the public has proven they will turn on a company in a second if they go SJW.

As for how this relates to Zoe Quinn, public opinion is almost entirely against her and the people defending her are in echo chambers of like-minded extremists. As I predicted, Board 8 is one of the only places on the internet siding with her. I give no fucks if the mob here hates my posts in this topic; I am factually correct in my analysis.

After all, analysis after the fact is kind of what I do <_<

ExTha why are you typing like a really bad Homestuck fantroll RPer from 2016.
---

Are there good Homestuck fantroll RPers?
---

Quinn, who uses they/them pronouns, first wrote: "I've been silent about this for almost my entire career and i can't do it anymore. Sorry if this is rambling and messy, I'm scared shitless to out an industry legend like this but I can't live with the secret anymore."

They said they decided to share their story after seeing a post by artist and game designer Nathalie Lawhead about about being raped by an industry legend. Lawhead shared a blog post, titled "calling out my rapist," earlier on Monday detailing her alleged experiences with abuse and rape by Skyrim composer Jeremy Soule.

"So many of the little details, down to the timing, had been things I've gone through too," Quinn wrote of Lawhead's post. "Its haunted me ever since. It's why I don't go to [Game Developers Conference] anymore. I'm drowning too."

Quinn said they began a long-distance relationship with Holowka, who was ostensibly supportive during a time when Quinn was "in an incredibly vulnerable place."
But when they went to visit him in Winnipeg, Canada, Quinn said, the relationship took a turn for the worse.
"While I was in Winnipeg he slowly isolated me from everyone else in my life while absolutely degrading me whenever we were alone," wrote Quinn. "He screamed at me for over an hour once because of the tone in my voice when I said hello. He wouldn't let me leave the apartment without him and refused to give me the code to get in."

Quinn wrote that Holowka blamed them for a past experience of sexual abuse from a previous partner, and that he brought it up repeatedly even during sex. They also wrote that they would hide in the bathroom to avoid Holowka, who would "throw things and hurt himself seemingly at random," only to blame Quinn for it all later. When Holowka refused to buy Quinn's ticket home, as the pair had agreed, Quinn's roommate offered to help them get home.
Quinn detailed that upon returning home, they sent Holowka a "cordial and friendly break up email," to which Holowka responded with hostility.
"He made sure to blacklist me at important industry events. He tried to ruin the career I'd barely started. To a degree it worked," they wrote.

---

It has been a while.

I feel like I wouldn't have been in a position to judge when it was relevant.
---

LapisLazuli posted...

ExTha why are you typing like a really bad Homestuck fantroll RPer from 2016.

i have literally zero idea what this is lol
---

gee ulti you seem really preoccupied with us thinking youre normal and popular

---

ExThaNemesis posted...

that ain't me anymore

Have your medal then

Need anything else from this topic and/or this person's suicide?
---

foolm0r0n posted...

ExThaNemesis posted...

that ain't me anymore

Have your medal then

Need anything else from this topic?

I could probably go for a really big sandwich.

idk i was thoroughly entertained by u trying to explain yourself to corrik not gonna lie
---

Corrik I dont know where the get the sexual assault part and its hard to look into since Zoe delete all them tweets. Maybe theyre defining her having sex with him under these sort of prisony conditions as sexual assault? I dunno. Maybe foolmo can help you out with this part.

---

also is it in bad taste to make a ##Alec joke rn
---

Common_Sense posted...

When I talk about how most normal people are anti-feminist, here is a wonderful example: https://np.reddit.com/r/AmItheAsshole/comments/cyj5v1/aita_for_telling_my_wife_that_if_she_quits_her/

The thread is locked now so there is no worry about you people invading like you tend to do. tl;dr version -- Wife wants to quit job and be a stay at home mom. Husband says this is only okay if she does 100% of the house work, because he has to pick up extra hours to compensate. She got pissy and played the feminist sexism card, but he was having none of it. (Side note: it's a MASSIVE red flag if a female ever does this, just FYI. Women all know they get more in a divorce if they're a stay at home mom, which is why you do not get married without a prenup.)

Anyway, Reddit almost universally sided with the husband. When I say normal people are anti-SJW and that SJWs like you find on Board 8 are an extreme outlier, I'm not talking out of my ass. I never make claims without knowing full well what the data is, and it's a big reason I spend far more time on Reddit than GameFAQs anymore.

I am not alone in this, either. Here is the data.

https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/reddit.com (ranked 15th)

https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/gamefaqs.com (ranked 17,250th, we used to be top 100 and tanked almost immediately once the site became leftist; there are other obvious factors there like the site refusing to modernize in time, but our message boards are famous across the internet for being a leftist joke)

https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/resetera.com (ranked 4,563rd)

https://theweek.com/speedreads/858632/verizon-reportedly-sells-tumblr-mindboggling-loss (tumblr sold for a 98% loss, a lot of which is due to them getting rid of porn but it's also due to them being known as an SJW web site)

The only big site I can think of with a large SJW presence is Twitter (https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/twitter.com), which ranks below Reddit and the SJWs there have all been boxed in anyway.

The data proves, as usual, SJWs are an extremist minority. Deal with it. Board 8 having a large SJW presence means absolutely nothing and is in no way indicative of how the real world thinks. I know that's impossible for the SJWs on here to believe, but it's the truth. Suck it up. People are almost universally against all of your positions and the second you guys show up, popularity dies. This is not an accident. Normal everyday people don't want to be around you. At all. Ever.

(Reuters) - Procter & Gamble Co's quarterly revenue and adjusted profit beat Wall Street expectations on Tuesday, sending shares to a record-high even as the world's No.1 personal goods company took an $8 billion charge on its Gillette shaving business.

P&G reported a net loss of about $5.24 billion, or $2.12 per share, for the quarter ended June 30, due to an $8 billion non-cash writedown of Gillette. For the same period last year, P&G's net income was $1.89 billion, or 72 cents per share.

And for the record, I actually defended that ad and didn't think it was bad. There was a 500 topic I made here about it. Still lost them 8 billion dollars. The Marvel Cinematic Universe needs to be very, very careful here because the public has proven they will turn on a company in a second if they go SJW.

As for how this relates to Zoe Quinn, public opinion is almost entirely against her and the people defending her are in echo chambers of like-minded extremists. As I predicted, Board 8 is one of the only places on the internet siding with her. I give no fucks if the mob here hates my posts in this topic; I am factually correct in my analysis.

After all, analysis after the fact is kind of what I do <_<

Lol.
---

foolm0r0n posted...

Common_Sense posted...

When I talk about how most normal people are anti-feminist, here is a wonderful example: https://np.reddit.com/r/AmItheAsshole/comments/cyj5v1/aita_for_telling_my_wife_that_if_she_quits_her/

The thread is locked now so there is no worry about you people invading like you tend to do. tl;dr version -- Wife wants to quit job and be a stay at home mom. Husband says this is only okay if she does 100% of the house work, because he has to pick up extra hours to compensate. She got pissy and played the feminist sexism card, but he was having none of it. (Side note: it's a MASSIVE red flag if a female ever does this, just FYI. Women all know they get more in a divorce if they're a stay at home mom, which is why you do not get married without a prenup.)

Anyway, Reddit almost universally sided with the husband. When I say normal people are anti-SJW and that SJWs like you find on Board 8 are an extreme outlier, I'm not talking out of my ass. I never make claims without knowing full well what the data is, and it's a big reason I spend far more time on Reddit than GameFAQs anymore.

I am not alone in this, either. Here is the data.

https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/reddit.com (ranked 15th)

https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/gamefaqs.com (ranked 17,250th, we used to be top 100 and tanked almost immediately once the site became leftist; there are other obvious factors there like the site refusing to modernize in time, but our message boards are famous across the internet for being a leftist joke)

https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/resetera.com (ranked 4,563rd)

https://theweek.com/speedreads/858632/verizon-reportedly-sells-tumblr-mindboggling-loss (tumblr sold for a 98% loss, a lot of which is due to them getting rid of porn but it's also due to them being known as an SJW web site)

The only big site I can think of with a large SJW presence is Twitter (https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/twitter.com), which ranks below Reddit and the SJWs there have all been boxed in anyway.

The data proves, as usual, SJWs are an extremist minority. Deal with it. Board 8 having a large SJW presence means absolutely nothing and is in no way indicative of how the real world thinks. I know that's impossible for the SJWs on here to believe, but it's the truth. Suck it up. People are almost universally against all of your positions and the second you guys show up, popularity dies. This is not an accident. Normal everyday people don't want to be around you. At all. Ever.

(Reuters) - Procter & Gamble Co's quarterly revenue and adjusted profit beat Wall Street expectations on Tuesday, sending shares to a record-high even as the world's No.1 personal goods company took an $8 billion charge on its Gillette shaving business.

P&G reported a net loss of about $5.24 billion, or $2.12 per share, for the quarter ended June 30, due to an $8 billion non-cash writedown of Gillette. For the same period last year, P&G's net income was $1.89 billion, or 72 cents per share.

And for the record, I actually defended that ad and didn't think it was bad. There was a 500 topic I made here about it. Still lost them 8 billion dollars. The Marvel Cinematic Universe needs to be very, very careful here because the public has proven they will turn on a company in a second if they go SJW.

As for how this relates to Zoe Quinn, public opinion is almost entirely against her and the people defending her are in echo chambers of like-minded extremists. As I predicted, Board 8 is one of the only places on the internet siding with her. I give no fucks if the mob here hates my posts in this topic; I am factually correct in my analysis.

After all, analysis after the fact is kind of what I do <_<

Lol.

He forgot to block me on this one
---

also u can get around that block-quote thing by just putting what they said in italics like we used to do way back when!
---

ulti saw that Reddit post and thought yeah gotta save this for later itll totally own those board 8 jerks

---

How can we not trust him?

His name is common_sense, it's not like you can just lie in your username.

Meanwhile you are a fool and the other guy is a nemesis.

The trustworthy one is clear and obvious.
---

ExThaNemesis posted...

also u can get around that block-quote thing by just putting what they said in italics like we used to do way back when!

Oh I know
---

Wait is that Ulti?

Has he brought out...3 ACCOUNTS in this topic to get people who have him on ignore to read his posts?
---

4 I think
---

It's very weird to be that he continues to do this even after utilizing the block feature on his end.

Seems incredible contradictory.
---

that's some LMS-level posting from ulti
---

MoogleKupo141 posted...

Corrik I dont know where the get the sexual assault part and its hard to look into since Zoe delete all them tweets. Maybe theyre defining her having sex with him under these sort of prisony conditions as sexual assault? I dunno. Maybe foolmo can help you out with this part.

Cuz he is full of shit and has to take an extreme label to act like he is morally superior to degrade jcgamer. Jcgamer at no point defended rapists (I know foolmo just tried to use the typical go to racist argument by changing the letter to rapist). Jcgamer called out mob mentality, which is bullying. That is literally it.

Whether Zoe or whoever is a good person or not, I dunno. But, this topic seems very divided on her. So, when he says she is divisive and doubts her credibility, he doesn't seem to be the only one.

However, saying people are rape apologists and defensing rapists in this topic is pure bullshit. Jcgamer did not deserve the drive by fuck offs and insults yinz levied on him (har har let's deflect he said yinz!). Like, you guys were frankly out of line as fuck with jcgamer. You could have conversed on the opposite end nicely. Instead you just insulted and told someone who is a part of this board with you to fuck off repeatedly. Like wtf

---

Corrik7 posted...

har har let's deflect he said yinz!

Damn, ya got me.
---