Current Events > Do you consider evolution to be 100% proven fact?

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4
CedarPointcp 09/04/19 7:16:30 PM #1:	do you? - Results (44 votes) yes 79.55% (35 votes) 35 i believe evolution is true but i don't believe it to that extent 13.64% (6 votes) 6 i don't believe in evolution 6.82% (3 votes) 3 and, are there any users on here who believe that there's a chance evolution could be overturned? --- "Ah, you most likely know it as Myanmar but it'll always be Burma to me" <cite>CedarPointcp posted [p:926975401] in Do you con... [t:77987770]...</cite> <quote> do you? - Results (44 votes) yes 79.55% (35 votes) 35 i believe evolution is true but i don't believe it to that extent 13.64% (6 votes) 6 i don't believe in evolution 6.82% (3 votes) 3 and, are there any users on here who believe that there's a chance evolution could be overturned?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Fuparulez 09/04/19 7:17:51 PM #2:	Intelligent design makes far more sense than the belief that life randomly sprung up from nothing. Not creationism, but intelligent design. --- It's the fat upper kitty area, and if you got one I wanna marry ya! <cite>Fuparulez posted [p:926975515] in Do you con... [t:77987770]...</cite> <quote>Intelligent design makes far more sense than the belief that life randomly sprung up from nothing. Not creationism, but intelligent design.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MorbidFaithless 09/04/19 7:18:13 PM #3:	It's literally scientific fact. --- walk like thunder <cite>MorbidFaithless posted [p:926975551] in Do you con... [t:77987770]...</cite> <quote>It's literally scientific fact. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CedarPointcp 09/04/19 7:18:16 PM #4:	Fuparulez posted... Intelligent design makes far more sense than the belief that life randomly sprung up from nothing. Not creationism, but intelligent design. are you being serious here? --- "Ah, you most likely know it as Myanmar but it'll always be Burma to me" <cite>CedarPointcp posted [p:926975554] in Do you con... [t:77987770]...</cite> <quote>Fuparulez posted...</cite> <quote>Intelligent design makes far more sense than the belief that life randomly sprung up from nothing. Not creationism, but intelligent design.</quote> are you being serious here?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Sackgurl 09/04/19 7:18:47 PM #5:	Fuparulez posted... Intelligent design makes far more sense than the belief that life randomly sprung up from nothing. Not creationism, but intelligent design. evolution isn't a discussion of abiogenesis --- LittleBigPlanet is like merging dress-up with a real game. <cite>Sackgurl posted [p:926975600] in Do you con... [t:77987770]...</cite> <quote>Fuparulez posted...</cite> <quote>Intelligent design makes far more sense than the belief that life randomly sprung up from nothing. Not creationism, but intelligent design.</quote> evolution isn't a discussion of abiogenesis</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DarkRoast 09/04/19 7:20:13 PM #6:	It's scientific fact. Anyone who disagrees 1) Doesn't know what evolution is 2) Likely believes it's abiogenesis --- Well allons-y, Alonso! <cite>DarkRoast posted [p:926975732] in Do you con... [t:77987770]...</cite> <quote>It's scientific fact. Anyone who disagrees 1) Doesn't know what evolution is 2) Likely believes it's abiogenesis</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Fuparulez 09/04/19 7:22:20 PM #7:	Of course I'm being serious. The funny thing is that most of the pro evolution arguments make more of a case for intelligent design. Venus, Earth, and Mars were three science experiments by an advanced culture. They terraformed the three of them, which is something we've proposed, then they engineered life to exist in every place, which is something we dabble with. Venus and Mars obviously failed. Look at the places life exists. Stuff living at the bottom of the ocean. That defies nature. Why would stuff want to live there when it could live... anywhere else. Somebody biologically engineered those creatures and put them there. "But we have vestigial organs, that's proof of evolution!" "We're 80% genetically similar to lettuce, that's proof of evolution!" No, that's just proof of lazy biological programmers. You ever done any coding? When you start a new task, you don't start from scratch. You take existing code and modify it to do what you need and extemporaneous code that doesn't hurt anything? Most of the time it gets left in. That's what our DNA is. Source code. Somebody wrote it. --- It's the fat upper kitty area, and if you got one I wanna marry ya! <cite>Fuparulez posted [p:926975918] in Do you con... [t:77987770]...</cite> <quote>Of course I'm being serious. The funny thing is that most of the pro evolution arguments make more of a case for intelligent design. Venus, Earth, and Mars were three science experiments by an advanced culture. They terraformed the three of them, which is something we've proposed, then they engineered life to exist in every place, which is something we dabble with. Venus and Mars obviously failed. Look at the places life exists. Stuff living at the bottom of the ocean. That defies nature. Why would stuff want to live there when it could live... anywhere else. Somebody biologically engineered those creatures and put them there. "But we have vestigial organs, that's proof of evolution!" "We're 80% genetically similar to lettuce, that's proof of evolution!" No, that's just proof of lazy biological programmers. You ever done any coding? When you start a new task, you don't start from scratch. You take existing code and modify it to do what you need and extemporaneous code that doesn't hurt anything? Most of the time it gets left in. That's what our DNA is. Source code. Somebody wrote it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Rikiaz 09/04/19 7:25:10 PM #8:	MorbidFaithless posted... It's literally scientific fact. This. A scientific theory doesn't mean that it's not a proven fact. --- From the depths, the thing they called Worm King did rise. Nirn itself did scream in the Mages' and Necromancers' war. <cite>Rikiaz posted [p:926976154] in Do you con... [t:77987770]...</cite> <quote>MorbidFaithless posted...</cite> <quote>It's literally scientific fact. </quote> This. A scientific theory doesn't mean that it's not a proven fact.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HasaDiga 09/04/19 7:30:16 PM #9:	Fuparulez posted... Intelligent design makes far more sense than the belief that life randomly sprung up from nothing. Not creationism, but intelligent design. The concept of the origin of existence IS mind-boggling, but we don't need to basically take it to "I don't understand it, therefore it must be magic." <cite>HasaDiga posted [p:926976564] in Do you con... [t:77987770]...</cite> <quote>Fuparulez posted...</cite> <quote>Intelligent design makes far more sense than the belief that life randomly sprung up from nothing. Not creationism, but intelligent design.</quote> The concept of the origin of existence IS mind-boggling, but we don't need to basically take it to "I don't understand it, therefore it must be magic."</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dragonblade01 09/04/19 7:30:20 PM #10:	Evolution is a direcly observable phenomenon. <cite>Dragonblade01 posted [p:926976573] in Do you con... [t:77987770]...</cite> <quote>Evolution is a direcly observable phenomenon.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
I Like Toast 09/04/19 7:31:34 PM #11:	Fuparulez posted... Intelligent design makes far more sense than the belief that life randomly sprung up from nothing. Not creationism, but intelligent design. Evolution isn't about how life started its about what happened after it started --- If you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all <cite>I Like Toast posted [p:926976685] in Do you con... [t:77987770]...</cite> <quote>Fuparulez posted... </cite> <quote>Intelligent design makes far more sense than the belief that life randomly sprung up from nothing. Not creationism, but intelligent design.</quote> Evolution isn't about how life started its about what happened after it started </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#12	Post #12 was unavailable or deleted.
ThyCorndog 09/04/19 7:32:12 PM #13:	Dragonblade01 posted... Evolution is a direcly observable phenomenon. this --- https://imgur.com/6cPXvLN <cite>ThyCorndog posted [p:926976729] in Do you con... [t:77987770]...</cite> <quote>Dragonblade01 posted...</cite> <quote>Evolution is a direcly observable phenomenon.</quote> this</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
joe40001 09/04/19 7:32:23 PM #14:	For all effects and purposes it's true. But aside from logic itself and the truths it can derive I don't treat anything else as 100% --- "joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9 <cite>joe40001 posted [p:926976755] in Do you con... [t:77987770]...</cite> <quote>For all effects and purposes it's true. But aside from logic itself and the truths it can derive I don't treat anything else as 100%</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lorenzo_2003 09/04/19 7:32:41 PM #15:	Sackgurl posted... Fuparulez posted... Intelligent design makes far more sense than the belief that life randomly sprung up from nothing. Not creationism, but intelligent design. evolution isn't a discussion of abiogenesis Good point. In my experience, most people are unaware of it. --- ... <cite>Lorenzo_2003 posted [p:926976778] in Do you con... [t:77987770]...</cite> <quote>Sackgurl posted...</cite> <quote>Fuparulez posted...</cite> <quote>Intelligent design makes far more sense than the belief that life randomly sprung up from nothing. Not creationism, but intelligent design.</quote> evolution isn't a discussion of abiogenesis</quote> Good point. In my experience, most people are unaware of it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Notti 09/04/19 7:33:43 PM #16:	Fuparulez posted... Of course I'm being serious. The funny thing is that most of the pro evolution arguments make more of a case for intelligent design. Venus, Earth, and Mars were three science experiments by an advanced culture. They terraformed the three of them, which is something we've proposed, then they engineered life to exist in every place, which is something we dabble with. Venus and Mars obviously failed. Look at the places life exists. Stuff living at the bottom of the ocean. That defies nature. Why would stuff want to live there when it could live... anywhere else. Somebody biologically engineered those creatures and put them there. "But we have vestigial organs, that's proof of evolution!" "We're 80% genetically similar to lettuce, that's proof of evolution!" No, that's just proof of lazy biological programmers. You ever done any coding? When you start a new task, you don't start from scratch. You take existing code and modify it to do what you need and extemporaneous code that doesn't hurt anything? Most of the time it gets left in. That's what our DNA is. Source code. Somebody wrote it. Nah. If you insist on the code analogy.... ERVs in our DNA show that life has common ancestry like source code forking over and over and over. If you line up all the ERV invasions in our DNA they produce... a tree. A tree of evolution. --- https://youtube.com/TheYoungTurks http://RightWingWatch.org/ https://DemocraticUnderground.com/?com=latest_threads https://reddit.com/r/The_Mueller/new <cite>Notti posted [p:926976851] in Do you con... [t:77987770]...</cite> <quote><cite>Fuparulez posted...</cite> <quote>Of course I'm being serious. The funny thing is that most of the pro evolution arguments make more of a case for intelligent design. Venus, Earth, and Mars were three science experiments by an advanced culture. They terraformed the three of them, which is something we've proposed, then they engineered life to exist in every place, which is something we dabble with. Venus and Mars obviously failed. Look at the places life exists. Stuff living at the bottom of the ocean. That defies nature. Why would stuff want to live there when it could live... anywhere else. Somebody biologically engineered those creatures and put them there. "But we have vestigial organs, that's proof of evolution!" "We're 80% genetically similar to lettuce, that's proof of evolution!" No, that's just proof of lazy biological programmers. You ever done any coding? When you start a new task, you don't start from scratch. You take existing code and modify it to do what you need and extemporaneous code that doesn't hurt anything? Most of the time it gets left in. That's what our DNA is. Source code. Somebody wrote it.</quote> Nah. If you insist on the code analogy.... ERVs in our DNA show that life has common ancestry like source code forking over and over and over. If you line up all the ERV invasions in our DNA they produce... a tree. A tree of evolution.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
I Like Toast 09/04/19 7:33:53 PM #17:	Sackgurl posted... abiogenesis abiogenesis /bjenss/ Learn to pronounce noun the original evolution of life or living organisms from inorganic or inanimate substances. --- If you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all <cite>I Like Toast posted [p:926976864] in Do you con... [t:77987770]...</cite> <quote>Sackgurl posted... </cite> <quote>abiogenesis</quote>abiogenesis /bjenss/ Learn to pronounce noun the original evolution of life or living organisms from inorganic or inanimate substances. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dragonblade01 09/04/19 7:35:33 PM #18:	I Like Toast posted... Sackgurl posted... abiogenesis abiogenesis /bjenss/ Learn to pronounce noun the original evolution of life or living organisms from inorganic or inanimate substances. The dictionary isn't using the scientific term "evolution" in that definition. <cite>Dragonblade01 posted [p:926977017] in Do you con... [t:77987770]...</cite> <quote>I Like Toast posted...</cite> <quote>Sackgurl posted... </cite> <quote>abiogenesis</quote>abiogenesis /bjenss/ Learn to pronounce noun the original evolution of life or living organisms from inorganic or inanimate substances. </quote> The dictionary isn't using the scientific term "evolution" in that definition.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DarkRoast 09/04/19 7:36:12 PM #19:	Fuparulez posted... Of course I'm being serious. The funny thing is that most of the pro evolution arguments make more of a case for intelligent design. Venus, Earth, and Mars were three science experiments by an advanced culture. They terraformed the three of them, which is something we've proposed, then they engineered life to exist in every place, which is something we dabble with. Venus and Mars obviously failed. Look at the places life exists. Stuff living at the bottom of the ocean. That defies nature. Why would stuff want to live there when it could live... anywhere else. Somebody biologically engineered those creatures and put them there. "But we have vestigial organs, that's proof of evolution!" "We're 80% genetically similar to lettuce, that's proof of evolution!" No, that's just proof of lazy biological programmers. You ever done any coding? When you start a new task, you don't start from scratch. You take existing code and modify it to do what you need and extemporaneous code that doesn't hurt anything? Most of the time it gets left in. That's what our DNA is. Source code. Somebody wrote it. As someone with a doctoral-level education in the biosciences, do please stop while you're ahead. --- Well allons-y, Alonso! <cite>DarkRoast posted [p:926977071] in Do you con... [t:77987770]...</cite> <quote>Fuparulez posted...</cite> <quote>Of course I'm being serious. The funny thing is that most of the pro evolution arguments make more of a case for intelligent design. Venus, Earth, and Mars were three science experiments by an advanced culture. They terraformed the three of them, which is something we've proposed, then they engineered life to exist in every place, which is something we dabble with. Venus and Mars obviously failed. Look at the places life exists. Stuff living at the bottom of the ocean. That defies nature. Why would stuff want to live there when it could live... anywhere else. Somebody biologically engineered those creatures and put them there. "But we have vestigial organs, that's proof of evolution!" "We're 80% genetically similar to lettuce, that's proof of evolution!" No, that's just proof of lazy biological programmers. You ever done any coding? When you start a new task, you don't start from scratch. You take existing code and modify it to do what you need and extemporaneous code that doesn't hurt anything? Most of the time it gets left in. That's what our DNA is. Source code. Somebody wrote it.</quote> As someone with a doctoral-level education in the biosciences, do please stop while you're ahead.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
I Like Toast 09/04/19 7:36:19 PM #20:	Dragonblade01 posted... The dictionary isn't using the scientific term "evolution" in that definition. ~~I'm making a joke I already agreed with their point~~ --- If you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all <cite>I Like Toast posted [p:926977077] in Do you con... [t:77987770]...</cite> <quote>Dragonblade01 posted... </cite> <quote>The dictionary isn't using the scientific term "evolution" in that definition.</quote> I'm making a joke I already agreed with their point </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DarkRoast 09/04/19 7:37:06 PM #21:	Evolution has literally been observed. In controlled clinical settings. --- Well allons-y, Alonso! <cite>DarkRoast posted [p:926977151] in Do you con... [t:77987770]...</cite> <quote>Evolution has literally been observed. In controlled clinical settings.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The Nintendo Master 09/04/19 7:39:25 PM #22:	There's a big difference in micro vs macro evolution. --- He who laughs last thinks slowest. <cite>The Nintendo Master posted [p:926977297] in Do you con... [t:77987770]...</cite> <quote>There's a big difference in micro vs macro evolution.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FrankGoreHOF 09/04/19 7:39:33 PM #23:	Lol the #2 troll post --- #FrankGoreHOF <cite>FrankGoreHOF posted [p:926977305] in Do you con... [t:77987770]...</cite> <quote>Lol the #2 troll post</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dragonblade01 09/04/19 7:40:05 PM #24:	The Nintendo Master posted... There's a big difference in micro vs macro evolution. Yeah, time. <cite>Dragonblade01 posted [p:926977355] in Do you con... [t:77987770]...</cite> <quote>The Nintendo Master posted...</cite> <quote>There's a big difference in micro vs macro evolution.</quote> Yeah, time.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DarkRoast 09/04/19 7:40:21 PM #25:	The Nintendo Master posted... There's a big difference in micro vs macro evolution. There is no "micro" or "macro" evolution. Evolution is one thing. The accumulation of mutations in the genetic code over time. Natural selection is (slightly) more theoretical, which would lead to what you think is "macro evolution" --- Well allons-y, Alonso! <cite>DarkRoast posted [p:926977373] in Do you con... [t:77987770]...</cite> <quote>The Nintendo Master posted...</cite> <quote>There's a big difference in micro vs macro evolution.</quote> There is no "micro" or "macro" evolution. Evolution is one thing. The accumulation of mutations in the genetic code over time. Natural selection is (slightly) more theoretical, which would lead to what you think is "macro evolution"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
_Rinku_ 09/04/19 7:48:05 PM #26:	Yes, in so far as we can prove anything as 100% fact. 99.9% isn't good enough for some naysayers, but I'm disinclined to put any weight in the opinions of people who think the world is six thousand years old. <cite>_Rinku_ posted [p:926977891] in Do you con... [t:77987770]...</cite> <quote>Yes, in so far as we can prove anything as 100% fact. 99.9% isn't good enough for some naysayers, but I'm disinclined to put any weight in the opinions of people who think the world is six thousand years old.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Squall28 09/04/19 7:50:36 PM #27:	99% I like keeping the door open. --- If you're going through hell, keep going. -Winston Churchill <cite>Squall28 posted [p:926978048] in Do you con... [t:77987770]...</cite> <quote>99% I like keeping the door open.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
D_Fen_Door 09/04/19 7:52:25 PM #28:	DarkRoast posted... Fuparulez posted... Of course I'm being serious. The funny thing is that most of the pro evolution arguments make more of a case for intelligent design. Venus, Earth, and Mars were three science experiments by an advanced culture. They terraformed the three of them, which is something we've proposed, then they engineered life to exist in every place, which is something we dabble with. Venus and Mars obviously failed. Look at the places life exists. Stuff living at the bottom of the ocean. That defies nature. Why would stuff want to live there when it could live... anywhere else. Somebody biologically engineered those creatures and put them there. "But we have vestigial organs, that's proof of evolution!" "We're 80% genetically similar to lettuce, that's proof of evolution!" No, that's just proof of lazy biological programmers. You ever done any coding? When you start a new task, you don't start from scratch. You take existing code and modify it to do what you need and extemporaneous code that doesn't hurt anything? Most of the time it gets left in. That's what our DNA is. Source code. Somebody wrote it. As someone with a doctoral-level education in the biosciences, do please stop while you're ahead. Met people with similar qualifications that dont believe in it. <cite>D_Fen_Door posted [p:926978191] in Do you con... [t:77987770]...</cite> <quote>DarkRoast posted...</cite> <quote>Fuparulez posted...</cite> <quote>Of course I'm being serious. The funny thing is that most of the pro evolution arguments make more of a case for intelligent design. Venus, Earth, and Mars were three science experiments by an advanced culture. They terraformed the three of them, which is something we've proposed, then they engineered life to exist in every place, which is something we dabble with. Venus and Mars obviously failed. Look at the places life exists. Stuff living at the bottom of the ocean. That defies nature. Why would stuff want to live there when it could live... anywhere else. Somebody biologically engineered those creatures and put them there. "But we have vestigial organs, that's proof of evolution!" "We're 80% genetically similar to lettuce, that's proof of evolution!" No, that's just proof of lazy biological programmers. You ever done any coding? When you start a new task, you don't start from scratch. You take existing code and modify it to do what you need and extemporaneous code that doesn't hurt anything? Most of the time it gets left in. That's what our DNA is. Source code. Somebody wrote it.</quote> As someone with a doctoral-level education in the biosciences, do please stop while you're ahead.</quote> Met people with similar qualifications that dont believe in it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#29	Post #29 was unavailable or deleted.
CedarPointcp 09/06/19 1:21:02 PM #30:	bimp --- "Ah, you most likely know it as Myanmar but it'll always be Burma to me" <cite>CedarPointcp posted [p:927062739] in Do you con... [t:77987770]...</cite> <quote>bimp</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
COVxy 09/06/19 1:22:58 PM #31:	Rikiaz posted... MorbidFaithless posted... It's literally scientific fact. This. A scientific theory doesn't mean that it's not a proven fact. I don't think those words mean what you think they mean. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] <cite>COVxy posted [p:927062816] in Do you con... [t:77987770]...</cite> <quote>Rikiaz posted...</cite> <quote>MorbidFaithless posted...</cite> <quote>It's literally scientific fact. </quote> This. A scientific theory doesn't mean that it's not a proven fact.</quote> I don't think those words mean what you think they mean.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DonaldClinton 09/06/19 1:24:48 PM #32:	Its 100% FAKE NEWS because Jesus and the Bible told me so --- Making Anerica Great Again <cite>DonaldClinton posted [p:927062881] in Do you con... [t:77987770]...</cite> <quote>Its 100% FAKE NEWS because Jesus and the Bible told me so</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
nemu 09/06/19 1:28:17 PM #33:	Yes. Anyone who disagrees really just has no intention of actually looking at it. They're just holding their ears and screaming at the top of their lungs in utter ignorance. <cite>nemu posted [p:927063051] in Do you con... [t:77987770]...</cite> <quote>Yes. Anyone who disagrees really just has no intention of actually looking at it. They're just holding their ears and screaming at the top of their lungs in utter ignorance.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tyranthraxus 09/06/19 1:30:15 PM #34:	Fuparulez posted... Intelligent design makes far more sense than the belief that life randomly sprung up from nothing. Not creationism, but intelligent design. Life did not spring up randomly but that has nothing to do with intelligent design and neither intelligent design nor creationism are valid. --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:927063125] in Do you con... [t:77987770]...</cite> <quote>Fuparulez posted... </cite> <quote>Intelligent design makes far more sense than the belief that life randomly sprung up from nothing. Not creationism, but intelligent design.</quote> Life did not spring up randomly but that has nothing to do with intelligent design and neither intelligent design nor creationism are valid. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DonaldClinton 09/06/19 1:30:25 PM #35:	@nemu posted... Yes. Anyone who disagrees really just has no intention of actually looking at it. They're just holding their ears and screaming at the top of their lungs in utter ignorance. What do you think about this? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tp1eZdtkdQM" data-time=" --- Making Anerica Great Again <cite>DonaldClinton posted [p:927063131] in Do you con... [t:77987770]...</cite> <quote>@nemu posted...</cite> <quote>Yes. Anyone who disagrees really just has no intention of actually looking at it. They're just holding their ears and screaming at the top of their lungs in utter ignorance.</quote> What do you think about this? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tp1eZdtkdQM" data-time="</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Unsugarized_Foo 09/06/19 1:31:13 PM #36:	COVxy posted... Rikiaz posted... MorbidFaithless posted... It's literally scientific fact. This. A scientific theory doesn't mean that it's not a proven fact. I don't think those words mean what you think they mean. I was gonna say stuff but I'm lazy https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_as_fact_and_theory Tl;Dr you're both not wrong --- "All I have is my balls and my word, and I don't break them for anyone!"-Tony Montana <cite>Unsugarized_Foo posted [p:927063163] in Do you con... [t:77987770]...</cite> <quote>COVxy posted...</cite> <quote>Rikiaz posted...</cite> <quote>MorbidFaithless posted...</cite> <quote>It's literally scientific fact. </quote> This. A scientific theory doesn't mean that it's not a proven fact.</quote> I don't think those words mean what you think they mean.</quote> I was gonna say stuff but I'm lazy https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_as_fact_and_theory Tl;Dr you're both not wrong</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Smashingpmkns 09/06/19 1:32:31 PM #37:	Yall ever look at a butthole and think "wow God really spent all this time etching the lines of where we poop out of"? --- Clean Butt Crew <cite>Smashingpmkns posted [p:927063220] in Do you con... [t:77987770]...</cite> <quote>Yall ever look at a butthole and think "wow God really spent all this time etching the lines of where we poop out of"?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
COVxy 09/06/19 1:34:19 PM #38:	Unsugarized_Foo posted... COVxy posted... Rikiaz posted... MorbidFaithless posted... It's literally scientific fact. This. A scientific theory doesn't mean that it's not a proven fact. I don't think those words mean what you think they mean. I was gonna say stuff but I'm lazy https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_as_fact_and_theory Tl;Dr you're both not wrong It's kinda silly. The only "facts" in science are actual data. And to suggest having data makes a theory both fact and theory is silly. Because then all theories are both fact and theory. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] <cite>COVxy posted [p:927063307] in Do you con... [t:77987770]...</cite> <quote>Unsugarized_Foo posted...</cite> <quote>COVxy posted...</cite> <quote>Rikiaz posted...</cite> <quote>MorbidFaithless posted...</cite> <quote>It's literally scientific fact. </quote> This. A scientific theory doesn't mean that it's not a proven fact.</quote> I don't think those words mean what you think they mean.</quote> I was gonna say stuff but I'm lazy https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_as_fact_and_theory Tl;Dr you're both not wrong</quote> It's kinda silly. The only "facts" in science are actual data. And to suggest having data makes a theory both fact and theory is silly. Because then all theories are both fact and theory.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Unsugarized_Foo 09/06/19 1:35:55 PM #39:	Evolution is special and has it's own wiki page tho --- "All I have is my balls and my word, and I don't break them for anyone!"-Tony Montana <cite>Unsugarized_Foo posted [p:927063369] in Do you con... [t:77987770]...</cite> <quote>Evolution is special and has it's own wiki page tho</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#40	Post #40 was unavailable or deleted.
Tyranthraxus 09/06/19 1:37:23 PM #41:	COVxy posted... It's kinda silly. The only "facts" in science are actual data. And to suggest having data makes a theory both fact and theory is silly. Because then all theories are both fact and theory. Well the theory is an attempt to explain the facts. And sometimes the theory is wrong but that doesn't mean the facts are wrong. Thus Evolution is a fact. The theory of evolution is just an attempt to explain it. --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:927063442] in Do you con... [t:77987770]...</cite> <quote>COVxy posted... </cite> <quote>It's kinda silly. The only "facts" in science are actual data. And to suggest having data makes a theory both fact and theory is silly. Because then all theories are both fact and theory.</quote> Well the theory is an attempt to explain the facts. And sometimes the theory is wrong but that doesn't mean the facts are wrong. Thus Evolution is a fact. The theory of evolution is just an attempt to explain it. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
COVxy 09/06/19 1:41:56 PM #42:	Tyranthraxus posted... COVxy posted... It's kinda silly. The only "facts" in science are actual data. And to suggest having data makes a theory both fact and theory is silly. Because then all theories are both fact and theory. Well the theory is an attempt to explain the facts. And sometimes the theory is wrong but that doesn't mean the facts are wrong. Thus Evolution is a fact. The theory of evolution is just an attempt to explain it. The only reason you're seeing it explained that way, the only reason there's a specific wiki entry re:evolution like that, is because evolution has been politicized. It's a way to play with words to lazily argue a point that could be better made appropriately. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] <cite>COVxy posted [p:927063635] in Do you con... [t:77987770]...</cite> <quote>Tyranthraxus posted...</cite> <quote>COVxy posted... </cite> <quote>It's kinda silly. The only "facts" in science are actual data. And to suggest having data makes a theory both fact and theory is silly. Because then all theories are both fact and theory.</quote> Well the theory is an attempt to explain the facts. And sometimes the theory is wrong but that doesn't mean the facts are wrong. Thus Evolution is a fact. The theory of evolution is just an attempt to explain it. </quote> The only reason you're seeing it explained that way, the only reason there's a specific wiki entry re:evolution like that, is because evolution has been politicized. It's a way to play with words to lazily argue a point that could be better made appropriately.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KJBDEFENDER 09/06/19 1:42:00 PM #43:	MorbidFaithless posted... It's literally scientific fact. But it's literally NOT a scientific FACT. That's why it's called The THEORY of Evolution, not The LAW of Evolution. You got the Law of Gravity, the Law of Thermodynamics, etc. Provable, demonstrable. The last two generations have been brainwashed by a leftist education system. Tell a lie long enough and often enough and it won't be long before there is no one left who knows the facts. --- FO3&NV, "War, war never changes." FO4, "Side Quests, Side Quests never changes." <cite>KJBDEFENDER posted [p:927063640] in Do you con... [t:77987770]...</cite> <quote>MorbidFaithless posted...</cite> <quote>It's literally scientific fact. </quote> But it's literally NOT a scientific FACT. That's why it's called The THEORY of Evolution, not The LAW of Evolution. You got the Law of Gravity, the Law of Thermodynamics, etc. Provable, demonstrable. The last two generations have been brainwashed by a leftist education system. Tell a lie long enough and often enough and it won't be long before there is no one left who knows the facts.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ThyCorndog 09/06/19 1:42:59 PM #44:	oh noooo someone's bringing up "laws" as if he knows what they are --- https://imgur.com/6cPXvLN <cite>ThyCorndog posted [p:927063674] in Do you con... [t:77987770]...</cite> <quote>oh noooo someone's bringing up "laws" as if he knows what they are</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
vocedelmorte 09/06/19 1:45:10 PM #45:	MorbidFaithless posted... It's literally scientific fact. <cite>vocedelmorte posted [p:927063766] in Do you con... [t:77987770]...</cite> <quote>MorbidFaithless posted... </cite> <quote>It's literally scientific fact.</quote> </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LordFarquad1312 09/06/19 1:46:51 PM #46:	KJBDEFENDER posted... You got the Law of Gravity, the Law of Thermodynamics, etc. Provable, demonstrable. Literally theories too. In fact, our current theory of gravitation was proposed a little more than a century ago. There's absolutely nothing that guarantees we won't come up with a better theory of evolution than our current one. --- The force is my ally "If you are tired of fear from links... Let Kirby's Nightmare protect you." <cite>LordFarquad1312 posted [p:927063837] in Do you con... [t:77987770]...</cite> <quote>KJBDEFENDER posted...</cite> <quote>You got the Law of Gravity, the Law of Thermodynamics, etc. Provable, demonstrable.</quote> Literally theories too. In fact, our current theory of gravitation was proposed a little more than a century ago. There's absolutely nothing that guarantees we won't come up with a better theory of evolution than our current one.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
GreatEvilEmpire 09/06/19 1:49:00 PM #47:	The theory that humans evolved from monkeys is so typical of human behavior. We look for any similarities in nature and we make a conclusion about it. There is very little science behind evolution to be honest, just a consensus. Just because we share some similar traits with monkey doesn't mean we evolve from monkeys. It's like saying a shark evolved from a dolphin because they both swim and have fins. There is a lack of evidence that humans evolved from monkeys. Humans have always been humans and monkeys have always been monkeys. --- Sig under construction! <cite>GreatEvilEmpire posted [p:927063925] in Do you con... [t:77987770]...</cite> <quote>The theory that humans evolved from monkeys is so typical of human behavior. We look for any similarities in nature and we make a conclusion about it. There is very little science behind evolution to be honest, just a consensus. Just because we share some similar traits with monkey doesn't mean we evolve from monkeys. It's like saying a shark evolved from a dolphin because they both swim and have fins. There is a lack of evidence that humans evolved from monkeys. Humans have always been humans and monkeys have always been monkeys.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ThyCorndog 09/06/19 1:49:41 PM #48:	a law is just a mathematical statement that works under certain conditions and caveats. the law of gravity is just a simple statement that doesn't cover everything we know about gravity. the theory of general relativity replaced the "law of gravity" a while ago --- https://imgur.com/6cPXvLN <cite>ThyCorndog posted [p:927063952] in Do you con... [t:77987770]...</cite> <quote>a law is just a mathematical statement that works under certain conditions and caveats. the law of gravity is just a simple statement that doesn't cover everything we know about gravity. the theory of general relativity replaced the "law of gravity" a while ago</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#49	Post #49 was unavailable or deleted.
Shadowplay 09/06/19 3:40:37 PM #50:	Have these alt-lite types regressed so much that they are now identical to evangelicals in their views? --- I make a topic in Final Fantasy 12 to ask if Tifa! They said no Tifa. Hardness gone!-gandob <cite>Shadowplay posted [p:927068923] in Do you con... [t:77987770]...</cite> <quote>Have these alt-lite types regressed so much that they are now identical to evangelicals in their views?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4

Current Events > Do you consider evolution to be 100% proven fact? (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Do you consider evolution to be 100% proven fact?