Current Events > Family of Man FALSELY accused by TARGET for CHILD PORN is SUING for 1 MILLION!!

Topic List	Page List: 1
Full Throttle 09/09/19 1:46:36 AM #1:	Do you think Target should pay up? - Results (5 votes) Yes. they haven't apologized nor fired the employee for false accusations so they deserve to pay up 80% (4 votes) 4 Yes but not in that amount. Something lower would suffice 0% (0 votes) 0 No.Target isn't responsible for what happened, the employee is. If anything, the employee should be responsible 20% (1 vote) 1 The family of 43 y/o Jeffrey Buckmeyer in Oregon who died of a HEART ATTACK, several months after he was falsely accused of having CHILD PORN on his phone by TARGET and have now launched a lawsuit against the retail giant!! They're launching the stunning 7 figures against Target for negligence, false arrest and intentional infliction of emotional distress that led to his sudden death On July 24, 2018, he was accused by an employee at Target of having child abuse or child porn on his cell phone and it sparked an FBI investigation where he was arrested in front of neighbors and his electronics were seized Several months following the probe, the insurance salesman who lived by himself and had a teen daughter in California died of a heart attack Now his family is suing Target on behalf of his estate, suspecting that the stress of being investigated as a child molester and handcuffed and interrogation led to his death In July, he went to Target asking for help on freeing up storage on his IPhone 6 as the employee claimed he found explicit images and provided shocking detail and naked and bound children on his device He said he found a folder that had more than 1000 pics and he viewed 15 to 20 of it and described in nature of what he saw were naked girls who appear 10 or younger of different ethnicities as it was some "sadomaschistic abuse" and claimed he saw Buckmeyer AROUSED in them He alerted security who then took down Buckmeyer's license plate number and reported it to police A month later Buckmeyer was arrested and his neighbors were told of the allegations against him and was restricted in how much time he had with his daughter Despite 4 months of investigation, the FBI DIDN'T find any child porn or proof he abused children His lawyer,Graham Fisher said "Not a shred of evidence" He was never charged and the case was dropped following 120 days of court granted permission to seize his electronics Buckmeyer had no criminal history and only had driving infractions as Michael Fuller, a civil attorney said Buckmeyer was a "straight shooter" It doesn't say why the employee made the allegations as the lawsuit claims that employee inteded to inflict severe and emotional distress Target hasn't identified that employee and they are STILL employed there!! Do you think Target should pay up? Buckmeyer - Deceased The target it happened at - --- call me mrduckbear, sweater monkeys. A GFAQS User Steps On A Bug, I'll Stop Posting for 48 HOURS. THIS ACCOUNT ONLY!! I'm an Asian Liberal. RESIST The Alt-Right <cite>Full Throttle posted [p:927180131] in Family of ... [t:77999462]...</cite> <quote> Do you think Target should pay up? - Results (5 votes) Yes. they haven't apologized nor fired the employee for false accusations so they deserve to pay up 80% (4 votes) 4 Yes but not in that amount. Something lower would suffice 0% (0 votes) 0 No.Target isn't responsible for what happened, the employee is. If anything, the employee should be responsible 20% (1 vote) 1 The family of 43 y/o Jeffrey Buckmeyer in Oregon who died of a HEART ATTACK, several months after he was falsely accused of having CHILD PORN on his phone by TARGET and have now launched a lawsuit against the retail giant!! They're launching the stunning 7 figures against Target for negligence, false arrest and intentional infliction of emotional distress that led to his sudden death On July 24, 2018, he was accused by an employee at Target of having child abuse or child porn on his cell phone and it sparked an FBI investigation where he was arrested in front of neighbors and his electronics were seized Several months following the probe, the insurance salesman who lived by himself and had a teen daughter in California died of a heart attack Now his family is suing Target on behalf of his estate, suspecting that the stress of being investigated as a child molester and handcuffed and interrogation led to his death In July, he went to Target asking for help on freeing up storage on his IPhone 6 as the employee claimed he found explicit images and provided shocking detail and naked and bound children on his device He said he found a folder that had more than 1000 pics and he viewed 15 to 20 of it and described in nature of what he saw were naked girls who appear 10 or younger of different ethnicities as it was some "sadomaschistic abuse" and claimed he saw Buckmeyer AROUSED in them He alerted security who then took down Buckmeyer's license plate number and reported it to police A month later Buckmeyer was arrested and his neighbors were told of the allegations against him and was restricted in how much time he had with his daughter Despite 4 months of investigation, the FBI DIDN'T find any child porn or proof he abused children His lawyer,Graham Fisher said "Not a shred of evidence" He was never charged and the case was dropped following 120 days of court granted permission to seize his electronics Buckmeyer had no criminal history and only had driving infractions as Michael Fuller, a civil attorney said Buckmeyer was a "straight shooter" It doesn't say why the employee made the allegations as the lawsuit claims that employee inteded to inflict severe and emotional distress Target hasn't identified that employee and they are STILL employed there!! Do you think Target should pay up? Buckmeyer - Deceased The target it happened at - </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Aristoph 09/09/19 1:49:42 AM #2:	Shouldn't sue Target. Should definitely sue the employee. And the fact that he's still there is both disgusting and not at all surprising. :-/ --- PSN ID: Aristoph http://www.youtube.com/user/SotCRules <cite>Aristoph posted [p:927180186] in Family of ... [t:77999462]...</cite> <quote>Shouldn't sue Target. Should definitely sue the employee. And the fact that he's still there is both disgusting and not at all surprising. :-/</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
bknight 09/09/19 1:55:04 AM #3:	If the guy wasn't smart enough to free up space in his phone, he's not going to be smart enough to keep the FBI from finding child porn on his electronics, sounds like the kid at Target was making it up, or got the wrong guy, because making something up like this is going to bring all kinds of authority down on everyone, meh. <cite>bknight posted [p:927180278] in Family of ... [t:77999462]...</cite> <quote>If the guy wasn't smart enough to free up space in his phone, he's not going to be smart enough to keep the FBI from finding child porn on his electronics, sounds like the kid at Target was making it up, or got the wrong guy, because making something up like this is going to bring all kinds of authority down on everyone, meh.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
biggernails 09/09/19 1:55:35 AM #4:	Aristoph posted... Should definitely sue the employee. I'd imagine they are not able to, since Target is withholding the employee's identity. --- I wanted ORANGE. It gave me lemon lime. <cite>biggernails posted [p:927180285] in Family of ... [t:77999462]...</cite> <quote>Aristoph posted...</cite> <quote>Should definitely sue the employee.</quote> I'd imagine they are not able to, since Target is withholding the employee's identity.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
StucklnMyPants 09/09/19 1:58:38 AM #5:	Yeah, they are definitely on the hook for this. At the very least, they'll settle out of court. Isn't weird how all it takes for government to investigate and seize your property, is to have a stranger accuse you of wrongdoing? One would think the bar would be a little higher. --- Power concedes nothing without a demand. <cite>StucklnMyPants posted [p:927180350] in Family of ... [t:77999462]...</cite> <quote>Yeah, they are definitely on the hook for this. At the very least, they'll settle out of court. Isn't weird how all it takes for government to investigate and seize your property, is to have a stranger accuse you of wrongdoing? One would think the bar would be a little higher.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
biggernails 09/09/19 1:59:16 AM #6:	StucklnMyPants posted... Yeah, they are definitely on the hook for this. At the very least, they'll settle out of court. Isn't weird how all it takes for government to investigate and seize your property, is to have a stranger accuse you of wrongdoing? One would think the bar would be a little higher. tbh it makes me hella paranoid to do anything I don't absolutely have to do --- I wanted ORANGE. It gave me lemon lime. <cite>biggernails posted [p:927180359] in Family of ... [t:77999462]...</cite> <quote>StucklnMyPants posted...</cite> <quote>Yeah, they are definitely on the hook for this. At the very least, they'll settle out of court. Isn't weird how all it takes for government to investigate and seize your property, is to have a stranger accuse you of wrongdoing? One would think the bar would be a little higher.</quote> tbh it makes me hella paranoid to do anything I don't absolutely have to do</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SH_expert44 09/09/19 2:20:49 AM #7:	Give the employee and security a manslaughter charge --- https://i.imgtc.ws/MAd5hwq.gif https://i.imgtc.ws/KXfrMn5.gif <cite>SH_expert44 posted [p:927180788] in Family of ... [t:77999462]...</cite> <quote>Give the employee and security a manslaughter charge</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
bevan306 09/09/19 2:33:48 AM #8:	well that's an insane thing to just make up --- http://rateyourmusic.com/~bevan https://imgur.com/5Ta28 <cite>bevan306 posted [p:927181051] in Family of ... [t:77999462]...</cite> <quote>well that's an insane thing to just make up</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
biggernails 09/09/19 2:46:28 AM #9:	bevan306 posted... well that's an insane thing to just make up the guy probably thought he was being hilarious --- I wanted ORANGE. It gave me lemon lime. <cite>biggernails posted [p:927181279] in Family of ... [t:77999462]...</cite> <quote>bevan306 posted...</cite> <quote>well that's an insane thing to just make up</quote> the guy probably thought he was being hilarious</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
mattnd2007 09/09/19 3:35:52 AM #10:	What a piece of shit. Yeah Target should be on the hook for that. Fuck that employee. --- Show me a man who resorts to violence and I'll show you a man who's run out of good ideas Phil Funnie <cite>mattnd2007 posted [p:927182063] in Family of ... [t:77999462]...</cite> <quote>What a piece of shit. Yeah Target should be on the hook for that. Fuck that employee. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Serious Cat 09/09/19 4:43:36 AM #11:	biggernails posted... Aristoph posted... Should definitely sue the employee. I'd imagine they are not able to, since Target is withholding the employee's identity. They could subpoena the information. --- I are Serious Cat This is serious thread <cite>Serious Cat posted [p:927182958] in Family of ... [t:77999462]...</cite> <quote>biggernails posted...</cite> <quote>Aristoph posted...</cite> <quote>Should definitely sue the employee.</quote> I'd imagine they are not able to, since Target is withholding the employee's identity.</quote> They could subpoena the information.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ricemills 09/09/19 4:52:20 AM #12:	yes, sue those fuckers. when i was in 7th grade, some bullies pulled a prank on me by reporting to the cop that i stole something in a school fair. even though i was proven innocent, the stigma stick in and i had to drop out and moved to another town. --- You have the right to remain silent. anything you post will be misquoted, then be used against you. <cite>Ricemills posted [p:927183060] in Family of ... [t:77999462]...</cite> <quote>yes, sue those fuckers. when i was in 7th grade, some bullies pulled a prank on me by reporting to the cop that i stole something in a school fair. even though i was proven innocent, the stigma stick in and i had to drop out and moved to another town.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
vigorm0rtis 09/09/19 4:58:27 AM #13:	Serious Cat posted... biggernails posted... Aristoph posted... Should definitely sue the employee. I'd imagine they are not able to, since Target is withholding the employee's identity. They could subpoena the information. Why sue an individual over a corporation with insanely deep pockets? If Target wants to take the hit, let them. --- "Can't wait to count out your coin!" -- Bethesda, 2018 <cite>vigorm0rtis posted [p:927183148] in Family of ... [t:77999462]...</cite> <quote>Serious Cat posted...</cite> <quote>biggernails posted...</cite> <quote>Aristoph posted...</cite> <quote>Should definitely sue the employee.</quote> I'd imagine they are not able to, since Target is withholding the employee's identity.</quote> They could subpoena the information.</quote> Why sue an individual over a corporation with insanely deep pockets? If Target wants to take the hit, let them.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Aristoph 09/09/19 5:52:09 AM #14:	vigorm0rtis posted... Serious Cat posted... biggernails posted... Aristoph posted... Should definitely sue the employee. I'd imagine they are not able to, since Target is withholding the employee's identity. They could subpoena the information. Why sue an individual over a corporation with insanely deep pockets? If Target wants to take the hit, let them. Oh yeah, I'm not faulting the family for suing Target. They deserve to get something, so if Target won't release the guy's information then fuck Target, they can pay. I'm just saying that in general, the employee should have been fired and he should be the one getting sued. --- PSN ID: Aristoph http://www.youtube.com/user/SotCRules <cite>Aristoph posted [p:927183830] in Family of ... [t:77999462]...</cite> <quote>vigorm0rtis posted...</cite> <quote>Serious Cat posted...</cite> <quote>biggernails posted...</cite> <quote>Aristoph posted...</cite> <quote>Should definitely sue the employee.</quote> I'd imagine they are not able to, since Target is withholding the employee's identity.</quote> They could subpoena the information.</quote> Why sue an individual over a corporation with insanely deep pockets? If Target wants to take the hit, let them.</quote> Oh yeah, I'm not faulting the family for suing Target. They deserve to get something, so if Target won't release the guy's information then fuck Target, they can pay. I'm just saying that in general, the employee should have been fired and he should be the one getting sued.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ving_Rhames 09/09/19 5:56:46 AM #15:	The employee deserves whatever sentence the falsely accused would have gotten. And the family deserves more money. --- the real Irving Rameses https://imgur.com/A7f6F9h <cite>Ving_Rhames posted [p:927183887] in Family of ... [t:77999462]...</cite> <quote>The employee deserves whatever sentence the falsely accused would have gotten. And the family deserves more money.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
viewmaster_pi 09/09/19 6:02:54 AM #16:	rip fam man --- Lorem ipsum <cite>viewmaster_pi posted [p:927183966] in Family of ... [t:77999462]...</cite> <quote>rip fam man </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zikten 09/09/19 6:10:20 AM #17:	why did they arrest him just on the word of a store clerk? they should have asked to see the pictures he claimed he saw before they arrested him <cite>Zikten posted [p:927184059] in Family of ... [t:77999462]...</cite> <quote>why did they arrest him just on the word of a store clerk? they should have asked to see the pictures he claimed he saw before they arrested him</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
iPhone_7 09/09/19 6:33:39 AM #18:	Whenever I help someone with their phone (not @ Target) and come across nudity I right away hand it back, the person becomes embarrassed & apologizes, and I wont ask any questions. Then theyll edit their gallery for anything they dont want popping up or send their selected photos through the internet to be printed/backed up. I would never scroll through to search for more nude photos or even look at one long enough to make any determinations about the person in the photo. I think I saw nudity/genitals, Im not gonna double check, heres your **ing phone back. Whatever is on a customers phone is none of my business and Im not going to involve myself & potentially ruin someones life or lose my job over any suspicions I may have. --- Sig User Logic https://imgur.com/lA5fm7w <cite>iPhone_7 posted [p:927184399] in Family of ... [t:77999462]...</cite> <quote>Whenever I help someone with their phone (not @ Target) and come across nudity I right away hand it back, the person becomes embarrassed & apologizes, and I wont ask any questions. Then theyll edit their gallery for anything they dont want popping up or send their selected photos through the internet to be printed/backed up. I would never scroll through to search for more nude photos or even look at one long enough to make any determinations about the person in the photo. I think I saw nudity/genitals, Im not gonna double check, heres your **ing phone back. Whatever is on a customers phone is none of my business and Im not going to involve myself & potentially ruin someones life or lose my job over any suspicions I may have.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Orochi_ 09/09/19 8:11:11 AM #19:	Is it still considered child porn if you have naked pictures of underage anime characters? Do you still go to prison? --- :p <cite>Orochi_ posted [p:927185859] in Family of ... [t:77999462]...</cite> <quote>Is it still considered child porn if you have naked pictures of underage anime characters? Do you still go to prison?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Alteres 09/09/19 8:58:16 AM #20:	Orochi_ posted... Is it still considered child porn if you have naked pictures of underage anime characters? Do you still go to prison? Asking for a friend? --- ........the ghost in the machine... IGN: Fox, FC: 5344-2646-0982 <cite>Alteres posted [p:927186911] in Family of ... [t:77999462]...</cite> <quote>Orochi_ posted...</cite> <quote>Is it still considered child porn if you have naked pictures of underage anime characters? Do you still go to prison?</quote> Asking for a friend?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BeyondWalls 09/09/19 8:59:59 AM #21:	No evidence doesnt mean the employee lied necessarily. The police could have been incompetent. How are you going to prove in court that the employee lied? You cant. And what 43yo guy needs help deleting stuff off an iPhone? And who the fuck goes to Target for technical help? Does Target even do that? This definitely sounds like a guy dumb enough to have child porn. --- END OF LINE <cite>BeyondWalls posted [p:927186945] in Family of ... [t:77999462]...</cite> <quote>No evidence doesnt mean the employee lied necessarily. The police could have been incompetent. How are you going to prove in court that the employee lied? You cant. And what 43yo guy needs help deleting stuff off an iPhone? And who the fuck goes to Target for technical help? Does Target even do that? This definitely sounds like a guy dumb enough to have child porn.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NeoShadowhen 09/09/19 9:32:35 AM #22:	BeyondWalls posted... No evidence doesnt mean the employee lied necessarily. The police could have been incompetent. How are you going to prove in court that the employee lied? You cant. And what 43yo guy needs help deleting stuff off an iPhone? And who the fuck goes to Target for technical help? Does Target even do that? This definitely sounds like a guy dumb enough to have child porn. All good points. The thing I cant shake out is how damn specific the clerk was. Really fucking specific about what they saw. If they were full of shit, why bother with all the additional details? Not just underage, but bound. Also mentioning the different ethnicities seems oddly specific, and the cherry on top is to include that the guy was in them and aroused. <cite>NeoShadowhen posted [p:927187745] in Family of ... [t:77999462]...</cite> <quote>BeyondWalls posted...</cite> <quote>No evidence doesnt mean the employee lied necessarily. The police could have been incompetent. How are you going to prove in court that the employee lied? You cant. And what 43yo guy needs help deleting stuff off an iPhone? And who the fuck goes to Target for technical help? Does Target even do that? This definitely sounds like a guy dumb enough to have child porn.</quote> All good points. The thing I cant shake out is how damn specific the clerk was. Really fucking specific about what they saw. If they were full of shit, why bother with all the additional details? Not just underage, but bound. Also mentioning the different ethnicities seems oddly specific, and the cherry on top is to include that the guy was in them and aroused.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
mrduckbear 09/09/19 9:11:20 PM #23:	it's a slam dunk yes --- Every time a Gamefaqs User PROVES they Stepped on a Bug, i will STOP Posting for 48 Hours...THIS ACCOUNT ONLY <cite>mrduckbear posted [p:927216812] in Family of ... [t:77999462]...</cite> <quote>it's a slam dunk yes</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Fuparulez 09/09/19 9:14:07 PM #24:	BeyondWalls posted... No evidence doesnt mean the employee lied necessarily. The police could have been incompetent. How are you going to prove in court that the employee lied? You cant. And what 43yo guy needs help deleting stuff off an iPhone? And who the fuck goes to Target for technical help? Does Target even do that? This definitely sounds like a guy dumb enough to have child porn. Your conclusion is irrelevant. A four month FBI investigation found zero child pornography and zero proof of the Target employee's claim. You know, kind of like how zero proof of Russian collusion was found on behalf of Donald Trump. Doesn't matter what you want to be true, here's the facts. --- It's the fat upper kitty area, and if you got one I wanna marry ya! <cite>Fuparulez posted [p:927216960] in Family of ... [t:77999462]...</cite> <quote>BeyondWalls posted...</cite> <quote>No evidence doesnt mean the employee lied necessarily. The police could have been incompetent. How are you going to prove in court that the employee lied? You cant. And what 43yo guy needs help deleting stuff off an iPhone? And who the fuck goes to Target for technical help? Does Target even do that? This definitely sounds like a guy dumb enough to have child porn.</quote> Your conclusion is irrelevant. A four month FBI investigation found zero child pornography and zero proof of the Target employee's claim. You know, kind of like how zero proof of Russian collusion was found on behalf of Donald Trump. Doesn't matter what you want to be true, here's the facts.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#25	Post #25 was unavailable or deleted.
#26	Post #26 was unavailable or deleted.
KLouD_KoNNeCteD 09/14/19 3:10:35 AM #27:	Target should absolutely be sued, they are responsible for their employees actions. If they did find child porn on his phone why would they give it back?? Target should have notified the police right then and there. To me it sounds like the employee is full of shit. --- hey guys <cite>KLouD_KoNNeCteD posted [p:927416301] in Family of ... [t:77999462]...</cite> <quote>Target should absolutely be sued, they are responsible for their employees actions. If they did find child porn on his phone why would they give it back?? Target should have notified the police right then and there. To me it sounds like the employee is full of shit.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OctilIery 09/14/19 3:20:49 AM #28:	Fuck, I worked for the company that employee is in(it wasn't target). I heard about these fucking accusations, it was a big story in my company at the time. While I don't know explicitly who it was I'm pretty sure I've met that employee. The company is called marketsource, they're a third party company target hired to handle their phone service and sales. Might make. This an interesting lawsuit as I don't know how culpability will work for Target as they acted appropriately based on the claims. I saw some fucked shit working there (a guy with dozens of tabs of escort services open comes to mind) but never that. <cite>OctilIery posted [p:927416476] in Family of ... [t:77999462]...</cite> <quote>Fuck, I worked for the company that employee is in(it wasn't target). I heard about these fucking accusations, it was a big story in my company at the time. While I don't know explicitly who it was I'm pretty sure I've met that employee. The company is called marketsource, they're a third party company target hired to handle their phone service and sales. Might make. This an interesting lawsuit as I don't know how culpability will work for Target as they acted appropriately based on the claims. I saw some fucked shit working there (a guy with dozens of tabs of escort services open comes to mind) but never that.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OctilIery 09/14/19 3:25:00 AM #29:	KLouD_KoNNeCteD posted... Target should absolutely be sued, they are responsible for their employees actions. If they did find child porn on his phone why would they give it back?? Target should have notified the police right then and there. To me it sounds like the employee is full of shit. Policy is to give it back. The employee acted perfectly per policy, other than presumably lying out his ass regarding content. We aren't allowed to seize phones for any reason. <cite>OctilIery posted [p:927416523] in Family of ... [t:77999462]...</cite> <quote>KLouD_KoNNeCteD posted...</cite> <quote>Target should absolutely be sued, they are responsible for their employees actions. If they did find child porn on his phone why would they give it back?? Target should have notified the police right then and there. To me it sounds like the employee is full of shit.</quote> Policy is to give it back. The employee acted perfectly per policy, other than presumably lying out his ass regarding content. We aren't allowed to seize phones for any reason.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OctilIery 09/14/19 3:26:34 AM #30:	BeyondWalls posted... No evidence doesnt mean the employee lied necessarily. The police could have been incompetent. How are you going to prove in court that the employee lied? You cant. And what 43yo guy needs help deleting stuff off an iPhone? And who the fuck goes to Target for technical help? Does Target even do that? This definitely sounds like a guy dumb enough to have child porn. Target in this area is actually the best retail chain to go for phone because they hired a decent company to do it. That said, any big retail place has phone sales and support now. <cite>OctilIery posted [p:927416549] in Family of ... [t:77999462]...</cite> <quote>BeyondWalls posted...</cite> <quote>No evidence doesnt mean the employee lied necessarily. The police could have been incompetent. How are you going to prove in court that the employee lied? You cant. And what 43yo guy needs help deleting stuff off an iPhone? And who the fuck goes to Target for technical help? Does Target even do that? This definitely sounds like a guy dumb enough to have child porn.</quote> Target in this area is actually the best retail chain to go for phone because they hired a decent company to do it. That said, any big retail place has phone sales and support now.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KLouD_KoNNeCteD 09/14/19 3:34:00 AM #31:	OctilIery posted... KLouD_KoNNeCteD posted... Target should absolutely be sued, they are responsible for their employees actions. If they did find child porn on his phone why would they give it back?? Target should have notified the police right then and there. To me it sounds like the employee is full of shit. Policy is to give it back. The employee acted perfectly per policy, other than presumably lying out his ass regarding content. We aren't allowed to seize phones for any reason. I figured as much but all they had to do was contact the police and stall for time before giving the phone back. --- hey guys <cite>KLouD_KoNNeCteD posted [p:927416652] in Family of ... [t:77999462]...</cite> <quote>OctilIery posted...</cite> <quote>KLouD_KoNNeCteD posted...</cite> <quote>Target should absolutely be sued, they are responsible for their employees actions. If they did find child porn on his phone why would they give it back?? Target should have notified the police right then and there. To me it sounds like the employee is full of shit.</quote> Policy is to give it back. The employee acted perfectly per policy, other than presumably lying out his ass regarding content. We aren't allowed to seize phones for any reason.</quote> I figured as much but all they had to do was contact the police and stall for time before giving the phone back.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OctilIery 09/14/19 3:40:57 AM #32:	KLouD_KoNNeCteD posted... OctilIery posted... KLouD_KoNNeCteD posted... Target should absolutely be sued, they are responsible for their employees actions. If they did find child porn on his phone why would they give it back?? Target should have notified the police right then and there. To me it sounds like the employee is full of shit. Policy is to give it back. The employee acted perfectly per policy, other than presumably lying out his ass regarding content. We aren't allowed to seize phones for any reason. I figured as much but all they had to do was contact the police and stall for time before giving the phone back. The reason they don't do that is it means putting the employee in the position of acting as enforcement, something that isn't just against their policy but damn near every major retail company's policy, because it leaves them open to major litigation if the employee is injured during. This is why they'll straight up fire you for resisting a robbery or stopping a shoplifting. Unfortunately for the family, I think they have a slim chance to win this if Target doesn't settle, but I wouldn't be surprised if they do to avoid bad press. Unless Target had reason to believe the employee was lying, such as a poor history or contradictory story, especially considering the third party nature, it'll be hard to find fault with how they handled it. <cite>OctilIery posted [p:927416763] in Family of ... [t:77999462]...</cite> <quote>KLouD_KoNNeCteD posted...</cite> <quote>OctilIery posted...</cite> <quote>KLouD_KoNNeCteD posted...</cite> <quote>Target should absolutely be sued, they are responsible for their employees actions. If they did find child porn on his phone why would they give it back?? Target should have notified the police right then and there. To me it sounds like the employee is full of shit.</quote> Policy is to give it back. The employee acted perfectly per policy, other than presumably lying out his ass regarding content. We aren't allowed to seize phones for any reason.</quote> I figured as much but all they had to do was contact the police and stall for time before giving the phone back.</quote> The reason they don't do that is it means putting the employee in the position of acting as enforcement, something that isn't just against their policy but damn near every major retail company's policy, because it leaves them open to major litigation if the employee is injured during. This is why they'll straight up fire you for resisting a robbery or stopping a shoplifting. Unfortunately for the family, I think they have a slim chance to win this if Target doesn't settle, but I wouldn't be surprised if they do to avoid bad press. Unless Target had reason to believe the employee was lying, such as a poor history or contradictory story, especially considering the third party nature, it'll be hard to find fault with how they handled it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
creativerealms 09/14/19 4:21:07 AM #33:	Always be careful with accusations. While mistakes can be made try to minimize mistakes. --- Occam's razor: The simplest solution (answer) is most likely the right one <cite>creativerealms posted [p:927417416] in Family of ... [t:77999462]...</cite> <quote>Always be careful with accusations. While mistakes can be made try to minimize mistakes. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OctilIery 09/14/19 10:48:47 AM #34:	creativerealms posted... Always be careful with accusations. While mistakes can be made try to minimize mistakes. I honestly doubt mistakes were made by the employee. If the FBI could find absolutely nothing, I'm leaning to this being more malicious. <cite>OctilIery posted [p:927424014] in Family of ... [t:77999462]...</cite> <quote>creativerealms posted...</cite> <quote>Always be careful with accusations. While mistakes can be made try to minimize mistakes. </quote> I honestly doubt mistakes were made by the employee. If the FBI could find absolutely nothing, I'm leaning to this being more malicious.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#35	Post #35 was unavailable or deleted.
Prismsblade 09/15/19 9:43:39 PM #36:	Aristoph posted... Shouldn't sue Target. Should definitely sue the employee. And the fact that he's still there is both disgusting and not at all surprising. :-/ I doubt the employee has anywhere near 7 figures to use for, ornmaybe even a few thousands even. --- 3DS FC:3368-5403-9633 Name: Kaizer PSN: Blackkaizer <cite>Prismsblade posted [p:927493415] in Family of ... [t:77999462]...</cite> <quote>Aristoph posted...</cite> <quote>Shouldn't sue Target. Should definitely sue the employee. And the fact that he's still there is both disgusting and not at all surprising. :-/</quote> I doubt the employee has anywhere near 7 figures to use for, ornmaybe even a few thousands even.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BeyondWalls 09/15/19 10:02:55 PM #37:	@Th3Truth posted... BeyondWalls posted... No evidence doesnt mean the employee lied necessarily. The police could have been incompetent. How are you going to prove in court that the employee lied? You cant. And what 43yo guy needs help deleting stuff off an iPhone? And who the fuck goes to Target for technical help? Does Target even do that? This definitely sounds like a guy dumb enough to have child porn. How do you prove a swatter lied? Plus there are laws against libel and slander and something like this should go above those. Swatter? Did I miss something about this thread? --- END OF LINE <cite>BeyondWalls posted [p:927494387] in Family of ... [t:77999462]...</cite> <quote>@Th3Truth posted...</cite> <quote>BeyondWalls posted...</cite> <quote>No evidence doesnt mean the employee lied necessarily. The police could have been incompetent. How are you going to prove in court that the employee lied? You cant. And what 43yo guy needs help deleting stuff off an iPhone? And who the fuck goes to Target for technical help? Does Target even do that? This definitely sounds like a guy dumb enough to have child porn.</quote> How do you prove a swatter lied? Plus there are laws against libel and slander and something like this should go above those.</quote> Swatter? Did I miss something about this thread?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#38	Post #38 was unavailable or deleted.
CharlesBronson 09/19/19 9:11:04 PM #40:	he's guilty just look at the picture posted what's up with his/her creepy lips? <cite>CharlesBronson posted [p:927680876] in Family of ... [t:77999462]...</cite> <quote>he's guilty just look at the picture posted what's up with his/her creepy lips? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Laserion 09/19/19 11:19:43 PM #41:	CharlesBronson posted... he's guilty just look at the picture posted what's up with his/her creepy lips? They are his natural lips and you're mocking him for his physical appearance. --- There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of". There is "would've", "should've" and "could've". <cite>Laserion posted [p:927686051] in Family of ... [t:77999462]...</cite> <quote>CharlesBronson posted...</cite> <quote>he's guilty just look at the picture posted what's up with his/her creepy lips? </quote> They are his natural lips and you're mocking him for his physical appearance.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CADE FOSTER 09/19/19 11:31:03 PM #42:	biggernails posted... bevan306 posted... well that's an insane thing to just make up the guy probably thought he was being hilarious kinda like those dudes that swat random people --- https://imgtc.com/i/HXEuaL9.jpg https://imgtc.com/i/xZ5hGDm.jpg https://imgtc.com/i/UZiqG9l.jpg https://imgtc.ws/i/gEfkzml.gif <cite>CADE FOSTER posted [p:927686412] in Family of ... [t:77999462]...</cite> <quote>biggernails posted...</cite> <quote>bevan306 posted...</cite> <quote>well that's an insane thing to just make up</quote> the guy probably thought he was being hilarious</quote> kinda like those dudes that swat random people</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > Family of Man FALSELY accused by TARGET for CHILD PORN is SUING for 1 MILLION!! (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Family of Man FALSELY accused by TARGET for CHILD PORN is SUING for 1 MILLION!!