Current Events > So Hillary Clinton has just lost her mind completely, huh?

(+) Yeah! (+)

https://twitter.com/AllegedlyZo/status/1264949747485417472?s=20

Look at the Trump White house, and say well you know the Russians probably did help them, to whatever extent we don't know, we're not going to go there, we're going to do what they tell us. Imagine you have one of the democratic nominees for 2020 on your show, and that person said "You know, the only other adversary of ours that is anywhere near as good as the Russians is China. So why should Russia have all the fun? And since Russia is clearly backing the republicans why don't we ask China to back us? That's right. And not only that, China, if you're listening, why don't you "get" Trumps tax returns. I'm sure the "media" would richly reward you. Now according to the Mueller report, that isn't conspiracy cause it's done right out in the open. So if after this hypothetical democratic candidate says this on your show, within hours all of a sudden the IRS offices are bombarded with incredibly sophisticated cyber tools looking for Trumps tax returns, and then extracts them and passes them to whatever the new Wikileaks happens to be, and they happen to be unraveled and disclosed...there's nothing wrong with that.

---

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA*snort*HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA


---

Sounds like she's giving a ridiculous hypothetical to prove a point against the Mueller Report. What's your complaint?

---

Remember when these people wouldn't stop riding Muellers nuts?

---

https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4719428/user-clip-mueller-testifies-iraqs-wmds

---

American leadership reflects its populace.

Sad!

---

Squall28 posted...

Sounds like she's giving a ridiculous hypothetical to prove a point against the Mueller Report. What's your complaint?

---

Shes so awful.

---

Godnorgosh posted...

I don't think she is capable of coping with the fact that she lost to a fascist orange clown, and it's largely her fault.

It's hardly her fault that the Sandernistas were too butthurt to support the nominee.

---

VitalGetPrank posted...

It's hardly her fault that the Sandernistas were too butthurt to support the nominee.

She wasn't entitled to their vote just because she has a D next to her name.

---

Godnorgosh posted...

It's not a given that the Sanders supporters who didn't vote for Clinton would have voted for her if Sanders hadn't run. Also, more than 12% of Clinton primary voters voted for McCain, and as we know Obama still won that election.

86% of Clinton voters voted for Obama, while Clinton only got 74% of Sanders' voters so your uninformed bit of whataboutism does nothing but show off how little you know.

---

Sanders supporters had every right to stay home or even vote Trump to flip the bird to the DNC. They stole the nomination from him.

---

Fuparulez posted...

Sanders supporters had every right to stay home or even vote Trump to flip the bird to the DNC. They stole the nomination from him.

She didn't steal the nomination, more people wanted her over Sanders, it's called Democracy and voting for Trump because you're butthurt your guy lost is about the most idiotic thing you can possibly do. You realize his SC justices are going to do whatever they can to make sure progresive policies never happen? Good job kneecapping the progressive movement for most of the rest of your life.

---

VitalGetPrank posted...

She didn't steal the nomination, more people wanted her over Sanders, it's called Democracy and voting for Trump because you're butthurt your guy lost is about the most idiotic thing you can possibly do. You realize his SC justices are going to do whatever they can to make sure progresive policies never happen? Good job kneecapping the progressive movement for most of the rest of your life.

LOL Hillary Clinton was never going to do much, and Biden will do even less. Progressive policies don't happen because the people running the Democratic party don't want them to happen, and the media feels the same way.
But go ahead, blame the victims, whatever helps you sleep at night.

VitalGetPrank posted...

She didn't steal the nomination, more people wanted her over Sanders, it's called Democracy and voting for Trump because you're butthurt your guy lost is about the most idiotic thing you can possibly do. You realize his SC justices are going to do whatever they can to make sure progresive policies never happen? Good job kneecapping the progressive movement for most of the rest of your life.

All of the Superdelegates voted for her at the start of the primary season. And their support limited the number of delegates Sanders could win throughout the season.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/may/20/coloradocare-healthcare-plan-faces-opposition-from-democrats

I'm curious now where you got your information on the percentage of Sanders supporters supporting Clinton being less than Clinton supporters supporting Obama.

---

ElatedVenusaur posted...

LOL Hillary Clinton was never going to do much, and Biden will do even less.

Do you think it's a smart move to vote for the guy who will go out of his way to make sure progressive policies never pass over a couple candidates who are at worse indifferent? Never mind that both of these candidates are actually pretty progressive in their own right.

---

This woman killed the democratic party, I'll never take them seriously again.

---

Sad_Face posted...

All of the Superdelegates voted for her at the start of the primary season. And their support limited the number of delegates Sanders could win throughout the season.

Clinton still got 4 million more votes, Even without the superdelagates Clinton destroyed Sanders so hard his whiny pissant base could do nothing but bitch and moan about the elections being rigged, a statement that's been disproven multiple times now.

Sad_Face posted...

I'm curious now where you got your information on the percentage of Sanders supporters supporting Clinton being less than Clinton supporters supporting Obama.

http://edition.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/11/04/exit.polls/
https://i.imgur.com/iiyC4Eo.png

---

Lmfao

VitalGetPrank posted...

Clinton still got 4 million more votes, Even without the superdelagates Clinton destroyed Sanders so hard his whiny pissant base could do nothing but b**** and moan about the elections being rigged, a statement that's been disproven multiple times now.

And you think the default Superdelegate support didn't influence the votes? Come on, why else would they do it in the first place as opposed to waiting till the primary election results and why would the DNC ban that for the next election cycle?

---

Sad_Face posted...

And you think the default Superdelegate support didn't influence the votes?

So your argument is that Sanders supporters are so weak-willed that they originally wanted to vote for the guy but after seeing the supposed superdelate results they changed their mind and voted for Clinton...

I'm not even going to dignify that with an actual rebuttal. Come up with a better argument.

---

VitalGetPrank posted...

So your argument is that Sanders supporters are so weak-willed that they originally wanted to vote for the guy but after seeing the supposed superdelate results they changed their mind and voted for Clinton...

I'm not even going to dignify that with an actual rebuttal. Come up with a better argument.

Do you think most voters are intelligent or something? They're constantly swayed by the dumbest shit lol

---

Jabodie posted...

Do you think most voters are intelligent or something? They're constantly swayed by the dumbest shit lol

The dumb voters vote Republican, we're talking about the Democrat primary.

---

Ew lol

---

ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

VitalGetPrank posted...

The dumb voters vote Republican, we're talking about the Democrat primary.

In all honesty, it is much less likely to effect the people that were already going to vote for either candidate and very likely to effect people that could be swayed or were on the fence.

---

Fairly simple solutions:

1) don't share things over an unsecure/easily-hacked server

2) don't hire a right-hand man for the biggest election in the free world who falls for simple email scams

3) get someone in IT who knows what they're doing, and would catch that stuff instead of clearing it

4) if you want to accuse someone else of conspiracies, don't get caught yourself taking pre-written debate questions, angling to rig Bernie out of the primary, taking Clinton Foundation and massive speaking fees from Russia, Saudi Arabia and others, whatever the heck "spirit cooking" was, and so on.

Compared to Donald Trump and several people around him who were spied on - think about this - compared to the guy who was pursued by the Obama administration in so many ways, if the contents of 1 email leak are scandalous enough to sink your campaign, you probably shouldn't be president. Blaming the messenger, Wikileaks, Russia, whoever means nothing. The problem is she did things she shouldn't have done and got caught. The problem was always Hillary.

---