Current Events > Would you be down for it if Capcom wanted to make a Marvel vs Capcom 4?

Topic List	Page List: 1
piUrsEitanizm 10/06/20 10:43:58 AM #1:	Would you be down for it if Capcom wanted to make a Marvel vs Capcom 4? Yes No Would you be down for it if Capcom wanted to make a Marvel vs Capcom 4? - Results (14 votes) Yes 85.71% (12 votes) 12 No 14.29% (2 votes) 2 Yes or no? --- That is all. <cite>piUrsEitanizm posted [p:945519631] in Would you ... [t:79023196]...</cite> <quote> Would you be down for it if Capcom wanted to make a Marvel vs Capcom 4? Yes No Vote View Results Would you be down for it if Capcom wanted to make a Marvel vs Capcom 4? - Results (14 votes) Yes 85.71% (12 votes) 12 No 14.29% (2 votes) 2 Show Voting Form Yes or no? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The_Korey 10/06/20 10:46:55 AM #2:	How badly does a Disney exec with 0 understanding of gaming have Capcom by the balls this time? --- https://imgur.com/PpxZDof \| https://imgur.com/xMGLcGE https://imgur.com/nsBw6Sy \| https://imgtc.com/i/sBYBaew.png <cite>The_Korey posted [p:945519704] in Would you ... [t:79023196]...</cite> <quote>How badly does a Disney exec with 0 understanding of gaming have Capcom by the balls this time? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The Popo 10/06/20 10:50:34 AM #3:	If its like MvC 1-3, yes. If it is like , then no. --- Live action Hungry Hungry Hippos though, now that was a sport. ~Aeon Azuran <cite>The Popo posted [p:945519806] in Would you ... [t:79023196]...</cite> <quote>If its like MvC 1-3, yes. If it is like , then no. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Guerrilla Soldier 10/06/20 10:54:00 AM #4:	The Popo posted... If its like MvC 1-3, yes. If it is like , then no. --- Disclaimer: There's a good chance the above post could be sarcasm. Die-hard Oakland A's fan --- Keep the A's in Oakland! <cite>Guerrilla Soldier posted [p:945519895] in Would you ... [t:79023196]...</cite> <quote>The Popo posted... </cite> <quote>If its like MvC 1-3, yes. If it is like , then no.</quote> </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Veggeta X 10/06/20 11:01:16 AM #5:	Yes because this time they'll be able to use the X-Men and other previously Fox owned Marvel characters. MvCI mostly failed because consumers were too stupid to understand why Capcom couldn't use those characters before. The_Korey posted... How badly does a Disney exec with 0 understanding of gaming have Capcom by the balls this time? Disney would have anyone and everyone by the balls, and you'd be stupid to go against you. --- Don't like it? Don't watch it. It's that simple Dictator of Nice Guys <cite>Veggeta X posted [p:945520100] in Would you ... [t:79023196]...</cite> <quote>Yes because this time they'll be able to use the X-Men and other previously Fox owned Marvel characters. MvCI mostly failed because consumers were too stupid to understand why Capcom couldn't use those characters before. The_Korey posted... </cite> <quote>How badly does a Disney exec with 0 understanding of gaming have Capcom by the balls this time?</quote>Disney would have anyone and everyone by the balls, and you'd be stupid to go against you. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The Popo 10/06/20 11:21:45 AM #6:	Veggeta X posted... MvCI mostly failed because consumers were too stupid to understand why Capcom couldn't use those characters before. Its not on consumers to understand why a company is making a business decision and make a purchase based on that understanding. Its on a business to provide a product that consumers are willing to purchase. They left out some of the biggest names from the history of the series (Doctor Doom, Wolverine, Magneto) just to push a larger business agenda. Consumers reacted by not purchasing it. Simple as that. Besides, there were plenty of other reasons why the game failed... Seemingly just pulling several character models from MvC3, rather than giving new characters for a fresh experiences. The illusion of taking the series back a step, going from 3v3 to 2v2. Capcom went into it with a bad recent track record for fighting games and DLC practices at launch. See also Street Fighter x Tekken (locked DLC on disc) and Street Fighter V (released an incomplete game). Dragon Ball Fighterz was coming out at the same time and destroyed it from a prelaunch hype perspective. --- Live action Hungry Hungry Hippos though, now that was a sport. ~Aeon Azuran <cite>The Popo posted [p:945520651] in Would you ... [t:79023196]...</cite> <quote>Veggeta X posted... </cite> <quote>MvCI mostly failed because consumers were too stupid to understand why Capcom couldn't use those characters before.</quote> Its not on consumers to understand why a company is making a business decision and make a purchase based on that understanding. Its on a business to provide a product that consumers are willing to purchase. They left out some of the biggest names from the history of the series (Doctor Doom, Wolverine, Magneto) just to push a larger business agenda. Consumers reacted by not purchasing it. Simple as that. Besides, there were plenty of other reasons why the game failed... Seemingly just pulling several character models from MvC3, rather than giving new characters for a fresh experiences. The illusion of taking the series back a step, going from 3v3 to 2v2. Capcom went into it with a bad recent track record for fighting games and DLC practices at launch. See also Street Fighter x Tekken (locked DLC on disc) and Street Fighter V (released an incomplete game). Dragon Ball Fighterz was coming out at the same time and destroyed it from a prelaunch hype perspective. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Veggeta X 10/06/20 11:24:23 AM #7:	The Popo posted... Its not on consumers to understand why a company is making a business decision and make a purchase based on that understanding. Its on a business to provide a product that consumers are willing to purchase. They left out some of the biggest names from the history of the series (Doctor Doom, Wolverine, Magneto) just to push a larger business agenda. Consumers reacted by not purchasing it. Simple as that. Okay Karen. --- Don't like it? Don't watch it. It's that simple Dictator of Nice Guys <cite>Veggeta X posted [p:945520712] in Would you ... [t:79023196]...</cite> <quote>The Popo posted... </cite> <quote>Its not on consumers to understand why a company is making a business decision and make a purchase based on that understanding. Its on a business to provide a product that consumers are willing to purchase. They left out some of the biggest names from the history of the series (Doctor Doom, Wolverine, Magneto) just to push a larger business agenda. Consumers reacted by not purchasing it. Simple as that.</quote>Okay Karen. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mezcla 10/06/20 11:24:23 AM #8:	Nope. --- Sig <cite>Mezcla posted [p:945520713] in Would you ... [t:79023196]...</cite> <quote>Nope. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Wasssup Now 10/06/20 11:55:05 AM #9:	The Popo posted... Its not on consumers to understand why a company is making a business decision and make a purchase based on that understanding. Its on a business to provide a product that consumers are willing to purchase. They left out some of the biggest names from the history of the series (Doctor Doom, Wolverine, Magneto) just to push a larger business agenda. Consumers reacted by not purchasing it. Simple as that. Besides, there were plenty of other reasons why the game failed... Seemingly just pulling several character models from MvC3, rather than giving new characters for a fresh experiences. The illusion of taking the series back a step, going from 3v3 to 2v2. Capcom went into it with a bad recent track record for fighting games and DLC practices at launch. See also Street Fighter x Tekken (locked DLC on disc) and Street Fighter V (released an incomplete game). Dragon Ball Fighterz was coming out at the same time and destroyed it from a prelaunch hype perspective. Great explanation <cite>Wasssup Now posted [p:945521712] in Would you ... [t:79023196]...</cite> <quote>The Popo posted... </cite> <quote>Its not on consumers to understand why a company is making a business decision and make a purchase based on that understanding. Its on a business to provide a product that consumers are willing to purchase. They left out some of the biggest names from the history of the series (Doctor Doom, Wolverine, Magneto) just to push a larger business agenda. Consumers reacted by not purchasing it. Simple as that. Besides, there were plenty of other reasons why the game failed... Seemingly just pulling several character models from MvC3, rather than giving new characters for a fresh experiences. The illusion of taking the series back a step, going from 3v3 to 2v2. Capcom went into it with a bad recent track record for fighting games and DLC practices at launch. See also Street Fighter x Tekken (locked DLC on disc) and Street Fighter V (released an incomplete game). Dragon Ball Fighterz was coming out at the same time and destroyed it from a prelaunch hype perspective.</quote> Great explanation </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > Would you be down for it if Capcom wanted to make a Marvel vs Capcom 4? (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Would you be down for it if Capcom wanted to make a Marvel vs Capcom 4?