Current Events > Amy Coney Barrett cannot list the five components of the First Amendment.

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2
DrizztLink 10/14/20 11:13:05 PM #53:	I'm gonna have to go ahead and repeat myself. It's the Bill of fucking Rights. That's a pretty big deal. --- http://guidesmedia.ign.com/guides/9846/images/slowpoke.gif https://imgur.com/M8h2ATe https://imgur.com/6ezFwG1 <cite>DrizztLink posted [p:945868325] in Amy Coney ... [t:79040071]...</cite> <quote>I'm gonna have to go ahead and repeat myself. It's the Bill of fucking Rights. That's a pretty big deal. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pegusus123456 10/14/20 11:33:55 PM #54:	whitelytning posted... No it's not at all. A lawyer is not expected to memorize everything. It's like a kindergarten teacher forgetting the letter M. I'm sure it was just a brainfart on her end and not indicative that she's an unqualified idiot, but I don't know why you're defending this so hard. --- https://imgur.com/Er6TT https://imgur.com/Er6TT https://imgur.com/Er6TT So? I deeded to some gay porn. It doesn't mean anything. - Patty_Fleur <cite>pegusus123456 posted [p:945868987] in Amy Coney ... [t:79040071]...</cite> <quote>whitelytning posted... </cite> <quote>No it's not at all. A lawyer is not expected to memorize everything.</quote>It's like a kindergarten teacher forgetting the letter M. I'm sure it was just a brainfart on her end and not indicative that she's an unqualified idiot, but I don't know why you're defending this so hard. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
RchHomieQuanChi 10/14/20 11:43:20 PM #55:	whitelytning posted... No it's not at all. A lawyer is not expected to memorize everything. Bruh....this is the equivalent of someone claiming to be an expert on operating cameras stumbling over his feet trying to turn the camera on. --- I have nothing else to say <cite>RchHomieQuanChi posted [p:945869252] in Amy Coney ... [t:79040071]...</cite> <quote>whitelytning posted... </cite> <quote> No it's not at all. A lawyer is not expected to memorize everything.</quote> Bruh....this is the equivalent of someone claiming to be an expert on operating cameras stumbling over his feet trying to turn the camera on. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#56	Post #56 was unavailable or deleted.
lilORANG 10/15/20 8:46:16 AM #57:	RchHomieQuanChi posted... Bruh....this is the equivalent of someone claiming to be an expert on operating cameras stumbling over his feet trying to turn the camera on. This is a really weird example --- #FeelTheBern https://imgur.com/q5z4CUu https://imgur.com/6B9oFXh https://imgur.com/sy42Dlf <cite>lilORANG posted [p:945877704] in Amy Coney ... [t:79040071]...</cite> <quote>RchHomieQuanChi posted...</cite> <quote> Bruh....this is the equivalent of someone claiming to be an expert on operating cameras stumbling over his feet trying to turn the camera on. </quote> This is a really weird example</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
eston 10/15/20 8:50:53 AM #58:	This is one of the questions on the citizenship test --- http://i73.photobucket.com/albums/i215/estonc/grizzly_bear_chairs_2.jpg https://imgur.com/8kjZU <cite>eston posted [p:945877788] in Amy Coney ... [t:79040071]...</cite> <quote>This is one of the questions on the citizenship test </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Rathinor 10/15/20 8:51:31 AM #59:	SamWincester posted... Before I got barred from interviews <cite>Rathinor posted [p:945877796] in Amy Coney ... [t:79040071]...</cite> <quote>SamWincester posted... </cite> <quote>Before I got barred from interviews</quote> </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Yelsin 10/15/20 8:54:50 AM #60:	It's ironic that a republican ended up tripping her up. <cite>Yelsin posted [p:945877860] in Amy Coney ... [t:79040071]...</cite> <quote>It's ironic that a republican ended up tripping her up. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
paerarru 10/15/20 1:20:57 PM #61:	Again, nobody's saying that she never learned this. It's just a very basic thing that she couldn't recall at the moment. Yeah it's just like if I goofed and said "klnop", or whatever. What we're saying is precisely that a SCOTUS nominee shouldn't make even this little goof. You expect them to have not just a level of competence, but mastery. Is she qualified for the job? Sure, there's no doubt of that. She can handle it. But is she the best candidate for the position, at this time, or even a good candidate? ...probably not, there are better candidates who are not nominated only for political reasons. And that's wrong. --- Hottest K-Pop Girl Group http://challonge.com/96st4ysk <cite>paerarru posted [p:945885992] in Amy Coney ... [t:79040071]...</cite> <quote>Again, nobody's saying that she never learned this. It's just a very basic thing that she couldn't recall at the moment. Yeah it's just like if I goofed and said "klnop", or whatever. What we're saying is precisely that a SCOTUS nominee shouldn't make even this little goof. You expect them to have not just a level of competence, but mastery. Is she qualified for the job? Sure, there's no doubt of that. She can handle it. But is she the best candidate for the position, at this time, or even a good candidate? ...probably not, there are better candidates who are not nominated only for political reasons. And that's wrong. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
skermac 10/15/20 9:29:20 PM #62:	I personally dnr know either --- To the edge of the universe and back, endure and survive <cite>skermac posted [p:945904591] in Amy Coney ... [t:79040071]...</cite> <quote>I personally dnr know either </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
WrestlinFan 10/15/20 9:29:54 PM #63:	I still remember those from sixth grade. --- https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random <cite>WrestlinFan posted [p:945904611] in Amy Coney ... [t:79040071]...</cite> <quote>I still remember those from sixth grade. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
shadowofwar 10/15/20 9:30:21 PM #64:	paerarru posted... Again, nobody's saying that she never learned this. It's just a very basic thing that she couldn't recall at the moment. Yeah it's just like if I goofed and said "klnop", or whatever. What we're saying is precisely that a SCOTUS nominee shouldn't make even this little goof. You expect them to have not just a level of competence, but mastery. Is she qualified for the job? Sure, there's no doubt of that. She can handle it. But is she the best candidate for the position, at this time, or even a good candidate? ...probably not, there are better candidates who are not nominated only for political reasons. And that's wrong. Lets be real. If it wasn't this, it'd be something else. <cite>shadowofwar posted [p:945904629] in Amy Coney ... [t:79040071]...</cite> <quote>paerarru posted... </cite> <quote>Again, nobody's saying that she never learned this. It's just a very basic thing that she couldn't recall at the moment. Yeah it's just like if I goofed and said "klnop", or whatever. What we're saying is precisely that a SCOTUS nominee shouldn't make even this little goof. You expect them to have not just a level of competence, but mastery. Is she qualified for the job? Sure, there's no doubt of that. She can handle it. But is she the best candidate for the position, at this time, or even a good candidate? ...probably not, there are better candidates who are not nominated only for political reasons. And that's wrong.</quote>Lets be real. If it wasn't this, it'd be something else. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tyranthraxus 10/15/20 10:42:33 PM #65:	shadowofwar posted... Lets be real. If it wasn't this, it'd be something else. And if it wasn't that something else it would be a something even other else. Almost like there's a long list of reasons not to confirm her. --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:945907187] in Amy Coney ... [t:79040071]...</cite> <quote>shadowofwar posted... </cite> <quote>Lets be real. If it wasn't this, it'd be something else.</quote> And if it wasn't that something else it would be a something even other else. Almost like there's a long list of reasons not to confirm her. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
shadowofwar 10/16/20 8:26:25 AM #66:	Theres a long list of nitpicks, yes. Also, how ironic is it that dem party members are all of a sudden concerned with the finer points of free speech? <cite>shadowofwar posted [p:945918251] in Amy Coney ... [t:79040071]...</cite> <quote>Theres a long list of nitpicks, yes. Also, how ironic is it that dem party members are all of a sudden concerned with the finer points of free speech? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#67	Post #67 was unavailable or deleted.
Jerry_Hellyeah 10/16/20 5:08:06 PM #68:	skermac posted... most anyone one else wouldnt know either Most everyone else isnt trying to be a Supreme Court Justice for the next few decades. --- This is a cool sig <cite>Jerry_Hellyeah posted [p:945935458] in Amy Coney ... [t:79040071]...</cite> <quote>skermac posted... </cite> <quote>most anyone one else wouldnt know either</quote> Most everyone else isnt trying to be a Supreme Court Justice for the next few decades. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2

Current Events > Amy Coney Barrett cannot list the five components of the First Amendment. (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Amy Coney Barrett cannot list the five components of the First Amendment.