Current Events > Sacred Geometry General

(+) Yeah! (+)

This topic is all about sacred geometry and any relevant discussion.

To get started, I encourage you to watch this 12 minute video, which goes over many different aspects and shares many examples of sacred geometry and math all throughout nature and the cosmos, big and small.

https://youtu.be/Mynr7uik5-0

"What is sacred geometry?"

Sacred geometry is a series of interconnected principles, ideas, foundations, and formulas, based on the mathematical precision and replication of any and all geometric shapes and patterns, which can be observed and measured anywhere in nature, from the smallest atom to the largest cluster of galaxies within our universe. With these principles and understanding that all aspects of the cosmos are interconnected as one through the universal language of mathematical geometry, our connection to all of creation brings us closer together towards peace, unity and enlightenment.

"What is so 'sacred' about sacred geometry?"

All aspects of the universe that are made of tangible matter, most commonly in the form of atoms, contain observable and measurable geometric shapes and patterns, which all follow the same mathematical blueprints and foundations in their design to such a vast a degree, that it would be considered intelligentlydesigned or sacred. Whether it's as precious as a human eye, or as massive as the Milky Way galaxy... as complex as a human lung, or as simple as a bolt of lightning shooting through the sky... everything that exists, past and future, follows the same set of universal laws and can be measured with the same mathematical formulas.

"Where can I find examples of sacred geometry?"

Sacred geometry can be found anywhere and everywhere you look in the world, whether it's outside or inside, big or small, animate or inanimate.

In art - paintings, drawings, sculptures
In music - instrument design, sound waves, sheet music, arpeggios
In architecture - temples, pyramids, churches, monolithic structures
In nature - animals, trees, flowers, sea shells, lightning bolts, snowflakes
In geography - mountains, rivers, lakes, valleys
In biology - organ systems, eyes, blood vessels, DNA molecules
In astronomy - planets, stars, solar systems, galaxies
In chemistry and physics - atomic elements, molecules, compounds, quantum particles

To learn more about sacred geometry, I encourage you to read through the following links:

https://www.geometrycode.com/sacred-geometry/

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sacred_geometry

https://destinationdeluxe.com/sacred-geometry-explained-healing-benefits/

---

---

cuh posted...

Does this count?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Garden_of_Cyrus

It does indeed!

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

Hexagons are the best.



Metatron's cube contains all platonic solids and is basically a three dimensional hexagon.

---

woah

---

I like stuff like this because it does help make more sense of spirituality vs science and where that line is fer sure

---

How delusional must you be to be a proponent of this concept while being ignorant enough to vote for Trump?

---

KINDERFELD posted...

How delusional must you be to be a proponent of this concept while being ignorant enough to vote for Trump?

Theres a huge overlap between new age/metaphysics hippies and right wing conspiracy dipshits

---

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=msnYBMdaB08

---

---

Who posted in those deleted messages

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

lol bye then

RedJackson posted...

I like stuff like this because it does help make more sense of spirituality vs science and where that line is fer sure

Science and spirituality are two sides of the same coin, you can use one half to further your understanding of the other half. Back and forth, you grow wiser and balanced

Cowthief posted...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=msnYBMdaB08

Mesmerizing af

Questionmarktarius posted...

Nice

Doe posted...

Cowthief posted...

woah

---

I've been drawing shit like this since high school



---

Xenozoa425 posted...

This is called Pantheism.

---

Flockaveli posted...

I've been drawing shit like this since high school

That's sick dude, nice!

Tyranthraxus posted...

This is called Pantheism.

Correct, but I posted that image mainly because matching sacred geometry is found in each pair of those smaller images. As above, so below. As within, so without. Human eyes look like nebulae, or star nurseries, blood vessels look like tree branches, etc.

---

woooah

---

I'm surprised no one's mention the Fibonacci Sequence yet...

---

Golden ratio of 1.618 is everywhere, yeah. The video in the OP goes over it a few times.

---

Xenozoa425 posted...

Correct, but I posted that image mainly because matching sacred geometry is found in each pair of those smaller images. As above, so below. As within, so without. Human eyes look like nebulae, or star nurseries, blood vessels look like tree branches, etc.

unfortunately the owl is blind

---

That's such powerful irony: a whole universe for all to see, in a pair of tiny eyes that cannot see for itself.

---

https://youtu.be/1Jj-sJ78O6M

JACKBUTTMOMMY posted...

Again, patterns that exist in nature are scientifically provable. If you don't want to believe in a higher power, that's fine (even though powers that are greater than us have been scientifically proven, too).

Such as?

---

tiornys posted...

https://youtu.be/1Jj-sJ78O6M

Great vid! I subscribed to the channel

---

JACKBUTTMOMMY posted...

Laws of nature, laws of science, love, the flow of the universe, music and the arts, electricity, stars, supernovas, black holes, lightning, rain, the weather, floods, consciousness, existentialism, the known universe, the unknown universe, radiation, dark matter, our planet, other planets, energy...

I would say humans are a part of most of those things--or they're a part of us, so I wouldn't necessarily make a division between "their" power and "us" as "we/they" are all interrelated.

---

JACKBUTTMOMMY posted...

Sounds like you pretty much agree with the overarching theme then - everything is connected.

I definitely believe this, and the scientific method backs it up

---

More pics

tiornys posted...

https://youtu.be/1Jj-sJ78O6M

Will watch later most definitely

---

Do your weirdo pseudoscience bullshit all you want, but don't drag geometry into it

---

Garioshi posted...

Do your weirdo pseudoscience bullshit all you want, but don't drag geometry into it

There is nothing fake or unscientific about measuring nature and the cosmos with math and geometry, and finding the same formulas, designs and equations all throughout. Even for atheists and agnostics, this is about as close to "God" as it gets.

Math is the language of the universe, and everything made up of physical matter, from atoms to galaxies, can be expressed and organized into the same fundamental set of numbers, patterns, shapes, forms, designs and templates.

---

Garioshi posted...

Do your weirdo pseudoscience bullshit all you want, but don't drag geometry into it

Classical mechanics tends towards fractal shapes. It just happens.

I have you tagged as a Nazi downplayer, so I don't think I'm going to go down any rabbit hole you encourage others to chase.

---

Xenozoa425 posted...

And then this topic took a dark turn. I smell some weird neo-nazi shit going on.


---

Shadow Don posted...

I smell some weird neo-nazi shit going on.

or just plain trying too hard, with a subtext of (((conspiracy))).

Try to arrange thirteen circles within another circle. These are the shapes you'll actually get:

That'll look awful on the back of money, though.
The 1/4/3/4/1 arrangement looks like you did on purpose, and it's symmetrical on several bisecting lines.

Dope Lupe Fiasco song about sacred geometry with an interesting fan made video to go with it
https://youtu.be/dDAJ-rXxA_Y

---

So, I see a number of issues with the kind of reasoning involved here. Let me talk about a few of them. First, we have a bias towards pattern fitting. When we think we've found a pattern and go looking for examples, we're prone to shoving things that are "close enough" into that pattern even when the deviations are significant. This is one of the points of the video I linked earlier, and most of post #35 looks like this kind of reasoning to me.

Another more subtle issue is a failure to understand that finding improbable coincidences is in fact highly probable. This is because the number of possible improbable coincidences is huge. With enough possibilities, even if the odds of finding any specific coincidence is low, the odds of finding at least one coincidence is high. There's a good talk along these lines starting about 41:30 in this vid:
https://youtu.be/6JwEYamjXpA?t=2490

I also think we tend to view reality as being much "cleaner" in a mathematical sense than it actually is, and I suspect a large part of this is due to how we're taught about science and especially physics. Quantum physics and general relativity are a lot messier than newtonian physics.

tiornys posted...

Quantum physics and general relativity are a lot messier than newtonian physics.

Newtonian physics is content with being "close enough, eh". It worked out pretty well until someone realized Mercury's orbit is a bit odd.

Questionmarktarius posted...

Newtonian physics is content with being "close enough, eh". It worked out pretty well until someone realized Mercury's orbit is a bit odd.

And now we have the new info on the Muon so...

---

MrMallard posted...

I have you tagged as a Nazi downplayer, so I don't think I'm going to go down any rabbit hole you encourage others to chase.

Again, nothing fake or conspiratorial about observing the same series of mathematics and geometry found in nature, space and everyday life, like on the back of a dollar bill or your bodily proportions.

Tag me as whatever you want, I don't care, but you can either contribute to the topic or not.

Shadow Don posted...

And then this topic took a dark turn. I smell some weird neo-nazi shit going on.

Same goes for you.

The Eko posted...

Dope Lupe Fiasco song about sacred geometry with an interesting fan made video to go with it
https://youtu.be/dDAJ-rXxA_Y

Will listen later, thanks for sharing!

tiornys posted...

So, I see a number of issues with the kind of reasoning involved here. Let me talk about a few of them. First, we have a bias towards pattern fitting. When we think we've found a pattern and go looking for examples, we're prone to shoving things that are "close enough" into that pattern even when the deviations are significant. This is one of the points of the video I linked earlier, and most of post #35 looks like this kind of reasoning to me.

Another more subtle issue is a failure to understand that finding improbable coincidences is in fact highly probable. This is because the number of possible improbable coincidences is huge. With enough possibilities, even if the odds of finding any specific coincidence is low, the odds of finding at least one coincidence is high. There's a good talk along these lines starting about 41:30 in this vid:
https://youtu.be/6JwEYamjXpA?t=2490

I also think we tend to view reality as being much "cleaner" in a mathematical sense than it actually is, and I suspect a large part of this is due to how we're taught about science and especially physics. Quantum physics and general relativity are a lot messier than newtonian physics.

Coincidences and probability is one thing, but you can't help and wonder about the nature of things, and why many aspects share the same fundamental designs, math formulas and templates. Everything is all made of the same subatomic particles. It's not far fetched to imagine that we share a greater sense of interconnectedness with the rest of the atoms that exist outside of us.

---