Current Events > $250 for SCOTUS sightings after Kavanaugh's protests

(+) Yeah! (+)

ShutDownDC, a liberal advocacy group in Washington, D.C., said on Friday that it will offer up to $250 to service industry workers in the district for every sighting of the justices who overturned Roe v. Wade.
Driving the news: This comes just days after Justice Brett Kavanaugh was forced to exit a restaurant in D.C. after abortion rights protesters showed up outside the premises.
The group is specifically targeting Kavanaugh and fellow Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Amy Coney Barrett and Chief Justice John Roberts.
What they're saying: "DC Service Industry Workers... If you see Kavanaugh, Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch, Coney Barrett or Roberts DM us with the details!," ShutDownDC said in a tweet.
"We'll Venmo you $50 for a confirmed sighting and $200 if they're still there 30 mins after your message."
Twitter has not responded on if the tweet from ShutDownDC violates any of its terms of service guidelines.
The big picture: Prior to the Supreme Court overturning Roe, the federal government warned that there could be a potential surge in political violence once the ruling was handed down.
Between the lines: Planned Parenthood, NARAL Pro-Choice America and the Liberate Abortion Campaign released a statement in late June saying they reject any and all threats of violence that come from the decision, adding that "[t]hey do not speak for us, our supporters, our communities, or our movement."

The Supreme Court should not be open to the influence of public opinion.

I want you to really consider this question: why not?

As long as no harm comes to them. Make them as publicly uncomfortable all you like. Never let them forget what they did.

They don't believe in privacy, why should they be able to eat in peace?

The Constitution does not guarantee the right to a peaceful meal.

Then who should be?

Meh. Two scotus seats were effectively stolen so they don't get to pretend they have any legitimacy. McConnell saw to that.

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/7/6/5/AAP2ssAADb6d.jpg

But he's blind

But he's blind

I'm waiting for The Prince Fish's opinion since he is a strict constructionist...

They shouldn't have got hungry, if they wanted to eat.

Plenty of other states they can eat in.

If they are against people exercising their democratic right to protest, they should move to the UK.

They shouldn't have got hungry, if they wanted to eat.

Plenty of other states they can eat in.

If they are against people exercising their democratic right to protest, they should move to the UK.

The Constitution does not guarantee the right to a peaceful meal.

Women are going to die because these assholes decided a right didn't exist. Why shouldn't harm come to them?

You lose your moral high ground when you beat and kill your opponents. The police also frown upon it.

You lose your moral high ground when you beat and kill your opponents. The police also frown upon it.

The police are gonna be frowning on minorities being out in public before long.

You lose your moral high ground when you beat and kill your opponents. The police also frown upon it.

Is this the part where we act like they don't already?

The same police who have historically and presently cause harm to protesters? :la

Seriously, that's the stupidest fucking post I've seen in a while.

XD When you're being forced to be an incubator, led to a gas chamber, lined up for a firing squad, or put into "indentured servitude", you can at least take solace in the fact that you did your due dilligence to take the moral high ground by not meeting violence with violence.

Jesus christ.