Current Events > Was the Harambe situation handled correctly?

(+) Yeah! (+)

Why couldn't they tranquilize it

I mean I get the situation might be different, but SURELY "shoot gorilla in face" isn't the first plan we should be putting into action.

not every interaction is the same. also, shoot to kill, because you generally only have 1 shot.

Yes. Yes it fucking is.

Holy shit.

Pure delusion by someone who bases his opinions on armchair ideology.

Explain it then bro? Why was blowing a gorilla's brains out the only route humanity should possibly ever take in this scenario?

A dangerous animal had a child in its hand. Immediate neutralization, not waiting for tranquilizers to take an effect, not risking angering the animal by "talking it down" should be plan A, plan B, plan C AND plan D.

Harambe killer, where you at??

So just want to make sure here. You believe that employees this shitty ass zoo that can't even manage to make an enclosure that doesn't suck ass utlitized perfect methods, tools, and planning during this incident? You believe that if this same exact scenario occured in every single zoo in the world, the only instances where the child survives are the ones where harambe is shot dead?

So yes, I believe if Harambe wasn't in some piece of shit zoo and had actual trained GOOD SOLID FUCKING professionals and not some bumfuck gator wrastlers then Harambe and the kid would both be alive.

I have said literally none of that.

Your belief is based on nothing onther the ideology of "derrrrp animals are goooood *snorts loudly*"

I'm sure the ideology has a more succinct name, but I'm using the more descriptive one.

kid could be a teenager now, chances are he plays video games. He could even visit gamefaqs.gamespot.com.

Harambe killer, where you at??

Whether or not Harambe is shot dead really depends on individual factors, doesn't it? Mainly the gorilla's behavior. Harambe didn't leave the child. Harambe died.

Simple as it should be.

Further you're being a big dummy. Of course that can be situations where Harambe is not killed and the kid survives. Point being, there's really no reason to take that chance other than you being a bad person who is willing to risk the life of a child based on some fucked up belief about the value of animals.

If there is a situation where harambe and the kid ever get out alive, that would make that situation the "correct" one, and this the "incorrect" one.

Nope.

Pure delusion.

Dingydang's argument seems to be that they handled the situation incorrectly because the kid managed to get in there at all. I think it's just kind of silly to argue from that point because you've opened the scope so far.

Yes.

I don't know what you want me to say. Claiming that the zoo staff shooting the gorilla is incorrect, not even that it was simply a bad decision, it was a mathematically wrong answer, because if they risked the kid's life there's a possibility that both could live IS delusional and based on ideological positions you hold rather than any aspect of reality we exist in.

Why couldn't they tranquilize it

This is pointless to ask here, you can only give the safe answer or you will be modded