Current Events > Lindsey Graham: Violence SHOULD happen if Trump is arrested

(+) Yeah! (+)

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/3629009-graham-defends-riot-in-the-streets-comment-says-he-tried-to-state-the-obvious/

Tldr; if Hillary Clinton wasn't arrested, Trump shouldn't be arrested. Even though Trump was the one who made it a felony and didn't cooperate with the doj

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/3/1/1/AAUFZqAADo_H.jpg

Every pearl that conservatives clutched over Black Lives Matter protests was made of cheap plastic.

Where in his statement does he say that violence should happen? It looks like once again, he said violence will happen because people will be pissed. You can say that it's ridiculous that people feel that way because orange man deserves it, but saying that something that will happen is not saying something should.

Lindsey Graham should be arrested for threatening violence.

ThePrinceFish posted...

Where in his statement does he say that violence should happen? It looks like once again, he said violence will happen because people will be pissed. You can say that it's ridiculous that people feel that way because orange man deserves it, but saying that something that will happen is not saying something should.

He's saying that people will be justified for being violent, and as we have learned over the past two years, that is deliberate dog whistling for violence.

ThePrinceFish posted...

Where in his statement does he say that violence should happen? It looks like once again, he said violence will happen because people will be pissed. You can say that it's ridiculous that people feel that way because orange man deserves it, but saying that something that will happen is not saying something should.

He's literally cheering it on by making it sound justified and preventable.

"Oh you should have known better than to arrest Trump when Hillary had emails!"

We are way past the point of allowing Republicans to feign ignorance about dog whistling violence

DarkRoast posted...

We are way past the point of allowing Republicans to feign ignorance about dog whistling violence

Lmao just yesterday you were accurately skeptical over that topic of the governor covering up sex crimes calling it cherry picking information and then you try to stretch a cowardly wuss like Lindsay Graham's stating the obvious into a secret call to war.

You people are hacks.

ThePrinceFish posted...

Lmao just yesterday you were accurately skeptical over that topic of the governor covering up sex crimes calling it cherry picking information and then you try to stretch a cowardly wuss like Lindsay Graham's stating the obvious into a secret call to war.

You people are hacks.

I was told the Republicans hate violence over polticial disagreements.

He should be be begging for no violence and calling anyone who would commit violence all kinds of horrible things. That would require logical consistency, but conservatives clutched pearls when London's mayor said terrorism is part and parcel of living in a big city. Then they turn around and say that about it happening in America.

There's always a "but" when Republicans talk about things they only publicly disagree with. Notice their response when a 12 year old rape victim is forced to have a baby. Or when a LGBTQ person is the victim of a hate crime.

Did he literally say that Violence should happen if Trump is arrested? Did he say those exact words in that exact order? Hhhhmmmmmmm???

Checkmate liberals. Also wtf is dog whistling, are yall making that up too?

ThePrinceFish posted...

Lmao just yesterday you were accurately skeptical over that topic of the governor covering up sex crimes calling it cherry picking information and then you try to stretch a cowardly wuss like Lindsay Graham's stating the obvious into a secret call to war.

You people are hacks.

She didn't stretch here though? You asked, and she explained her logic. Would you like me to link Graham's statements where he says it would be justified?

Heres what I said: The raid on President Trumps home, the likely nominee for 2024, better bear some fruit here, Graham continued. If its just about mishandling classified information, weve had a standard set when it came to Hillary Clinton.

So according to Graham, every instance of an illegal act is treated with the same standard, regardless of the severity of the act?

Also, is he claiming qualified immunity here? Does it apply to politicians?
Fani Willis, the Democratic district attorney, has sought Grahams testimony as part of her investigation into whether Trump or his allies unlawfully attempted to overturn the 2020 presidential election in the state.
But Graham has argued a constitutional provision protecting lawmakers from lawsuits and prosecution for things they say and do as part of their legislative work allows him to avoid testifying.

Republicans need to be called out for what they truly are.

ThePrinceFish posted...

Lmao just yesterday you were accurately skeptical over that topic of the governor covering up sex crimes calling it cherry picking information and then you try to stretch a cowardly wuss like Lindsay Graham's stating the obvious into a secret call to war.

You people are hacks.

Grow up. It's as simple as saying "don't be violent, violence will not be tolerated."

Instead, it's "GOSH IF THEY BECOME VIOLENT, IT'S BIDEN'S FAULT FOR ATTACKING THEM"

It's deliberately calculated.

Graham knows the Lady G pics release the moment something happens to trump