Current Events > Conker's Bad Fur Day was really average.

(+) Yeah! (+)

It's shocking that the company that made BK, BT and DK64 also made this. Some of the gameplay was reasonably good fun, and the voice acting was good, but it was nothing special.

Thoughts? Did you play this back in the day?

No u

It was a novelty game.

Both Banjo games were way better imo

Strongly disagree. I felt that way about DK64 every time I tried it.

You were a red squirrel that shot Frankenstein monster teddy bears, specifically in a manner like Saving Private Ryan for no reason other than to advance the plot of a fairytale panther king using you as a table leg.

Game was anything but average in 2001

The only reason anyone remembers it is because of the "humor"

Smashingpmkns posted...

Both Banjo games were way better imo

Not Tooie. That game goes to absolute shit at Grunty Industries.

This game struck me similarly to that of a somewhat immature teenager going through a "trying really hard to sound edgy and cool" phase.

Billyionaire posted...

You were a red squirrel that shot Frankenstein monster teddy bears, specifically in a manner like Saving Private Ryan for no reason other than to advance the plot of a fairytale panther king using you as a table leg.

Game was anything but average in 2001

Lol. That's a good point. A big part of it's selling point was that it wasn't the average platformer it looked like on the outside. And the games he mentioned were the one's considered the average game it wasn't.

That's part of the reason it was turned into an M rated game. Otherwise it wouldn't have stood out.

creativerealms posted...

That's part of the reason it was turned into an M rated game. Otherwise it wouldn't have stood out.

Hard to say that when the entire game revolves around an M rating. It's not like it was thrown into the game as a gimmick. You can't take out a couple things and be down to T or E. Every scenario revolves around an M rating.

It's also just fun and has more diversity that's not just tacked on than any of the other games mentioned. You can't easily take out the diversity by removing a mini game or something. The drastic changes are entire sections of the game. Especially when you consider the multiplayer.

You're obviously just trying to look for tye easiest excuse to write off anyone who doesn't share your perspective.

Also, I really like BK. So, Im not hating on it. Just standing up for Conker. Liking BK more than Conker is an opinion Id respect. But you don't gotta take away from Conker just to validate the others.

Also, I know it was literally thrown into the game after the first conception on the game. Hardly any game ends with it's very first conceptual idea. But it's obvious that it was built from the ground up after coming to the decision to make it M rated. It wasn't a finished game that they decided to just hurry up and throw adult stuff on top of. If it was, Id be surprised. Id like the proof

Sunhawk Topic (maybe)

Lost_All_Senses posted...

Hard to say that when the entire game revolves around an M rating. It's not like it was thrown into the game as a gimmick. You can't take out a couple things and be down to T or E. Every scenario revolves around an M rating.

It's also just fun and has more diversity that's not just tacked on than any of the other games mentioned. You can't easily take out the diversity by removing a mini game or something. The drastic changes are entire sections of the game. Especially when you consider the multiplayer.

You're obviously just trying to look for tye easiest excuse to write off anyone who doesn't share your perspective.

Also, I really like BK. So, Im not hating on it. Just standing up for Conker. Liking BK more than Conker is an opinion Id respect. But you don't gotta take away from Conker just to validate the others.

Also, I know it was literally thrown into the game after the first conception on the game. Hardly any game ends with it's very first conceptual idea. But it's obvious that it was built from the ground up after coming to the decision to make it M rated. It wasn't a finished game that they decided to just hurry up and throw adult stuff on top of. If it was, Id be surprised. Id like the proof

You just gave the proof. That's what I was talking about. The original Conker wasn't that interesting and development was restarted when it was decided to make the game rated M. That is what makes it stand out even if it's a weaker rare title.

I actually had a lot of fun with the multiplayer.

multiplayer was top tier

creativerealms posted...

You just gave the proof. That's what I was talking about. The original Conker wasn't that interesting and development was restarted when it was decided to make the game rated M. That is what makes it stand out even if it's a weaker rare title.

You can use that. But I don't think it proves anything unless you want it to because you don't like the game. There's plenty of awesome games that change course after they don't feel the original vision is working out. It's not just simply, that happened, so it's impossible the end result is a good game

One of the best multiplayer games for it's time for sure carries it past some of the grievances people might have.

Which game has better multiplayer, CBFD or Perfect Dark? I have never once played any version of Conker.

matt mcmuscles sucks

I am the Great Mighty Poo

Great game

Great game.

Did you ever play the multiplayer with people? That alone was better than them overall