Current Events > New poll shows Elvis' cousin in tight race for Mississippi governor

(+) Yeah! (+)

https://mississippitoday.org/2023/10/23/governors-race-poll-tate-reeves-brandon-presley/

If youve wondered why the Democratic Governors Association has pumped a historic amount of money into Brandon Presleys 2023 campaign, you might get your answer later today.

The Washington-based organization that works to get Democratic governors elected will publicly release a poll today that shows Republican incumbent Gov. Tate Reeves leading Presley by just one point, according to a memo shared with Mississippi Today.

The poll shows Reeves leading Presley 46% to 45%, with nearly 10% still undecided 15 days from the election. The poll also shows that among those undecided voters, 68% have an unfavorable opinion of Reeves, while just 2% view him favorably.

If accurate, the poll also shows both candidates well below the 50%-plus-one threshold needed to avoid a runoff. A third candidate, independent Gwendolyn Gray, dropped out of the race in early October and endorsed Presley, but her announced exit came too late to be removed from the ballot.

She could earn enough votes to keep Reeves or Presley from reaching 50%, which would push those two candidates to a Nov. 28 runoff election.

The Democratic Governors Association has pumped at least $3.75 million into Presleys campaign this year, which is an unprecedented Mississippi investment from a single group affiliated with the national Democratic Party.

That sum helped Presley out-raise Reeves over the past three months a feat that very few political observers expected.

To add some context to this years DGA investment, the same group gave Democratic nominee Jim Hood just $2.4 million in his race against Reeves four years ago. And this year in neighboring Louisiana, one of two other states with a 2023 governors election, the DGA invested about $300,000 total.

A word of warning about this poll and any others youll see between now and November: tis the season for skewed polling leaks. Given their investment in one candidate in the race, the uber-politically affiliated DGA could very well have reason to release numbers that dont tell a complete picture.

But heres what we do know: The poll was conducted by Public Policy Polling, a reputable North Carolina-based firm that has an A-minus rating from the industry standard FiveThirtyEight pollster rating service.

This pollster, according to the memo shared with Mississippi Today, surveyed 601 Mississippi voters via a mix of text message and phone calls from October 19-20, and the margin of error is 4%.

There are reasons to buy this latest polls numbers. This new poll, like others before it, shows Reeves underwater on favorability. Of the new polls total respondents, according to the memo, 51% have an unfavorable opinion of Reeves and just 33% view him favorably.

Presley, on the other hand, has a marginal favorable rating among all the polls respondents (36% favorable to 31% unfavorable), but the poll memo shows the

Democratic nominee still has a major name ID problem something that also mirrors other public polling released earlier this year. In all, 32% of the polls respondents are unsure of their opinion of Presley.

The poll that shows neither candidate particularly close to the 50% mark also tracks with buzz among Republican and Democratic politicos over the past week or two. Political operatives on both sides in Mississippi continue to openly speculate about the runoff possibility. And both campaigns, according to several sources, are said to be preparing for the possibility of a three-week November sprint to the runoff election.

Accurate or not, this new DGA poll will rattle the states political ground and attract even more national attention to the race. Just 15 days out, theres plenty of drama.

Could Presley win?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5eEvfOyb7k

Dems consistently pour money into lost races.

ClayGuida posted...

Dems consistently pour money into lost races.

The pour it into tight races. Gotta show some fight first in order to get national money. That's how it works.

I didn't know he had a living cousin. Or that he was in politics

Zikten posted...

I didn't know he had a living cousin. Or that he was in politics

Second cousin, IIRC. Not a part of his campaign strategy, but it comes up.

brestugo posted...

The pour it into tight races. Gotta show some fight first in order to get national money. That's how it works.

The issue is these "tight races" often prove fruitless and then we lose locality races because they weren't funded.

Charismic_Zach_Gowen posted...

The issue is these "tight races" often prove fruitless and then we lose locality races because they weren't funded.

Absent an incumbent, races that show the most fight (including organizational and operational skill) get the most money. Don't know what else to tell you.

brestugo posted...

Absent an incumbent, races that show the most fight (including organizational and operational skill) get the most money. Don't know what else to tell you.

And it's this thinking that has caused several states to get viciously gerrymandered the way they are. Local races matter and the Dems continue to throw money at these state wide races like how they did with Texas that they lose, and then go on and wonder why they're losing state legislatures that get to draw the maps.

Charismic_Zach_Gowen posted...

And it's this thinking that has caused several states to get viciously gerrymandered the way they are. Local races matter and the Dems continue to throw money at these state wide races like how they did with Texas that they lose, and then go on and wonder why they're losing state legislatures that get to draw the maps.

I agree with this. State legislatures and gerrymandering are important issues. But given the way the system is set up that's on the state (and state party) in question.

Those are state laws we're complaining about. Maybe a favorable governor like Presley getting elected in MS can help with that, we'll see. There's not much otherwise a national party can do about changing state laws and affecting local races in our current system.

Tater being at risk is insane. Go Presley.

Starks posted...

Tater being at risk is insane. Go Presley.

Apparently a welfare scandal - involving Brett Favre - is really biting him in the ass.

ClayGuida posted...

Dems consistently pour money into lost races.

It's a close race and it's got a chance of working. Check out Georgia.

I didn't think it was dragging him that much since Favre hasn't testified yet. That's on the 26th.

Tyranthraxus posted...

It's a close race and it's got a chance of working. Check out Georgia.

Yeah, GA should be a model for trying to turn a red state blue. Stacey Abrams did a hell of a job.

You can scream at Texas and get people to register to vote, but they still won't vote.