Current Events > Democracy might come to an end because some dudes can't get p****

(+) Yeah! (+)

Well that sucks that can't help inform me and bring me up to their level, and instead act like a 14yo like I do smh

Your question was already answered by the way.

that is far from the only interpretation of that comment.

I'm asking and no one wants to answer >_> what else am I supposed to get from this besides assuming it's unhinged fearmongering from people that read social media too much. That's on them at this point lol

I'm leaning towards this. No one is giving context so this sounds like a bunch of disconnected doomposting right now to me >_>

• Reclassifying federal employees as "at will" workers, so they can be more easily fired.
• Firing over 50,000 federal employees to replace them with like minded conservatives
• Abolishing diversity, equity and inclusion policies because they're part of the "woke" agenda
• Installing conservative allies in top administrative positions so that Trump can more easily bypass Senate confirmation.

Yeah, right wing ideology and rhetoric. As I have shown statistically in the past. Most liberal women refuse to be with a maga conservative and some 30% of maga conservative women don't want to be with a conservative either. As women's rights get ripped away. The more we don't want anything to do with right wing demagogues.

Let's not even get started on the number of men who are confused that women are no longer keen on the idea of being chained at home popping out babies and why we should care that the only contribution they have is that they have a job or the aversion to higher education and proposals to free education and supportive methods to ensure more people get into higher education when it's been proven women are more keen to pursue men who have higher education.

Luckily 80+% of men aren't like this and are actually really good and decent people. Maga aren't popular and women move further to the left day by day.

Unfortunately it's not doomposting. There's a nearly 1000 page plan detailing what changes the Republicans want to do once they have Trump back in office. These plans include:
* Reclassifying federal employees as "at will" workers, so they can be more easily fired.
* Firing over 50,000 federal employees to replace them with like minded conservatives
* Abolishing diversity, equity and inclusion policies because they're part of the "woke" agenda
* Installing conservative allies in top administrative positions so that Trump can more easily bypass Senate confirmation.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/conservatives-aim-to-restructure-u-s-government-and-replace-it-with-trumps-vision

Pornography, manifested today in the omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology and sexualization of children, for instance, is not a political Gordian knot inextricably binding up disparate claims about free speech, property rights, sexual liberation, and child welfare. It has no claim to First Amendment protection. Its purveyors are child predators and misogynistic exploiters of women. Their product is as addictive as any illicit drug and as psychologically destructive as any crime. Pornography should be outlawed. The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned. Educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed as registered sex offenders. And telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered.

"A Promise to America", Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 5, Project 2025

Unfortunately it's not doomposting. There's a nearly 1000 page plan detailing what changes the Republicans want to do once they have Trump back in office. These plans include:
* Reclassifying federal employees as "at will" workers, so they can be more easily fired.
* Firing over 50,000 federal employees to replace them with like minded conservatives
* Abolishing diversity, equity and inclusion policies because they're part of the "woke" agenda
* Installing conservative allies in top administrative positions so that Trump can more easily bypass Senate confirmation.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/conservatives-aim-to-restructure-u-s-government-and-replace-it-with-trumps-vision

You only have yourself to blame with the reputation you build yourself with. But if you want to know, it's Trump's plan to effectively replace people he seems as the "deep state" in politics with his chosen right wing/conservative people for a full takeover. It's pretty disturbing.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_2025

People should be able to tell when I'm adopting a persona and when I'm serious though.

you can't downplay that TC, "some guys just cant get p****", seems like an issue that threatens the fabric of society

Censor bypassing actually isnt allowed. Just say the word and the censor will auto block it.

This. It's a comment on Project 2025 and how so many terrible people vote Republican despite (i.e. because) of it.

There is no easy answer. But there is an 'EASY' answer that exploits these people. And the right are always known for their easy answers to complex problems.

what was the rights answer to men not getting women? I'm on 'the right' and im not aware of an answer. Maybe only take in women and children as immigrants and less immigrants all together?

what was the rights answer to men not getting women?

what was the rights answer to men not getting women? I'm on 'the right' and im not aware of an answer. Maybe only take in women and children as immigrants and less immigrants all together?

...Your solution to "men not getting women" is only taking in women and children immigrants? Holy shit

...Your solution to "men not getting women" is only taking in women and children immigrants? Holy shit

It can't be those men should be expected to actually be appealing to women, the problem is clearly everything other than the men being unappealing.

in canada we take in like 60% men 40% women, and they wanted to bring in 1 million a year in a country with 35 million people. I think men with no prospects probably turn to crime and violence, and I phrased that as a question, what is the rights answer?

Society runs on people forming families. With no prospect of starting a family people are heavily disnvested with the collective good of humanity and increasingly focused only on themselves. Which is part of why the "democracy is at stake" messaging isn't hitting with everyone.

There are people who vote Trump purely because he's funny. But if they had a household to protect they'd be a lot less likely to pull that shit.

So you think men who cant find women just automatically turn to a life of crime?

Im not even gonna touch on your weird immigration point because you clearly have some strange opinions there

You never seem to present yourself as serious tho, which is why there's a disconnect.

I dont agree with this at all. Id actually argue once you have a family you become more focused on self interest.

I like all the rich context in this topic assuming we know exactly what you're talking about