Current Events > Did not being in Chronological order help Pulp Fiction. Spoilers

(+) Yeah! (+)

I know this may be unpopular opinion but Pulp Fiction isn't one of my favorite movies and 1 thing I get annoyed about it is that it seems that it not being in chronological order didn't help the movie at all. Seems just like QT saying look at this cool way of shooting things. But what does it add..

Anyone agree...disagree?

It's a cinematic device.

I had never seen a movie presented out of order like that before when I first saw it. It blew my mind. I don't think the movie would be quite the milestone that it is if it were presented sequentially.

It's part of what made it unique. It would probably have stood out far less otherwise.

It's unique. There's a lot of things done "Just because it's cool" in Tarantino movies, but it's fine because of his directing, writing, and overall style.

One time I watched PF in chronological order just for the hell of it. It wouldn't be as great if it was done that way originally.

It did not really help the story but it made the movie more memorable and keeps people talking about it.

I'm neutral on it. I don't care for the movie. In all the discourse over the years it seems like that's the one thing that doesn't really come up much. People just like the movie it's totally cool, dude.