Current Events > Is it time for another classic turn-based Final Fantasy?

Topic List	Page List: 1
GeraldDarko 03/28/25 10:37:23 AM #1:	Is it time for another classic turn-based Final Fantasy? - Results (75 votes) I think so 72% (54 votes) 54 I don't think so 10.67% (8 votes) 8 Don't care 17.33% (13 votes) 13 Should they do one where they go back to their roots? --- Carpe petat <cite>GeraldDarko posted [p:984508039] in Is it time... [t:80957312]...</cite> <quote> Is it time for another classic turn-based Final Fantasy? - Results (75 votes) I think so 72% (54 votes) 54 I don't think so 10.67% (8 votes) 8 Don't care 17.33% (13 votes) 13 Show Voting Form Should they do one where they go back to their roots?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
WingsOfGood 03/28/25 10:37:58 AM #2:	it has been since 12 came out <cite>WingsOfGood posted [p:984508043] in Is it time... [t:80957312]...</cite> <quote>it has been since 12 came out</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
-Crissaegrim- 03/28/25 10:39:13 AM #3:	It's long overdue it's turn. --- Work in progress bass guitar sound- https://youtu.be/rWj0ZbwTMQU?si=IiqHSLOcy2RaLNaM https://youtu.be/UdKl9R1l9YY?si=bHWWk7oCI9Blt3mj <cite>-Crissaegrim- posted [p:984508060] in Is it time... [t:80957312]...</cite> <quote>It's long overdue it's turn.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
gmanthebest 03/28/25 10:39:20 AM #4:	It's well past time for one --- The large print giveth And the small print taketh away <cite>gmanthebest posted [p:984508062] in Is it time... [t:80957312]...</cite> <quote>It's well past time for one</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lonestar2000 03/28/25 10:41:24 AM #5:	No, turn-based games suck. --- Rumble Roses. Someone enters the room. Them: O_O Me: What?! I always play games without my pants on!- Inmate 922335 #ImprisonToadDickTrump <cite>Lonestar2000 posted [p:984508088] in Is it time... [t:80957312]...</cite> <quote>No, turn-based games suck.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Hayame_Zero 03/28/25 10:41:37 AM #6:	I'd like to see one, but at the same time, I think the FFVII:R combat system is the best one they've made and I don't want them to drop that one. --- ...I think I'm done here... <cite>Hayame_Zero posted [p:984508090] in Is it time... [t:80957312]...</cite> <quote>I'd like to see one, but at the same time, I think the FFVII:R combat system is the best one they've made and I don't want them to drop that one.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
PeteyParker 03/28/25 10:44:35 AM #7:	I was hoping that mobile FF VII game they did that was supposed to incorporate all the games was going to be exactly that. Then it turned out to not be that and it's not very fun. Disappointing. --- "How can.. the Prime minister.. support a law.. that makes it illegal for people.. who....What I'm trying to say is.. Oasis rules!" <cite>PeteyParker posted [p:984508115] in Is it time... [t:80957312]...</cite> <quote>I was hoping that mobile FF VII game they did that was supposed to incorporate all the games was going to be exactly that. Then it turned out to not be that and it's not very fun. Disappointing. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Metal_Gear_Raxis 03/28/25 10:44:54 AM #8:	Square seems terrified of going back to what works. --- Time is a funny thing, you know? I guess in the big picture of my life, you were only a blip. But oftentimes, those "blips" make the biggest impacts. <cite>Metal_Gear_Raxis posted [p:984508119] in Is it time... [t:80957312]...</cite> <quote>Square seems terrified of going back to what works.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Jupiter 03/28/25 10:45:02 AM #9:	While I love the Remake series, my favorite FF combat system is FFX. I love turn-based games, and FFX felt the best to me. --- Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/kid_prodigy23 <cite>Jupiter posted [p:984508121] in Is it time... [t:80957312]...</cite> <quote>While I love the Remake series, my favorite FF combat system is FFX. I love turn-based games, and FFX felt the best to me.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
WingsOfGood 03/28/25 10:47:14 AM #10:	Lonestar2000 posted... No, turn-based games suck. shut the fuck up <cite>WingsOfGood posted [p:984508145] in Is it time... [t:80957312]...</cite> <quote>Lonestar2000 posted... </cite><quote>No, turn-based games suck.</quote>shut the fuck up</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ellis123 03/28/25 10:59:08 AM #11:	Clearly not. If people actually wanted the games they would buy them rather than complaining about them not existing. --- "A shouted order to do something of dubious morality with an unpredictable outcome? Thweeet!" My FC is in my profile. <cite>ellis123 posted [p:984508263] in Is it time... [t:80957312]...</cite> <quote>Clearly not. If people actually wanted the games they would buy them rather than complaining about them not existing.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Baron_Ox 03/28/25 11:04:08 AM #12:	I like turn-based games, when done correctly, but IMO, turn-based JRPGs generally don't have compelling mechanics. --- "I could never encapsulate all my cosmicality on my own." - mr. MFN eXquire. https://imgur.com/a/CwuPnzk <cite>Baron_Ox posted [p:984508316] in Is it time... [t:80957312]...</cite> <quote>I like turn-based games, when done correctly, but IMO, turn-based JRPGs generally don't have compelling mechanics. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
uwnim 03/28/25 11:07:38 AM #13:	Jupiter posted... While I love the Remake series, my favorite FF combat system is FFX. I love turn-based games, and FFX felt the best to me. FFX had a good system, yeah. Most classic FF games were ATB though which is something that should never come back. VIIRs system makes ATB obsolete. --- I want a pet Lavos Spawn. [Order of the Cetaceans: Phocoena dioptrica] <cite>uwnim posted [p:984508355] in Is it time... [t:80957312]...</cite> <quote>Jupiter posted... </cite><quote>While I love the Remake series, my favorite FF combat system is FFX. I love turn-based games, and FFX felt the best to me.</quote>FFX had a good system, yeah.Most classic FF games were ATB though which is something that should never come back. VIIRs system makes ATB obsolete.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
archizzy 03/28/25 11:09:25 AM #14:	We had a nice ATB game in World of Final Fantasy. It was a great game that felt like classic Final Fantasy and it was mostly criticized for the chibi artstyle used and it is largely completely ignored even on gamefaqs where a lot of the more committed and die hard fans are. --- PSN ID: sled_dogs76 60" Pioneer Kuro Elite PRO151FD, Yamaha RX-V3900 A/V Receiver, Oppo DV983-H player. Coming soon: 2 Seaton Submersives from Mark Seaton <cite>archizzy posted [p:984508376] in Is it time... [t:80957312]...</cite> <quote>We had a nice ATB game in World of Final Fantasy. It was a great game that felt like classic Final Fantasy and it was mostly criticized for the chibi artstyle used and it is largely completely ignored even on gamefaqs where a lot of the more committed and die hard fans are. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Jupiter 03/28/25 11:13:24 AM #15:	uwnim posted... FFX had a good system, yeah. Most classic FF games were ATB though which is something that should never come back. VIIRs system makes ATB obsolete. Yea I wasn't a huge fan of the ATB system to be honest. --- Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/kid_prodigy23 <cite>Jupiter posted [p:984508410] in Is it time... [t:80957312]...</cite> <quote>uwnim posted... </cite><quote>FFX had a good system, yeah.Most classic FF games were ATB though which is something that should never come back. VIIRs system makes ATB obsolete.</quote>Yea I wasn't a huge fan of the ATB system to be honest.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Solid_Snake07 03/28/25 11:15:46 AM #16:	ellis123 posted... Clearly not. If people actually wanted the games they would buy them rather than complaining about them not existing. Baldurs gate 3 is probably the best selling rpg in recent memory. So I wouldnt say turn based games have no audience. They just need to be good. --- "People incapable of guilt usually do have a good time" -Detective Rust Cohle <cite>Solid_Snake07 posted [p:984508438] in Is it time... [t:80957312]...</cite> <quote>ellis123 posted... </cite><quote>Clearly not. If people actually wanted the games they would buy them rather than complaining about them not existing.</quote>Baldurs gate 3 is probably the best selling rpg in recent memory. So I wouldnt say turn based games have no audience. They just need to be good.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Jupiter 03/28/25 11:19:24 AM #17:	ellis123 posted... Clearly not. If people actually wanted the games they would buy them rather than complaining about them not existing. Oh, you mean like Persona, Metaphor, Dragon Quest 11, Baldur's Gate 3, etc? There's also a lot of hype for that Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 game. --- Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/kid_prodigy23 <cite>Jupiter posted [p:984508482] in Is it time... [t:80957312]...</cite> <quote>ellis123 posted... </cite><quote>Clearly not. If people actually wanted the games they would buy them rather than complaining about them not existing.</quote>Oh, you mean like Persona, Metaphor, Dragon Quest 11, Baldur's Gate 3, etc? There's also a lot of hype for that Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 game.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Giant_Aspirin 03/28/25 11:24:59 AM #18:	SE needs to get over this idea of trying to appeal to everyone. just make RPGs and don't worry about 'casual gamers'. of course, this means lowering production costs, but who really cares about those $20M FMVs anyway? --- I hope something good happens to you today Playing: Baldur's Gate 3 <cite>Giant_Aspirin posted [p:984508541] in Is it time... [t:80957312]...</cite> <quote>SE needs to get over this idea of trying to appeal to everyone. just make RPGs and don't worry about 'casual gamers'. of course, this means lowering production costs, but who really cares about those $20M FMVs anyway?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ellis123 03/28/25 11:25:38 AM #19:	Solid_Snake07 posted... Baldurs gate 3 is probably the best selling rpg in recent memory. So I wouldnt say turn based games have no audience. They just need to be good. I'm specifically talking about JRPGs, and more specifically Final Fantasy. If people actually wanted a classic-style FF they would have bought Dimensions, wouldn't pretend like it didn't exist, etc. But all of those things apply: people clearly just want to bitch about a bygone time, they don't actually want to put their money/time down. It isn't about the style done by Square either, as the whole 2DHD line up has had multiples of classic-styled games: they just don't explicitly have the "Final Fantasy" name. Square keeps returning to classic turn based games. They never stop doing it. Jupiter posted... Oh, you mean like Persona, Metaphor, Dragon Quest 11, Baldur's Gate 3, etc? There's also a lot of hype for that Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 game. Which of those are by Square Enix? --- "A shouted order to do something of dubious morality with an unpredictable outcome? Thweeet!" My FC is in my profile. <cite>ellis123 posted [p:984508549] in Is it time... [t:80957312]...</cite> <quote>Solid_Snake07 posted... </cite><quote>Baldurs gate 3 is probably the best selling rpg in recent memory. So I wouldnt say turn based games have no audience. They just need to be good.</quote>I'm specifically talking about JRPGs, and more specifically Final Fantasy. If people actually wanted a classic-style FF they would have bought Dimensions, wouldn't pretend like it didn't exist, etc. But all of those things apply: people clearly just want to bitch about a bygone time, they don't actually want to put their money/time down. It isn't about the style done by Square either, as the whole 2DHD line up has had multiples of classic-styled games: they just don't explicitly have the "Final Fantasy" name.Square keeps returning to classic turn based games. They never stop doing it.Jupiter posted... </cite><quote>Oh, you mean like Persona, Metaphor, Dragon Quest 11, Baldur's Gate 3, etc? There's also a lot of hype for that Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 game.</quote>Which of those are by Square Enix?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tyranthraxus 03/28/25 11:26:45 AM #20:	Giant_Aspirin posted... but who really cares about those $20M FMVs anyway? Did you forget the part where they bankrupted themselves to make a movie out of those FMVs and Enix had to bail them out? They are the ones who care about those movies. --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://i.imgur.com/dQgC4kv.jpg <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:984508566] in Is it time... [t:80957312]...</cite> <quote>Giant_Aspirin posted... </cite><quote>but who really cares about those $20M FMVs anyway?</quote>Did you forget the part where they bankrupted themselves to make a movie out of those FMVs and Enix had to bail them out? They are the ones who care about those movies. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Hayame_Zero 03/28/25 11:30:57 AM #21:	uwnim posted... FFX had a good system, yeah. Most classic FF games were ATB though which is something that should never come back. VIIRs system makes ATB obsolete. Pretty much how I feel. I wouldn't mind seeing a turn-based system again, but I don't want to see one that's just tapping the confirm button or hitting auto-battle for most regular fights again. Give me a reason to use other skills and target specific enemies. --- ...I think I'm done here... <cite>Hayame_Zero posted [p:984508611] in Is it time... [t:80957312]...</cite> <quote>uwnim posted... </cite><quote>FFX had a good system, yeah.Most classic FF games were ATB though which is something that should never come back. VIIRs system makes ATB obsolete.</quote>Pretty much how I feel. I wouldn't mind seeing a turn-based system again, but I don't want to see one that's just tapping the confirm button or hitting auto-battle for most regular fights again. Give me a reason to use other skills and target specific enemies.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Jupiter 03/28/25 11:36:03 AM #22:	ellis123 posted... If people actually wanted a classic-style FF they would have bought Dimensions, wouldn't pretend like it didn't exist, etc. Are you sure you meant Dimensions? I just googled this as I have legit never heard of it, and google tells me this was a mobile game for iOS and Android released in 2010. Again, I have legit never heard of this game before your post. ellis123 posted... Which of those are by Square Enix? At first I thought you meant FF games exclusively until I saw that other post. But Dragon Quest is Square Enix. If you mean Square Enix exclusively, there's also Octopath Traveler series that sold 5 million. Triangle Strategy sold 1 million copies in 2 weeks without being multiplatform. I'm sure there are others. Keep in mind, these games do not have the same budget as FF. I don't think it's fair to criticize people for wanting a new mainline FF game that is turn-based. --- Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/kid_prodigy23 <cite>Jupiter posted [p:984508667] in Is it time... [t:80957312]...</cite> <quote>ellis123 posted... </cite><quote>If people actually wanted a classic-style FF they would have bought Dimensions, wouldn't pretend like it didn't exist, etc.</quote>Are you sure you meant Dimensions? I just googled this as I have legit never heard of it, and google tells me this was a mobile game for iOS and Android released in 2010. Again, I have legit never heard of this game before your post.ellis123 posted... </cite><quote>Which of those are by Square Enix?</quote>At first I thought you meant FF games exclusively until I saw that other post. But Dragon Quest is Square Enix. If you mean Square Enix exclusively, there's also Octopath Traveler series that sold 5 million. Triangle Strategy sold 1 million copies in 2 weeks without being multiplatform. I'm sure there are others. Keep in mind, these games do not have the same budget as FF. I don't think it's fair to criticize people for wanting a new mainline FF game that is turn-based.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheOtherMike 03/28/25 11:43:28 AM #23:	Lonestar2000 posted... No, turn-based games suck. Wrong. --- Only two things can end a Republican's career - a dead girl or a live boy. <cite>TheOtherMike posted [p:984508760] in Is it time... [t:80957312]...</cite> <quote>Lonestar2000 posted... </cite><quote>No, turn-based games suck.</quote>Wrong.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ellis123 03/28/25 11:47:19 AM #24:	Jupiter posted... Are you sure you meant Dimensions? I just googled this as I have legit never heard of it, and google tells me this was a mobile game for iOS and Android released in 2010. Again, I have legit never heard of this game before your post. Yes. It is quite literally a "classic FF" in every single way that the TC wants, based on FFV. It's pretty good. Jupiter posted... At first I thought you meant FF games exclusively until I saw that other post. But Dragon Quest is Square Enix. If you mean Square Enix exclusively, there's also Octopath Traveler series that sold 5 million. Triangle Strategy sold 1 million copies in 2 weeks without being multiplatform. I'm sure there are others. Keep in mind, these games do not have the same budget as FF. I don't think it's fair to criticize people for wanting a new mainline FF game that is turn-based. You appear to be missing my point. I am pointing out the hypocritical nature of TC's entire topic, that we keep on getting exactly what they're saying they want over and over, but any time it specifically has the Final Fantasy title everyone ignores it like it will kill their dog. And it is impossible to have a classic turn based JRPG with a budget on par with the non. It is purely a ridiculous, almost pig-headed, unwillingness to actually accept that the overwhelming about of any modern game's budget comes from things that do not exist in classic JRPGs. Persona 5's team was, at its height, just a bit over 60 people. Final Fantasy XV had over 200, its massive budget coming from them. And there is no world where P5 would have been made any better by adding in another 200 developers solely so they could add in stuff like physics interactions: the expensive part of modern games. Dimensions had all the budget that it needed for a modern FF in the classical style: no, the fact that it didn't have a massive physics bloat on its budget was not needed. --- "A shouted order to do something of dubious morality with an unpredictable outcome? Thweeet!" My FC is in my profile. <cite>ellis123 posted [p:984508810] in Is it time... [t:80957312]...</cite> <quote>Jupiter posted... </cite><quote>Are you sure you meant Dimensions? I just googled this as I have legit never heard of it, and google tells me this was a mobile game for iOS and Android released in 2010. Again, I have legit never heard of this game before your post.</quote>Yes. It is quite literally a "classic FF" in every single way that the TC wants, based on FFV. It's pretty good.Jupiter posted... </cite><quote>At first I thought you meant FF games exclusively until I saw that other post. But Dragon Quest is Square Enix. If you mean Square Enix exclusively, there's also Octopath Traveler series that sold 5 million. Triangle Strategy sold 1 million copies in 2 weeks without being multiplatform. I'm sure there are others. Keep in mind, these games do not have the same budget as FF. I don't think it's fair to criticize people for wanting a new mainline FF game that is turn-based.</quote>You appear to be missing my point. I am pointing out the hypocritical nature of TC's entire topic, that we keep on getting exactly what they're saying they want over and over, but any time it specifically has the Final Fantasy title everyone ignores it like it will kill their dog.And it is impossible to have a classic turn based JRPG with a budget on par with the non. It is purely a ridiculous, almost pig-headed, unwillingness to actually accept that the overwhelming about of any modern game's budget comes from things that do not exist in classic JRPGs. Persona 5's team was, at its height, just a bit over 60 people. Final Fantasy XV had over 200, its massive budget coming from them. And there is no world where P5 would have been made any better by adding in another 200 developers solely so they could add in stuff like physics interactions: the expensive part of modern games.Dimensions had all the budget that it needed for a modern FF in the classical style: no, the fact that it didn't have a massive physics bloat on its budget was not needed.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tyranthraxus 03/28/25 11:48:47 AM #25:	Yeah Dimensions is a game that you could probably lie about to someone saying it was released on the SNES and they'd never realize otherwise. Edit: but not Dimensions 2. Only the first one. --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://i.imgur.com/dQgC4kv.jpg <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:984508823] in Is it time... [t:80957312]...</cite> <quote>Yeah Dimensions is a game that you could probably lie about to someone saying it was released on the SNES and they'd never realize otherwise.Edit: but not Dimensions 2. Only the first one.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Piplup_Sniper 03/28/25 11:52:58 AM #26:	Solid_Snake07 posted... Baldurs gate 3 is probably the best selling rpg in recent memory. So I wouldnt say turn based games have no audience. They just need to be good. BG3 is a different beast than the traditional four guys in a row combat of FF. --- Forbid it, Almighty God! <cite>Piplup_Sniper posted [p:984508861] in Is it time... [t:80957312]...</cite> <quote>Solid_Snake07 posted... </cite><quote>Baldurs gate 3 is probably the best selling rpg in recent memory. So I wouldnt say turn based games have no audience. They just need to be good.</quote>BG3 is a different beast than the traditional four guys in a row combat of FF. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ellis123 03/28/25 11:53:13 AM #27:	Tyranthraxus posted... Edit: but not Dimensions 2. Only the first one. Man, Dimensions 2 still annoys me. What a waste of the spin-off name. --- "A shouted order to do something of dubious morality with an unpredictable outcome? Thweeet!" My FC is in my profile. <cite>ellis123 posted [p:984508863] in Is it time... [t:80957312]...</cite> <quote>Tyranthraxus posted... </cite><quote>Edit: but not Dimensions 2. Only the first one.</quote>Man, Dimensions 2 still annoys me. What a waste of the spin-off name.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tyranthraxus 03/28/25 11:56:48 AM #28:	Piplup_Sniper posted... BG3 is a different beast than the traditional four guys in a row combat of FF. Ok hear me out FFT2 but it's got the combat system of D:OS2 instead. --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://i.imgur.com/dQgC4kv.jpg <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:984508902] in Is it time... [t:80957312]...</cite> <quote>Piplup_Sniper posted... </cite><quote>BG3 is a different beast than the traditional four guys in a row combat of FF.</quote>Ok hear me out FFT2 but it's got the combat system of D:OS2 instead. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
AvlButtslam 03/28/25 11:57:49 AM #29:	Play Bravely Default 2 --- http://i.imgur.com/98y63.jpg http://i.imgur.com/yOcp8.jpg http://i.imgur.com/wdX6S.jpg <cite>AvlButtslam posted [p:984508915] in Is it time... [t:80957312]...</cite> <quote>Play Bravely Default 2</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
GeraldDarko 03/28/25 12:03:42 PM #30:	Hayame_Zero posted... Pretty much how I feel. I wouldn't mind seeing a turn-based system again, but I don't want to see one that's just tapping the confirm button or hitting auto-battle for most regular fights again. Give me a reason to use other skills and target specific enemies. FFX did a great job ramping up the pressure while introducing new mechanics. Once you hit the calm lands, you really need to start using everything youve learned. --- Carpe petat <cite>GeraldDarko posted [p:984508980] in Is it time... [t:80957312]...</cite> <quote>Hayame_Zero posted... </cite><quote>Pretty much how I feel. I wouldn't mind seeing a turn-based system again, but I don't want to see one that's just tapping the confirm button or hitting auto-battle for most regular fights again. Give me a reason to use other skills and target specific enemies.</quote>FFX did a great job ramping up the pressure while introducing new mechanics. Once you hit the calm lands, you really need to start using everything youve learned. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
masterpug53 03/28/25 12:19:10 PM #31:	Is Pokemon still the eternal comeback to people who think there's no market for turn-based RPGs? (I'm forced to ask because I dropped out of the series after Gen 6 and know that the Arceus game mixed things up a bit) --- Simple questions deserve long-winded answers that no one will bother to read. <cite>masterpug53 posted [p:984509146] in Is it time... [t:80957312]...</cite> <quote>Is Pokemon still the eternal comeback to people who think there's no market for turn-based RPGs? (I'm forced to ask because I dropped out of the series after Gen 6 and know that the Arceus game mixed things up a bit)</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tyranthraxus 03/28/25 12:19:58 PM #32:	masterpug53 posted... Is Pokemon still the eternal comeback to people who think there's no market for turn-based RPGs? I sure hope not because Z-A is... not doing that anymore --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://i.imgur.com/dQgC4kv.jpg <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:984509159] in Is it time... [t:80957312]...</cite> <quote>masterpug53 posted... </cite><quote>Is Pokemon still the eternal comeback to people who think there's no market for turn-based RPGs?</quote>I sure hope not because Z-A is... not doing that anymore</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Baron_Ox 03/28/25 12:55:59 PM #33:	Tyranthraxus posted... Ok hear me out FFT2 but it's got the combat system of D:OS2 instead. --- "I could never encapsulate all my cosmicality on my own." - mr. MFN eXquire. https://imgur.com/a/CwuPnzk <cite>Baron_Ox posted [p:984509568] in Is it time... [t:80957312]...</cite> <quote>Tyranthraxus posted... </cite><quote>Ok hear me out FFT2 but it's got the combat system of D:OS2 instead.</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Jupiter 03/28/25 2:08:23 PM #34:	ellis123 posted... Yes. It is quite literally a "classic FF" in every single way that the TC wants, based on FFV. It's pretty good. You appear to be missing my point. I am pointing out the hypocritical nature of TC's entire topic, that we keep on getting exactly what they're saying they want over and over, but any time it specifically has the Final Fantasy title everyone ignores it like it will kill their dog. And it is impossible to have a classic turn based JRPG with a budget on par with the non. It is purely a ridiculous, almost pig-headed, unwillingness to actually accept that the overwhelming about of any modern game's budget comes from things that do not exist in classic JRPGs. Persona 5's team was, at its height, just a bit over 60 people. Final Fantasy XV had over 200, its massive budget coming from them. And there is no world where P5 would have been made any better by adding in another 200 developers solely so they could add in stuff like physics interactions: the expensive part of modern games. Dimensions had all the budget that it needed for a modern FF in the classical style: no, the fact that it didn't have a massive physics bloat on its budget was not needed. When I was referring to budget, I moreso meant the marketing aspect of it. The point I was trying to make is those games didn't have as much marketing as a Final Fantasy game and still were able to sell in the millions. I also still stand by my statement that I don't think it's fair to criticize people for wanting a turn based Final Fantasy game that looks like Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 or even Dragon Quest 11. --- Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/kid_prodigy23 <cite>Jupiter posted [p:984510340] in Is it time... [t:80957312]...</cite> <quote>ellis123 posted... </cite><quote>Yes. It is quite literally a "classic FF" in every single way that the TC wants, based on FFV. It's pretty good.You appear to be missing my point. I am pointing out the hypocritical nature of TC's entire topic, that we keep on getting exactly what they're saying they want over and over, but any time it specifically has the Final Fantasy title everyone ignores it like it will kill their dog.And it is impossible to have a classic turn based JRPG with a budget on par with the non. It is purely a ridiculous, almost pig-headed, unwillingness to actually accept that the overwhelming about of any modern game's budget comes from things that do not exist in classic JRPGs. Persona 5's team was, at its height, just a bit over 60 people. Final Fantasy XV had over 200, its massive budget coming from them. And there is no world where P5 would have been made any better by adding in another 200 developers solely so they could add in stuff like physics interactions: the expensive part of modern games.Dimensions had all the budget that it needed for a modern FF in the classical style: no, the fact that it didn't have a massive physics bloat on its budget was not needed.</quote>When I was referring to budget, I moreso meant the marketing aspect of it. The point I was trying to make is those games didn't have as much marketing as a Final Fantasy game and still were able to sell in the millions. I also still stand by my statement that I don't think it's fair to criticize people for wanting a turn based Final Fantasy game that looks like Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 or even Dragon Quest 11.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Giant_Aspirin 03/28/25 2:10:14 PM #35:	Tyranthraxus posted... Did you forget the part where they bankrupted themselves to make a movie out of those FMVs and Enix had to bail them out? They are the ones who care about those movies. exactly! they're the only ones who care. i certainly dont consider the quality of FMVs when deciding if i want to buy a game or not. and i suspect most gamers dont either --- I hope something good happens to you today Playing: Baldur's Gate 3 <cite>Giant_Aspirin posted [p:984510361] in Is it time... [t:80957312]...</cite> <quote>Tyranthraxus posted... </cite><quote>Did you forget the part where they bankrupted themselves to make a movie out of those FMVs and Enix had to bail them out? They are the ones who care about those movies.</quote>exactly! they're the only ones who care. i certainly dont consider the quality of FMVs when deciding if i want to buy a game or not. and i suspect most gamers dont either</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Jiek_Fafn 03/28/25 2:17:30 PM #36:	Why it gotta be specifically FF? Square has made a lot of turn based rpgs in recent years but no one really talks about them. --- I don't believe in belts. There should be no ranking system for toughness. <cite>Jiek_Fafn posted [p:984510424] in Is it time... [t:80957312]...</cite> <quote>Why it gotta be specifically FF?Square has made a lot of turn based rpgs in recent years but no one really talks about them.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tyranthraxus 03/28/25 2:30:10 PM #37:	Jiek_Fafn posted... Why it gotta be specifically FF? Square has made a lot of turn based rpgs in recent years but no one really talks about them. The only turn based RPGs they've made these days are remakes and remasters. The last original non gacha turn based game was Octopath 2 --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://i.imgur.com/dQgC4kv.jpg <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:984510562] in Is it time... [t:80957312]...</cite> <quote>Jiek_Fafn posted... </cite><quote>Why it gotta be specifically FF?Square has made a lot of turn based rpgs in recent years but no one really talks about them.</quote>The only turn based RPGs they've made these days are remakes and remasters. The last original non gacha turn based game was Octopath 2 </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > Is it time for another classic turn-based Final Fantasy? (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Is it time for another classic turn-based Final Fantasy?