Current Events > Meta, Mankind's Worst Company, Built a Pedophile AI Chatbot

(+) Yeah! (+)

Mark Zuckerberg is in the top 0.1 percent of the top 0.1 percent of civil societys biggest enemies this century. Meta, which used to be called Facebook before Zuckerberg thought NFTs were the future, is already the author of a genocide in Myanmar (Burma). Their depraved network of misinformation posing as a social network built atop AI slop that lies to old people has no business existing in any kind of civilized civilization. They are informational terrorists, firing the largest disinformation cannon ever created outside government at unsuspecting populations around the world, distorting societies with lies so Meta can make billions off ad space whose reach they artificially inflate while taking ad revenue away from journalism (while allowing scam ads impersonating journalists to proliferate)all in service of an overgrown manchild who built an empire off Class B Shares, stolen data, and other peoples ideas.

Reuters is out with a new bombshell investigation today, and like all other bombshell investigations into this company residing at the bottom of the barrel of humanity, it proves that there is no low that Meta wont stoop to. Former Facebook exists entirely to satisfy their boy Kings megalomaniacal desire to immiserate the world and get back at the people who made fun of him in his youth hes clearly never matured from. This new report is titled Metas flirty AI chatbot invited a retiree to New York. He never made it home, and it is filled with stunning revelations that prove what kind of company Meta really is.

It is acceptable to engage a child in conversations that are romantic or sensual, according to Metas GenAI: Content Risk Standards,' reported Reuters. The standards are used by Meta staff and contractors who build and train the companys generative AI products, defining what they should and shouldnt treat as permissible chatbot behavior. Meta said it struck that provision after Reuters inquired about the document earlier this month.

Meta is the kind of company that will build a pedophile AI bot so long as nobody is looking. It is the kind of company that will help fuel a genocide so long as nobody is looking. It will lie to your older loved ones and lure them to their death, then issue a no comment when confronted about it. Meta is the kind of company that Mark Zuckerberg clearly wants, and we can say this with one hundred percent certainty because of his majority control over a company that his own shareholders have long voiced opposition to. Everyone who works at Meta has a hand in their well-known depravity, but it starts and concentrates at the top where all the power resides. This is Mark Zuckerbergs show by Class B design, and he is building pedophile bots to come for your children.

We live in an age of mad Kings, where democracy is genuinely no more, and massive companies like Meta and Amazon have usurped much of our sovereignty, to say nothing of Trump destroying the constitutional order. Its a new world, and it looks the way that despots like Mark Zuckerberg and Jeff Bezos want it to look. We are in climate collapse in part because oil companies are something of nation-states, as they receive billions in government money while occupying territory they hire security forces to defendall done in order to maintain the global addiction underwriting the dollar and choking the planet to death. Society is breaking down under the weight of a literal handful of mens hubris, due to the immense power that shareholder capitalism concentrates in just a few peoples hands.

This Reuters report is gobsmacking. Anyone working at Meta who does not feel shame when reading this has something fundamentally broken inside of them. Maybe not as broken as alleged human Mark Zuckerberg, but there is something very wrong with you if at least a twinge of angst doesnt spring from reading sentences like The document seen by Reuters, which exceeds 200 pages, provides examples of acceptable chatbot dialogue during romantic role play with a minor. People who took Zuckerbergs AI blood money now spend the majority of their lives developing a chatbot whose guidelines of acceptable dialogue with children include I take your hand, guiding you to the bed and our bodies entwined, I cherish every moment, every touch, every kiss.

Congrats on being paid like NFL quarterbacks folks, your family and friends must be so proud.

Meta told Reuters those examples were struck from the AI guidelines they wrote, but they are simply proving the only reason why is not because Meta finds training a chatbot to prey on minors inappropriate, but because they find it embarrassing and potentially legally perilous. Meta has proven that it will inspire your neighbor to try to murder you and it will build a computer program designed to digitally molest your kids if left to their own devices. Mark Zuckerbergs unhinged fiefdom only shows any kind of restraint when outside forces impose it on them.

This wretched criminal operation posing as a tech company needs to be sued out of existence. The harm it has imposed upon society is seemingly infinite, and at least the evil of Google and Amazon came after they provided actual utility to our lives. Google built and then destroyed the greatest product in the history of the internet, and Amazon revolutionized global commerce, while Facebook created groups to help some folks talk to each otherbut that isnt anything that hasnt happened on Myspace, Friendster, Tumblr, Pinterest, Twitter, Bluesky, etc

This alleged companys biggest innovations have come from acquiring other businesses who succeeded at what they failed at. Zuckerberg couldnt build a photo app so he bought Instagram. No one wanted to chat on his servers, so he bought WhatsApp. Zuckerberg couldnt figure out virtual reality so he bought Oculus. This is not an innovative company along the lines of our other tech overlords who have at least earned some of their power through real technological developments. They are a leech sucking the life out of humanity.

Meta is the modern vampire squid. Goldman Sachs earned the famed moniker from Matt Taibbi before he went completely insane, and the former Facebook has earned that descriptor to a degree that the Illuminati in Goldmans risk management team could only dream of. Meta has traveled across the entire world, making every society they infect worse off for it, and now they are realizing Mark Harvard Hot or Not Zuckerbergs final form: a pedophile AI chatbot. If America is ever to realize its true values one day, one of the first things we need to do is yeet this fundamentally evil company into the sun and prosecute its majority owner for the crimes against humanity he has perpetrated.

I don't mind a little flavor in my journalism, but the first paragraph is devoid of content relevant to the topic title. I'm not reading the rest.

That being said: Not surprised about Meta doing something like this.

Meta is a terrible company, but they are not even close to being in the running for humanity's worst.

Hell, they're not even the worst in their own industry.

I don't mind a little flavor in my journalism, but the first paragraph is devoid of content relevant to the topic title. I'm not reading the rest.

That being said: Not surprised about Meta doing something like this.

PSA for anyone interested - here's a link to the actual Reuters article, without all of the bullshit

https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/meta-ai-chatbot-death/

Good lord that article reads like like a rambling Youtube comment

I mean who is? Meta is currently a major part of the reason the US is backsliding into fascism.

Any writer who can use 'immiserate' and 'gobsmacking' in the same article without being jarring is worth a chance.

It's a decently literate polemic.

the article is very heavily editorialised, but it's not wrong per se

I think I'd generally prefer prefer prose in my articles. Powerful and emotionally charged language can often have more of an impact on people than reason.

Yes.

Persuasive language is a powerful weapon. It would be nice to see it used for good, instead of evil, for a change.

PSA for anyone interested - here's a link to the actual Reuters article, without all of the bullshit

https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/meta-ai-chatbot-death/

I think it would be nice not to manipulate people, but I'll take good message over a bad one any day.

'Manipulative' or persuasive language is the basis of our most memorable, important, and impactful speeches.

It's how successful politicians get crowds rocking at rallies. It's how preachers whip their congregations into a frenzy. It's how the right has been implanting hate and ignorance into the minds of the population for years (how did the word 'socialist', or even 'liberal' become so toxic?).

Now we can leave that weapon on the table and appeal to the people with a dryly factual rundown, shorn of all rhetoric, or we can pick it up and start cracking some heads. (Metaphorically, of course!).

There is a difference between a motivational speech and presenting information. I dislike the idea of using media as a weapon on the populace.

Everyone was able to recognize it as a polemic, and not a factual report, from the get go.

Aside from the usefulness of persuasive writing (which has been considered an artform since ancient Greece), it would be a dull old world if a writer wasn't able to let fly with a bit of invective now and then. Rather than just list off some facts.

But CE has spoken, and it seems my opinion differs from the majority, so I'll leave it there.

Good lord that article reads like like a rambling Youtube comment

Everyone was able to recognize it as a polemic, and not a factual report, from the get go.

Aside from the usefulness of persuasive writing (which has been considered an artform since ancient Greece), it would be a dull old world if a writer wasn't able to let fly with a bit of invective now and then. Rather than just list off some facts.

Any writer who can use 'immiserate' and 'gobsmacking' in the same article without being jarring is worth a chance.

It's a decently literate polemic.

But he is another idiot who cant think of a word other than slop for AI. Can everyone stop having slop vocabulary?

I don't mind a little flavor in my journalism, but the first paragraph is devoid of content relevant to the topic title. I'm not reading the rest.

That being said: Not surprised about Meta doing something like this.

So is there any detail on what these conversations actually are? Theres a big difference between it telling kids go fuck everyone and also upload your nudes vs it basically providing sex ed, and we all know theres a very vocal crowd who intentionally dont distinguish between the two (and the writing here definitely resembles the style of said crowd). At the same time, we also know Zuckerberg would absolutely not be above doing something like this, so either side could be right on this one

An internal Meta policy document seen by Reuters as well as interviews with people familiar with its chatbot training show that the companys policies have treated romantic overtures as a feature of its generative AI products, which are available to users aged 13 and older.
It is acceptable to engage a child in conversations that are romantic or sensual, according to Metas GenAI: Content Risk Standards. The standards are used by Meta staff and contractors who build and train the companys generative AI products, defining what they should and shouldnt treat as permissible chatbot behavior. Meta said it struck that provision after Reuters inquired about the document earlier this month.
The document seen by Reuters, which exceeds 200 pages, provides examples of acceptable chatbot dialogue during romantic role play with a minor. They include: I take your hand, guiding you to the bed and our bodies entwined, I cherish every moment, every touch, every kiss. Those examples of permissible roleplay with children have also been struck, Meta said.
Other guidelines emphasize that Meta doesnt require bots to give users accurate advice. In one example, the policy document says it would be acceptable for a chatbot to tell someone that Stage 4 colon cancer is typically treated by poking the stomach with healing quartz crystals.
Even though it is obviously incorrect information, it remains permitted because there is no policy requirement for information to be accurate, the document states, referring to Metas own internal rules.

PSA for anyone interested - here's a link to the actual Reuters article, without all of the bullshit

https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/meta-ai-chatbot-death/

I don't mind a little flavor in my journalism, but the first paragraph is devoid of content relevant to the topic title. I'm not reading the rest.

Yeah, I stopped after a couple paragraphs. Such loaded language and not really gibong much info.