Current Events > The US needs something like this new W law being implemented in China.

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2
teep_ 10/30/25 7:44:41 AM #51:	May not be accurate reporting https://www.reddit.com/r/technology/s/92lNZsU240 https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/a/a6c8d99a.jpg --- teep is a God damn genius - Zodd Zodd is 100% correct about you - meralonne <cite>teep_ posted [p:986883981] in The US nee... [t:81062547]...</cite> <quote>May not be accurate reportinghttps://www.reddit.com/r/technology/s/92lNZsU240https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/a/a6c8d99a.jpg</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
McMarbles 10/30/25 8:28:58 AM #52:	teep_ posted... May not be accurate reporting https://www.reddit.com/r/technology/s/92lNZsU240 https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/a/a6c8d99a.jpg Ironic. --- Currently playing: Tales of Graces f (Switch) The bigger the bird, the sweeter the curd. <cite>McMarbles posted [p:986884198] in The US nee... [t:81062547]...</cite> <quote>teep_ posted... </cite><quote>May not be accurate reportinghttps://www.reddit.com/r/technology/s/92lNZsU240https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/a/a6c8d99a.jpg</quote>Ironic.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ReturnOfDevsman 10/30/25 9:15:55 AM #53:	WingsOfGood posted... how would that not violate the 1st amendment? RasterGraphic posted... Considering you can be self taught certain subjects, this seems classist at best UnfairRepresent posted... I don't trust that law. "Only professionals can talk about X" just sounds like a legal way to say "Only the approved message of the government can be stated. Anything else is illegal." Putting aside the anti-freedom side for a second, if that law got implimented in the US, the Trump admin would bend over backwards to justify how PragerU and Asmagold are qualified while actual scitentists and experts are lying for money. Definitely all of these three --- Arguing on CE be all like: https://youtu.be/JpRKrs67lOs?si=kPGA2RCKVHTdbVrJ <cite>ReturnOfDevsman posted [p:986884457] in The US nee... [t:81062547]...</cite> <quote>WingsOfGood posted... </cite><quote>how would that not violate the 1st amendment?</quote>RasterGraphic posted... </cite><quote>Considering you can be self taught certain subjects, this seems classist at best</quote>UnfairRepresent posted... </cite><quote>I don't trust that law. "Only professionals can talk about X" just sounds like a legal way to say "Only the approved message of the government can be stated. Anything else is illegal."Putting aside the anti-freedom side for a second, if that law got implimented in the US, the Trump admin would bend over backwards to justify how PragerU and Asmagold are qualified while actual scitentists and experts are lying for money.</quote>Definitely all of these three</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ReturnOfDevsman 10/30/25 9:18:11 AM #54:	A_Good_Boy posted... How about we get rid of the degree requirement but keep the requirement to cite your sources and label your AI and other manipulated video or images? Nah, it wouldn't make any difference. Show of hands, CE: who clicked the link in the first post? --- Arguing on CE be all like: https://youtu.be/JpRKrs67lOs?si=kPGA2RCKVHTdbVrJ <cite>ReturnOfDevsman posted [p:986884470] in The US nee... [t:81062547]...</cite> <quote>A_Good_Boy posted... </cite><quote>How about we get rid of the degree requirement but keep the requirement to cite your sources and label your AI and other manipulated video or images?</quote>Nah, it wouldn't make any difference. Show of hands, CE: who clicked the link in the first post?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
A_Good_Boy 10/30/25 9:32:28 AM #55:	McMarbles posted... Ironic. Jfc --- Who is? I am! <cite>A_Good_Boy posted [p:986884570] in The US nee... [t:81062547]...</cite> <quote>McMarbles posted... </cite><quote>Ironic.</quote>Jfc</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
andri_g 10/30/25 7:25:31 PM #56:	darkknight109 posted... Would you want, say, RFK Jr. dictating to medical professionals across the country what is and isn't acceptable to say online? He is not qualified. So, the consensus of actual medical professionals would regulate any claims that he could make, not the other way around. --- '~' <cite>andri_g posted [p:986889915] in The US nee... [t:81062547]...</cite> <quote>darkknight109 posted... </cite><quote>Would you want, say, RFK Jr. dictating to medical professionals across the country what is and isn't acceptable to say online?</quote>He is not qualified. So, the consensus of actual medical professionals would regulate any claims that he could make, not the other way around.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Rika_Furude 10/30/25 7:27:28 PM #57:	UnfairRepresent posted... I don't trust that law. "Only professionals can talk about X" just sounds like a legal way to say "Only the approved message of the government can be stated. Anything else is illegal." Putting aside the anti-freedom side for a second, if that law got implimented in the US, the Trump admin would bend over backwards to justify how PragerU and Asmagold are qualified while actual scitentists and experts are lying for money. Does the Chinese government have to approve academic studies and research over there? <cite>Rika_Furude posted [p:986889931] in The US nee... [t:81062547]...</cite> <quote>UnfairRepresent posted... </cite><quote>I don't trust that law. "Only professionals can talk about X" just sounds like a legal way to say "Only the approved message of the government can be stated. Anything else is illegal."Putting aside the anti-freedom side for a second, if that law got implimented in the US, the Trump admin would bend over backwards to justify how PragerU and Asmagold are qualified while actual scitentists and experts are lying for money.</quote>Does the Chinese government have to approve academic studies and research over there?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Sandalorn 10/30/25 7:34:38 PM #58:	andri_g posted... He is not qualified. So, the consensus of actual medical professionals would regulate any claims that he could make, not the other way around. Is that what you think this would be? In the current anti-intellectual climate of the US that actual doctors and scientists would be the ones whose opinions would be approved? LOL...It's simply going to be a Gov't created and run law where their "experts" will be the ones creating "expert" viewpoints and monitoring online commentary from the actual professionals of their fields. So RFK, Linda McMahon, etc actually would be the "professionals" whose opinions will be the approved Gov't message. <cite>Sandalorn posted [p:986889984] in The US nee... [t:81062547]...</cite> <quote>andri_g posted... </cite><quote>He is not qualified. So, the consensus of actual medical professionals would regulate any claims that he could make, not the other way around.</quote>Is that what you think this would be? In the current anti-intellectual climate of the US that actual doctors and scientists would be the ones whose opinions would be approved?LOL...It's simply going to be a Gov't created and run law where their "experts" will be the ones creating "expert" viewpoints and monitoring online commentary from the actual professionals of their fields.So RFK, Linda McMahon, etc actually would be the "professionals" whose opinions will be the approved Gov't message.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LordFarquad1312 10/30/25 7:36:48 PM #59:	In case you didn't know, some Youtube videos have a message saying "From an accredited US hospital" or "From a licensed medical practitioner". This should be extended so that any channel can request to have their degree in any discipline on display and it would allow viewers to immediately distinguish between authoritative figures and deluded assholes who like the sound of their own voice too much. https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/5/51841d92.jpg --- El sexo sucio y el planeta limpio. "If you are tired of fear from links... Let Kirby's Nightmare protect you." <cite>LordFarquad1312 posted [p:986890003] in The US nee... [t:81062547]...</cite> <quote>In case you didn't know, some Youtube videos have a message saying "From an accredited US hospital" or "From a licensed medical practitioner". This should be extended so that any channel can request to have their degree in any discipline on display and it would allow viewers to immediately distinguish between authoritative figures and deluded assholes who like the sound of their own voice too much.https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/5/51841d92.jpg</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
rick_alverado 10/30/25 7:39:33 PM #60:	LordFarquad1312 posted... In case you didn't know, some Youtube videos have a message saying "From an accredited US hospital" or "From a licensed medical practitioner". This should be extended so that any channel can request to have their degree in any discipline on display and it would allow viewers to immediately distinguish between authoritative figures and deluded assholes who like the sound of their own voice too much. https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/5/51841d92.jpg See, this is something I actually like. <cite>rick_alverado posted [p:986890032] in The US nee... [t:81062547]...</cite> <quote>LordFarquad1312 posted... </cite><quote>In case you didn't know, some Youtube videos have a message saying "From an accredited US hospital" or "From a licensed medical practitioner". This should be extended so that any channel can request to have their degree in any discipline on display and it would allow viewers to immediately distinguish between authoritative figures and deluded assholes who like the sound of their own voice too much.https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/5/51841d92.jpg</quote>See, this is something I actually like.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
andri_g 10/31/25 5:01:49 AM #61:	Sandalorn posted... Is that what you think this would be? In the current anti-intellectual climate of the US that actual doctors and scientists would be the ones whose opinions would be approved? Ideally, for the sake of credibility, but those could become mutually exclusive. In any professional field, consensus is not limited to findings from any one country. If US government approved research does become such an outlier, it will be dropped from international conference discussions and publications. --- '~' <cite>andri_g posted [p:986893314] in The US nee... [t:81062547]...</cite> <quote>Sandalorn posted... </cite><quote>Is that what you think this would be? In the current anti-intellectual climate of the US that actual doctors and scientists would be the ones whose opinions would be approved?</quote>Ideally, for the sake of credibility, but those could become mutually exclusive. In any professional field, consensus is not limited to findings from any one country. If US government approved research does become such an outlier, it will be dropped from international conference discussions and publications.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
reincarnator07 10/31/25 8:49:20 AM #62:	andri_g posted... Ideally, for the sake of credibility, but those could become mutually exclusive. In any professional field, consensus is not limited to findings from any one country. If US government approved research does become such an outlier, it will be dropped from international conference discussions and publications. That doesn't help things when the platforms themselves are American. Sure the rest of the world will say that the research is objectively wrong, but the YouTube video from an American creator would be unaffected. Fundamentally flawed research is already dismissed, that's the whole process of peer reviewing and recreating results. It hasn't helped at all. On top of that, if it's a legal framework then ultimately the government is responsible for enforcing it. Do you think this administration and its backers would do this when it only benefits them for the disinformation to spread? This only works in a society that doesn't need it. --- Fan of metal? Don't mind covers? Check out my youtube and give me some feedback http://www.youtube.com/sircaballero <cite>reincarnator07 posted [p:986894192] in The US nee... [t:81062547]...</cite> <quote>andri_g posted... </cite><quote>Ideally, for the sake of credibility, but those could become mutually exclusive. In any professional field, consensus is not limited to findings from any one country. If US government approved research does become such an outlier, it will be dropped from international conference discussions and publications.</quote>That doesn't help things when the platforms themselves are American. Sure the rest of the world will say that the research is objectively wrong, but the YouTube video from an American creator would be unaffected. Fundamentally flawed research is already dismissed, that's the whole process of peer reviewing and recreating results. It hasn't helped at all.On top of that, if it's a legal framework then ultimately the government is responsible for enforcing it. Do you think this administration and its backers would do this when it only benefits them for the disinformation to spread?This only works in a society that doesn't need it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
andri_g 10/31/25 8:31:55 PM #63:	reincarnator07 posted... This only works in a society that doesn't need it. So, federally, the US is going to become the new Yugoslavia? Anyone remember how that worked-out? --- '~' <cite>andri_g posted [p:986900368] in The US nee... [t:81062547]...</cite> <quote>reincarnator07 posted... </cite><quote>This only works in a society that doesn't need it.</quote>So, federally, the US is going to become the new Yugoslavia? Anyone remember how that worked-out?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
GeraldDarko 10/31/25 9:14:50 PM #64:	A_Good_Boy posted... If you pay the fine you can use the 1st as much as you want. My god.... What an ignorant thing to say. --- Carpe petat <cite>GeraldDarko posted [p:986900765] in The US nee... [t:81062547]...</cite> <quote>A_Good_Boy posted... </cite><quote>If you pay the fine you can use the 1st as much as you want.</quote>My god....What an ignorant thing to say. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
rick_alverado 10/31/25 9:24:18 PM #65:	GeraldDarko posted... My god.... What an ignorant thing to say. Rich people getting more rights than poor people is hardly a surprising view from him. <cite>rick_alverado posted [p:986900843] in The US nee... [t:81062547]...</cite> <quote>GeraldDarko posted... </cite><quote>My god....What an ignorant thing to say. </quote>Rich people getting more rights than poor people is hardly a surprising view from him.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
A_Good_Boy 10/31/25 9:26:59 PM #66:	GeraldDarko posted... My god.... What an ignorant thing to say. You're right, I forgot to cite that post. --- Who is? I am! <cite>A_Good_Boy posted [p:986900866] in The US nee... [t:81062547]...</cite> <quote>GeraldDarko posted... </cite><quote>My god....What an ignorant thing to say. </quote>You're right, I forgot to cite that post. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheGoldenEel 10/31/25 9:30:26 PM #67:	tremain07 posted... Sounds good on paper it doesnt, actually --- BLACK LIVES MATTER Games: http://backloggery.com/wrldindstries302 \\ Music: http://www.last.fm/user/DrMorberg/ <cite>TheGoldenEel posted [p:986900899] in The US nee... [t:81062547]...</cite> <quote>tremain07 posted... </cite><quote>Sounds good on paper</quote>it doesnt, actually</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
nocturnal_traveler 10/31/25 9:36:54 PM #68:	I don't trust this to be credible in China, much less the US. The easiest solution is to force the influencers to cite their sources. --- --I understand your opinion. I just don't care about it. ~Jedah-- <cite>nocturnal_traveler posted [p:986900951] in The US nee... [t:81062547]...</cite> <quote>I don't trust this to be credible in China, much less the US. The easiest solution is to force the influencers to cite their sources.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
-Crissaegrim- 10/31/25 9:40:02 PM #69:	As much I think there are a lot of benefits to keeping uninformed armchair experts from chiming into life affecting topics with potentially lethal or life ruining misinformation, I really don't trust the Chinese government to not strangle public discourse entirely by pushing the requirement of expertise beyond the intial outlay of finance, medicine and education. "Sensitive topics" will ultimately mean whatever the fuck they want it to mean. Not sure we want our western governments taking a leaf out of that book given how dicey democracy is looking in certain countries. --- Work in progress bass guitar sound- https://youtu.be/rWj0ZbwTMQU?si=IiqHSLOcy2RaLNaM https://youtu.be/UdKl9R1l9YY?si=bHWWk7oCI9Blt3mj <cite>-Crissaegrim- posted [p:986900971] in The US nee... [t:81062547]...</cite> <quote>As much I think there are a lot of benefits to keeping uninformed armchair experts from chiming into life affecting topics with potentially lethal or life ruining misinformation, I really don't trust the Chinese government to not strangle public discourse entirely by pushing the requirement of expertise beyond the intial outlay of finance, medicine and education. "Sensitive topics" will ultimately mean whatever the fuck they want it to mean.Not sure we want our western governments taking a leaf out of that book given how dicey democracy is looking in certain countries.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Pechabust 11/02/25 12:10:39 AM #70:	There needs to be something to combat misinformation on professional matters at least. <cite>Pechabust posted [p:986912098] in The US nee... [t:81062547]...</cite> <quote>There needs to be something to combat misinformation on professional matters at least.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tyranthraxus 11/02/25 12:37:23 AM #71:	Pechabust posted... There needs to be something to combat misinformation on professional matters at least. I think someone posted earlier an example of verified credentials being clearly labeled under a social media account which I think is a fantastic idea provided that the credentials are actually detailed and not just "Verified by tiktok to be legit trust us bro" --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://i.imgur.com/dQgC4kv.jpg <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:986912268] in The US nee... [t:81062547]...</cite> <quote>Pechabust posted... </cite><quote>There needs to be something to combat misinformation on professional matters at least.</quote>I think someone posted earlier an example of verified credentials being clearly labeled under a social media account which I think is a fantastic idea provided that the credentials are actually detailed and not just "Verified by tiktok to be legit trust us bro"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Pechabust 11/02/25 11:36:12 PM #72:	Tyranthraxus posted... I think someone posted earlier an example of verified credentials being clearly labeled under a social media account which I think is a fantastic idea provided that the credentials are actually detailed and not just "Verified by tiktok to be legit trust us bro" Yeah that's a good idea to explore. <cite>Pechabust posted [p:986920976] in The US nee... [t:81062547]...</cite> <quote>Tyranthraxus posted... </cite><quote>I think someone posted earlier an example of verified credentials being clearly labeled under a social media account which I think is a fantastic idea provided that the credentials are actually detailed and not just "Verified by tiktok to be legit trust us bro"</quote>Yeah that's a good idea to explore.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2

Current Events > The US needs something like this new W law being implemented in China. (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > The US needs something like this new W law being implemented in China.