They all suck. But Islam sucks the most
Is Scientology considered a real religion? If so, there is an objectively correct answer to this.
Is Scientology considered a real religion? If so, there is an objectively correct answer to this.
They all suck. But Islam sucks the most
These topics are almost as boring as the political ones.
yes. They are all equally invalid.
is your name a play on IHeartRadio?
D.
The religion that makes the most falsifiable/unreasonable claim is the least valid.
Example:
Religion 1 says that the sun rises because God's chariot is pulling it across the sky.
Religion 2 says that God will bless you with happiness if you believe in Him, as he is full of love.
Religion 3 says that the God doesn't interfere with the human world or the universe for that matter, It just caused the universe to happen.
Religion 1 is the least valid, since it makes a claim that we know with good certainty to be false. Religion 2 is more nebulous, but still asserts the observable effect of a deity with human emotions on Earth - making an unsubstantiated claim that is probably man-made. Religion 3 is the most reasonable because the deity takes the role of the primordial force - an unmoved mover that sets in motions the chains of the universe. It doesn't ascribe any human characteristics to the deity and functions more as a philosophical axiom than a personal deity.
lilORANG posted...
is your name a play on IHeartRadio?
Nope, came up with it about a year or so before I heard of them.
I get the space alien angle, that could happen, but you think the bit about the nuclear dust being reborn as human souls or whatever isn't kinda goofy like stuff in other religions?
They all have the exact same amount of supporting evidence, that being literally none, so yes.
There is one religion that is worse than any of them.
Just because the 3rd religion's claim is less absurd doesn't mean it isn't premised on something impossible and nonsensical.
This subject eats at you quite a bit, huh TC
They all suck. But Scientology sucks the most
Valid is kind of a dumb word for this.
Some are worse than others.
Is there a stronger reason to believe in one religion over another?
Yes, there is a stronger reason to believe in the ones that aren't as bad. Like ones that treat people like shit, cover up crimes, or have been known to be shady financially.
Are they all equally false, or equally true?
They are all equally false. But I have no problem with peaceful believers.
Khalpz posted...
Is there a stronger reason to believe in one religion over another?
Yes, there is a stronger reason to believe in the ones that aren't as bad. Like ones that treat people like shit, cover up crimes, or have been known to be shady financially.
Are they all equally false, or equally true?
They are all equally false. But I have no problem with peaceful believers.
This doesn't have anything to do with validity.
Khalpz posted...
Is there a stronger reason to believe in one religion over another?
Yes, there is a stronger reason to believe in the ones that aren't as bad. Like ones that treat people like shit, cover up crimes, or have been known to be shady financially.
Are they all equally false, or equally true?
They are all equally false. But I have no problem with peaceful believers.
This doesn't have anything to do with validity.
They are all equally valid in the sense that they are each equally un-valid.
FroMan posted...
They are all equally valid in the sense that they are each equally un-valid.
