Home
Community
Blacklist
Login
Don't have an account? Register Here.
Popeye vs Saitama
Current Events
Current Events
» Popeye vs Saitama
Saitama: Oooh look at meeee, I beat someone who can destroy a whoooole planet!
Popeye: *rearranges entire constellations with a punch*
*shrugs off existence erasure multiple times, once from his own animator*
*annihilates the moon by punching Bluto into it*
Popeye: *rearranges entire constellations with a punch*
*shrugs off existence erasure multiple times, once from his own animator*
*annihilates the moon by punching Bluto into it*
Do the good die young, or do the young die good?
http://i.imgur.com/QiEb7.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/QiEb7.jpg
l33t_iRk3n_Rm33 posted...
The salt inspired me to vote Saitama.
Saitama: Oooh look at meeee, I beat someone who can destroy a whoooole planet!
Popeye: *rearranges entire constellations with a punch*
The salt inspired me to vote Saitama.
Posted with GameRaven 3.4
Honestly I've been thinking about this and Saitama hard counters Popeyes. Toon force characters work on what is funny. The whole point of saitama is to effortlessly beat characters that power up. Popeye getting trounced and then eating spinach to beat saitama is generic and bland. Popeye getting one punched, eating spinach, powering up and flexing his increased muscles only to get one punched again is funny. Saitama wins.
</topic>
GiftedACIII posted...
Theyre both supposed to be invincible but I like Saitama more so hes stronger
Horse shit
Saitama is just the strongest ant on his hill. He doesnt have some magical durability ignoring fists. Hes Donkey Kong in the RWBY universe.
Saitamad be wailing on Popeye to no effect like Hercule wailing on Cell.
The author is dead in VS, and in interpreting any work of fiction in any way. Saitama has never fought a solar system buster capable of regenerating from literal, actual nothingness (something Boros failed to do), therefore he cant.
Honestly I've been thinking about this and Saitama hard counters Popeyes. Toon force characters work on what is funny. The whole point of saitama is to effortlessly beat characters that power up. Popeye getting trounced and then eating spinach to beat saitama is generic and bland. Popeye getting one punched, eating spinach, powering up and flexing his increased muscles only to get one punched again is funny. Saitama wins.
Theyre both supposed to be invincible but I like Saitama more so hes stronger
Horse shit
Saitama is just the strongest ant on his hill. He doesnt have some magical durability ignoring fists. Hes Donkey Kong in the RWBY universe.
Saitamad be wailing on Popeye to no effect like Hercule wailing on Cell.
The author is dead in VS, and in interpreting any work of fiction in any way. Saitama has never fought a solar system buster capable of regenerating from literal, actual nothingness (something Boros failed to do), therefore he cant.
Do the good die young, or do the young die good?
http://i.imgur.com/QiEb7.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/QiEb7.jpg
l33t_iRk3n_Rm33 posted...
lmao do you have any self-awareness? You're arguing toon physics seriously. In popeye regular non powered characters survive being punted to the moon, anvils are never dangerous, the sun can be pulled to earth and it doesn't destroy earth because at that moment, the sun is the size of a car.
It's not that the characters themselves are strong, it's that their universe is shit.
GiftedACIII posted...
Honestly I've been thinking about this and Saitama hard counters Popeyes. Toon force characters work on what is funny. The whole point of saitama is to effortlessly beat characters that power up. Popeye getting trounced and then eating spinach to beat saitama is generic and bland. Popeye getting one punched, eating spinach, powering up and flexing his increased muscles only to get one punched again is funny. Saitama wins.
Theyre both supposed to be invincible but I like Saitama more so hes stronger
Horse shit
Saitama is just the strongest ant on his hill. He doesnt have some magical durability ignoring fists. Hes Donkey Kong in the RWBY universe.
Saitamad be wailing on Popeye to no effect like Hercule wailing on Cell.
The author is dead in VS, and in interpreting any work of fiction in any way. Saitama has never fought a solar system buster capable of regenerating from literal, actual nothingness (something Boros failed to do), therefore he cant.
lmao do you have any self-awareness? You're arguing toon physics seriously. In popeye regular non powered characters survive being punted to the moon, anvils are never dangerous, the sun can be pulled to earth and it doesn't destroy earth because at that moment, the sun is the size of a car.
It's not that the characters themselves are strong, it's that their universe is shit.
</topic>
One punch man haters continue to miss the point and try to objectify things with power levels. More at 5 minutes from now.
Post #8 was unavailable or deleted.
Popeye wins by beating up the animators.
GiftedACIII posted...
No, it is that the characters are strong. Why does comedic durability only count for Saitama?
If a character is powerful, thats that. Doesnt matter why. Like I said, the author is dead. Even if a character were to perform a superhuman feat because an author overestimates what a peak human is capable of, that wouldnt take the strength away from the character.
Spidey5 posted...
One Punch Man IS about power levels. It is a well established fact in the series that Saitama is just inexplicably powerful, not just magically killing everyone despite being weaker. Its not that hes not powerful, its that he shouldnt be. Power that can be quantified if only he had a sufficiently durable target. Popeye is all that and then some.
Why does Saitama can kill anyone take priority over Popeye can do anything?
l33t_iRk3n_Rm33 posted...
GiftedACIII posted...
Honestly I've been thinking about this and Saitama hard counters Popeyes. Toon force characters work on what is funny. The whole point of saitama is to effortlessly beat characters that power up. Popeye getting trounced and then eating spinach to beat saitama is generic and bland. Popeye getting one punched, eating spinach, powering up and flexing his increased muscles only to get one punched again is funny. Saitama wins.
Theyre both supposed to be invincible but I like Saitama more so hes stronger
Horse shit
Saitama is just the strongest ant on his hill. He doesnt have some magical durability ignoring fists. Hes Donkey Kong in the RWBY universe.
Saitamad be wailing on Popeye to no effect like Hercule wailing on Cell.
The author is dead in VS, and in interpreting any work of fiction in any way. Saitama has never fought a solar system buster capable of regenerating from literal, actual nothingness (something Boros failed to do), therefore he cant.
lmao do you have any self-awareness? You're arguing toon physics seriously. In popeye regular non powered characters survive being punted to the moon, anvils are never dangerous, the sun can be pulled to earth and it doesn't destroy earth because at that moment, the sun is the size of a car.
It's not that the characters themselves are strong, it's that their universe is shit.
No, it is that the characters are strong. Why does comedic durability only count for Saitama?
If a character is powerful, thats that. Doesnt matter why. Like I said, the author is dead. Even if a character were to perform a superhuman feat because an author overestimates what a peak human is capable of, that wouldnt take the strength away from the character.
Spidey5 posted...
One punch man haters continue to miss the point and try to objectify things with power levels. More at 5 minutes from now.
One Punch Man IS about power levels. It is a well established fact in the series that Saitama is just inexplicably powerful, not just magically killing everyone despite being weaker. Its not that hes not powerful, its that he shouldnt be. Power that can be quantified if only he had a sufficiently durable target. Popeye is all that and then some.
Why does Saitama can kill anyone take priority over Popeye can do anything?
Do the good die young, or do the young die good?
http://i.imgur.com/QiEb7.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/QiEb7.jpg
Popeye gets his ass kicked constantly.
hes not consistently powerful. Saitama easily...
hes not consistently powerful. Saitama easily...
l33t_iRk3n_Rm33 posted...
Nope, when their universe is explicitly shown to work ridiculously and childishly it's shit. For example in Doraemon, the MC who is explicitly shown to be so weak he can't even lift bags of groceries gets a telescope that allows him to grab whatever he sees through it. One time he tries to grab a cat but accidentally grabs the tree it was on so he's pulled to the tree. However, later on, while he's viewing the sky he reaches out and somehow grabs the moon into his room and the moon is just the size of his room. That doesn't make this normal 10 year old kid stronger than Bane because he pulled the moon to his room this just means his universe is ridiculous.
If some normal high school girl in a normal high school comedy suddenly beats the shit out of Cthulhu for looking up her skirt in a one off gag, you'd just write that off as that universe's Cthulhu being weak as fuck. Why does that not apply to inanimate objects in toon universes that are explicitly shown to work ridiculously?
People who take toon physics seriously have got to be some of the most detached from reality fanboys that exist.
characters are strong. Why does comedic durability only count for Saitama?
If a character is powerful, thats that. Doesnt matter why. Like I said, the author is dead. Even if a character were to perform a superhuman feat because an author overestimates what a peak human is capable of, that wouldnt take the strength away from the character.
Nope, when their universe is explicitly shown to work ridiculously and childishly it's shit. For example in Doraemon, the MC who is explicitly shown to be so weak he can't even lift bags of groceries gets a telescope that allows him to grab whatever he sees through it. One time he tries to grab a cat but accidentally grabs the tree it was on so he's pulled to the tree. However, later on, while he's viewing the sky he reaches out and somehow grabs the moon into his room and the moon is just the size of his room. That doesn't make this normal 10 year old kid stronger than Bane because he pulled the moon to his room this just means his universe is ridiculous.
If some normal high school girl in a normal high school comedy suddenly beats the shit out of Cthulhu for looking up her skirt in a one off gag, you'd just write that off as that universe's Cthulhu being weak as fuck. Why does that not apply to inanimate objects in toon universes that are explicitly shown to work ridiculously?
People who take toon physics seriously have got to be some of the most detached from reality fanboys that exist.
</topic>
Genos: Popeye-sama, I have come to you to learn where you get your strength from. Saitama-sama gave me this bullshit story about doing 100 push ups, sit ups, squats, and running 10 KM every day for his strength, so I come to you for real answers.
Popeye: *shrug* I just eat spinach
Genos: ....
Popeye: *shrug* I just eat spinach
Genos: ....
Post #14 was unavailable or deleted.
Both seem to have limitless pover, BUT popey seems to also have reality changin powers. He can change living things to mindless things, and afaik he punched King Kong type monster so that it turned into three smaller gorillas.
Can't think any good sig
Popeye literally willed himself back into existence and kicked the animator's ass for trying to erase him.
A scattered dream that's like a far-off memory. A far-off memory that's like a scattered dream. I want to line the pieces up--yours and mine.
Haven't seen one punch man but Popeye lost to a baby and some dudes who ate broccoli. He'd lose if it's funny. The situation in post #4 seems funny.
Simple-straight-narrow
popeye with spinach vs. saitama with long french fry is the real debate
Sami1000 posted...
XD prob wouldn't work on Saitama tho.
Is it safe to say they are both stronger than Goku?
Both seem to have limitless pover, BUT popey seems to also have reality changin powers. He can change living things to mindless things, and afaik he punched King Kong type monster so that it turned into three smaller gorillas.
XD prob wouldn't work on Saitama tho.
Is it safe to say they are both stronger than Goku?
----
-----
-----
Gods help us if Saitama gets into Popeyes spinach! Everything would end in a single punch!
Water+Fall=Radiation.
Saitama only fights weak opponents and his creator says his opponents are city busters at best. Popeye rearranges solar systems and beats up his own animator.
Who is? I am!
A_Good_Boy posted...
Boros was clearly not a city buster. Everyone else, sure.
Saitama only fights weak opponents and his creator says his opponents are city busters at best. Popeye rearranges solar systems and beats up his own animator.
Boros was clearly not a city buster. Everyone else, sure.
Maybe the only duel Saitama would effectively lose.
~
Phoenix Nine
~
~ Victory needs no explanation; defeat allows none. ~
~ Victory needs no explanation; defeat allows none. ~
l33t_iRk3n_Rm33 posted...
Why are you so angry?
GiftedACIII posted...
Honestly I've been thinking about this and Saitama hard counters Popeyes. Toon force characters work on what is funny. The whole point of saitama is to effortlessly beat characters that power up. Popeye getting trounced and then eating spinach to beat saitama is generic and bland. Popeye getting one punched, eating spinach, powering up and flexing his increased muscles only to get one punched again is funny. Saitama wins.
Theyre both supposed to be invincible but I like Saitama more so hes stronger
Horse shit
Saitama is just the strongest ant on his hill. He doesnt have some magical durability ignoring fists. Hes Donkey Kong in the RWBY universe.
Saitamad be wailing on Popeye to no effect like Hercule wailing on Cell.
The author is dead in VS, and in interpreting any work of fiction in any way. Saitama has never fought a solar system buster capable of regenerating from literal, actual nothingness (something Boros failed to do), therefore he cant.
Why are you so angry?
Tyranthraxus posted...
Lmao
Genos: Popeye-sama, I have come to you to learn where you get your strength from. Saitama-sama gave me this bullshit story about doing 100 push ups, sit ups, squats, and running 10 KM every day for his strength, so I come to you for real answers.
Popeye: *shrug* I just eat spinach
Genos: ....
Lmao
Story Lovers Welcome!
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/1443-writers-cafe
http://i.imgtc.com/YQId2Bz.png
http://i.imgtc.com/YQId2Bz.png
What happens is Saitama wins initially. Then again after Spinach.
So Popeye beats the animator up and makes him animate him winning.
So Popeye beats the animator up and makes him animate him winning.
Pre spinach or post spinach Popey?
3khc posted...
Lol. Have you seen some of Goku's feats? I haven't seen Saitama fight anyone close to that level of power.
Is it safe to say they are both stronger than Goku?
Lol. Have you seen some of Goku's feats? I haven't seen Saitama fight anyone close to that level of power.
CE's source of sagely advice
#BLM
#BLM
Post #29 was unavailable or deleted.
ClunkerSlim posted...
Cartoon Network used to play it pretty often back when it was first founded, and you can even catch it on Boomerang still iirc. There's even episodes on YouTube.
OK, seriously. Is there some new Popeye media that I'm not aware of? Where are you guys watching all this Popeye stuff? Most of you blank at the mention of even obscure 80s shows, and now suddenly everyone is watching Popeye?
Cartoon Network used to play it pretty often back when it was first founded, and you can even catch it on Boomerang still iirc. There's even episodes on YouTube.
Who is? I am!
Popeye and its not even close
[Your sig sucks]
Waaaaah
Waaaaah
And I read that the film is back in production.
----
-----
-----
Current Events
» Popeye vs Saitama