At least they admitted there was a job gain this month. I don't think we're that far away from Fox News doubling down anyways and saying the White House numbers are fake news until they can give Trump credit somehow.They did that with Obama already
huh? how is sitting there and reporting on the news considered being "giddy"
huh? how is sitting there and reporting on the news considered being "giddy"They're smiling and happy that the numbers might be low. don't be dense.
As someone who was a Republican for decades, I can tell you that whenever jobs look good / unemployment is low and a Democrat is president, they switch to talking about the labor force participation rateUnemployment is "up" because the U6 is leaking back to U3.
Let me get this straight, Republicans WANT to see people not have jobs???That's how you keep labor costs down, yes.
That's how you keep labor costs down, yes.why are you saying this like its a good thing?
That's how you keep labor costs down, yes.Let me get this straight, Republicans WANT to see people living in poverty?
why are you saying this like its a good thing?That's just how it is. Your value as a employee has fuck all to do with the value of your labor, but instead how quickly and easily someone else can be trained to do your job.
Let me get this straight, Republicans WANT to see people not have jobs???
The problem here is that your average MAGA has a room temp IQ so they'll have only retained the first part of this bitThat's one cold room
Less people applying for a job, the more you have to pay them so they will want to apply for your job.This is why a UBI would actually raise wages. If you don't have to work, you won't, especially not scrubbing toilets or shoveling shit. Those jobs would have to pay quite a bit to get anyone to bother.
That's one cold roomMy refrigerator has doors and an interior, therefore it is a room and applicable to the situation.
This is why a UBI would actually raise wages. If you don't have to work, you won't, especially not scrubbing toilets or shoveling shit. Those jobs would have to pay quite a bit to get anyone to bother.
It's just too bad UBI is essentially impossible.
Am I trippin?Nope, you are not tripping. He literally said it lol
It said 150,000 potential job gains and 300,000 job losses.
And the dude goes "That would be a half a million job swing the wrong way"
??
Why is UBI impossible?Were you and I to decide that we should both get $1000 a month, that means we have to somehow find $2000 each month between us. All that changes when it's "everyone" is scale.
Wealth Tax easily raises enough money for it and more.Last time I ran the numbers, we could liquidate all the wealth on the planet, an hand out about $36000 to everyone.
Nope, you are not tripping. He literally said it lol
Last time I ran the numbers, we could liquidate all the wealth on the planet, an hand out about $36000 to everyone.
What happens then? Do we punish the guy who somehow ends up with $36001?
This is why a UBI would actually raise wages. If you don't have to work, you won't, especially not scrubbing toilets or shoveling shit. Those jobs would have to pay quite a bit to get anyone to bother.it's not the taxpayers job to subsidize people whose only skill is scooping up feces, thank you.
It's just too bad UBI is essentially impossible.
since they avoid taxes now, it is simply getting from them what the actually already owe"owe" why?
it's not the taxpayers job to subsidize people whose only skill is scooping up feces, thank you.
"owe" why?
Actually garbage men are paid by tax dollars.So is the sewer system, where shoveling shit does happen sometimes.