I take the $100 billion, keep 0.1% of it for myself, and use the rest to solve world hunger.
You can't solve world hunger with $100 billion dollars.Well then I put $99.9 billion towards the eventual solution then.
Money because turning the USA into a monarchy would be one of the worst things that could happen.Yep. Giving anyone absolute power as ruler would be a bad idea even if they would make an awesome king. You have no guarantee that they would remain an awesome king or that the next king wouldn't be horrible.
We have literally zero evidence of Aragorn's competency as an administrator, so this is a pretty easy choice.
Money because turning the USA into a monarchy would be one of the worst things that could happen.
We've seen it, a good man could save the people of America from utter doom, if on Election Day the price of eggs is $0.05 more expensive than before, Americans will vote for Sauron rather than Aragon.Good thing there is no voting involved then :p
Tolkien was also going to write a sequel to LOTR that was about how as Aragorn aged/died, Sauron/Morgoth-worshiping cultists started showing up and everything started going to hell. He ultimately abandoned the sequel because he just found it too depressing to write.IIRC, the issue was with magical groups like
I don't live in the US, give me money.
Money, and I spend half of it on the biggest anti-Republican smear campaign in history along with enormous media buys.