Trump claims it is illegal to be mean about him

Current Events

Current Events » Trump claims it is illegal to be mean about him
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/trump-says-negative-media-coverage-010528599.html

The majority of Americans view this man as a free speech advocate. The majority of Americans view this man as a strong tough manly man.
~Hivebent4Life
3DS FC: 5069-3910-2647
most sensitive sore LOSER in the history of planet Earth
"We would have no NBA possibly if they got rid of all the flopping." ~ Dwyane Wade
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DOtaZMuDh4R/?igsh=N240c3ptdGd5NWdw

According to this guy. America is one step away to being in an authoritarian. The last step is one party rule.
Above all things, never be afraid. The enemy who forces you to retreat is himself afraid of you at that very moment.
He is a loser that needs to shut up.
It's more than good, it's alive!
Warning: May contain stone hat pieces http://i.imgur.com/N6v5qZx.jpg
Scardude posted...
. The last step is one party rule.
That is definitely coming, in my opinion. At least they will try to accomplish it. Trump is trying to paint all left wing people as out of control extremists. That inevitably leads to attempting to ban the Democrat party
Zikten posted...
That is definitely coming, in my opinion. At least they will try to accomplish it. Trump is trying to paint all left wing people as out of control extremists. That inevitably leads to attempting to ban the Democrat party

The only saving grace seems to be Trump and like 90% of his administration are ****ing terrified of doing anything to actually risk their spot. Hitler and the nazis were at least willing to go to jail and die for the nazi-dom.

If we're "lucky" I could see the US largely just continuing as it is, Trump doing whatever he wants, and democrats pretending to do something but not doing anything. Trump can probably just say "no more elections" or rig the crap out of them and not need to have an "official" banning of the democrats or anything like that.
Proto_Spark posted...
The only saving grace seems to be Trump and like 90% of his administration are ****ing terrified of doing anything to actually risk their spot. Hitler and the nazis were at least willing to go to jail and die for the nazi-dom.
They're also incompetent.
Time is a funny thing, you know? I guess in the big picture of my life, you were only a blip. But oftentimes, those "blips" make the biggest impacts.
The Fat Orange Fascist needs to shut the hell up, he has brought nothing but misery to wherever he goes.
If you need the threat of eternal damnation to be a good person, you're just a bad person on a leash.
For all the whining this piece of shit does about his media coverage, it's not nearly as negative as it should be from the NYT et al.

One example, of literally thousands -- we haven't had a single "President Traitor" headline.
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." -- 1984
Tyrant Trump can go fuck himself if he doesn't like free speech.
Black Lives Matter. ~ DYL ~ (On mobile)
hivebent4life posted...
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/trump-says-negative-media-coverage-010528599.html

The majority of Americans view this man as a free speech advocate. The majority of Americans view this man as a strong tough manly man.
Not even close to a majority, but ok.

Votes for Trump in 2024: 75 million
American population in 2024: 340 million

Donald Trump is in the Epstein files. You know it, I know it, and he knows it.
mybbqrules posted...
Not even close to a majority, but ok.

Votes for Trump in 2024: 75 million
American population in 2024: 340 million
Anyone who didnt vote is also a de facto Trump supporter
~Hivebent4Life
3DS FC: 5069-3910-2647
After the years and years of shit talking, lies, and slander he's pulled on anyone he doesn't like, he needs to thoroughly shut the fuck up.
solosnake posted...
most sensitive sore LOSER in the history of planet Earth
Musk is a close second. Like how do they not understand why people are "mean" to them online lol
Less is more. Everything you want, isn't everything you need.
Zikten posted...
That is definitely coming, in my opinion. At least they will try to accomplish it. Trump is trying to paint all left wing people as out of control extremists. That inevitably leads to attempting to ban the Democrat party

I promise you the first thing he's going to try and do is go for the illusive 3rd term. The one that up until this point has only been accomplished due to extreme circumstances.
mybbqrules posted...
Not even close to a majority, but ok.

Votes for Trump in 2024: 75 million
American population in 2024: 340 million
And also, some of those who voted him may not have done so out of concerns for free speech.
(2025-02-24) Not changing my sig until I feel like it.
Proto_Spark posted...
The only saving grace seems to be Trump and like 90% of his administration are ****ing terrified of doing anything to actually risk their spot. Hitler and the nazis were at least willing to go to jail and die for the nazi-dom.

If we're "lucky" I could see the US largely just continuing as it is, Trump doing whatever he wants, and democrats pretending to do something but not doing anything. Trump can probably just say "no more elections" or rig the crap out of them and not need to have an "official" banning of the democrats or anything like that.

I genuinely, unironically, think that they will attack China by 2027 and use that as an excuse to call off elections.

You can see the battle lines being drawn for World War 3 right now. Russia is actively probing NATO/EU nations, China is eyeing Taiwan and waiting to see if the US will leave them in the lurch while strengthening their strategic infrastructure to avoid relying on the Strait of Malacca, and Israel's government is going completely feral in the Middle East.

Watching how insane the US got after Kirk's death (which was right after China had their huge parade) made me realize how fast we're accelerating towards... Something big. Might not be World War 3 but we're seeing the storm gather right now and it's going to get very bad very soon.

Trump's made hints that one of his methods for avoiding future elections is to use war as a cover to attempt to prevent them occurring (even complimenting Zelensky for doing it...)

If it isn't China it'll likely be a nation in the South America continent or Canada.
Currently Playing: Xenoblade X Definitive Edition (Switch), Fate/stay night Remastered (Switch), Arknights (Android)
M1Astray posted...
I genuinely, unironically, think that they will attack China by 2027 and use that as an excuse to call off elections.

You can see the battle lines being drawn for World War 3 right now. Russia is actively probing NATO/EU nations, China is eyeing Taiwan and waiting to see if the US will leave them in the lurch while strengthening their strategic infrastructure to avoid relying on the Strait of Malacca, and Israel's government is going completely feral in the Middle East.

Watching how insane the US got after Kirk's death (which was right after China had their huge parade) made me realize how fast we're accelerating towards... Something big. Might not be World War 3 but we're seeing the storm gather right now and it's going to get very bad very soon.

Trump's made hints that one of his methods for avoiding future elections is to use war as a cover to attempt to prevent them occurring (even complimenting Zelensky for doing it...)

If it isn't China it'll likely be a nation in the South America continent or Canada.
Mexico. Under the excuse of stopping the cartels.
Zikten posted...
Mexico. Under the excuse of stopping the cartels.
Yeah, Mexico seems like the most realistic option if Trump were to try and start a war to stay in power. Needs to be someone nearby enough to feel like it's "at home"; China isn't going to qualify for that, the US is fighting overseas wars all the time and it's never stopped elections, not even during WW2. But something right on the doorstep? He can try and play that off as "unprecedented". And realistically, he's going to see Mexico as both an easier and more justified target, and realistically, he's probably not wrong about the "easier" part at least. (Questioning which is "more justified" would imply that either is justified in the first place.)
(2025-02-24) Not changing my sig until I feel like it.
mybbqrules posted...
Not even close to a majority, but ok.

Votes for Trump in 2024: 75 million
American population in 2024: 340 million
"Its not entirely outright support, loads of people just don't lift a finger to oppose fascism " isn't the defense you think it is
^ Hey now that's completely unfair!
http://i.imgur.com/yPw05Ob.png
it's definitely Mexico that will be the target because it plays to racism, it plays to conservatives who have been demonizing mexico for decades as this drug fueled hellhole of savages and it plays to billionaires and trump's desire for more landmass and people to exploit for profit.

Through I'd like to think that if Trump attacks Mexico that Canada would immediately attack the US as a NATO ally but war is unpopular so the right wing of mexico would immediately use it to worm their way into power and back Trump up against mexico or simply sit there and let it happen not knowing or not caring that America winning in Mexico means they will turn around and attack Canada next because this administration will have committed so many war crimes there that the only way they stay in power and avoid jail time is to keep conflicts going
A worthless existence
Trumble posted...
Yeah, Mexico seems like the most realistic option if Trump were to try and start a war to stay in power. Needs to be someone nearby enough to feel like it's "at home"; China isn't going to qualify for that, the US is fighting overseas wars all the time and it's never stopped elections, not even during WW2. But something right on the doorstep? He can try and play that off as "unprecedented". And realistically, he's going to see Mexico as both an easier and more justified target, and realistically, he's probably not wrong about the "easier" part at least. (Questioning which is "more justified" would imply that either is justified in the first place.)
The elections of 1812 and 1864 weren't interrupted by the War of 1812 or the Civil War. Congressional elections in 1846-7 weren't interrupted by the Mexican-American War.
hivebent4life posted...
The majority of Americans view this man as a free speech advocate. The majority of Americans view this man as a strong tough manly man.
Neither of these statements are true and you know that.
Do you like books? Do you like games? Do you like books about games? Then you should buy my upcoming eBook!
https://books2read.com/u/38wqzO
such an advocate for free speech yet he censors anyone who dares to criticize him. i love the hypocrisy here...
Scardude posted...
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DOtaZMuDh4R/?igsh=N240c3ptdGd5NWdw

According to this guy. America is one step away to being in an authoritarian. The last step is one party rule.

There's one party rule right now. If what he means is banning other parties then that's incorrect. Most modern authoritarian states allow opposition parties to exist, they just aren't allowed to get enough seats to do anything. Russia, Hungary, Turkey, China, etc. all have opposition parties.
Favorite Games: BlazBlue: Central Fiction, Street Fighter III: Third Strike, Bayonetta, Bloodborne
thats a username you habe - chuckyhacksss
hivebent4life posted...
The majority of Americans
Nope. I still refuse to believe this. And no, people who didn't vote aren't automatically Trump supporters. That's stupid. You have to actively be supporting the guy to be a supporter of the guy. Ignorance and complacency are not support.
kind9 posted...
Nope. I still refuse to believe this. And no, people who didn't vote aren't automatically Trump supporters. That's stupid. You have to actively be supporting the guy to be a supporter of the guy. Ignorance and complacency are not support.

The majority who didn't vote would have voted for Trump.

https://www.npr.org/2025/06/26/nx-s1-5447450/trump-2024-election-non-voters-coalition

Even if everyone who is eligible to vote in the country would have voted, President Trump still would have won the 2024 presidential election, a new study out Thursday from the Pew Research Center finds.Trump won in 2024 with just under 50% of the vote, 49.7%-48.2% over Democrat Kamala Harris.
Roughly 64% of the eligible-voting population turned out in 2024, the second highest since 1904. 2020 was the highest.
But even if everyone who could vote did, Trump would have won by an even wider margin, 48%-45%, according to Pew's validated voters survey.
Favorite Games: BlazBlue: Central Fiction, Street Fighter III: Third Strike, Bayonetta, Bloodborne
thats a username you habe - chuckyhacksss
ssjevot posted...
The majority who didn't vote would have voted for Trump.

https://www.npr.org/2025/06/26/nx-s1-5447450/trump-2024-election-non-voters-coalition

Even if everyone who is eligible to vote in the country would have voted, President Trump still would have won the 2024 presidential election, a new study out Thursday from the Pew Research Center finds.Trump won in 2024 with just under 50% of the vote, 49.7%-48.2% over Democrat Kamala Harris.
Roughly 64% of the eligible-voting population turned out in 2024, the second highest since 1904. 2020 was the highest.
But even if everyone who could vote did, Trump would have won by an even wider margin, 48%-45%, according to Pew's validated voters survey.
Seems like a big "so what?" to me. What is the total population, how many of them voted, how many of them voted for Trump, how many of them would have voted for Trump? I didn't claim that people who didn't vote aren't still Trump supporters, I'm pointing out that they're not automatically Trump supporters, which is the claim.
ssjevot posted...
The majority who didn't vote would have voted for Trump.

https://www.npr.org/2025/06/26/nx-s1-5447450/trump-2024-election-non-voters-coalition
Not according to your article.

Pew asked non-voters how they would have voted and found they would have broken for Trump, 44%-40%.

If the majority of non-voters had voted for Trump, his percentage would've gone up, not down.
MLBloomy posted...
The elections of 1812 and 1864 weren't interrupted by the War of 1812 or the Civil War. Congressional elections in 1846-7 weren't interrupted by the Mexican-American War.
We both know that wont stop him trying. He probably doesnt even know about them.
(2025-02-24) Not changing my sig until I feel like it.
He's not going to use a war to stop elections. That involves too much effort. He's going to say "we need to ensure our elections are secure. We're temporarily delaying the elections until we can be confident that there will be no fraud" and then he never brings up the subject again.
"Something's wrong! Murder isn't working and that's all we're good at." ~Futurama
Wouldn't an actual tough guy just ignore the mean things people are saying about him? Wouldn't he not try to sue them and freeze out these kinds of opinions? Wouldn't he just continue doing his thing?
YUNASBFGIR posted...
Wouldn't an actual tough guy just ignore the mean things people are saying about him?

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." - Teddy Roosevelt, actual tough guy
Current Events » Trump claims it is illegal to be mean about him