Lurker > WingsOfGood

Doom_Art posted...

Dude you're doing that thing again. Chill out.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XMQC01n7hHo

so they gonna go to the mall and play nintendo and ps1 and then skate and then get fast food?

didn't see these 90s activities in the trailer

where is the McDonalds birthday party

MarcoRubio posted...

Not one of yours, I can tell you that

you just....did

1337toothbrush posted...

You don't need to make so many topics on this.

Then what topic would you click on, read, watch and then make a comment about?
hmm?

_____Cait posted...

What

Jiek_Fafn posted...

Please explain extra easily. What you said went over my head

watch the video then, maybe the dude does better job than me? Or too much work?

Dude could have made 500 MILLION dollars if he was pumping and dumping but he didn't sell anything.
If by Jun 21 GME goes under $25 he gets 0 ZERO he gets no money.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PPiZNXXbHkg

Now consider if the biggest buyer you would assume didn't sell, how does the stock keep going down? Answer is new shorts are being made.

And here is the kicker

Shorting it to get it under $25 is lucrative because it makes money off this guy not getting anything ever from his options

or perhaps I can explain it this way

let's say him posting that he bought these calls made GME go to $300

he don't have the stock yet, but he could exercise

however, what if as soon as he exercises it all goes back down?

you call it a pump and dump, this isn't how you do a pump and dump

but what he did is what people do everyday and shouldn't draw so much ire.
the fact that it has means there is something else here JUST LIKE THERE WAS WHEN GME SQUEEZED (note not saying this means any price action just saying there is something shady factually going on; even GME opponents admit etrade should LOVE to have this guy on their platform it would be a dream come true to absorb these young investors....and YET)

it is a FACT that GME was so ridiculously overshorting the SQUEEZE was a real event that Melvin CEO himself said in a congressional hearing that is why the price spiked, because the short interest was too high

and yet people will try and act like that is not a fact

I think people are upset some internet dudes actually figured stuff out, makes them feel dumb I guess?

proof it is a fact: not from superstonk or my word but literal congressional hearing of the dude who lost money saying it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=orMxmQyy_tA
timestamp 2mins 10 seconds

iGenesis posted...

Good, I hope he gets jail time. Classic pump & dump.

You understand he didn't buy the stock yet right?

He bought the future ability to buy the stock.

His future move would not be to dump but he would then buy the stock.

You guys literally have no idea what a pump and dump is it seems.
@iGenesis

The bigger subtext here is that e-trade likely doesn't have the stock to give to him when he exercises his right to buy

coyot posted...

Didnt Treytrades get sued along with the CEO of AMC?

AMC was sued for rigging the vote NOT in favor of the investors

https://www.reuters.com/legal/amc-meme-investors-face-off-court-over-stock-conversion-2023-06-28/

The company was sued in February for allegedly rigging a shareholder vote that would allow AMC to convert preferred stock to common stock and issue hundreds of millions of new shares.
The conversion would dilute the common stockholders' ownership, but allow AMC to pay down some of its $5.1 billion in debt.
AMC has told investors it is burning cash at an unsustainable rate and warned that an inability to raise capital could force the company into bankruptcy.
It cannot carry out its plan to do so until the litigation has been resolved. Objections to class action settlements are rare but the court received more than 2,800 objections to the agreement.

Also to note a difference between GME and AMC.

GME no longer has debt.
It infact now has a surplus of capital in the billions range.
Billion in cash on hand as it is called.

Things are going to get juicy :D

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/7/7e79821f.jpg

bump

Here is a funny.

Martin Shkreli hosted a space called GME haters and accidently spoke on speaker before it started.

"You know how citadel works, gotta scare the shit out of these people before the market opens"

https://x.com/lycos82/status/1798013516185763984?t=Qn6csXTjD2toM7WvaZycfQ

tracker for congressional trading

https://www.quiverquant.com/congresstrading/

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/a/a7301ba2.jpg

Also why nothing will come of this even if they think there might be a miniscule case.
Because if they punish him they will have to do these others and that can't happen.

But the tactic is to scare scare scare.
The idea is they think GME cultists will be scared if they throw around the idea of taking down roaringkitty, Seems out of touch.

1337toothbrush posted...

Does this count as market manipulation?:
https://www.morningstar.com/news/marketwatch/20240517203/citron-researchs-andrew-left-says-he-is-shorting-gamestop-again-after-his-2021-short-flopped

exactly

also why this very same guy says

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/4/43412d41.jpg

Same reason Warren Buffet can do it too.

fyi

CEO of Citron currently bought a bunch of shorts on GME and even they are like "yeah probably did nothing illegal"

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/4/43412d41.jpg

ironman2009 posted...

@WingsOfGood in shambles

??? How am I in shambles or do you think "investigating" means GUILTY

?

it is more like "we don't understand why FF7 was so beloved"

so they pull every stop possible hoping somewhere they replicate it

the irony being they could have easily just replicated it

Dungeater posted...

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/8/8c5af2b5.jpg

Dude has a migraime he should take some aspirin and see a doctor.

Irony posted...

TC is brave and stunning

Thanks

MICHALECOLE posted...

Holy shit now this is a controversial opinion

I dare you to say your favorite Terminator then

Gobstoppers12 posted...

Not for nothing, but posting reaction images like this is more or less equal to saying "bad opinion."

If you're sincerely rallying against low effort/lightly insulting replies, you might want to break this habit.

Gottem

Just never got better than that. 3 had some good scenes though.

Maybe 80s not having tons of digital renderings just made it better?

Dot fuck em up

Ima do my stuff

Dungeater posted...

just coming in and adversarially posting "bad opinion" like ur some authority is just so goddamn rude and egotistical. i wish u guys could just be normal

Why do you think people make topics like these? For an epic cordial "ah yes, ethereal sister I daresay your opinion, I must consider for many days, ahem"?

emblem-man posted...

You can both pay property taxes to the govt for land, while still owning the property is my point.

You basically have no choice or you lose your house, so..yes?
But it shouldn't be this way. There are other ways to do taxes. Issue is those ways effect the very wealthy more than the poor.
This way effects the poor more which is why it is often considered to be sooo good.

It also helps the wealthy because it frees up prime real estate they can afford and displaces that family elsewhere increasing all real estate.

Fyi if you got a lot of money you can throw it in the bank for a return higher than your mortgage and property taxes.
Rich can do this poor cannot.
To the rich this tax barely exists.
So they love it.

Dungeater posted...

"bad opinion"

"tag checks out"

do u guys even hear urselves

what happened to "i disagree" and shit

Lmao what? Since when can someone opinion not be bad?

AceMos posted...

i hope this encourages more youtubers to vet their sponsors

Lol

That will never happen

Bad opinion

Good cause physical switch ver is hard to find.

emblem-man posted...

Property rights can/should exist through the form of the contract of rent/ownership.

This Feudalism. We already had a long periods tasting the negatives of this.

Yet here you are arguing for it.

emblem-man posted...

Bro, you're the one that wants to increase property taxes ONLY on multiple home owners, who would be the ones renting property to low income people. And those landlord would then pass on those cost increases to the renters.

And I'M the one who supports feudalism? Lol.

Yes. Because we own land we buy not the government.
They cannot enter the property without a warrant. Even that is more or less an agreement about lethal force than their actual right to enter.
If you rent they can do whatever the fuck they want. The right of property is Fundamental to the American government.

The suggestion we should all rent from the government is Fedualism.
Tech companies want to be the Lord's who are the good boys who own the serfs and kindly let them exist and breed on borrowed lands.

emblem-man posted...

most low income people don't even have a house, and are instead renters.

And they never will because property tax kills the few who break through into ownership but that is ok?

Tyranthraxus posted...

Yep. There's families in New York that are having to sell their home of 3 generations because they can't afford the tax. It's bullshit. Property taxes should only be applied to things that aren't primary residences.

But the wealthy don't like that. They flipping all these homes makimg moolah and don't want to have to pay more. "Make the families suffer!"

And what is worse is these families forced to leave will raise the price of some other neighborhood.
It all goes up and never stops.

So this movie about how Rome was built by Xenomorphs?

ItsNotA2Mer posted...

It absolutely matters. Raising taxes more negatively impacts certain people/groups of people than others.
And the fact that you don't want to answer that question is proof positive that it does in fact matter.

If he happens to be wealthy makes more sense the "i'm ok with you just renting" comment as techbros LOOOOVE the idea of Feudalism coming back.

Us knowing about it means they most likely gave it to the cops.

The cycle.goes on and on.

Soon it will die and another takes it place only to repeat the same deathblow.

emblem-man posted...

As it should be.

So you have no understanding of the American government and the right of property? Got it.

the irony is that buy forcing property tax you actually force the sell of a house that went from say $30,000 to multi-millions to hit the market because of the unaffordable tax to people whose lifestyle literally didn't change but now they have to move

"oh good it hits the market!" actually not good. the sell will further increases the prices as it is bought up by some investment company

you also then displace these people who will take the proceeds and seek a cheaper area and push those prices up

If you have only one house it shouldn't be taxed.

Property tax is simply rent.

Why they tax everyone is so they don't have to EXTRA tax the people actually flipping houses which is what SHOULD be done.

now do scotty version

lmao this is familiar

see even scumbag CITRON CEO knows Kitty did nothing illegal he literally just does what Warren Buffet does like everyday (he even compares it and says the difference is it went up when Buffet did it LMAO)

LMAO

fyi this guy is currently shorting GME that is why he wants to FUD the stock, but even a guy like him has to admit nothing illegal

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/4/43412d41.jpg

This was said before congress in the GME hearings:

Also of note was NBC edited out his full 10 minute speech from the livestream.
This was noted by Dennis himself on Better Markets:
https://bettermarkets.org/newsroom/cnbc-posts-edited-video-house-financial-services-gamestop-hearing-deleting-dennis-kelleher/

March 23, 2021
CNBC Posts Edited Video from House Financial Services GameStop Hearing, Deleting Dennis Kellehers Key Testimony Criticizing Citadel

CNBC Posts Edited Video from House Financial Services GameStop Hearing,
Deleting Dennis Kellehers Key Testimony Criticizing Citadel
Washington, D.C. Dennis M. Kelleher, President and Chief Executive Officer of Better Markets, issued the following statement in response to revelations that CNBC omitted one key part of the recent U.S. House Financial Services Committee (HFSC) hearing on GameStop and related issues. CNBCs deleted footage included Kellehers call for the Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC) to examine whether to designate Citadel Securities (Citadel) as systemically important, given the firms substantial presence throughout the U.S. equities and options markets. Such a designation, if made, would subject Citadel to substantial additional regulatory scrutiny.
A side-by-side comparison of CNBCs incomplete version of the hearing and the official complete version released by the U.S. House Financial Services Committee confirms this deletion: Compare the video posted by HFSC (includes Kellehers full comments on the need to carefully scrutinize Citadel) with the video posted by CNBC (which abruptly cuts off Kellehers comments and inexplicably jumps ahead approximately 10 minutes).
CNBC always rolls out the welcome mat for Citadel and its founder Ken Griffin, but rarely, if ever, is any criticism of them ever allowed on CNBC. That is not by accident; that is an editorial decision to only present one side of these key issues facing the country related to our financial markets and the economy. We do not know if that is the reason CNBC posted an edited version of the video of the House Financial Services Committees March 17 GameStop hearing or if it is a remarkable coincidence. We do know that, out of more than four hours of the hearing, CNBC deleted a part in the middle of the hearing that included the most direct, pointed criticism of Citadel.
Specifically, I testified that FSOC should review Citadels wide-ranging activities in the financial markets to determine if it should be designated and regulated as a systemically significant nonbank. Citadel is a gigantic, interconnected financial firm, but it is non-transparent and unregulated in critical respects, preventing effective oversight and accountability. Thats why it is vital for Main Street Americans and retail investors to know whether or not it is a systemically significant firm, whether it poses a threat to the financial system and economy, and whether it should be regulated more comprehensively. CNBCs viewers, however, would not know those critical issues were pointedly discussed at the hearing or deleted from the video CNBC posted. CNBC should immediately restore the deleted parts of the video.
To hear Kellehers concerns about Citadels substantial presence in the financial markets without the regulatory oversight necessary to protect investors and markets, visit this link. However, Kellehers following comments, directly responding to a Republican witnesss unqualified defense of Citadel, during the hearing capture the essence of his concerns:
If Citadel shut down today, even for a day, that means 26 percent of all U.S. equities volume in 8,900 listed securities would stop. It executes 47 percent of all U.S. listed retail volume. It represents 99 percent of the traded volume of 3,000 listed options. To say that the system would work perfectly fine if all that evaporated today and competitors would come into the marketthat may ultimately happenbut until it ultimately happens, youre going to have a systemic event. And to deny that is to deny reality.
Here is the official recording from HFSC, and here is the recording posted by CNBC. For more information on Citadel, refer to this Better Markets Citadel Fact Sheet and this Payment For Order Flow Fact Sheet.
Better Markets is a non-profit, non-partisan, and independent organization founded in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis to promote the public interest in the financial markets, support the financial reform of Wall Street and make our financial system work for all Americans again. Better Markets works with allies including many in finance to promote pro-market, pro-business and pro-growth policies that help build a stronger, safer financial system that protects and promotes Americans jobs, savings, retirements and more. To learn more, visit www.bettermarkets.com.

What did he say?

If Citadel shut down today, even for a day, that means 26 percent of all U.S. equities volume in 8,900 listed securities would stop. It executes 47 percent of all U.S. listed retail volume. It represents 99 percent of the traded volume of 3,000 listed options. To say that the system would work perfectly fine if all that evaporated today and competitors would come into the marketthat may ultimately happenbut until it ultimately happens, youre going to have a systemic event. And to deny that is to deny reality.

If something, say GME poses risk to Citadel because they are idiots, then that something poses risk to 26% of all USA securities.
Facts like this makes some APES wonder if the glitch yesterday was not a glitch.

All the fertile young keep getting Isekai'd

give us a game that is just fighting in waffle house

some dudes asking is it even legal for e trade to disclose that he is a client?

that might be an ez pz lawsuit for him to win more money to burn on GME

you are the product now not windows

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/6/6bc4c87d.jpg

If true would be wild and sign of another squeeze perhaps

Board_hunter567 posted...

What do you think happens to his June 21st calls on June 21st?

some dudes saying e-trade is spooked cause they don't actually have enough of the stock

of course this is the general GME discourse that they are overshorting such that they loan the stock out at a percentage higher than what exists

so him wanting to buy a ton if they don't have it in this idea would cause them to be defcient