Lurker > omniryu

Talk about short sighted, and you wanna play the what if game. You can go down the what if rabbit hole all god damn day for both parties involved, but what we see now from the body cam footage is a cop standing in front of the car, the car slowly accelerating, and the cop choosing to kill her instead of getting out of the way.

Multiple posters have said just that. So why are you ignoring that just to continue to argue.

Please show where his life was in danger in the video. We'll wait...

If we stick with your principle, anyone accused of even a minor crime is subject to summary execution If they do not immediately surrender.

You know Judge Dredd is dystopian fiction, don't you?

She very very clearly turned the wheel enough to demonstrate that she couldn't run the cop over from where he was standing. His life wasn't threatened.

Because the action of shooting her is the action under scrutiny. Any reasonable person can look at this and see that while she DID break the law the serious life ending force being used here doesn't make sense. It should have never gotten to this point.

Let the woman go, add to her charges when she gets caught, and don't escalate this to a deadly force situation.

Did she make him stand in front of the car? If she did force him to stand in front of the car then why didn't the other cop stand in front of the car too?

Was that the right call for the cop in this situation? Absolutely fucking not.

The cops should be held accountable for standing in front of her car, creating a dangerous situation where they "had to" shoot her.

What are you talking about? Everyone said she should have gotten out but that doesn't make the cops actions correct. He's the trained professional here and he needlessly escalated the situation when it's his job to do the opposite.

• Ohio, Kroger (a grocery store)
• Young lady was parked with the car facing outward (she reversed in)
• She is supposedly 7 months pregnant.
• I believe someone called the cops on her accusing her of stealing an alcohol bottle (drinking?) I will look further into it.
• The car was not moving.
• At least two police officer. One was by the driver side another was in front of the car.
• The one by the driver side repeatedly knock on the door requesting the lady to get out.
• She said, "for what? No I am not". Refusing to comply.
• Someone said they heard her say, "what are you going to do? Shoot me? Please tell me if you hear it, I didn't. Will edit this out once we get confirmation.
• She attempted to drive off
• Police officer in front shoots, but the video is cut off before we hear or see it.

If your employer is micromanaging you to the point of counting keystrokes, and thinking that qualifies as "work," then nothing about this was fair.

Those are employers who know fuck-all except metrics, which have nothing to do with the job.

yet constantly they want to paint me as a UFO chaser, when I am more skeptical than they are

says who?
all the supposed study did was confirm they weren't human at least according to a layman that being Grusch as far as biology goes

People who keep saying it could be some dead animals are wrong. Grusch said nonhuman biologics, which are engineered or manufactured complex chains of molecules. Nonhuman meaning it was not manufactured or engineered by us. So I wouldnt be giving much weight to the words of low information skeptics with low credibility on this topic.

I couldn't find the thing I originally read. It may have been wrong. When I searched it I didn't find a lot of great sources but I'll share what I found.

https://www.livescience.com/58602-do-cats-dogs-have-long-term-memories.html
https://www.dailypaws.com/cats-kittens/behavior/cat-psychology/do-cats-remember-people

What I'm getting from these is that cats are good at remembering things that are related to their survival, like memories involving food or involving people they've directly interacted with. Other things aren't necessarily going to stick with them as well. The first article also notes that it depends on the age of the cat as well.

Guess he just decided not to come, I dunno. There were some reserved seats for people who never made it to the hearing. Maybe he was one of them. I wasn't looking for him in the audience to see if he was really there.

I do know there were former FBI and CIA directors there though

That is why you investigate.

So is it people thinking congress just believes this guy and won't followup on anything? Not sure how this compares to fake Nintendo Switch 2.

You've made your point but, the Department of Defense and Intelligence Community Inspector General already acknowledged Grusch's claims as credible, so they gave him the go-ahead to Congress. That's how he got to this stage in the first place

Who is us??

Who is us??

I just wanted to report on this and man so many people wanted to let it be known they were so enlightened to not believe any of this! It is like, they don't want it to be talked about, reported on or discussed despite it being a real current event important members of congress like AOC have participated in.

Was 3 dudes at the hearing and he supposedly is giving congress more names of people who will talk if they are protected.

Like guys isn't that hard to read the most basic info about this.

Probably because when you make the biggest scientific claim in the history of the human race then you better have some pretty fucking compelling evidence.

They're probably counting events like this.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mantell_UFO_incident?wprov=sfla1

1. Why do these aliens keep "crash landing" on earth?
2. Who in the hell gets killed by a UAP?
3. Why does he get government clearance to speak on topics.
4. If this has been going on for decades then why haven't any of those decade old documents been released or cleared?
5. Why haven't been investigated on who told him this information?
6. Are you keeping an open mind this could be a hoax, a study on how society would react on a possibilities of aliens?
7. Why have we not had any "caught in 4K" evidence? Black folks where saying for decades that police were beating them and guess what? "They caught it in 4K"
8. Again, if you really think about it you would need a huge team of varies discipline to work on this project

• Linguistics
• Biologist
• Engineers
• Physicist
• Heck Maybe even chemist

If said technology actually existed it could take potentially decades to reverse engineer.

What do you mean, "who"? Simply an ex of mine. Great person but emotional regulation issues that I couldn't handle, even more so than my emotional issues (I have autism).

She remains one of my favorite people.

Lol. I had a two year relationship end about 4 months into Covid. But we had everything in common, but our personalities clashed because too similar. She is still my friend as a result.

I want a high end dinner. I like high end dinners. Thats why when I was single, those are the dates I would do. And yeah, unless they insisted otherwise, I would pay. And that was fine.

I think the issue is that far too many people see a date or relationship or whatever as a simplified transaction. I dont see it that way.

I think if theyre stringing you along for a meal ticket youll find out soon enough. Just try to have some fun in the mean time.

At the end of the day, paying for a meal here and there isnt going to be a problem unless youre seriously hard up.

Ive never really understood an aversion to paying on a date. If youre going on a date, that should be because you want to. If you want to go on the date, whats the issue with paying?

But I could still argue that my way quickly finds out what type of women you are dealing with.

Regardless, most women I dated made sure I was NOT a conservative before the first date. Also, I swiped left if any conservative red flags in their profiles.

Ya, people need to realize that things change when the weather is extreme.
It can cost you significant health risks.

Learn to flex, all is not usual in extreme weather.

People are rather disconnected nowadays though.

Twin Cities, MN

I now realize that this could make a difference. Things vary.

I agree with this:

"The person who does the asking should assume they will get the bill"

But not that it is an "expectation". I know that seems like a tiny nuance, but it is an important one to me. I already gave my reasoning for why I did it, and why I think it is in the best interest of men to do so.

And once again, almost none of my dates actually "expected" me to do so. This is why I don't buy that "hypocrisy of feminism" BS. It typically is NOT the same women who are actually feminists and the women who expect to have a free meal. I have almost exclusively dated feminists (I do not like conservatives much, men or women), and they did not expect me to pay. I simply did, and I did it in a courteous way and it did not seem I then expected sex in return, because I didn't.

Misogyny detected! Lol

1. I want to break gender role and have a high paying job - feminism, which is cool
2. A man must have to pay for a date - part of the patriarchy submitting to gender role norm.

Me and my wife split the first date. I bought dinner, and the parking, while she had bought the tickets to the concert (oak ridge boys). While the tickets were a Christmas gift from her to me, right after that we decided screw it, lets make it our first date.

Why do I get this feeling that some of the posters in this thread are a week or two away from saying stuff like "Dating is the same as prostitution. I should get sex if I'm paying for a date."

It's super good for debugging but at times it'll make up commands that don't exist and will stubbornly stand by it till you copypaste the documentation to prove it wrong.

There's a glimmer of hope that it won't totally replace developers, but it damn well will contract the market. It can only get better from here.

If someone is wealthy they should always pay for everyone, maybe even throw in a free car too

It tells me the only way they can grace me with their presence if they can get something free out of me which says a lot where I stand to them.

You're only seeing what is presented in front of you on the internet which not indicative of the actual dating pool. It's like watching the news seeing robberies being reported and then thinking robberies are happening at a much higher rate than it is.

I'm not saying there aren't people like that, there are, but you just move on and find someone else. When you start dwelling on that one bad date or person and try to apply that to the wider group, it's pathetic and weird. There are guys who have weird entitlements when it comes to dating too.

im a lesbian so its not something that comes up

Bay Area

McDonald's

First few dates I'd always assume I'm going to pay. If they pull out their wallet, I won't stop them.

Also I've never had any issues splitting the bill on dates

PA, NP, MD or DO?