Lurker > DarkTransient

They can have all the opinions they like, and express them when not performing however they feel is appropriate (obviously, within the limitations of the law).

However, when they're at a match, they're working. Their job is not to push political statements.

Basically, I'm all for telling them to "keep it to themself" when they're playing a match; once they're on their spare time, they can do whatever the hell they like.
---

http://www.facebook.com/loaocos/

TheGrindery posted...

RebelElite791 posted...

DarkTransient posted...

you're still missing out on literally every other aspect of the music. It's simply not a suitable form of entertainment for someone in her position

Deaf people can and do enjoy music. This is a really uninformed statement lol.

How? Do they feel the vibrations or something? What do you think her favorite song is? Massage chair?

You seem to have overlooked that that was a RebelElite791 post.
---

http://www.facebook.com/loaocos/

I have no idea how many old banned accounts I've got, although the last one went down 3+ years ago.
---

http://www.facebook.com/loaocos/

As an Eminem fan, and someone who could loosely be defined as a Trump supporter (although only in the sense of "Hillary would have been even worse")... he has every right to think that, but he's wrong.
---

http://www.facebook.com/loaocos/

Completely ridiculous. Even if you have an interpreter to tell you what the lyrics are saying, you're still missing out on literally every other aspect of the music. It's simply not a suitable form of entertainment for someone in her position; and trying to use disability accomodation laws for this kind of purpose is plain and simply abusing them for nothing beyond "Look at me, I got muh way."
---

http://www.facebook.com/loaocos/

BLAKUboy posted...

When you have no other argument, just call your opposition "Fake news".

(Despite that two other arguments were presented in the very same post, AND that that site is well known for bias.)
---

http://www.facebook.com/loaocos/

The data also showed that black voters were more likely to make use of early voting particularly the first seven days out of North Carolina's 17-day voting period. So lawmakers eliminated these seven days of voting. "After receipt of this racial data, the General Assembly amended the bill to eliminate the first week of early voting, shortening the total early voting period from seventeen to ten days," the court found.

... you mean you REALLY don't realise that they'll just vote in what becomes the new "first 7 days"?

Most strikingly, the judges point to a "smoking gun" in North Carolina's justification for the law, proving discriminatory intent. The state argued in court that "counties with Sunday voting in 2014 were disproportionately black" and "disproportionately Democratic," and said it did away with Sunday voting as a result.

"Thus, in what comes as close to a smoking gun as we are likely to see in modern times, the States very justification for a challenged statute hinges explicitly on race specifically its concern that African Americans, who had overwhelmingly voted for Democrats, had too much access to the franchise," the judges write in their decision.

As wrong as it is, it's pretty clear this is an attempt to reduce votes for their opponent, rather than to reduce votes by people of a specific race.

And, the biggest evidence that your claim is full of shit and going to be very biased towards the "everything is racism" cries:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/

---

http://www.facebook.com/loaocos/

KillerKhan420 posted...

(b7)

I mean, even if we ignore that you're being blatantly racist now rather than saying anything that's based in fact... if anyone is willing to "just steal", why wouldn't they "just steal" from the liquor shop too?
---

http://www.facebook.com/loaocos/

RebelElite791 posted...

DarkTransient posted...

Conflict posted...

It's funny seeing all these random joke alts pop up out of nowhere. Both TC and that guy.

"Someone doesn't agree with my bullshit, must be a troll alt."

Yep, watch out everyone, we have a genius here.

New User User Since: Jan 2018

Right, my bad. I forgot that in the recent rule changes they also added "You can't create a new account unless you already have another one."
---

http://www.facebook.com/loaocos/

Conflict posted...

It's funny seeing all these random joke alts pop up out of nowhere. Both TC and that guy.

"Someone doesn't agree with my bullshit, must be a troll alt."

Yep, watch out everyone, we have a genius here.
---

http://www.facebook.com/loaocos/

I mean, Democrats are the ones encouraging minorities to just go on welfare, to spend their time protesting instead of making something of their lives; they're the ones trying to convince minorities that everyone else is out to get them when the majority of people really couldn't care less who or what you are; heck, Democrats are the ones who tried to prevent the end of slavery. But sure, Republicans are the racists.
---

http://www.facebook.com/loaocos/

Conflict posted...

In other words you don't understand definitions

Those terms literally get thrown around before the relevant statuses of the people involved are known, half the time. If that doesn't make you realise that they're simply using them as buzzwords, then---*gets b7*
---

http://www.facebook.com/loaocos/

littlebro07 posted...

Zikten posted...

Disrespector posted...

Trumpanzees don't read. They just parrot whatever Breitbart/Fox news tells them to say.

the feud between the 2 sides is never going to end if people like you won't stop saying such ignorant things.

I mean he wouldn't have to say it if it wasn't true in a lot of cases. Obviously not all Trump supporters are morons incapable of thinking for themselves. Unfortunately most of the vocal ones are, which makes the rest of you poor bastards look bad.

You're not wrong, but
> implying liberals aren't exactly the same, just with different publications
---

http://www.facebook.com/loaocos/

If the girl is outright underage, then older man dating younger woman seems more looked down on (when compared to an older woman dating an underage man).

If not, usually, it's the older woman / younger man that's more looked down on.
---

http://www.facebook.com/loaocos/

Darklit_Minuet posted...

If stores locked up all haircare products, they it'd be fine.

If stores specifically lock up black haircare products, they're basically saying "black people are thieves and we don't trust them" and thus are racist

If you're defining a haircare product that can literally be used by anyone as "black" in the first place, maybe you're the racist.
---

http://www.facebook.com/loaocos/

Pretty much every "ism" is meaningless these days, thanks to liberals accusing literally everything of being some form of -ism. They don't even so much as indicate that the race / gender / sexuality / disability / whatever's applicable of the people involved is known; that's how quick liberals are to throw those terms around.
---

http://www.facebook.com/loaocos/

-Gavirulax- posted...

Although one insists on dating an asshole - can relate somewhat.

Would have been a million times funnier if you said "fucking an asshole".
---

http://www.facebook.com/loaocos/

Fun fact: Gavirulax has a pretty hot sister.
---

http://www.facebook.com/loaocos/

All joking aside, the rules on GameFAQs have always been a fucking joke. Or rather - the rules themself have always been good, but the way they're enforced has always been a joke. It's nothing new; all that happened was a rule change.
---

http://www.facebook.com/loaocos/

Questionmarktarius posted...

DarkTransient posted...

Knowledge_King posted...

You realize the point isn't 'poor drug dealers' but that drug users and dealers will be disproportionately targeted and affected when in majority black areas right? It's just saying the law is being applied in a racist way.

Liberal: "This law is racist."
Everyone else: "No, it's not, here's why."
Liberal: "Okay but it's being applied in a racist way."
Everyone else: "No it isn't, here's proof."
Liberal: "Uh, the original intent behind it was still racist!"

Doesn't matter how many times you show them they're wrong, they'll just either change the claim, or just accuse your response of being fake. When they can no longer do either, they just disappear and move onto calling something else racist (or sexist, or whatever).

This is clearly sexist, because it's incarcerating a disproportionate number of men.

(am i doing it right?)

Almost, but generally when crying "sexism" it's important to claim it's sexist against women. Ways around this include claiming it's only sexist against trans-men; or finding a way to claim "it affects men but the root cause is still misogyny".

You're doing well, though.
---

http://www.facebook.com/loaocos/

A_Good_Boy posted...

DarkTransient posted...

A_Good_Boy posted...

DarkTransient posted...

Knowledge_King posted...

You realize the point isn't 'poor drug dealers' but that drug users and dealers will be disproportionately targeted and affected when in majority black areas right? It's just saying the law is being applied in a racist way.

Liberal: "This law is racist."
Everyone else: "No, it's not, here's why."
Liberal: "Okay but it's being applied in a racist way."
Everyone else: "No it isn't, here's proof."
Liberal: "Uh, the original intent behind it was still racist!"

Doesn't matter how many times you show them they're wrong, they'll just either change the claim, or just accuse your response of being fake. When they can no longer do either, they just disappear and move onto calling something else racist (or sexist, or whatever).

*Looks at the plethora of overturned voter ID laws

Yeah OK buddy.

Yes, because requiring proof of citizenship in order to vote in an election that only citizens are allowed to vote in is totally racist.

Go tell the courts that.

Go tell the courts that everything you're claiming is racist (and they disagree) is. ;)
---

http://www.facebook.com/loaocos/

A_Good_Boy posted...

DarkTransient posted...

Knowledge_King posted...

You realize the point isn't 'poor drug dealers' but that drug users and dealers will be disproportionately targeted and affected when in majority black areas right? It's just saying the law is being applied in a racist way.

Liberal: "This law is racist."
Everyone else: "No, it's not, here's why."
Liberal: "Okay but it's being applied in a racist way."
Everyone else: "No it isn't, here's proof."
Liberal: "Uh, the original intent behind it was still racist!"

Doesn't matter how many times you show them they're wrong, they'll just either change the claim, or just accuse your response of being fake. When they can no longer do either, they just disappear and move onto calling something else racist (or sexist, or whatever).

*Looks at the plethora of overturned voter ID laws

Yeah OK buddy.

Yes, because requiring proof of citizenship in order to vote in an election that only citizens are allowed to vote in is totally racist.
---

http://www.facebook.com/loaocos/

CrimsonRage posted...

Mal_Fet posted...

CrimsonRage posted...

i love how the right is suddenly okay with firing someone over words

An employer should have the right to fire any of their employees for any reason. That's not against the freedom of speech.

yet you still get mad when somebody gets fired for a politically incorrect facebook post

Thinking someone should have the legal right to do something, and thinking it's actually the right thing to do, are two very different things.
---

http://www.facebook.com/loaocos/

shockthemonkey posted...

DarkTransient posted...

Socialism supporters in Western countries don't genuinely believe that things should be free; just that they should be able to force someone else to pay for things they want instead of paying for it themself.

Account made in Jan 2018

"Well I can't find any flaw in your argument BUT OOH LOOK YOUR ACCOUNT ISN'T VERY OLD, GUESS I WIN."
---

http://www.facebook.com/loaocos/

Knowledge_King posted...

You realize the point isn't 'poor drug dealers' but that drug users and dealers will be disproportionately targeted and affected when in majority black areas right? It's just saying the law is being applied in a racist way.

Liberal: "This law is racist."
Everyone else: "No, it's not, here's why."
Liberal: "Okay but it's being applied in a racist way."
Everyone else: "No it isn't, here's proof."
Liberal: "Uh, the original intent behind it was still racist!"

Doesn't matter how many times you show them they're wrong, they'll just either change the claim, or just accuse your response of being fake. When they can no longer do either, they just disappear and move onto calling something else racist (or sexist, or whatever).
---

http://www.facebook.com/loaocos/

Socialism supporters in Western countries don't genuinely believe that things should be free; just that they should be able to force someone else to pay for things they want instead of paying for it themself.
---

http://www.facebook.com/loaocos/

If you are dealing with a situation where there is known to be an armed offender, if someone has a gun and does not comply with orders to put it down immediately, you shoot them. Better them than yourself. Black, white, cop, civilian, doesn't matter.
---

http://www.facebook.com/loaocos/

Where's the "exactly the same" option?
---

http://www.facebook.com/loaocos/

CirocObama posted...

damn do bees eat honey? I thought they ate nectar and puked up honey.

Their young eat it.
---

http://www.facebook.com/loaocos/

OP
---

http://www.facebook.com/loaocos/

shockthemonkey posted...

DarkTransient posted...

BruceWayneJr posted...

Republicans only care when Dems in charge. Otherwise, it's a free-for-all (white guys).

(Nevermind that literally the next strongest contender for the Republican nomination after Trump was a black guy...)

...you werent actually paying attention during the primary, were you?

Oh right. He's not a "real" black guy because he supports Republican policies, rather than the Democrat ones that are designed to keep blacks down while claiming to be supporting them.
---

http://www.facebook.com/loaocos/

BruceWayneJr posted...

Republicans only care when Dems in charge. Otherwise, it's a free-for-all (white guys).

(Nevermind that literally the next strongest contender for the Republican nomination after Trump was a black guy...)
---

http://www.facebook.com/loaocos/

Name one administration that hasn't squandered money on bullshit. Hiring and firing is simply Trump's choice of how to do so.
---

http://www.facebook.com/loaocos/

Found the vegan.
---

http://www.facebook.com/loaocos/

Kaname_Madoka posted...

DarkTransient posted...

That site needs to hurry up and accept my game. It'd be a really good contender for the "hardest boss" category, even if they slap a "must be fair" requirement on it (and nothing else, except the joke categories maybe).

what

I assume you're referring to rpgmaker.net and their Misao awards, right?
---

http://www.facebook.com/loaocos/

That site needs to hurry up and accept my game. It'd be a really good contender for the "hardest boss" category, even if they slap a "must be fair" requirement on it (and nothing else, except the joke categories maybe).
---

http://www.facebook.com/loaocos/

Axiom posted...

Eh I have sigs turned off and I donno how a link to a facebook account would prove anything but I'll say my bad anyway. The cucks thing was definitely a lot newer than 3 years ago though

Not directly. But it's a page for an RPG Maker VX Ace project of my own creation, which I also had linked in my previous account's sig, and have also posted about (including that link) in several other places around the internet. All put together, that'd be a pretty bad move for a troll alt. This is my only GameFAQs account that meets either of (a) been used in the last 5 years or so, or (b) isn't banned or closed.
---

http://www.facebook.com/loaocos/

DarkTransient posted...

gnomefromnome posted...

JustMonika posted...

I don't remember cucks being a major thing on CE 3 years ago.

I think it was neckbeards?

I remember when that was a thing too, yeah. Remember that "Neckbeard" story someone (I forget their username now, aside from that it was a female user) was writing but never finished? Was kinda disappointed when they abandoned it tbh.

Username was MambaGrillzYo. I literally still have a PDF copy of it on my old Google Drive account. xD
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5f9dN9_Mn5lYTJvaWZ5M1k5d1U
---

http://www.facebook.com/loaocos/

gnomefromnome posted...

JustMonika posted...

I don't remember cucks being a major thing on CE 3 years ago.

I think it was neckbeards?

I remember when that was a thing too, yeah. Remember that "Neckbeard" story someone (I forget their username now, aside from that it was a female user) was writing but never finished? Was kinda disappointed when they abandoned it tbh.
---

http://www.facebook.com/loaocos/

Axiom posted...

DarkTransient posted...

Everyone's still obsessed with cucks.

Yeah this is BS that was far more recent than 3 years ago and basically proves you're yet another alt someone is using to shitpost

I mean, given that the link in my sig was also in my last account's sig, and that the game that page is about is also mentioned by accounts under names easily connected to me (at least to my online identity, not my IRL one as such), I'd be doing a pretty shit job of hiding my identity...
---

http://www.facebook.com/loaocos/

Pretty much what REMercsChamp said, although I might give them food.

And there was this one time a homeless guy came to me and straight up said "Can you spare a dollar for me towards some beers?" Simply because of his honesty, I gave him a bit.
---

http://www.facebook.com/loaocos/

DarkTransient posted...

Reis posted...

JustMonika posted...

I don't remember cucks being a major thing on CE 3 years ago.

It wasn't

I might be remembering how long ago it was a bit wrong, but it was definitely a major thing when I was last here. Hold up, I'll try and see how long ago my last account was active.

From what I can tell, it was even longer than this - about 5 years ago.
---

http://www.facebook.com/loaocos/

Reis posted...

JustMonika posted...

I don't remember cucks being a major thing on CE 3 years ago.

It wasn't

I might be remembering how long ago it was a bit wrong, but it was definitely a major thing when I was last here. Hold up, I'll try and see how long ago my last account was active.
---

http://www.facebook.com/loaocos/

armandro posted...

@DarkTransient

you can do that now

Oh, that's pretty cool! :O
---

http://www.facebook.com/loaocos/

MC_BatCommander posted...

weapon_d00d816 posted...

I think it's funny how feminists scour the world for shit they can get faux-pissed off at.

I find it funnier when people don't even read the headline in the linked article

After reading the headline, I'd say his post is still 100% valid in relation to this article.
---

http://www.facebook.com/loaocos/

DeanAuryn posted...

I dont see any fucking problem.

It wasn't a complaint so much as an observation.
---

http://www.facebook.com/loaocos/

We still have UnfairRepresent making misleading ultra-liberal clickbaity posts with news links.

We still have Mal_Fet doing the same but with ultra-conservative stuff.

Everyone still gives a shit about 500 topics.

Everyone's still obsessed with cucks.

Being a "sigless user" is still a big deal.

The only thing that seems to have changed is the URL.
---

http://www.facebook.com/loaocos/