Lurker > JE19426

What are you playing on, why's it look like that

You think women aren't randomly harrased and insulted for no reason on the street/internet?

You're sheltered

Musk is a douche but going "You insulted me bro! Imma sue you!" is a horrible attitude, it's sad that brits are chomping at the bit to do it now.

If people could sue every ignorant bastard who insulted them for no reason then all sexy women would be billionaires and half of black people in America would be millionaires.

Seriously dude just Google 'theresa may love actually'

It has nothing to do with saying anything good about her either.

oops. I forgot to mention the welldone steak and the two scoops of ice cream

hate Trump because Hillary's emails got hacked therefore making the election invalid...

Weinstein rapes women, WTF is wrong with the DNC?

then you should probably be carrying a bag of some sort.

You mean to tell me that Sadiq Kahn participating in a gender-segregated event organized by Islamic extremists was purely by happenstance?

I literally quoted the article backing up the statement.

the companies that own these stations are called media conglomerates, they provide what they say for the national news.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_conglomerate

here are some that own local newstations
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nexstar_Media_Group
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Knight_Broadcasting

did you guys really think that local news wasn't owned by another company?

How many media companies aren't owned by a larger media company? like 1% of them? I doubt any news station isn't owned by a larger company

Nope.

They buy articles from the associated press.

Unrelated, but not as much as you'd think. The turd is a well-known Hamas sympathiser.
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/mayor/sadiq-khan-shared-platform-with-five-islamic-extremists-a3231436.html

Dude, youre not reading that right. Do you seriously think the burden of proof goes down if you dispute early? They are saying that debts accrue from day 1. Child maintenance is the debt, and that debt builds up if you sit on your hands.

No. Read page 6. You need conclusive evidence.

You have to provide conclusive evidence, which is pretty hard for a man outside of a DNA test.

And you cant be serious with that second part.

They can request a court order which I already said was possible.

Just so the double standard is clear to you, keep the following in mind. If a man refuses a paternity test, he is automatically assumed to be the father and has to pay.

If a person named as the parent of a child disputes parentage, but then refuses to take a DNA test, we will presume they are the childs parent. This means they will have to pay child maintenance.

But as I stated above, if the mother blocks the test, then the man has to fight in court to possibly get a paternity test done.

Yeah that looks to confirm what the other government link I posted said, and my interpretation

BBC censors the word. At least BBC America does. Is that our fault or theirs? I actually don't know.

Look at what happened to Tommy Robinson. He's behind bars now for something that would be protected by the First Amendment in the US.

Court order or not, there ought to be a rule that all men can require a test before dealing with 18 years of baby jail.

Didn't California just spend the last few weeks having meltdowns over putting children in detention centers?

The obstruction investigation IS unconstitutional, since the President has ultimate authority to decide who gets investigated.

The only to get unthawed in Gen 1 was for the opponent to use a Fire attack,

I don't drink, so whatever.

IGN, where a game that's exactly like a great game from 3 years ago scores a 6 and is considered a bland ripoff whike a game that's exactly like a great game from 23 years ago scores a 9 and is considered a faithful homage

Who believes the Second Amendment doesn't protect the individual right to own a firearm...

No, I was referring to -261

That place is brain-wash city. They actually believe Hillary didn't do anything illegal, and that CNN is unbiased.

You dont know why any of it is happening so it fits the theme perfectly, and dont quote me but I think in legal terms slaying 3 or more people in one location is considered mass murder.