Lurker > JE19426

The option at the inn wasn't actually "switch to a different character's story", it was "hear a tale", meaning what's happening is that the character that joined your character can tell you their tale, meaning you the player can go back and play their beginning story. And from that, it sounds like only one character choice is actually required for the entire game, but then you have the option of also playing through the other seven if you want, possibly with a reward system in place of some kind. So the character you first pick is the "main character", the other seven become your party members, and you can optionally play their beginning stories.

That's how I see it.

All ignored.

Mandate that drug and medical device manufacturers can't advertise to the public. These companies often cite the advertising costs for their products as a reason for their expense.

might want to re-read it. Refugees can claim refugee status at embassies/consulates; Asylum seekers meet all the refugee criteria but are inside the US.

Great, another anti-sjw talking point to enable the alt-right because the left can't stop shitting the bed on basic bitch shit.

Literally one rule for women and another for men. Equality, right?

asylum seekers are refugees that made it into USA's borders and went to a port of entry.

They will be in better conditions with the State Department than with some coyote

The State Department can provide transportation, bud.

They can declare asylum there, son.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embassy_of_the_United_States,_Mexico_City#Consulates

No crime committed in coming here illegally?

So my folks were just total losers for going through the proper channels in coming to the U.S.?

So theyre being rounded up for fun you say?

Not because they committed a crime?

Those POEs are scattered throughout Mexico, ergo if expediency were the goal, they would be closer to reach; aka the quickest as possible.

If they really were seeking asylum, you'd think they would just go to a US port of entry. I mean, there are 10 in Mexico alone after all.

can't throw stones, you see popcorn or blueberry flavour soft drinks all the time

No they definitely all are.

They're criminals, you know.

There are legal methods.

no TC is being serious. there actually have been a bunch of scientists murdered in mysterious ways for years now. they talk about it on Coast to Coast sometimes

I dont think anything of them

It took years of bitching via Operation Rainfall to convince Nintendo of Europe to localize it.

he had realdonaldtrump long before he was president and is not legally bound to only use it for official business as US head of state.

realDonaldTrump is his personal twitter

POTUS is the official one

What about daleks?

I rephrased it in the hopes of pointing out the fact that you're making a bad argument. I'll try again in a more direct way:

Nothing against my argument?

You used "it's eugenics" as a justification for why it shouldn't happen

No, it isn't. All you did was try to handwave it away with a buzzword, instead of actually explaining what the problem is.

If your argument simply comes down to "it's eugenics", then you still need to explain both why it counts as that

and why that itself is a bad thing.

No, you didn't. If you think you did, you ignored the second half of my post.

Explain how it's different in real terms, rather than just "here's a buzzword that I think applies to it".

A birth control obligation is no different to an obligation to look for work if you're able, or attend training, or whatever other requirement might be put onto receiving that welfare to ensure you're on it for as short a time as possible and don't create any extra burden.

And until there is, a law saying you must be on birth control to receive welfare is not forcing anyone to do anything.

Perhaps you don't understand the suggestion.

IF someone wishes to sign up to welfare, they must be on birth control in order to receive it.

What part of that legally prevents them from choosing the option "don't go on welfare, and remain off birth control"?

Until you can show me a situation where someone is legally obliged to sign up for welfare, it is not forcing anything.

It is not

And if you're literally in a position where you have no other option

Not forcing.

How so? No one is forcing anyone not to reproduce.