Lurker > _RETS_

yeah so? capn?

_RETS_ posted...

Making up that this story has a white racist spin when here is no indication of this being racist? The exact people calling this dude a racist would be the first ones screaming "Trumps America" if brick bitch had been a white person. You're lying to yourself if you think other wise.

So you can't call something racist unless you can prove beyond all doubt that it is? That's just stupid.

_RETS_ posted...

hockeybub89 posted...

_RETS_ posted...

hockeybub89 posted...

_RETS_ posted...

A white person in the exact scenario you wouldn't know about it, he would still have a job

I hope not as he absolutely needs to be fired and have the door hit him on the way out.

Edit: And that is what happened. Good job, CVS.

Yes! That's it! Let's circle jerk about wrecking this guy's livelihood because we THINK (though there is more evidence to suggest he is not racist than otherwise) that he is racist and that offends us to the core!

I don't give a fuck if he was a racist. He was a stupid prick who acted extremely unprofessionally and was giving CVS a bad name. Do you think he shouldn't have been fired if racism wasn't a factor? I'm glad I don't work for you.

You don't have a right to suck at your job and keep that job.

The only reason you care is because he is white and she is black. If sucking at your job is calling cops on a customer who refuses to leave, then sure, throw the book at him.

No, I care because he gives CVS a bad name by acting like a tool. Regardless of how much nationwide media traction this story would get if we theoretically swapped people around, that is not how you act here or any job.

Actions have consequences.

_RETS_ posted...

nicklebro posted...

_RETS_ posted...

nicklebro posted...

_RETS_ posted...

It isn't just that it was worse. It's that it happened around the same time as this, at least the coverage started, then this CVS shit takes off and stirs everyone into a frenzy while a group of black people beating an elderly Mexican and telling him to go back to his country just kinds simmered down once the leftists learned it wasn't some Mexican-hating Trump hillbilly.

Now why could that be?

You keep saying that that story is getting playe much more than the other, but there's 0 reason to bieve that. I have seen far more news coverage about the man being assaulted than this woman getting the cops called on her, so you're either being dishonest or are mistaken.

Could be mistaken, but there is definitely no SJW pretend outrage machine about the brick bitch like there is with this dude in an instance in which there is no apparent racism. Any reporting on the brick bitch is solely reporting the story with no narrative, and if there is a narrative, it is somehow still a Trump's America narrative.

Look at TYT's coverage of brick bitch. No mention at all that she was black or a group of black dudes joined her in trying to kill the guy. But they sure mentioned Trump and the right wing!

The only reason anyone cares about CVS is because she is black. If the manager was also black you would never hear about this. If the lady's white you would never hear about it. If the manager was black and the lady was white and he said "get out of my store you white devil bitch" you might hear about it if you lived locally.

Starting to think the Mexican story was only known because it wasn't originally reported widely that the lady was black so everyone just assumed it was some racist Trumper

Well if you're gonna just making stuff up, don't be mad when people alter the details of stories to fit their agenda.

I'm not making anything up. There is a very clear difference in the narrative of these two stories. The reporting of the Mexican one is just reporting. The reporting of this one is about an evil white racist daring to call the cops on a black lady who wouldn't leave.

You're clearly making up a narrative to fit your argument. None of your analysis has been accurate.

_RETS_ posted...

nicklebro posted...

_RETS_ posted...

It isn't just that it was worse. It's that it happened around the same time as this, at least the coverage started, then this CVS shit takes off and stirs everyone into a frenzy while a group of black people beating an elderly Mexican and telling him to go back to his country just kinds simmered down once the leftists learned it wasn't some Mexican-hating Trump hillbilly.

Now why could that be?

You keep saying that that story is getting playe much more than the other, but there's 0 reason to bieve that. I have seen far more news coverage about the man being assaulted than this woman getting the cops called on her, so you're either being dishonest or are mistaken.

Could be mistaken, but there is definitely no SJW pretend outrage machine about the brick bitch like there is with this dude in an instance in which there is no apparent racism. Any reporting on the brick bitch is solely reporting the story with no narrative, and if there is a narrative, it is somehow still a Trump's America narrative.

Look at TYT's coverage of brick bitch. No mention at all that she was black or a group of black dudes joined her in trying to kill the guy. But they sure mentioned Trump and the right wing!

The only reason anyone cares about CVS is because she is black. If the manager was also black you would never hear about this. If the lady's white you would never hear about it. If the manager was black and the lady was white and he said "get out of my store you white devil bitch" you might hear about it if you lived locally.

Starting to think the Mexican story was only known because it wasn't originally reported widely that the lady was black so everyone just assumed it was some racist Trumper

Well if you're gonna just making stuff up, don't be mad when people alter the details of stories to fit their agenda.

_RETS_ posted...

ImTheMacheteGuy posted...

nicklebro posted...

_RETS_ posted...

It isn't just that it was worse. It's that it happened around the same time as this, at least the coverage started, then this CVS shit takes off and stirs everyone into a frenzy while a group of black people beating an elderly Mexican and telling him to go back to his country just kinds simmered down once the leftists learned it wasn't some Mexican-hating Trump hillbilly.

Now why could that be?

You keep saying that that story is getting playe much more than the other, but there's 0 reason to bieve that. I have seen far more news coverage about the man being assaulted than this woman getting the cops called on her, so you're either being dishonest or are mistaken.

Did you also notice that he's calling racism and hate crime against Mexicans (nationality, not race, but I won't split hairs) but then says she isn't a Mexican-hating trump hillbilly. Okay so she obviously isn't a hillbilly, but she's not a Mexican-hating trump supporter but she committed a hate crime against a Mexican? His logic is like... cannibalizing itself. Makes no sense.

Nothing you just said makes sense. What the fuck are you talking about?

And yes, I have every right to believe a corporation would throw staff under the bus in the face of racism allegations. It is fire them and save face or have people protesting your stores, harassing your employees, etc.

Trump-supporting woman commits hate crime against Mexican man.

You: "She wasn't a Mexican-hating trump supporter"

?????

And I'm the one who doesn't understand words?

Also, the dude called the cops on her because she wouldn't leave in a situation where he had no right to tell her to leave. Therefore he does suck at his job. Therefore, the book was rightfully thrown at him. Therefore CVS was not throwing him under the bus to avoid backlash but terminating his employment for misconduct and unprofessionalism, so your point on that is moot.

nicklebro posted...

_RETS_ posted...

It isn't just that it was worse. It's that it happened around the same time as this, at least the coverage started, then this CVS shit takes off and stirs everyone into a frenzy while a group of black people beating an elderly Mexican and telling him to go back to his country just kinds simmered down once the leftists learned it wasn't some Mexican-hating Trump hillbilly.

Now why could that be?

You keep saying that that story is getting playe much more than the other, but there's 0 reason to bieve that. I have seen far more news coverage about the man being assaulted than this woman getting the cops called on her, so you're either being dishonest or are mistaken.

Did you also notice that he's calling racism and hate crime against Mexicans (nationality, not race, but I won't split hairs) but then says she isn't a Mexican-hating trump hillbilly. Okay so she obviously isn't a hillbilly, but she's not a Mexican-hating trump supporter but she committed a hate crime against a Mexican? His logic is like... cannibalizing itself. Makes no sense.

_RETS_ posted...

hockeybub89 posted...

_RETS_ posted...

A white person in the exact scenario you wouldn't know about it, he would still have a job

I hope not as he absolutely needs to be fired and have the door hit him on the way out.

Edit: And that is what happened. Good job, CVS.

Yes! That's it! Let's circle jerk about wrecking this guy's livelihood because we THINK (though there is more evidence to suggest he is not racist than otherwise) that he is racist and that offends us to the core!

I don't give a fuck if he was a racist. He was a stupid prick who acted extremely unprofessionally and was giving CVS a bad name. Do you think he shouldn't have been fired if racism wasn't a factor? I'm glad I don't work for you.

You don't have a right to suck at your job and keep that job.

_RETS_ posted...

A white person in the exact scenario you wouldn't know about it, he would still have a job

I hope not as he absolutely needs to be fired and have the door hit him on the way out.

Edit: And that is what happened. Good job, CVS.

_RETS_ posted...

It isn't just that it was worse. It's that it happened around the same time as this, at least the coverage started, then this CVS shit takes off and stirs everyone into a frenzy while a group of black people beating an elderly Mexican and telling him to go back to his country just kinds simmered down once the leftists learned it wasn't some Mexican-hating Trump hillbilly.

Now why could that be?

You keep saying that that story is getting playe much more than the other, but there's 0 reason to bieve that. I have seen far more news coverage about the man being assaulted than this woman getting the cops called on her, so you're either being dishonest or are mistaken.

You guys keep saying she harassed him when no one has even said such a thing. What did happen is after asking why her coupon wouldn't work a second guy asked her to leave (Which CVS obviously recognied as BS. You don't ask a customer to leave just because they want to speak to someone else or ask questions) at which point she started recording and the video clearly indicates she wasn't aggressive at all

Cops were literally called and nothing happened. Instead 2 people got fired because they called the cops when a woman questioned why they wouldn't accept her coupon

Fair next

Monday morning, CVS spokesman Mike DeAngelis issued a statement that we have completed our investigation, and as a result the two store colleagues who were involved in this incident are no longer employed by CVS Health.

Fair next. Don't be an idiot and call the police because a person tries to use a coupon

_RETS_ posted...

ImTheMacheteGuy posted...

>claims that changing the subject is not deflecting
>continues to deflect by talking about other subject

Also, I don't watch the news. I hadn't heard of this story until someone posted it here. I saw the story about the 91 y/o before seeing it posted here.

Do you understand what words mean? I have been talking about this subject the entire time. Me using another incident as basis of comparison to media/social reaction as it pertains to this case is not changing the subject.

Is there some kind of stupid test race-baiters have to take before getting their virtue badge or something?

No I don't understand words. I speak in grunts and type by mashing buttons. If this actually forms words, it is completely coincidental and I have no idea how it happened. Again, I just click on random things, in this case the quote icon, and then I just press randomly around the lower part of my phone screen.

You're deflecting from one incident to another, just like whenever trump does something wrong, his supporters deflect to obama or hillary. I don't want to talk about that though, because I'm not deflecting. I'm remaining on the subject at hand, which you don't seem to want to do.

See, you're saying "I'm not deflecting. I'm talking about another incident that's the same." Oh? So you're deflecting from an incident that "isn't racist" according to you to an incident that is racist according to you. Basically, you're trying to argue that it's not deflecting because racism and non-racism are the same.

I don't race bait and virtue is utterly meaningless to me, so I don't know how you think that last paragraph applied to me.

>claims that changing the subject is not deflecting
>continues to deflect by talking about other subject

Also, I don't watch the news. I hadn't heard of this story until someone posted it here. I saw the story about the 91 y/o before seeing it posted here.

_RETS_ posted...

ImTheMacheteGuy posted...

Yeah, let's talk about the racist CVS manager instead of deflecting to an separate and unrelated incident.

Deflecting? I don't have to deflect from him being a racist because there is no indication at all he is a racist. Yet this story is making its social media rounds and stirring outrage. Pointing out that the same isn't really happening for a through and through violent hate crime isn't deflecting and it definitely points to a specific narrative the media wants pushed. And you are so easily manipulated that you guzzle it right up, say thank you, and open wide for more. And these happened within the same time frame. Why is one getting all the outrage when the other got oddly quiet as soon as it came out the hate crime was perpetrated by a black lady? Definitely makes you wonder what the agenda might be...

yeah i completely agree the attack on the hispanic man was far far worse than this woman being denied a coupon even if maybe her race had something to do with it.

Yeah, let's talk about the racist CVS manager instead of deflecting to an separate and unrelated incident.

_RETS_ posted...

Rika_Furude posted...

ImTheMacheteGuy posted...

Rika_Furude posted...

CwebbMichSac4 posted...

Rika_Furude posted...

Did we ever get a source for this white guys so-called "racism"? TC always dodged the question and nobody else answered either

source? maybe he was racist

A source as in link to evidence. Thats what im asking you to present. Evidence.

I'm asking you to stop posting on this board. Doesn't mean it's gonna happen lol.

I forgot that sjws are physically incapable of holding an actual conversation...

Just continue with your shitty gimmick of calling everyone a racist then. It seems like you dont care about actual racism

Here is the evidence. A quote from the shameless racist gay Nazi himself:

"Are you in the silent majority who want a property tax freeze? Do you want to build the lakefront infrastructure project? Are you in the moral majority who think restricting access to our lakefront just to keep out the African-American community goes against God and the American way?"

If you can't see this is the mindset of an absolutely irredeemable racist then you sir are very likely Adolph Hitler incarnate. RRREEEEEEEEE

It is funny how this is getting so much attention but there doesn't seem to be nearly as much outrage from leftist media of the black lady who attempted to murder a 91 one year old immigrant yelling "go back o your country" and recruited 4 other dudes (all white, I'm sure) to start beating him as well.

i agree that attack on that hispanic man was terrible, and it was because he accidentally bumped her kid or something?

ImTheMacheteGuy posted...

Rika_Furude posted...

CwebbMichSac4 posted...

Rika_Furude posted...

Did we ever get a source for this white guys so-called "racism"? TC always dodged the question and nobody else answered either

source? maybe he was racist

A source as in link to evidence. Thats what im asking you to present. Evidence.

I'm asking you to stop posting on this board. Doesn't mean it's gonna happen lol.

I forgot that sjws are physically incapable of holding an actual conversation...

Just continue with your shitty gimmick of calling everyone a racist then. It seems like you dont care about actual racism

Did we ever get a source for him campaigning for pro black issues?

hold up someone actually thought that presenting a cashier with an expired coupon is a crime?

lmao

_RETS_ posted...

Taharqa_ posted...

_RETS_ posted...

Taharqa_ posted...

_RETS_ posted...

cjsdowg posted...

Like I said before I can switch this around and it will fit you.

Do you deny there is precedent from people being racist being? You are fooling yourself if you think otherwise. AGAIN, not everything that happens to a white employee person is because people are scared of black people. I could go on but you get the picture. It is funny how you see no issues assuming that the CVS caved due to "SWJs" but yet complain because I think this dude is bigot.

That's because there is way more precedent for companies caving to societal outrage than for this dude being racist. Unless he is just one of those rare gay racists campaigning on pro-black initiatives.

You have a serious issue if your very first inclination is to whine about racism without any other details than what the leftist media initially spoon feeds you. I bet you're still outraged about Michael Brown, Antwon Rose, and that other dude that Chicago is rioting about right now, aren't you?

The victim mentality you have is ruining the black community. The blacks that don't subscribe to that bullshit are the ones that succeed and make a great life for themselves. There are explanations for things (and often way more to stories than you ever care to admit, even when those details come out) other than racism. And the sooner you and people like you realize that, the sooner the black community can mend itself and excel.

The only people who benefit from blacks being kept down are leftists and people like you.

"The blacks"

Yep, single out short hand instead of addressing any points when every other instance I have said people or community. You're a joke. And "black" isn't a bad word, as our hero in the video says.

You really just prefer that people not speak up about instances of racism and social injustices. If they do they are "whining" or playing the "victim card". You are not the arbiter on issues that important to black people.

No, I'd prefer people not default to racism in every scenario. It doesn't have to be "everything is racist" or "nothing is racist". It the absence of evidence of racism it is very irresponsible to demonize someone as a racist, especially in today's mob culture.

And it's hard not to say there is a victim narrative being pushed when an armed suspect reaches for a gun, is shot, and there are protests about it anyway just because the suspect was black. If he was white, they wouldn't give a shit.

I also think that not everything should automatically be attributed to racism, HOWEVER, something doesn't have to be an obvious malicious act before it can be considered racist. It does not have to involve violence or racial slurs.

_RETS_ posted...

Taharqa_ posted...

_RETS_ posted...

cjsdowg posted...

Like I said before I can switch this around and it will fit you.

Do you deny there is precedent from people being racist being? You are fooling yourself if you think otherwise. AGAIN, not everything that happens to a white employee person is because people are scared of black people. I could go on but you get the picture. It is funny how you see no issues assuming that the CVS caved due to "SWJs" but yet complain because I think this dude is bigot.

That's because there is way more precedent for companies caving to societal outrage than for this dude being racist. Unless he is just one of those rare gay racists campaigning on pro-black initiatives.

You have a serious issue if your very first inclination is to whine about racism without any other details than what the leftist media initially spoon feeds you. I bet you're still outraged about Michael Brown, Antwon Rose, and that other dude that Chicago is rioting about right now, aren't you?

The victim mentality you have is ruining the black community. The blacks that don't subscribe to that bullshit are the ones that succeed and make a great life for themselves. There are explanations for things (and often way more to stories than you ever care to admit, even when those details come out) other than racism. And the sooner you and people like you realize that, the sooner the black community can mend itself and excel.

The only people who benefit from blacks being kept down are leftists and people like you.

"The blacks"

Yep, single out short hand instead of addressing any points when every other instance I have said people or community. You're a joke. And "black" isn't a bad word, as our hero in the video says.

You really just prefer that people not speak up about instances of racism and social injustices. If they do they are "whining" or playing the "victim card". You are not the arbiter on issues that important to black people.

_RETS_ posted...

cjsdowg posted...

Like I said before I can switch this around and it will fit you.

Do you deny there is precedent from people being racist being? You are fooling yourself if you think otherwise. AGAIN, not everything that happens to a white employee person is because people are scared of black people. I could go on but you get the picture. It is funny how you see no issues assuming that the CVS caved due to "SWJs" but yet complain because I think this dude is bigot.

That's because there is way more precedent for companies caving to societal outrage than for this dude being racist. Unless he is just one of those rare gay racists campaigning on pro-black initiatives.

You have a serious issue if your very first inclination is to whine about racism without any other details than what the leftist media initially spoon feeds you. I bet you're still outraged about Michael Brown, Antwon Rose, and that other dude that Chicago is rioting about right now, aren't you?

The victim mentality you have is ruining the black community. The blacks that don't subscribe to that bullshit are the ones that succeed and make a great life for themselves. There are explanations for things (and often way more to stories than you ever care to admit, even when those details come out) other than racism. And the sooner you and people like you realize that, the sooner the black community can mend itself and excel.

The only people who benefit from blacks being kept down are leftists and people like you.

Really "the Blacks" ? What are these Pro black things he campaigned understand you keep bring up. I have shown how did just the opposite. And since we are using individual precedent , you have to show CVS doing this thing before. And yes I am still upset that someone with the PRECEDENT of violence shot someone in the back no matter his crimes. I wouldn't want Carl shot in the back. I would want anyone shot in the back.

_RETS_ posted...

cjsdowg posted...

Like I said before I can switch this around and it will fit you.

Do you deny there is precedent from people being racist being? You are fooling yourself if you think otherwise. AGAIN, not everything that happens to a white employee person is because people are scared of black people. I could go on but you get the picture. It is funny how you see no issues assuming that the CVS caved due to "SWJs" but yet complain because I think this dude is bigot.

That's because there is way more precedent for companies caving to societal outrage than for this dude being racist. Unless he is just one of those rare gay racists campaigning on pro-black initiatives.

You have a serious issue if your very first inclination is to whine about racism without any other details than what the leftist media initially spoon feeds you. I bet you're still outraged about Michael Brown, Antwon Rose, and that other dude that Chicago is rioting about right now, aren't you?

The victim mentality you have is ruining the black community. The blacks that don't subscribe to that bullshit are the ones that succeed and make a great life for themselves. There are explanations for things (and often way more to stories than you ever care to admit, even when those details come out) other than racism. And the sooner you and people like you realize that, the sooner the black community can mend itself and excel.

The only people who benefit from blacks being kept down are leftists and people like you.

"The blacks"

Like I said before I can switch this around and it will fit you.

Do you deny there is precedent from people being racist being? You are fooling yourself if you think otherwise. AGAIN, not everything that happens to a white employee person is because people are scared of black people. I could go on but you get the picture. It is funny how you see no issues assuming that the CVS caved due to "SWJs" but yet complain because I think this dude is bigot.

_RETS_ posted...

Do you not think he would call the cops on a white person refusing to leave? Again, something happening to a black person does not immediately mean racism. And that is an important thing for you and people like you to understand especially now when the allegation of racism can ruin someone's life.

And the proof is in the precedent. You have no proof he is racist. Funny how only race-baiters hear "dog whistles." You're a perpetual victim and your life will come up short because of your horrible mindset.

I love how you want to have it both days. You can't hear the dog whistles , yet you say that CVS caved because of pressure that black people would put on it, when they said no such thing. Dude it is either you take people for the word with out reading into their actions or you don't . You want to read into the CVS actions but complain when people read in to Carls .

_RETS_ posted...

Great, is the geography of the South Side responsible for its crime rate, or the people who live there?

I guess what leads some of those people to criminality is the same thing that lead Carl into criminality. But I know what you are trying to do. But it is clear what you trying to do and nope.. carl was used clear dog whistles.

Also it is funny how you have not issues thinking that the CVS caved in just because of the race of the victim with no proof, yet you don't see how people can think Carl's actions were racist.

_RETS_ posted...

Great, is the geography of the South Side responsible for its crime rate, or the people who live there?

I guess what leads some of those people to criminality is the same thing that lead Carl into criminality. But I know what you are trying to do. But it is clear what you trying to do and nope.. carl was used clear dog whistles.

Also it is funny how you have not issues thinking that the CVS caved in just because of the race of the victim with no proof, yet you don't see how people can think Carl's actions were racist.

_RETS_ posted...

There absolutely would be people protesting the store for being "racist" and harassing this dude. Companies are always going to cave to public outcry, write or wrong.

I asked about the crime rate because you brought up him wanting to build a bike path to avoid a certain area. So I asked what the crime rate was for that area, since YOU brought it up. Or is he a racist bigot for not wanting to ride his bike through high crime areas?

The Bike Path is not about hte not going to the South Side. He was fighting for the Bike Path and saying it would not lead to the people from the South said coming there .

Matson is a conservative who opposes high taxes, but Matson was also politically active in leading an effort to build a waterfront bike path to a beach near his own home. As part of that effort, he got the government to make the beachs old sea wall a historic landmark and worked to convince his racist neighbors that that improving the beachfront would not mean they saw an influx of people from the South Side.

_RETS_ posted...

write or wrong

_RETS_ posted...

My point is you can't simply cry racism every time a black person is inconvenienced. And why would I be giving him a pass? His crime has nothing to do with hers. If he did what was alleged, he should be punished. And of course CVS said he was wrong. Why would they want a bunch of angry black people protesting their stores? It's easier and better optics to just throw their employee under the bus.

And people steal and lie for petty s*** all the time. You are assuming she didn't do that JUST BECAUSE she is black and he is white. She was asked to leave for arguing and following staff around after she was told her coupon was fake and refused to leave. If someone refuses to leave, then the recourse is to call the police or on-site security and have them handle it.

So one you assume there would be scores of angry black people if store doesn't cave.
Next you assume the store caved just to avoid this.
Kind of double standard you living by isn't it.

cjsdowg posted...

_RETS_ posted...

Great avoidance of the question. What is the crime rate in the south side of Chicago?

Like you avoid everything in my post. You can't complain about the Crime Rate in the South Side of Chicago if you , yourself are a criminal. But I guess you give Carl's criminal action a pass ?

Why are you being a hypocrit? I could have sworn you were on the politics board getting upset about people bringing up past criminal activity of black people shot by police and saying it doesn't matter what those people did before.

_RETS_ posted...

What is the crime rate in south side Chicago?

And him doing something in the past is not mutually exclusive to him doing his job if a customer is trying to scam the store. Are you serious?

His crimes don't get a "pass", and if he did what was alleged he should be punished for them, but they also don't mean he can't call the cops on someone who won't leave his store when asked upon suspicion that they are trying to steal.

You sure seem to be giving him a pass, and like I said before why would anyone make a coupon for product that is kind of embarrassing and only value it less than 18 dollars. The STORE even said he was wrong. But yet you are saying he is right. So the store lie and was wrong. This lady is a lied and make fake coupon that she has no issues shows to proof her self. But a literally con artist is the person you and Rika support. LOL

"but what about black on black crime?!"

_RETS_ posted...

Great avoidance of the question. What is the crime rate in the south side of Chicago?

Like you avoid everything in my post. You can't complain about the Crime Rate in the South Side of Chicago if you , yourself are a criminal. But I guess you give Carl's criminal action a pass ?

_RETS_ posted...

What's the crime rate in the south side of Chicago?

Less the crime rate for this guys house hold .

_RETS_ posted...

So we have a gay dude, whose political campaigning includes anti-racism initiatives, who may have Parkinson's or some other condition for all any of you know, who called the police because a lady was refusing to leave the store. Not for using a coupon, for refusing to leave when asked. And surely, her video, just like all of these incidents without fail, tells the entire story.

He supports a man who post fake crime stats about black people form Neo-Nazis , he supports a man who says that Latinx judge can't be unbiased. He literally wanted to get a bike path to his home to avoid people from the South Side.

lmfao this guy is LITERALLY shaking in his boots goddamn.

_RETS_ posted...

Yes, but it's a Texas restaurant like In-nOut is a California one.

And we got both of them in Texas! Hell I think there's an In-n-Out closer to my house than Whataburger is.

Prestoff posted...

_RETS_ posted...

eggcorn posted...

_RETS_ posted...

Blue_Inigo posted...

Fin_Dawg_004 posted...

tc's taste buds confirmed to be SHIT

In-N-Out is the bacon of fast food burgers. People just fawn over it because they think they are supposed to. It's a meme restaurant.

Whataburger and Shake Shack are both way better. In-N-out is just simply passable.

nope

But yes. Those who say otherwise are just Californians jealous that they aren't Texans.

We have whataburgers in california though.

yeah

_RETS_ posted...

not nearly as overhyped as In-N-Out.

I don't know about that, people lost their shit here when Whataburger opened up, for good reason.

_RETS_ posted...

Blue_Inigo posted...

Fin_Dawg_004 posted...

tc's taste buds confirmed to be SHIT

In-N-Out is the bacon of fast food burgers. People just fawn over it because they think they are supposed to. It's a meme restaurant.

Whataburger and Shake Shack are both way better. In-N-out is just simply passable.

nope

I understand preferring Shake Shack. But Whataburger? Lol that's burger king and McDonald's tier burger.

Fin_Dawg_004 posted...

tc's taste buds confirmed to be SHIT

I'd ask them what other historical events they don't think happened, and why.

There are first person accounts, there are pictures, there are videos, there are documents. There are human remains. There's an overwhelming amount of evidence to corroborate that millions of people were removed from society and imprisoned, worked to death, executed.

I imagine holocaust denial stems from a perhaps delusional level of solipsism, which should apply to plenty of other things, or it stems from anti-semitism and/or similar biases against the other victims. I don't think it's a rational belief to hold.

_RETS_ posted...

shockthemonkey posted...

Yikes, I guess you can start by proving literacy

Prove that I admitted my mistake? I already did that in a reply to Cruel. What are you talking about?

Oh so now youre backtracking and admitting that you did use it wrong, and not the I totally would if I actually used it wrong that you were spouting a little while ago?

Dude just let it go. You shitposted, you embarrassed yourself, you got called out it for it. Stop the game. Admit you were wrong if youre so damn capable of it.

_RETS_ posted...

There is a difference between denying the holocaust happened and believing that the stats are overblown.

I don't deny it nor do I believe the stats are overblown, but I can see those two viewpoints being conflated.

Because they both come to the same conclusion: that there's some sort of conspiracy to inflate the numbers so Jews can get some sort of social benefit or control. It's perfectly fine to conflate them because "it's exaggerated" is just a more subtle way of tricking people into believing objective falsehoods.