Lurker > Dragonblade01

Megaman50100 posted...

Dragonblade01 posted...

Can we at least cuck together?

Hell yeah

:D

I'd recommend Hai to Gensou no Grimgar if you want something with a bit more serious tone, tbh

ElatedVenusaur posted...

Dragonblade01 posted...

So is watching porn together cucking?

If your wife even looks at another man with desire, you've already been cucked, my friend. It's in the Bible, which has a perfect track record for suggesting common-sense regulations!

Megaman50100 posted...

Dragonblade01 posted...

So is watching porn together cucking?

Watching any porn other than solo vids is getting cucked.

Can we at least cuck together?

Axiom posted...

Dragonblade01 posted...

No

This. Someone described it as Sword Art Online which is the perfect descriptor. Instead of harassment and NTR themes you just get full on rape

Yeah, it's basically what would happen if the SAO writer had a hard-on for Berserk.

No

So is watching porn together cucking?

AvantgardeAClue posted...

Aren't like two of those movies on the PS4 collections

And Kingdom Hearts makes BlazBlue look like high literature

Yeah, but Days is only really interesting for showing what Riku was doing between 1 and 2 and making some of the Org. XIII more likeable. Coded is pointless except for the final scene. Back Cover (the X/Chi movie) is only really important because it shows off a couple new McGuffins that will probably come into play for 3.

Chain of Memories is important, but again, a brief synopsis is fine. 90% of the game is a worse version of KH1.

Depends on how much time you have to play. At the very least, play 1, 2, and Birth by Sleep. While you can do the others as well, a synopsis on them would probably work just fine (hell, the Days and Codes movies are basically just a long-winded synopsis of those games). You should play 0.2 as well since it's so short.

I liked playing Little Mac initially, but after experience Pikachu's amazing off-stage game, I feel so gimped whenever I try to use him now.

Maybe I can get away with getting the Hori gamepad. Dunno if I really want to spend all that much on the pro controller.

For those that have a pro controller, are the analog sticks a lot better than the joy con's? I've heard they degrade kinda fast.

EbonTitanium posted...

Dragonblade01 posted...

I mean, the porn industry is kind of a shady industry. I imagine I'd be worried for her safety.

Cam girls aren't really in the porn industry.

True, but I was focusing on the pornstar part.

I know TC also included camgirls, but in my mind, those are pretty substantially different for that very reason.

I just jumped to the last page of this topic and I'm very confused.

Forgot to answer the second part.

Because I enjoy the service.

I mean, the porn industry is kind of a shady industry. I imagine I'd be worried for her safety.

I got my license when last year (28 now) because my job eventually became too inconvenient to travel to without it.

Until then, the main reason I never got my license was likely due to my father. He has this conflicting nature where on the one hand he was so protective that I never learned to ride a bike, but super critical and aggressive behind the wheel (which would come out when he tried to teach me from the passenger's seat).

But in Japan (I'm from America, btw), they have driving schools that people are expected to go to, and that environment was much better for me. Ungodly expensive though. But I also got a good deal for a car at auction, so overall it could have been much worse for my wallet.

Rolling is definitely a bad habit. Gonna only let myself shield and do spot dodges on the ground until I break it.

Insofar as we're probably born with a desire to bond with our in-group and ignore the out-group, maybe. But then, what specifically constitutes those groups is largely taught, and race is certainly not a required criteria.

I think it depends on what you mean when you say "pedophile."

If you mean the actual meaning of being attracted to prepubescent children, then I can believe that there may be some internal wiring mutation that people are born with that doesn't manifest until they become sexually mature. It would still be interesting to understand how exactly this error causes the stimulus of prepubescent children to result in the emotions/behaviors it does.

If you are including minors who have gone through puberty, it's probably a bit trickier than that. On a strictly biological, there's nothing unusual about being attracted to those who've reached sexual maturity. So in that case, it may simply be an inability to properly internalize social teachings as they grow up. However, that in-and-of-itself could be caused by some biological mutation.

Anti-245 posted...

Dragonblade01 posted...

I imagine a lot of it has to be the romanticization of the period through all the stories being passed down and new versions emerging year after year after year. Probably little more than a fondness developed over centuries of stories being told in regions, the people from which would take those stories with them wherever they went.

They may fall in and out of popularity at various times, but the "nostalgia," so to speak, remains.

I don't see how they could be nostalgic given how most people were serfs in feudal Europe. They'd be like me being nostalgic about colonial America when slavery was legal.

It's not the actual time period itself, it's the romanticized stories that come from it that spread along with the Western empires. The truth of the history doesn't really matter all that much. What matters is that stories from and about that era have bled into the generations that were influenced by them.

The problem, beyond just house rules, is people don't play it aggressively. That's what extends the game. People horde property and money, because they think "getting rich and owning a lot" is how it should be played. You're supposed to buy, trade, and sell in order to eliminate the competition as ruthlessly as possible.

That's when the game is at its fastest and most fun.

I imagine a lot of it has to be the romanticization of the period through all the stories being passed down and new versions emerging year after year after year. Probably little more than a fondness developed over centuries of stories being told in regions, the people from which would take those stories with them wherever they went.

They may fall in and out of popularity at various times, but the "nostalgia," so to speak, remains.

Idk what it is about P5 that brings out the bad opinions in people.

Duncanwii posted...

K. Rool definitely deserves to be higher up.

K. Rool is definitely good, but he's more the noob killer that people just need time to figure out.

Another session, and I'm that much closer to understanding how these mechanics all fit together. Getting my ass spanked in the process though, lol

God, Pikachu is fun. I can't tell you how many times his speed and air control has saved me.

Anti-245 posted...

Dragonblade01 posted...

Anti-245 posted...

Dragonblade01 posted...

Anti-245 posted...

Masculinity is an ideology of patriarchal societies that generally justifies the advantages that men have over non-men systemically. It maintains its power through constant propaganda throughout the society similarly, but not exactly, to whiteness with race.

That's an odd definition. Most people refer to that as "the patriarchy," iirc. What lead you to defining it that way? And if I may ask, what word do you use to describe behavior commonly associated with men?

Those are just gender roles, usually socially enforced by society at large.

And? That doesn't preclude masculinity from referring to behaviors (and traits, I forgot to mention that originally) that some society commonly associates with men. I'm still curious how you arrived at your definition, because that's a very uncommon usage.

I suppose you could use whatever terms you want to to describe behaviors but I feel you are looking into this society as if it remains neutral, which is I believe you agree with masculinity being as simple as just gender roles.

You're using an uncommon definition for a word, and then judging my views through your uncommon definition. My view of masculinity as a term tells you nothing about any other view I have.

And again, why do you define masculinity the way that you do?

Anti-245 posted...

Dragonblade01 posted...

Anti-245 posted...

Masculinity is an ideology of patriarchal societies that generally justifies the advantages that men have over non-men systemically. It maintains its power through constant propaganda throughout the society similarly, but not exactly, to whiteness with race.

That's an odd definition. Most people refer to that as "the patriarchy," iirc. What lead you to defining it that way? And if I may ask, what word do you use to describe behavior commonly associated with men?

Those are just gender roles, usually socially enforced by society at large.

And? That doesn't preclude masculinity from referring to behaviors (and traits, I forgot to mention that originally) that some society commonly associates with men. I'm still curious how you arrived at your definition, because that's a very uncommon usage.

Anti-245 posted...

Masculinity is an ideology of patriarchal societies that generally justifies the advantages that men have over non-men systemically. It maintains its power through constant propaganda throughout the society similarly, but not exactly, to whiteness with race.

That's an odd definition. Most people refer to that as "the patriarchy," iirc. What lead you to defining it that way? And if I may ask, what word do you use to describe behavior commonly associated with men?

Anti-245 posted...

Dragonblade01 posted...

Anti-245 posted...

Dragonblade01 posted...

Anti-245 posted...

Dragonblade01 posted...

Anti-245 posted...

Well, then we can dispose of it since it serves us no inherent value at the moment.

As long as those of a certain gender exhibit any degree of behavioral trends, and as long as we are able as a society to discern these trends, masculinity will always have a place in our language.

Well, we can get rid of gender roles then. They are of no service.

That doesn't necessarily mean that masculinity or femininity won't emerge as concepts. While we may not need to rely on gender roles as a means of conveying social responsibility and expectation anymore, but they didn't emerge in a vaccuum.

What is your definition of masculinity?

A term used to describe behavior commonly associated with men.

That's not mine. So we're talking about two different things.

So what's your definition?

Anti-245 posted...

Dragonblade01 posted...

Anti-245 posted...

Dragonblade01 posted...

Anti-245 posted...

Well, then we can dispose of it since it serves us no inherent value at the moment.

As long as those of a certain gender exhibit any degree of behavioral trends, and as long as we are able as a society to discern these trends, masculinity will always have a place in our language.

Well, we can get rid of gender roles then. They are of no service.

That doesn't necessarily mean that masculinity or femininity won't emerge as concepts. While we may not need to rely on gender roles as a means of conveying social responsibility and expectation anymore, but they didn't emerge in a vaccuum.

What is your definition of masculinity?

A term used to describe behavior commonly associated with men.

Anti-245 posted...

Dragonblade01 posted...

Anti-245 posted...

Well, then we can dispose of it since it serves us no inherent value at the moment.

As long as those of a certain gender exhibit any degree of behavioral trends, and as long as we are able as a society to discern these trends, masculinity will always have a place in our language.

Well, we can get rid of gender roles then. They are of no service.

That doesn't necessarily mean that masculinity or femininity won't emerge as concepts. While we may not need to rely on gender roles as a means of conveying social responsibility and expectation anymore, but they didn't emerge in a vaccuum.

Anti-245 posted...

Well, then we can dispose of it since it serves us no inherent value at the moment.

As long as those of a certain gender exhibit any degree of behavioral trends, and as long as we are able as a society to discern these trends, masculinity will always have a place in our language.

I don't think it's a question of "need."

This seems like one of those "if you have to ask" kind of situations.

I mean, if you don't use it...

Vodkarade posted...

Dragonblade01 posted...

Vodkarade posted...

^cool. This topic isnt addressed to you, so you can leave

you first

I made this topic, so I need to be here to make sure the message is gotten.

Nope, I said you first. By not leaving, you're in violation. You are hearby sentenced to be wrong about everything.

So I guess not much has really changed, tbh

Vodkarade posted...

^cool. This topic isnt addressed to you, so you can leave

you first

Vodkarade posted...

I just hope you all ^^^^^ get the message. Stick to elder scrolls and let important people discuss important matters

Okay, but then what are you gonna do?

That part I understand. I play a lot of fighting games. I just don't have the specific fundamentals for Smash down yet. My off stage game is weak, and shielding is very different from guarding in a lot of fighting games. The fact that the way you face varies and isn't always towards your opponent takes some getting used to as well.

Finally started challenging people online after a lot of figuring basic things out in training mode. Yep, I suck, lol

Still fun though. I feel like I do have a general sense of the movement and flow of the game. I just need to adjust to another person being on stage. That and following people off stage. Fortunately, using Pikachu, he has a ton of maneuverability off stage.

Playing Judge Eyes myself. Love this studio's titles.

SaithSayer posted...

I'm not sure about Gun but Dragonblade01 is definitely smart enough to realize that LeBron and Michael are exceptions but men being stronger than women on average is a rule.

What's next? Arguing in favor of letting adults into little league?

There's nothing to suggest that, following proper standards, transgender athletes can't compete with cisgender athletes.

FireJoeGirardi posted...

The same way its unfair to a blind man that he cant play football, is the same reason its unfair to a woman that they cant compete with men or a MtF that they cant compete with women.

Unless you want a sport dominated by MtFs. You never did address whether or not you wanted that to happen, rendering women useless in competitive sports.

I don't typically want any group consistently dominating a sport, although we see it happening all the time in sports regardless.

But to both of you, the overall point is that we willingly overlook advantages that may be considered unfair to other participants. However, the moment we see something out of the norm, we are all too quick to label it unfair on reaction. Now, that reaction may prove to be justified later, but it isn't now. Not to mention the fact that regulations can be put into place to alleviate concerns regarding transgender athletes who are still in the early stages of transitioning.

FireJoeGirardi posted...

Do you like ridiculously unfair advantages in sports? Yes or no?

Please stay consistent.

I've always been for more granular criteria by which athletes are allowed to compete in their respective events. You, meanwhile, have admitted that you readily accept that sports are unfair, and yet have an issue with something under the pretense that it's "unfair."

You're the person who needs to stay consistent.

None of this changes the fact that it was an odd thing to question me about in the first place.

Who cares? The only thing that matters is if Pegasus Fantasy is the theme song.

I don't know.

There is marginal scaling with different colored moblins and such.

Also, the weapon durability system is fine as is. It's the way the game handles unique weapons that needs fixing.

FireJoeGirardi posted...

Do you like steroids in sports?

I'm not the one you need to ask that question to. Look in the mirror for that. You're the one who's so bizarrely selective regarding "fairness."

FireJoeGirardi posted...

Dragonblade01 posted...

FireJoeGirardi posted...

Dragonblade01 posted...

FireJoeGirardi posted...

Dragonblade01 posted...

It's also extremely telling that none of you seem interested in an actual solution to this proposed unfairness, and are instead perfectly content with just misgendering trans athletes.

And yet somehow you insult others for being emotional.

The solution is biological males should stick to mens sports

That's not a solution in a world where we segregate based on men and women. It's also not a solution to those who've gone through the transitioning process.

If you're actually interested in fair competition, you should be for more granular criteria for competitive eligibility.

Life isnt fair. The same reason a blind person cant play football is the same reason why a MtF shouldnt play in womens sports. You cant always get what you want.

So you admit that this isn't about fairness to you. At least you finally let that pretense go.

Since when is competitive sports fair? Are we going to kick LeBron out of the league for being an athletic freak of nature?

Then what's your issue with transgender athletes? It can't be that it's unfair to cisgender women, since you just admitted that you're fine with competitive sports being unfair.

FireJoeGirardi posted...

Dragonblade01 posted...

FireJoeGirardi posted...

Dragonblade01 posted...

It's also extremely telling that none of you seem interested in an actual solution to this proposed unfairness, and are instead perfectly content with just misgendering trans athletes.

And yet somehow you insult others for being emotional.

The solution is biological males should stick to mens sports

That's not a solution in a world where we segregate based on men and women. It's also not a solution to those who've gone through the transitioning process.

If you're actually interested in fair competition, you should be for more granular criteria for competitive eligibility.

Life isnt fair. The same reason a blind person cant play football is the same reason why a MtF shouldnt play in womens sports. You cant always get what you want.

So you admit that this isn't about fairness to you. At least you finally let that pretense go.