Lurker > lolife67

Yeah, actually.

I've never heard of thanking family at TG. I suppose it makes sense though.

Just the same as you dont know that isnt their intent. Unless they make a public statement then yeah no one knows either way.

If their intent for changing Clark Kent's skin color by having him portrayed by another non-white actor as a means to appeal directly to a specific demographic just by doing that and nothing else to character I would say that is the definition of pandering.

well, the complete line was there is another, Skywalker so Im gonna go with no lol

How is it not? Clark Kent is and always has been white.

You graduated high school maybe

Yea the term itself is meaningless now since it basically ranges from the truly nutty folks who normal people cannot rationalize with to "Hey man, maybe you shouldn't call that kid the n-word".

All "darn ess Jay dubz" to the internet.

What We need to do is leverage our vote and only support those who support our issues. Voting without power is worthless

They do, they just pander to the people they care more about.

Kitt posted...
This seems tongue-and-cheek, but CE have a hate boner for her, so don't let me stop you guys.

This.

I love watching men argue over womens lingerie

Oh, wait. They did remake Speed Racer as something it wasn't. And nobody blamed it on sexism when the film flopped.

Is it just a re-adaptation of the comic or a different original story based in the world? I'm only aware of the one comic the movie was based on so I guess there might have been more.

There's a difference in not caring about politics at all and caring about the politics of a goddamn chicken sandwich restaurant

I wonder who will play the boy version of him.

Do you guys not realize the INSANE amount of money involved in this?

Id prefer having both. So one takes some effort, so be it.

It's actually more about bodily autonomy. Equating it to promiscuity is some incel shit

Imagine getting sick every month even sick in a month 3 times, that is sure to hinder any skills trying to gained. With age that will eventually deteriorate the body and the mind.

There are things that money can't solve, so that is why I choose power. Heck with an extended life span imagine all the more time to achieve goals and dreams.

Money can't buy skills, they have to be earned which is something power would help.

Elective surgery is actually fairly risky snd not very effective when it comes to weight loss

Not mention 50 mill doesnt go as far as one would think. If you start just 1 business you can easily burn through that pretty quickly

Thats why i say the powers a priceless. Most billionaires would pay to have them

Maybe they aren't now, but they anticipate the possibility and it scares them?

When I was younger, I'd have agreed with that. However, having dealt with serious illness and injuries in the last decade or so, I'd take the powers. Being able to walk without pain would be worth a shitload to me.

When's the last time you were sick?

The last time you thought you were getting fat and thought about working out because of it?

Scared of getting tetanus or how about an STD?

I can't believe people don't see the benefits of his powers.

The claws are relatively useless, but his other powers are all fantastic even for a normal person.

I'm tempted to not go to work tomorrow i'm so amped up for this. Been looking forward to it since it was announced.

I watched that as a kid. So stupid. If he tried that shit today Magneto would laugh and rip the iron out of his blood.

Was Ant-Man 3 greenlit already?

1. Homelander may not be strong enough to lift an airplane. Just because he's a "Superman" archetype, doesn't mean they have the exact same abilities (or on the same power level.)
2. Superman can do that because he exists in a world where the laws of physics aren't always obeyed. Homelander exists in a world which uses real world physics more. So, assuming he was strong enough to hold up a plane, he would more than likely punch right through it.
3. Superman can also do this because he has a bio-electric aura/field that was introduced in the late 80s. See, John Byrne realized what I said above. That Superman lifting something super-heavy should cause the structure to crumble. So he came up with the idea that Clark has a field that helps hold said objects together. This is also the basis for Superboy (Conner Kent version) having Tactile Telekinesis.

It wasn't a great way to introduce the character like how Iron Man 1 was

Didn't think of that but Marvel can only put out so much 3rd rate movies for her

and? How do they intimidate in any way? Show me one that do that. There are hundreds of statues and most don't even notice then nor care for their origin.

Do you people run lol? People cant maintain a jogging speed the whole time, but dont want to revert to walking. So at times they do an odd middle ground thing.

CE is just toxic. Holy shit. Bad mouthing people actually exercising.

That's dumb though. The ending of the graphic novel was the world coming together against an alien threat. It would be weird that race issues would still be a thing, let alone real world issues.

Maybe it will all tie together but right now it feels out of place.

What f***ing world are you living in? It's full of class issues and it's set in a world full of totalitarianism.

The race slant is weird IMO, Watchman didn't have anything to do with race as far as I recall. It's been a long time since I read the comic or seen the movie though, so maybe I'm just forgetting? But race issues wasn't the thing I took away from the story.

Also The Comedian inspiring white nationalists makes more sense than Rorschach I think.

Can we admit that movie was really overrated at the time and kind of garbage? Im not sure who really wanted a series after that?

What's the problem with eliminating it?
It serves no useful purpose, other than giving bank and postal workers a day off.

Pretty sure I've seen liberals who want those to go away as well