Lurker > lolife67

Anyone defending that he should go to jail is insane. Imagine walking through a crowded bar, festival, or public transit. Should everyone be in jail for touching persons shoulder or arm?

It's also not some super unheard of thing for people who live in shitholes to fall victim to random violence tbh

InfinityMonster posted...

GigaSPX posted...

Sony isn't mainly the blame, as Disney wanted to be more greedy sharing 50/50 with Sony's property.

Disney owns the Spider-Man IP. Sony just has movie rights.

Seeing as how well crafted Disney's MCU is, Sony was being a bitch no matter what.

No, Disney was trying to strong arm them into taking half of the profits, but Disney faced Backlash, so they agreed to Sony's counter offer of 25%, and they have to let Tom Hardy potentially be in the MCU at some point.

that cop that tried to defend her is a piece of shit too

blue wall of corruption

A number of DC villains.

Black Manta and Zoom stand out.

Black Manta hates Aquaman for reasons he can't even remember, murdered his infant son and then taunted him about it on nearly every subsequent meeting.

This is when he found out Aquaman was resurrected some years back.

https://imgur.com/ztILIQL

I will say this. I was one of those teenagers that thought they knew everything at the time but adults always told me "Wait until you're an adult" and it's pretty true. I thought I knew shit when I was a teenager but now I really know everything as an adult. Was wondering if it's the same as having a kid.

Kaldrenthebold posted...

You mean #1 right? Or are you having issues counting and just found a meme that looked like numbers so you posted it?

So this is the first time democrats have tried impeachment on Trump?

konokonohamaru posted...

man, the people who won't admit to any hint of corruption on their own side are delusional.

That's the problem with the left right now. Either they're doing this to expose Biden to get rid of him as a candidate because he's been terrible, or they really are this tone-deaf.

lolife67 posted...

fenderbender321 posted...

It actually is. The behavioral habits of millions of people are much more impactful to our daily life.

Not when it's only on the internet, it isn't. Unless that's the only place you interact with people, which would explain a lot actually.

Internet behavior habits matter. Not only do they influence other people but they influence your real life habits too even if you don't think they do.

It actually is. The behavioral habits of millions of people are much more impactful to our daily life.

I'm not saying Trump is a great president. But to anyone paying attention, the behavior of the masses in the way they react to every little thing he does or says is 10x more concerning.

Now we have it in, as we would say, tippy-top shape.

lolife67 posted...

Men should advocate for these things more. I know why we don't (we can be dumb) but that attitude really needs to change.

The reason they don't is because the narrative and media are completely dominated by just women's needs, and contesting that or trying to bring light to men's issues gets you labeled an MRA. Even when MRAs have valid points.

This problem will probably get much worse before it gets better. You already see a ton of boys checking out of school due to being neglected and punished more severely for the same bad behaviors due to biases against boys. Etc.

The moment you try to advocate for a mens issue, you get labeled negatively.

pogo_rabid posted...

Another good example is the sheer focus on breast cancer vs prostate cancer. One has a super high survival rate, the other, is basically the inverse...however one gets all the funding and attention, while the other is practically ignored.

Or how men are far more likely to get injured at work, to commit suicidal, to be given harmful medicines for "ADD" when they're really just being energetic boys, etc.

Also, men who try and get care for breast cancer can face some hurdles. Where's that article from a few years ago about the guy who went to a breast cancer event that had free screenings and got declined due to being a man?

eston posted...

M_Live posted...

Calling it the "#metoo treatment" makes you sound like an asshole honestly. I can understand not wanting to jump to "he did it! immediately, but victim blaming is just shitty. Just word it objectively, "was accused of sexual assault" or something along those lines.

This tbqh
There's nothing wrong with casting doubt on specific allegations, but calling it "the metoo treatment" or "getting metoo'd" heavily implies that most sexual assault allegations are fake, which yeah is pretty assholish

Then why is there a civil suit and not a criminal one pending?

her: this guy has been assaulting me, but i'll keep working with him because he'll pay for my hotel accommodations

her: this guy raped me, but i'll try to enter a business relationship with him for over a million dollars

her: he refused to do business with me, i should sue him for money

---

we need some evidence to prove guilt, and if that exists, then they should charge/convict him for rape, but she has little credibility in my opinion

1. Guess your reading comprehension isnt that great

2.actually its rather low, Genius
http://ufwildlife.ifas.ufl.edu/venomous_snake_faqs.shtml
But since yoi need me to spell it out for you, the chances of it happening are still high enough. Same with being accused of any sort of sexual misconduct. Better to limit your chances all together instead of risking it and ending up sorry later. Doesnt matter if itams called sexist by silly liberals. Atleast your not in jail and you can find another job rathrt easily

3. He was not discriminating though. He was simply not putting himself in an innappropriate situation.

1. I guess analogies clearly are above you then. Because no one said that. Do you even know what they are or are you a memeber of Drax's species?

2.i made the point because you seem to state that the number of actual times a man gets into avoidable sticky situations with women somehow has anything to do with if he should protect himself or not. Even if his likelyhood is low, he should protect himself because the possibility is there.

3. No it hasnt. Just because on the surface a man and a woman were involved doesnt make it sexist. Tell me where in this story he stated that he thought she was inferiour and acted in such a way? Tell me where i said anything about not wanting to train women because they are women? Tell me where his history of sexism is.

You cant because you know you are just kneejerking with typical liberal drivel

No its not. You are just not able to grasp it

Thats like saying "show me the rates of snake bites every year and tell me of that justifies not getting near a random one in the jungle!" Even Once is enough. To me its time men learned to be smarter to protect themselvea from BS like that or thw temptation to stray in their marriage

There are two genders: male and political.

There are two races: white and political.

There are two sexualities: heterosexual and political.

The stuff that has happened because of this trans fad makes it embarrassing to be associated with this era.

100 years from now I imagine people researching our history will be saying "you can't make this stuff up. These people literally thought their gender was a feeling and not a scientific fact"

Smashingpmkns posted...

SailorGoon posted...

Monopolies are good because I liked the Avengers

I wouldn't really consider Marvel fully owning the rights to their own properties as a "monopoly"

He's talking about Disney

ASithLord7 posted...

TDW may not be *great* but I think calling it bad is a huge stretch

What do you rate it?

Jason Mamoa has that effect.

Why was Thor able to overpower Thanos with all the stones in Infinity War, but then got completely bodied by Thanos with no stones in Endgame?

Just finished episode 1

holy fuck

Fuck marvel, fuck DC, fuck watchment.

This is this shit.

The chick who played the 18yo hs chick was hot. Too bad her shazam form actor was more ugly >_>