Lurker > garan

Cry for help

Free speech is part of the 15$ a month gold membership

Chicago deep dish is a casserole, not a pizza, so New York pizza wins by default.

Bryfang posted...

Okay, Im gonna need some context on this peanut butter girl.

If it's any type of candy, fruit snack, or freeze pop you're almost certainly horribly wrong.

Calwings posted...

These contests are not kind to people who like sleep. I went to bed early one night and lost Mithos because of it.

I don't usually do naps, but I'm really not feeling well, so I went to lay down. Know it's risky to step away from a round, but damn it sucks.

I would just explain your situation to your boss and ask how serious they are about hiring people after internships, assuming that's the goal. But you better be leaps and bounds above the other interns. Don't take a risk unless you're the type of person to kick ass at work.

darkjedilink posted...

legendary_zell posted...

darkjedilink posted...

codey posted...

darkjedilink posted...

So, stay with the cheating whore. Gotcha.

Jesus fucking Christ you're so jaded you can't even realize that you don't have to stay with a cheating spouse to remain in a child's life.

So, they get a divorce, and what? You think he'll get custody? You think she's going to let him see the child? You think she isn't going to make up a bunch of shit about him to tell the kid?

I'm not jaded. You're extremely naive.

The kid would go with the primary caretaker, as they should, and the cheating and lying would be taken into account during the division of assets and custody dispute, as it should be. Things aren't nearly as biased against men as some might think. The issue is that women in our society are usually the primary caretakers and the residue from when that was enforced heavily by society is hard to overcome in terms of the actual child rearing arrangements and then in the courts.

No, the kid would go to the mom. Period. End of story. Her cheating and lying would be deemed irrelevant.

That you are either oblivious or willfully ignorant of these facts is not surprising to me in the least.

I really don't meant this as an insult, but I think your specific experience is blinding you to objective or empirical reality. You are saying that a child would categorically go to the mother, regardless of what happened in the relationship or who was the primary caretaker and that's simply inaccurate.

There may have been a grossly miscarriage of justice in your case, but that doesn't mean that's the way it's supposed to work or how it typically works.