Lurker > legendary_zell

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Board List
Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 10
TopicGM cutting health coverage to striking workers
legendary_zell
09/17/19 4:38:08 PM
#6
No, you see, the unions said no, so he can't. His hands see tied.

I hope people are tweeting this at Sanders, Warren, and Castro. And of course Biden.
---
TopicEyepatch guy is back with his weirdest take yet
legendary_zell
09/17/19 3:53:04 PM
#16
s0nicfan posted...
shockthemonkey posted...
s0nicfan posted...
I mean, people get what he's saying right? You should absolutely support your veterans, but we (are supposed to) go to war because it's necessary, not because you've sufficiently planned for what happens after. We should have gone to war to stop Hitler whether or not we had a Veterans Affairs in place for returning soldiers.

Do you think its honest to interpret Sanders statement as the only reason people should serve is for the benefits?


I don't think that's the interpretation he's taking. I don't think anybody in stating that interpretation.


What's Crenshaw's interpretation if not that, then? That's pretty clearly the strawman he's replying to, otherwise his tweet makes even less sense.

I feel like you're a pretty smart guy, but you seem to reflexively "to be fair" for the weirdest conservative stuff.
---
TopicYouTube is infested with ads.
legendary_zell
09/17/19 3:48:06 PM
#44
YoshitoKikuchi posted...
Use Brave browser, you won't see ads. I haven't seen an ad on Youtube in about 2 years.


This. It's a game changer.
---
Topic1 In 16 Women Reports First Sexual Experience As Rape
legendary_zell
09/17/19 11:15:41 AM
#85
EIiza posted...
Sad_Face posted...
TheGreatGeno6 posted...
So if a guy begs a girl to have sex over and over but does NOT ever threaten her and the girl agrees to it, then it is rape?

That's a grey area. I do hear of girls who are relentlessly pressured and just give up and get it over with it. It's clear she doesn't want it but just wants the pressure to end. How do you classify this?


Maybe view women as autonomous beings capable of making decisions? If this were the other way around and it were women pressuring men into sex (which happens all the time), you wouldn't care.


There's not the same omni present threat of physical violence from a bad reaction to rejection. Plus it's not okay when women pressure men either. Why not just advocate for that as a universal value instead of making false equivalencies or asserting what other people care about or derailing a conversation?
---
Topic1 In 16 Women Reports First Sexual Experience As Rape
legendary_zell
09/17/19 11:13:03 AM
#84
All I'll say is that if you guys have dealer friends, listen to them. They might tell you about some experiences that are horrifying and eye opening. There's a lot of otherwise "normal" people who have really messed up ideas about how sex works and where the boundaries are. They don't think of themselves as rapists and think of themselves as good people, but they're leaving a lot of scars.

We should all do our best not to be one of those people, and the best way to do that is to define what's acceptable by enthusiastic consent, not what we want to do or are allowed to do.
---
TopicBen Shapiro: rap isn't real music
legendary_zell
09/16/19 6:06:26 PM
#19
This is the quality of the rest of his opinions as well.

This is the best the right can do for "public intellectuals"

Not surprising as there's no conservative held out as an interlectual who hasn't said approximately 1 trillion dumb things.
---
TopicSecret Service: "The first family is very active in water sports"
legendary_zell
09/16/19 3:39:35 PM
#7
Pee tape confirmed! And it was a family affair too, apparently.
---
TopicScenario: This dude slaps your girlfriend's ass
legendary_zell
09/15/19 3:23:33 PM
#4
I don't know what that thing is. I'm just happy I have a gf in this scenario.
---
TopicIf Everyone but Bernie, Biden, and Warren dropped out now, Biden would be loser.
legendary_zell
09/15/19 12:43:26 PM
#16
ElatedVenusaur posted...
Yeah, there's no reason for either Bernie or Warren to be VP.
I saw an argument that was persuasive to me: that Bernie and Warren are beneficial to each other(and certainly they seem to have a non-aggression pact between themselves, save the odd comment here and there): essentially, Bernie covers Warren's left flank, making it harder for others to paint her as "extreme"(which seems to have worked on the party's ruling class). What Warren does for Bernie is that she's essentially prevented candidates to her right, particularly Kamala Harris and Pete Buttigieg, from getting oxygen: it's hard, if not impossible, to argue that either is a better debater, more substantive, or smarter than Warren. This keeps Biden in place as the "moderate" candidate of choice, and Biden is already in a weak position in 3 of the 4 early contests.


I've never seen this analysis before and it seems correct. Warren and Sanders are winning the idea and campaign quality primaries easily. Warren is clearly running the best campaign and that makes it hard for the moderates who are essentially running on their ability to campaign to get anywhere, which kills Harris, Beto, and Buttigieg. And that helps Bernie a lot because these people could be getting a lot of the excitement and youth vote if it wasn't for Warren. She soaks up a lot of the young and educated people that want to be swept off their feet like with Obama 08. And Warren gets to avoid being painted as a radical socialist because there's an actual socialist running. There's pretty much no way she could have avoided that label otherwise, no matter how much she says she loves capitalism.
---
TopicIf Everyone but Bernie, Biden, and Warren dropped out now, Biden would be loser.
legendary_zell
09/15/19 11:51:32 AM
#12
I don't know if that's clear. All of the people backing other moderate candidates might be resigned to the reality that Joe would be their only hope and would rally behind him, ensuring he wins.
---
TopicMan found guilty of first-degree murder for booby trapping his shed...
legendary_zell
09/15/19 11:48:13 AM
#55
Lil_Bit83 posted...
legendary_zell posted...
No, it's pretty standard for you to not be able to set up death traps to kill trespassers, regardless of the signs or warnings. Because that's an insane and murderous thing to do. Federal law says using deadly force indiscriminately to protect unoccupied property is not reasonable, even if the victim is a trespasser. And even with state laws like stand your ground laws and anti-theft laws, the reasonableness of deadly force is determined on a case by case basis, and setting up a death trap means the defendant threw reason out the window and decided to execute all living things because they have a cave dragon mentality when it comes to property.


Yes. How dare someone get frustrated after multiple thefts and decide to take more measures against it? Thief got what they deserved end of story.


Society across multiple levels and in multiple countries has already decided that what you're talking about is outside the bounds of rational or justifiable behavior. I don't think you can do this in ANY western country. Because again, no amount of frustration makes it okay to indiscriminately kill people who dare to disrespect your property. And theft at pretty much any level is not a death penalty offense. Individuals are rightfully not allowed to play judge, jury and executioner when their lives are not at risk. No one gets to decide that others shouldn't live anymore because of their attitude towards theft and property.
---
TopicMan found guilty of first-degree murder for booby trapping his shed...
legendary_zell
09/15/19 11:33:02 AM
#50
ThisIsIt posted...
He had signs, death warnings, a giant dug hole in front of door, razer blades on the handle to prevent open it.

Plus it is legal to murder people for theft in llinois.

The jury here clearly had a biased individual on the panel who made the others follow suit.

I bet they win the appeal.


No, it's pretty standard for you to not be able to set up death traps to kill trespassers, regardless of the signs or warnings. Because that's an insane and murderous thing to do. Federal law says using deadly force indiscriminately to protect unoccupied property is not reasonable, even if the victim is a trespasser. And even with state laws like stand your ground laws and anti-theft laws, the reasonableness of deadly force is determined on a case by case basis, and setting up a death trap means the defendant threw reason out the window and decided to execute all living things because they have a cave dragon mentality when it comes to property.
---
TopicMan found guilty of first-degree murder for booby trapping his shed...
legendary_zell
09/15/19 11:26:19 AM
#48
TheMikh posted...
so if you use a gun in self-defense during unlawful entry it's legally permitted

but god forbid you automate the process


You are in danger when directly confronted. When you set up a trap, you are deciding to kill anyone who goes in there in a manner that triggers the trap, even if you're safe and sound.
---
TopicDem Debate #3 tonight: One night only
legendary_zell
09/12/19 11:02:37 PM
#488
Antifar posted...
https://twitter.com/tomscocca/status/1172341328790708224


This, I can't believe that level of disingenuousness doesn't' cause a lightning bolt to strike immediately.
---
TopicDem Debate #3 tonight: One night only
legendary_zell
09/12/19 10:46:19 PM
#459
This is a good story. It started a little tough, but had a great turn.
---
TopicDem Debate #3 tonight: One night only
legendary_zell
09/12/19 10:29:57 PM
#413
Don't worry about the commentators they have on. They always say exactly what their organization or ideology would dictate, it has little to do with how people performed.
---
TopicDem Debate #3 tonight: One night only
legendary_zell
09/12/19 10:17:59 PM
#369
That was the worst answer I've heard in a long time. He said NOTHING and sounded senile. He just kept talking so he wouldn't be seen as stumped, that's his general strategy.
---
TopicDem Debate #3 tonight: One night only
legendary_zell
09/12/19 9:27:53 PM
#267
Rahm is a ghoul. And cool to see some WOC clearly support Bernie.
---
TopicDem Debate #3 tonight: One night only
legendary_zell
09/12/19 9:12:06 PM
#231
Great question! He's never ever ever gonna answer this.
---
TopicDem Debate #3 tonight: One night only
legendary_zell
09/12/19 9:05:17 PM
#215
Man what a Beto lovefest. But he's really doing way way better.
---
TopicDem Debate #3 tonight: One night only
legendary_zell
09/12/19 8:58:59 PM
#198
What was that laugh? She sounds like Ultimecia with voice acting.
---
TopicDem Debate #3 tonight: One night only
legendary_zell
09/12/19 8:56:27 PM
#187
WTF did he just do with his teeth?
---
TopicInspiring: 12-year-old does manual labor to help pay for college
legendary_zell
09/12/19 9:51:10 AM
#102
The kid didn't do anything wrong. But this is not a great story. It shares the same terribleness as those "man walks 20 miles round-trip for work until someone notices and gives him a ride/buys him a car". The noteworthy thing there is the broken-ness of the public transportation system and the poverty wages that don't allow the person to buy the car.

The story here is the absurd cost of a college education and economic inequality that allows some people's children to never worry about a dime of college money while others are forced to "heart-warmingly perform manual labor for sub minimum wage to scrape a college fund together.

You people praising this story would be like people who praised Frederick Douglass and said "see, black people can succeed " while ignoring slavery and the injustice that makes the story noteworthy
---
TopicDead franchises that still have a vocal fanbase asking for a sequel
legendary_zell
09/11/19 10:12:03 PM
#54
The ones that need a sequel immediately are

Legend of Dragoon
Mega Man Legends
Chrono Cross
Skies of Arcadia
SSX Tricky
Viewtiful Joe

All would be day one purchases for me.
---
TopicCA just passed a bill for reclassifying gig (Uber, Lyft, etc) employees
legendary_zell
09/11/19 5:15:08 PM
#24
Balrog0 posted...
SK8T3R215 posted...
"Hey can I clock in to do a few hours of driving tonight?"

"sorry you're not scheduled you can work Wednesday at 3 PM does that work?"

"no I have a job then"

"sorry"


Uber's actual argument is even worse

https://twitter.com/faizsays/status/1171865967321702400

Uber says it will not reclassify drivers as employees in the wake of landmark California law, despite the lack of ride-hail exemption in #AB5. Lead attorney argues Uber is exempt from requirements because "drivers work is outside the usual course of Uber's business."

Uber counsel Tony West had pointed to legal rulings in making this argument. "In fact, several previous rulings have found that drivers work is outside the usual course of Uber's business, which is serving as a technology platform for several different types of" marketplaces.


Man, this trash is why people hate lawyers, and I'm saying this as a lawyer. This is such a disingenuous, anti-meaning, anti-reality argument that it should be considered frivolous.
---
TopicFirms that bankrolled Boris Johnson's campaign have 8b riding on no deal Brexit
legendary_zell
09/11/19 4:22:17 PM
#3
In a rational world, this would be a huge scandal that would topple the government and trigger a huge investigation that results in a lot of people being completely shamed out of any form of public influence. Then again, in a rational world, Brexit wouldn't have happened like this and Johnson wouldn't have gotten within a thousand miles of the PM office.
---
TopicDid George Bush handle 9/11 well IYO?
legendary_zell
09/11/19 4:16:58 PM
#17
The Great Muta 22 posted...
Maybe the day itself, but considering his administration both had an idea an attack was coming prior and immediately tried to tie it into and blaming Iraq like, the same fucking day, he still should face some criticism


This. He did the national leader stuff well. He did the commander in chief stuff as badly as anyone has ever done it.
---
TopicThe new Bill Burr Netflix special is pretty tryhard and cringey, tbh.
legendary_zell
09/10/19 2:02:13 PM
#13
darkprince45 posted...
legendary_zell posted...
Richard Pryor, Bernie Mac, John Mulaney, Louis C.K. (cancelled), Tig Notaro, Mitch Hedberg, Eddie Izzard, Chris Rock (when not laundering racism). I thought Hannah Gadsby was pretty funny when she was trying to be funny.
You should have no problem with bill burr then lol. Especially with the shit Richard Pryor said. Probably a million times worse than anything burr ever said


Bill Burr amplifies the things I don't like about Pryor the most. The condescending, superior, ironic political tone is really hard to pull off because 9/10 times, people rely on political/cultural agreement to get laughs and forget to include the funny. It makes sense because it really really works for the people that agree with you, as you can see with the undying for Burr and Carlin among the misanthropic, "society has gone mad and doesn't care about the REAL issues" crowd. Carlin is even worse at that and Lewis Black made a whole career out of it.

It's the tone and lack of funny, relative to the adoration from people that agree that I take issue with, not the statements themselves.
---
TopicThe new Bill Burr Netflix special is pretty tryhard and cringey, tbh.
legendary_zell
09/10/19 1:51:39 PM
#9
pogo_rabid posted...
legendary_zell posted...
Well his vocal fanbase seems to be almost exclusively angry right wing or "I'm actually pretty left, I just don't like SJWs" white guys who like their opinions yelled back at them. The same types who fellate Carlin. And that's a big demographic here so you're not gonna have a good time criticizing Burr on that basis here.

Could you list a few of your favorite comedians so we can see where your tastes lie?


Richard Pryor, Bernie Mac, John Mulaney, Louis C.K. (cancelled), Tig Notaro, Mitch Hedberg, Eddie Izzard, Chris Rock (when not laundering racism). I thought Hannah Gadsby was pretty funny when she was trying to be funny.
---
TopicThe new Bill Burr Netflix special is pretty tryhard and cringey, tbh.
legendary_zell
09/10/19 9:32:35 AM
#7
Well his vocal fanbase seems to be almost exclusively angry right wing or "I'm actually pretty left, I just don't like SJWs" white guys who like their opinions yelled back at them. The same types who fellate Carlin. And that's a big demographic here so you're not gonna have a good time criticizing Burr on that basis here.
---
TopicWoah those Joker leaks...prove the media right, INCELS got a hero.
legendary_zell
09/10/19 1:24:54 AM
#36
mattnd2007 posted...
Esrac posted...
I'm not going to pretend I know exactly what's causing things, but it seems to me that these incels do have some pretty significant issues that they need help on. And the trend of everyone endlessly dumping on them is just another instance of shitting on men who need help with behavioral and mental problems.
Yup.


Based on your unreserved agreement with this post, my post was appropriate. They aren't crapped on for being men with behavioral and mental issues, they are disliked for being bad people with a toxic ideology and worldview that they actively attempt to spread and even kill for in rare instances. Just like gang members aren't hated for being poor or being from bad neighborhoods, they're hated for crime and murder.

There's lots of people that can't get laid, and lots of people with mental health problems, and few of them buy into the incel ideology. And not all of the people in incel communities have mental health issues, especially if getting laid alone would solve them. Everyone can get frustrated at their inability to find connection when they desperately want it, and that should never be mocked, but only some take the step of making that the core of their identity and worldview and turn venomous towards others and themselves.
---
TopicWoah those Joker leaks...prove the media right, INCELS got a hero.
legendary_zell
09/10/19 1:04:05 AM
#30
They aren't attacked because they are virgins. Lots of people are virgins and that gets you little more than light teasing. Lots of people will leap to your defense for that. They are hated because of the misogyny, racism, catastrophizing, dehumanization of others, spouting pseudoscience, oh and the occasional murder. It's not about virgins, it's about the specific people that identify as incels and join online communities with a shared language and culture. Spinning it as attacking virgins or lonely young men in general is disingenuous and inaccurate.
---
Topicwoman in wheel chair gets stole on.
legendary_zell
09/08/19 2:58:59 PM
#44
LMAO, CE knows zero slang. I need topics like these to remind me of the demographics of this website.
---
TopicModern day female and LGBT "equality" is just attacking men
legendary_zell
09/08/19 2:53:49 PM
#39
HasaDiga posted...
@legendary_zell

The issues they fight here while claiming to make the world a better place for women is like going up to someone with a gunshot wound, pulling a splinter out of their hand and walking away feeling like you're amazing.

People wanna help...so long as they can do it safely online.


Just for the benefit of others reading this conversation, I'll address this argument. It's a very common propaganda argument that attempts to criticize "western feminism" by pointing to worse issues in third world countries. It's based on the premise that there are no legitimate issues to focus on here, and asserts that feminists are pecking at minor issues instead of addressing major ones elsewhere.

It's nothing more than an attempt at misdirection. First, almost all social movements primarily focus on their own societies, even if they do have an international focus because people know their own problems and their own society's the best. Second, feminists focused on human rights are the ones putting pressure on foreign countries to improve their human rights records. Non-feminists snipe at feminists for not doing enough, while international human rights focused feminists actually do work.

Third, it's really easy for domestic conservatives to discredit domestic feminist movements when they're perceived as being inspired by western feminists. Fourth, almost no one has the resources to do what you're suggesting. Fifth, it's perfectly legitimate for people to focus on the issues that affect them and their community and not focusing on other issues faced by other people doesn't discredit anything. All injuries are worthy of being addressed.

Feeling that the issues that feminists organize about aren't important is one thing. Just make that regressive point if you want to, argue that feminists should shut up because you don't perceive any issues, but don't deflect to third world women as if you care about them at all.
---
TopicPrager U goes full Nazi
legendary_zell
09/08/19 2:30:43 PM
#28
TheMikh posted...
I'll withhold my usual commentary knocking on neocons today, and say this:

If sensible people do not address pressing issues, they needlessly lend credence to the fringes.

The stifling of discussion pertaining to such issues in more mainstream circles is precisely why the topic is now primarily associated with the far right.


Maybe that's because the people who make these points are racist AF and reveal their racism every time they talk about it, making the topics taboo? Maybe it's because of Europe's history of what happened the last time this type of rhetoric was fully embraced?
---
TopicModern day female and LGBT "equality" is just attacking men
legendary_zell
09/08/19 2:23:53 PM
#35
HasaDiga posted...
hockeybub89 posted...
HasaDiga posted...
hockeybub89 posted...
HasaDiga posted...
hockeybub89 posted...
HasaDiga posted...
I'm tired of people trying to turn the first world into an episode of The Care Bears while not really giving a shit about the third world.

Why? Typically, people try to fix the issues they have at home, not fly to oppressive third world shitholes and try to force a governmental and societal coup

Because I see people act as if they're "champions of defending women" when all they're willing to do is complain on the internet to artists...be it writers, actors, comedians, artists who draw.... and just demand that they change the things they don't like.

Meanwhile women are getting their genitals mutilated but that's happening by those scary guys in the middle east and I don't wanna say anything!

They wanna help...so long as there's zero risk to themselves.

What makes you believe that most feminists or most women have no issue with genital mutilation and the general oppression of women worldwide? That same social media you just mocked as bullshit?


I didn't say they don't care. I'm saying they puss out because they're afraid.

They also typically want others to change their own intellectual properties rather than having the ambition to create new content.

What should they do exactly from the other side of the world that you would find appropriate?

Join the military in some way if they're truly this passionate on the subject.


You are quickly rising up the ranks of worst posters on this board. You have a special talent for incredible galaxy brain conservative takes. No serious human being could type these words.
---
TopicDo you consider evolution to be 100% proven fact?
legendary_zell
09/07/19 5:16:50 PM
#159
Yo, real talk, some of y'all are legit brain dead. You have faulty, diseased, illogical ways of thinking that lead to nonsensical, harmful ways to thinking. And the exact people with that mindset also exhibit the same types of beliefs politically.

You are making trash arguments that were laughable 100 years ago. You hold our society back. You aren't even worthy of the explanations being given in this topic. All of this applies whether you're serious or trolling.
---
TopicTulsi Gabbard on her online Russian support.
legendary_zell
09/06/19 7:53:16 PM
#10
We're not on the cusp of nuclear war. Like at all. We were probably closer under Obama and it was never ever going to happen then either. This is a really dumb and glib response.
---
TopicMoscow Bitch: We have to cut social security and medicare to lower the deficit
legendary_zell
09/05/19 8:50:39 PM
#12
One of the biggest non-slave owning, non-segregationist villians in American history. It's an indictment on our political, social, and economic system that this dude is in power and not run out of town on a rail for being anti-human.
---
TopicUnions are stupid
legendary_zell
09/04/19 9:56:28 PM
#48
CanuckCowboy posted...
AlisLandale posted...
I mean I sort of agree.

But Amazon still pisses itself whenever the warehouse workers try bring up unionization so they must still be doing something right


Hey I support an mma union. Walmart blocks unions hard too. Theres times Ill get behind em but for the most part Ive always done better without em and you can yadda yadda anecdotal it away but Im talking the strongest unions in North America and I know plenty who would agree. I risk my life at my job literally and no union has ever done shit for me or anyone I know in any meaningful sense.

My moms union did absolutely jack for her too when she became unable to work. They fight the wrong causes and care about profit. Theyre another company now. Get over the past.


Unions are another company that cares about profit so you want to leave your future entirely up to actual companies that actually care entirely about profit?

This is clearly an emotional issue for you which is completely valid. You feel like they've failed you and your family. But you've definitely come to the wrong conclusion here.
---
TopicUnions are stupid
legendary_zell
09/04/19 9:21:29 PM
#32
Surely you guys who hate unions defending "crackhead" workers outnumber the "crackheads" so why not be democratic about it and fight to change it, rather than spouting rhetoric that leaves you completely at the whims of what business owners decide among themselves is acceptable. Because without unions, that's where workers are left, and then they have to try to re-create unions from scratch to be treated like human beings again. See Amazon factory workers, game developers, Walmart employees etc.

If you don't exercise workplace democracy, you ensure that you will work in an economic dictatorship.
---
TopicUnions are stupid
legendary_zell
09/04/19 9:16:42 PM
#28
It makes no sense to hate on the institution that allows you to have power in the economic part of your life. You wouldn't hate on the very idea of a Republic or having elected officials in the political sphere, so why dump on the concept of joining to have economic power in the face of rich, mobile, politically powerful capital?

If you want better unions, join your union and improve it or advocate for better unions from the outside. Don't be a tool of employers and destroy your own power.
---
TopicBreaking: House of Commons passes bill preventing no-deal Brexit
legendary_zell
09/04/19 6:23:22 PM
#65
The British government not jumping off the cliff isn't due to cowardice. It's not like the vague quality of "courage" is really what's at issue here. They're not doing it because what's on the table now is an incredibly, mind blowingly bad idea that no one voted for. To use the results of a vote where A and B are the options but Z is what will actually happen as binding to force you to do Z makes no sense when there is nothing actually forcing you to do Z and the public doesn't want to do Z.

You're talking about shredding trade deals, economic chaos, potential political violence and the separation of the country all because of a narrow vote based on lies and an unclear result. What's the point of having elected officials and a Republican system if they're just going to charge off what is so very obviously a cliff? Why even have leaders at that point if they don't try to preserve the country?
---
TopicReport: Straight Pride Parade a total sausagefest
legendary_zell
09/04/19 1:10:07 PM
#12
AngelsNAirwav3s posted...
Sounds like it was all just a massive joke, but the far left took it serious and caused violence


This seems to be the only type of "joke" the right is capable of nowadays. Ones that attract alt right types and that make everyone laugh at them. And jokes that seem to be indistinguishable from their actual beliefs.
---
TopicI'm 33 years old and have never drank before.
legendary_zell
09/04/19 1:47:39 AM
#4
Don't, it's not a good habit. It would probably be banned along with cigs if we restarted society tomorrow. . If you've managed to have fun without it this long, you've been doing it the right way.

But if you really really want to, start with cocktails that actually taste good, especially with tequila, vodka, gin, and rum. Then work to beer, then whiskey.
---
TopicC/D: Fish Hook Theory
legendary_zell
09/03/19 10:20:34 PM
#54
Accurate in the sense that many people propagandize through their self assessment of their political ideology. I've seen a truly countless number of people openly defend family separation, Charlottesville Nazis, forced sterilization of groups of people, etc and claim to be centrists. Many of these are MAGA people, trolls, and extremists by any rational metric. These are the ones who try to claim things like ethnonationalism and the abolition of the welfare state as common sense policies. There's also a big second group of people who seem to be giving an honest self assessment, but just have no idea of the political spectrum. Many of these people seem to have almost exclusively conservative political instincts, but just don't have a problem with gay marriage or want government healthcare for people like them and think that puts them in the center. They have no idea that middling views plus several radical ones does not make you a centrist.

The common thread here is lacking actual liberal or leftist values. They are not big fans of actual social progress or equity and so anything that makes them uncomfortable is "where the left has gone too far". That's where you start to see people express shocking views on things like LGBT rights, immigration, the criminal justice system, economic assistance etc.

You very rarely see these centrists devil's advocate for things on the left like you see them do with right wing radicalism because there is no human rights focus to stop them from saying things like "fuck that minority group"
---
Topicdo you guys believe in spanking kids as punishment
legendary_zell
09/02/19 3:30:49 PM
#259
averagejoel posted...
legendary_zell posted...
Is the problem here a lack of scientific literacy? Are you just not aware of the difference between anecdote and a repeatable scientific result?

I don't think anyone still arguing in favour of spanking is being genuine at this point


No, it's even worse than that. They ARE being genuine. This is yet another bad opinion brought about by the combination of conservative cultural norms and lack of scientific education. They're not trolling, they think they're making sense and that we're softies who will let our kids kick us in the shins with no consequences. They think "analyzing" their lives where they "turned out alright" is equivalent to actual research on the subject.
---
Topicdo you guys believe in spanking kids as punishment
legendary_zell
09/02/19 3:11:59 PM
#257
HasaDiga posted...
legendary_zell posted...
You pro-spanking people are absolutely embarrassing yourselves in this topic. You have been asked repeatedly, to post one, ONE measly source supporting your anecdote based opinions and you refuse to. Instead, you post the same debunked opinions let me go through them and dismiss them one by one so I know if they're used again, you're a robot.

1. Spanking is different from beating. This sounds like common sense, but there is no evidence for this. Both are violent responses, both are temporary fixes, both have been shown to have no positive effect. People in the past would have said with no evidence that beating was necessary, now since it's socially unacceptable, people draw arbitrary distinctions between undefined terms. The difference is how negatively you are impacting the child, there is no positive side here.

2. Not spanking means not disciplining. Not true. There's an infinite amount of things you can do before spanking. If your child is not listening, you are either not modeling the right behavior, not speaking to them in the right way, not responding with the right non-violent intervention or they need psychological help. That's harder and more expensive than simply losing your cool and hitting a child, but it's is surely a more direct way of fixing what's wrong. The key is researching age appropriate, peer reviewed parenting strategies and putting them into practice rather than relying on the gut or folk wisdom. Then getting help if that doesn't work.

3. I was spanked and I turned out fine/people aren't spanked and they are not fine. This is purely anecdotal evidence. Many people are spanked and do not end up fine. Incarcerated people were probably far more likely to have been spanked than not. It didn't help because spanking doesn't treat underlying issues. Lots of people experience negative consequences from spanking. You may feel that it helped you, but that is a cultural belief, not a data based one. You have no idea what you would have been like if you weren't spanked but instead got an effective non-violent intervention. And past generations that were spanked more were not better, they were more violent, more criminal, and bigger assholes all around.

Again, please, pretty please, someone post a peer reviewed study showing that any form of spanking is effective or I will be forced to assume you guys are simply perpetuating a cultural practice you were taught.


Everyone needs to look out for this word. The words that come after are usually pulled out of the person's ass.


I've already seen studies showing that spanking is associated with increased aggression and that the fall in rates of spanking is associated with decreases in crime. I didn't have data specifically indicating that point, so I didn't act like I knew it for a fact. It would be nice if pro-spanking people could follow my lead.

@alimajor

My mind is actually not made up. In my culture, spanking is done as a matter of course and my parents spanked me. It would be better if what they did and what many many American parents do turned out to be neutral or positive. I'd be inclined to believe spanking was okay if I'd ever seen evidence that it was. If anyone could show me that. But it's never happened once.

You seem to be telling me to run my own experiment, but at the same time, you're ignoring the results of all the actual experiments and studies done by actual scientists. Even if I did exactly what you're saying that would be an anecdote, not proof of anything. Is the problem here a lack of scientific literacy? Are you just not aware of the difference between anecdote and a repeatable scientific result?
---
Board List
Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 10