Lurker > Monopoman

Roy Moore.

Genshin Impact sure felt weird after a 6 week Bloodborne binge. I'm enjoying it though.

I wish I could call Biden a total creeper without everyone whataboutism-ing Trump. The Dems literally chose diet Trump as their candidate.

Tried it, and will play more in a bit, but at least initially it's very easy and I think I got bonus exp items or something as I could just level a ton right away (normal level not adventure). I stopped leveing at 10, although it looks like I could have kept going.

I didn't want to be over powered for the start of the game which was already extremely easy.

Just got to the first town and took a break for now. The graphics are very nice, the combat not so much so far. It's very simplistic. I do hope it gets more complicated/intense as you go further, as I love action/rpg combat.

Because if people get free tiny studio apartments, they totally don't have any incentive to work and move up.

you think that stops people?

why don't you ask mcdonalds about how that worked for their monopoly game

it comes with a medium drink. but there is an xbox series x promo going on, and anyone who orders a medium or large drink will get a code on the drink container for a chance to win an xbox series x. when i entered in my code, it said invalid. i am guessing some worker ay the taco bell i go to already used the code. if that is the case, that is some unprofessional stuff. people going crazy for a chance to win an xbox series x.

Anyone that claims to love the 2nd amendment but supports the cops here is a joke of a person tbh

If someone breaks into your home you have every right to protect yourself, especially if it's the government

theres literally no way to even tell if that happened because of the potato filmin

this is fake news

'i feared for my life so i plowed through a crowd of people'

I do enjoy how sad he looked while he was getting eviscerated with boos. It's pretty much the same reaction most conservatives have when you say anything bad about dear dear leader.

I'm pretty sure they still do it, and blame him for current events.

Your open hatred isn't attracting anyone to your side. Keep it up. See how the election turns out.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-atlantic/

What sources do you get your news from, Zeus?

How much of that is reused assets from the base game? Because if not, wow, that's a lot of work. Good trailer though.

Some are more forgettable than others, but Ginsburg was one of the court's biggest names (who you'd hear about as often as Scalia back when he was alive). I can usually remember six of them. I tend to forget Kagan, Alito, and Gorsuch.

Well, he was played by Matt Damon...

Yes, but that's never the argument that gets presented or even mentioned. When it does get mentioned it's always as a defense, never a solution to the problem. Remember, it's beneficial to both parties (even if it heavily favors the left) to keep the issue going. If abortions ever stop being an issue they risk losing voters. So things like the effectiveness of contraceptives only matter in that they occasionally fail. That means they can go and say 'do you think you'll be safe because you used condoms/birth control? THOSE THINGS FAIL! Better vote dem or else you're off to motherhood city!'. Abstinence? Why should you be forced to abstain and, even if you do, bad things can happen! Better vote dem in case those bad things happen!

When it comes to politics it's best not to think of it in terms of 'right' and 'wrong' but, rather, like two master players of a game. Both parties desire power and votes and it's beneficial to them to have a problem that they can solve but only do so slowly if at all. Because if they actually SOLVE the issue they lose votes. Let's assume something happened tomorrow and, for whatever reason, the right went 'You know what? Abortions are okay'. The left now has a bunch of young female voters whose top issue may be something like illegal immigration, crime, jobs, or whatever instead of abortion rights. Those are votes that the right wing can snatch up. However if there's the constant threat that the right will find a way to make it illegal again then that issue remains the top issue regardless of if it's been 'solved' or not.

I know right.

Anyhoo, I'm a woman and Pro-Choice. I think abortion should be legal up until the baby is out of the mother's body.
As soon as it is out of her body, THEN I would treat it as a human being with all the human rights every citizen deserves.

If Pro-Life are not okay with it, then I think the fair thing to do is to prevent their own freedom too. If they believe a fetus' life is more important than a woman right, then they should believe their spermatozoids (the genetic bagage of baby conception) shouldn't be spilled outside of a women's womb and, thus, masturbation should be punished by law. After all, when you masturbate, you prevent a baby from being born.

If women can't control their own body, Pro-Life men shouldn't.

Only THEN, will I consider not taking abortion.
But let's face it, it will never happen. Pro-Life Men don't want to lose their rights.
They prefer to enslave women back in the midlle ages.

@Revelation34

That's impossible since abortion is not mentioned in the bible.

'' Scriptural truths

Ten biblical episodes and prophecies provide an unequivocal expression of God's attitude toward human life, especially the ontological status of "unborn children" and their pregnant mothers-to-be. Brief summaries:

A pregnant woman who is injured and aborts the fetus warrants financial compensation only (to her husband), suggesting that the fetus is property, not a person (Exodus 21:22-25).

The gruesome priestly purity test to which a wife accused of adultery must submit will cause her to abort the fetus if she is guilty, indicating that the fetus does not possess a right to life (Numbers 5:11-31).

God enumerated his punishments for disobedience, including "cursed shall be the fruit of your womb" and "you will eat the fruit of your womb," directly contradicting sanctity-of-life claims (Deuteronomy 28:18,53).

Elisha's prophecy for soon-to-be King Hazael said he would attack the Israelites, burn their cities, crush the heads of their babies and rip open their pregnant women (2 Kings 8:12).
King Menahem of Israel destroyed Tiphsah (also called Tappuah) and the surrounding towns, killing all residents and ripping open pregnant women with the sword (2 Kings 15:16).

Isaiah prophesied doom for Babylon, including the murder of unborn children: "They will have no pity on the fruit of the womb" (Isaiah 13:18).

For worshiping idols, God declared that not one of his people would live, not a man, woman or child (not even babies in arms), again confuting assertions about the sanctity of life (Jeremiah 44:7-8).

God will punish the Israelites by destroying their unborn children, who will die at birth, or perish in the womb, or never even be conceived (Hosea 9:10-16).

For rebelling against God, Samaria's people will be killed, their babies will be dashed to death against the ground, and their pregnant women will be ripped open with a sword (Hosea 13:16).

Jesus did not express any special concern for unborn children during the anticipated end times: "Woe to pregnant women and those who are nursing" (Matthew 24:19).''

Source : https://ffrf.org/component/k2/item/25602-abortion-rights

Yes abortion is mentioned in the Bible.

That's true, as well. People normally want babies. That's not to say older kids don't get adopted and stuff, because they do. But not a lot of them...

both lives are important, that's why we should strive for neither of them to end

it is another person though, there is no definition that states you have to be 100% self reliant to be considered a person and not be killed, otherwise according to your standard people linked to machines in hospital, children and people with severe issues in general are actually not people

Personally, I feel abortions are just better in some cases. Probably most. I think the foster care system and stuff already overcrowded. Putting more kids just makes it's harder for all of them. Not to mention kids with disabilities that the parent isn't financially able to help, so they put them up for adoption. Unless they find rich parents, their quality of life won't be any good. And they probably aren't happy with the fact that their parents gave them up. Which they might not wanted to have done, but couldn't afford a child at the time. I just feel abortion is an ok solution sometimes... And sometimes, necessary...

is this a serious post? pro birth not pro life. A lot support taking away social safety net programs while at the same time restricting access to abortions, insanity

That's why you see this sort of thing come up constantly. It's an extremely EASY way to rile up a particular part of the left's supporters and voter base. Like with what's happening now you'll see a bunch of people talking about how Roe vs. Wade will be overturned when Trump hasn't even picked a candidate yet. It's true he may pick someone who will oppose abortions, but it's also true that he may not. Either way it's HIS choice or, if you want to stretch it, the choice of the president and congress. All the votes in the world can't change that. So why bring it up? Well, isn't it obvious? We're very close to a massive election and both factions want massive turn-out in a highly polarized environment. What better way to try and force young women into the voting booth to vote for your candidate than to convince them that, if they don't, they're risking being devalued down to being little more than domestic slaves? So you better get in there and vote for Biden so Biden can put in a left wing justice to protect you

All I know is that abortion laws DONT stop abortions.

They just dictate whether one is performed in a doctors office or a motel room.

Especially about keeping Roe V Wade in place?

I'm prolife, but I do understand that there is a necessity in having access to abortion, which is why that if it were to remain legal, then women should have access to it until the fetus is capable of surviving outside of the womb(which is 5 months since conception). Yet there are some people who want abortions to be legal until at least 6 months of pregnancy, even though there have been instances of 6 month old fetuses being born early and surviving due to medical care.

Just a heads up for anyone else who had it. I don't know why they don't freaking send a message to people on steam when a game they have gets out of early access. It's really annoying.

R.I.P. wonderful and tough old lady. Thank you for fighting for us women.

LOL, you think McConnell gives a damn about precedent?

He already said they'd shamelessly fill an open seat if it opened up, no matter how late in Trump's term.

We're fucking fucked. Dems don't have enough Senate seats to stall it till after the election, and McConnell is literally Satan. Abortion is gone. RIP, both RBG and abortion law. You both had a good run.

Probably because the Dems don't want it legalized, but they don't want to be seen voting against it given that Biden needs every advantage he can get (likewise voting for it won't do them any favors).

If it gets forced to a vote, the whole party can shout "Present!"

Both parties have people who want it and don't want it. There's a fallacy where people believe that issues are generally partisan whereas in reality opinions tend to be split.

but i've heard he requires people to sign an nda to read the menu, ok?

larry, is looking to be americas pizza chef, ok?

I've always thought "gay" was for males and "lesbian" was for females.