Lurker > Crazyman93

BlazinBlue88 posted...

Letting a senior dog spend their final years in a loving home instead of a shelter is a wonderful thing to do.

So I assume your parents will live with you until they die on e they can't take care of themselves instead of sitting in a retirement home?

Full Throttle posted...

you're a piece of s*** like how f*** up can you be?

I like how the woman banging her step brother has the nerve to ask how fucked up someone else can be.

Also, how gross I find it depends on when they became step siblings. Like, teenagers? Fine. Raised together from childhood... Ehhhhh.....

Mibahlzitch posted...

It would be a lot easier to show anime to non weirdoes if otherwise normal series wouldn't have like, the one straight up sexual predator character for laughs you have to ignore, or the 12 year old that keeps dropping her pants on accident or whatever. "No guys, honest, except for this weird ass shit here the rest of it is great". Even I don't believe me when I hear me say it.

Yeah, I hear you. So much of it is thrown in for no reason and it's cringe as hell. Like, my biggest detriment to my enjoyment of Fire Force is them having a fan service character whose entire existence seems to revolve around an inability to stay dressed, to the point the laws of physics don't have a say. And it's EVERY. FUCKING. EPISODE! To the extent it happens in what's supposed to be a serious battle. It's a one note joke repeated ad nauseum. And unfortunately, your average American, and apparently Japanese, anime fan eats that stupid fan service shit up. I don't need a masterpiece of a plot. If you present a basic ass plot of "demons invade, people have to save world" to me, and present it well, I can enjoy it as a time waster. But when you throw in shit like characters showing up whose existence seems to involve an exaggerated chest bounce in a bikini whenever they show up, it makes me embarrassed to watch it.

Funny how the moment she turned 18 she went from "I want to be known for my music not my looks" to "CHECK OUT MY HUGE TITS EVERYONE!"

Halo478 posted...

Yes it is cuz they wont stop there

It becomes our problem when he fucks with a NATO country like Poland. Not before.

What_ posted...

Is this another like right wing troll or is it some other annoying gimmick?

No, left wing and Vegan. Guy is constantly butthurt and overly aggressive about everything. There is literally no topic he's capable of not being an arrogant dick about.

Mearcstapa posted...

Russia is such a failed, weak, mafia-run state with a puny economy, and I hate how the world is only forced to take them seriously because they inherited the Soviet nuclear arsenal.

They also inherited the permanent UNSC seat with the absolute veto. That's a pretty big thing to have since it totally prevents the UN from doing anything to Russia beyond sternly saying "bad, bad Russia. Naughty country." Whoever formed the UNSC thinking the Allied powers would always get along should have been shot in the head.

Tyranthraxus posted...

It's former USSR territory

It's also former Imperial Russian territory, as was Belarus and the Baltic states.

OVERGOATED posted...

still, frankly, dont understand the full motivation for why, why now

Why now? Because Biden was VP when Obama was limp dicked about Crimea. So the figure Biden will give a limp dick response if they invade mainland Ukraine.

Didn't he get fat?

NocturneD85 posted...

catholics are for the Pope. Protestants arent.

Hell, Orthodox aren't for the Pope either. Or the Anglicans. The Pope isn't actually all that popular.

It took 24 fucking posts before someone backed a name up with pics.

Alisa posted...

great if it means a more open, purposeful internet

Man, you swallowed their sales pitch hook, line, and sinker.

pikachupwnage posted...

Put him in padded cell and forget about him.

You think this shit stain deserves padding?

How does it feel to participate in a Ponzi scheme?

No. Gaming laptops are inherently inferior to gaming desktops

Of course CE's shut ins can't figure out why people want to go out despite a pandemic.

Smashingpmkns posted...

Ugh. My girlfriend is already trying to split up our New Year to appease them. This is going to be a rough one lol

I'm sorry, in what way did you think your GF would be okay with not seeing her parents on a holiday?

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

That's Google in general

Xethuminra posted...

Stick to smaller channels and let the Man know what really matters .

YouTube is actively suppressing smaller channels. I saw a video where someone talked about it and mentioned every time they post a video, he loses 20 subscribers, and he isn't the only one this happens to. To PewDiePie or Markiplier who have literally millions of subs, 20 is no big deal. To Joe Blow with 132 subs.... Yeah.

MrDrMan posted...

He believed a turn at that speed would flip the vehicle.

That's nice, Runaway Truck ramps often precede turns to allow the truck to go straight to them, without turning. He turned to avoid it. And yeah, you usually don't see traffic around a turn until you make the turn.

MrDrMan posted...

Maybe Im asking too much but I just think as society we should be more empathetic.

Hard to be empathetic to a guy who killed four people because he lied about his experience.

There's a short fall of truckers. He could easily have gotten a new job. And I love how you keep ignoring that this moron failed to use a runaway truck ramp. Which are for, you know, trucks that can't stop because the driver cooked the brakes instead of using other methods of slowing down.

With all respect to John MAdden, is dying really "unexpected" when you're 85. I mean, once you get that age, I feel like waking up in the morning starts to feel a little unexpected.

MrDrMan posted...

Tell him to stop driving? You act like its rocket science. Its pretty simple.

Stop driving the truck. would have saved those peoples lives.

So would "I'm not continuing with an unsafe truck." Pretty simple.

MrDrMan posted...

Your dad being a trucker doesnt make you an expert. The fact I even have to explain that is embarrassing.

Clearly I have more understanding of what a trucker is supposed to do than you. And the jury clearly agrees that he was negligent. You can argue about the sentence length, but he deserves prison time, period. And thankfully he'll get it.

MrDrMan posted...

. So because he didnt want to lose his job and listened to his boss its his fault?

Yes. Yes it is, what was his boss going to do? Run all the way out there and drive the truck himself? I doubt it.

MrDrMan posted...

His boss was the one that told him to keep going! He expressed concern and the people above him didnt care. That is on them.

Any good employer would have told him to stop. They didnt.

We can agree to disagree at this point because you refuse to admit his employer is also responsible and its just ridiculous at this point.

And as the driver it was his responsibility to say "no, the truck is unsafe." He didn't. And again, even after that, he ignored a runaway truck ramp which would have safely brought the truck to a stop, and instead used slow traffic as a substitute for brakes.

Your refusal to understand that when you're in command of a large vehicle with potential to cause serious damage, you assume responsibility for what it does, is ridiculous. You know nothing about being a truck driver. But yes, I'm glad you're willing to admit you're wrong about this, even if you won't flat out say it.

MrDrMan posted...

That only reinforces my point that circumstances out of his control caused the crash. Its not just blind negligence like everyone here is trying to say.

Um, no it doesn't reinforce your point. Especially not when he stopped before he lost brakes to call his boss and say he was losing brakes. Then kept going. He was negligent and 100% guilty of every charge he was convicted of.

MrDrMan posted...

You admit that there are multiple braking systems yet think its solely the drivers fault they all failed simultaneously.

That testimony doesn't say anything about the Engine Compression brake or a transmission ret*rder (stupid fucking babyfaqs censor). Also, there are signs on grades like that telling truckers to use low gear to keep from gaining a ton of speed.
And again, as the driver, it was his job to check that the rig was safe to drive before he set out. He didn't. 50 miles before the crash he stopped because his truck's brakes were smoking. Then continued after not adjusting the trailer brakes, or giving the truck brakes ample time to cool off so they'd work. And then he avoided a runaway truck ramp and plowed into stopped rush hour traffic at 85mph, causing an explosion, injuries, and four people to die. If he'd drove up the runaway truck ramp like he should have done, none of this would be happening. So yeah, this is 100% his fault.

MrDrMan posted...

Im not saying the driver is at no fault but to claim the brakes failed entirely due to his own negligence is flat out bullshit.

They have spots where drivers are required to check their brakes are properly adjusted and to adjust them if not. Obviously he decided that "mandatory brake check" sign didn't apply to him. So yeah, the crash is a result of his negligence.

DrizztLink posted...

I've driven that road, the brakes on my goddamn CIVIC were overheating by the end because the first time I didn't understand downshifting.

And a Honda Civic only weighs about 3000 pounds. Now imagine a big rig in excess of 80,000 pounds.

daynlokki posted...

Theres a reason they have literally stopping points to check brakes. Much like Pikes Peak which has a spot for a MANDATORY brake check. If your brakes are too hot from overuse, they pull you over until they cool down. Overuse of brakes on an incline is 100% a thing.

And he stopped 50 miles before his brakes "failed" (read: faded from over use), because they were smoking. And he kept going. That careless decision is why he bears full responsibility for this.

Oh, and regardless of why the brakes stopped working, he steered AWAY from the runaway truck ramp, which are on steep mountain grades specifically to prevent the sort of accident he caused. There is no excuse for the four deaths he caused beyond negligence.

MrDrMan posted...

Over use? Of fucking brakes? Thats ridiculous

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brake_fade
You're wrong, shut up. He over used his brakes instead of other methods of slowing down on a steep grade, and they faded. And then stopped working.

MrDrMan posted...

Good brakes dont wear down that fast from one trip

Spoken like someone who has no idea the difference between stopping a 4000 pound car versus an 80,000 pound loaded semi.

MrDrMan posted...

Truckers are striking over this and I trust their opinion over anyone on CE.

Funny, my father's a trucker and said the driver is guilty as hell and said he was probably an idiot trying to drive a semi truck like a car. And by the way, refusing to enter a state isn't a "strike".

MrDrMan posted...

Before the driver even steps foot into the vehicle it should be safe to drive.

They are equally to blame. Just be consistent. Youre calling the driver all sorts of names but the people that allowed their vehicle to drive while it had bad brakes you havent said a word about.

Be consistent or quit crying.

No they are not equally to blame. The driver has a duty to make sure the vehicle is in fact safe to drive. He failed. And you keep acting like the bad brakes was a maintence issue. If they were smoking on a mountain pass it was from over use. A semi truck has at least two if not three ways to slow down including the air brakes. The fact he continued another 50 miles after he cooked the brakes is 100% his fault. He cooked the brakes to the point he got brake fade that left them useless. Not the company. I am being consistent. Everything that happened in that accident was the driver's fault because of his negligence and incompetence.

MrDrMan posted...

His employer ignored the fact that the truck wasnt fit to drive in the first place.

And the driver would have known that if he'd done the pre-trip like he was legally required to. Blaming the employer for things that they did wrong doesn't make the driver innocent of negligent homicide.

MrDrMan posted...

His employer is worse

Okay, that's nice. His employer didn't ignore the fact that his brakes were smoking and becoming unusable. His employer didn't ignore a runaway truck ramp. His employer didn't fail to properly inspect the truck. He was the driver. The responsibility for making sure the truck was operated safely was rested on him the moment he started the engine and put it in gear. Period.