Lurker > lolife67

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

Sure and that's why I stopped responding to them lol I don't go back and forth like that.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

I don't have a problem with different opinions. As I said, it seemed more like a statement of fact, especially how it was reiterated.

deoxxys posted...

Why would it not be my personal opinion? Superheros, anime, medieval adventures and space operas face I've always been my favorites. If I think something is trash I'm free to say so. I think my last statement still stands here: Don't call people stupid for their personal preferences.

You stated it as a declaration, not a personal opinion. Especially since nobody was speaking about the quality until you brought it up.

deoxxys posted...

Not liking a show doesn't make you stupid.

Judging other people harshly on their tastes does.

No, your statement does. And don't pretend you were speaking in terms of personal opinion lol

deoxxys posted...

Marvel hasn't been good since Endgame.

As for Star Wars, Star Wars under Disney has never been good. Like even if it was prequel levels of okay that would have been better.

Doubling down on stupid, huh? Bold strategy...

Punished_Blinx posted...

It's popular with YouTuber reactionaries to hate on Disney at the moment so I'm sure that's overall a factor too.

Saying Disney ruined Marvel when they've owned them over the entirety of their movie peak is really silly.

Agreed.

Pepys_Monster posted...

The Marvel movies are good. Sure, the new Star Wars movies sucked, but The Mandalorian and Solo were good.

That's also ignoring the animated shows. I typically find people who say that aren't really Star Wars fans. They see the films because they're pop culture, not because they actually care about the franchise.

TheDurinator posted...

Setting the precedent that giant mega corporations can have self-governing fiefs on US soil is also bad.

That's not what's happening, though? You should really actually read up on this so you know what's going on.

TheDurinator posted...

Whoever wins, we lose.

How, exactly?

Zithers posted...

wouldnt be the first time a republican stumbled ass backwards into doing something good probably

Accept there's nothing good about what he's doing?

Norman_Smiley posted...

Disney has only their self interest in mind, and corporate self interests rarely align with the public interests. And Desantis needs no support on his shit.

So? Disney's self-interest doesn't harm anyone else here. So how does anyone lose if they win? It just allows corporate employees to speak out when they choose too.

On the other hand, if DeSantis wind then it definitely impacts people in a harmful way. So your post doesn't make sense.

Norman_Smiley posted...

I feel like regardless of the outcome of this, somehow everyone loses.

That doesn't make any sense.

voldothegr8 posted...

Are you new to Disney? They give no fucks if whatever they're suing for is winnable or not. They practically invented the "throw money at it until they run out" approach.

Yes and that works against people who aren't the Governor of Florida. This isn't the same type of case.

I agree about Big Shot, TC. That was a legitimately good show smh

DarkBuster22904 posted...

"I know I left you in order to help myself while you're dealing with stage 4 brain cancer, but I'll still tell people I'm doing it for you while completing a personal athletic milestone!"

"... thanks for your support..."

That's exactly what he basically feels, though. So if he's good with it then that's what matters. And none of us know the actual conversation they had, so no need to be hyperbolic.

They'd have to come up with even more contrived reasons for his villains returning. Which is why the whole "Batman should kill Joker" thing is stupid. Even if he did, Joker would just be brought back somehow. It wouldn't change anything, really.

Aso, I'm not sure she's really at fault for promoting this story. It's not like she posted it on her timeline. A publication picked up the story and decided to run with it.

DarkBuster22904 posted...

But if you DO decide to leave them, you do not get to publicly parade their name around in some sick feel-good campaign that's clearly a ploy to fish for sympathy for yourself.

Like, what do you mean "running it in his honor?" You abandoned him to help yourself, and are now doing something functionally worthless for his "cause." Just own it.

Well like I said earlier she can still be supportive as a friend, which considering he seems ok with it, is likely where she's coming from.

chrono625 posted...

not married, at least stick around for support then whatever happens you make that decision after. Not during. Its quite simple - youre able to make that decision but be prepared for the consequences.

Why? She can be supportive as a friend. She's not obligated to be more than that. And what decision are you talking about? Again, being in a monogamous relationship doesn't equate to agreeing to stay with someone while they're dying. That's what marriage vows are for. This isn't that. The rest of what you posted is predicated on this flawed reasoning you have, so no need to go further. I think you're being a bit naive on how bf/gf relationships actually work and are romanticizing them s great deal. It's not a forever commitment.

Revelation34 posted...

Bullshit.

It's really not, though? Old tweets have been the cause of a lot of people losing our, as well as aiding their publicity by a great deal.

Someone should make this idea into a (comic)book.

chrono625 posted...

Saying I cant handle this mentally taxing situation to your partner whos dealing with stage 4 brain cancer is fucking weak.

Im not saying mental health isnt important - but at that particular moment, someone who you supposedly cared about or love is dealing with literal death, you have to put your mental taxation on hold. Because either that person is going to live or die within a brief window.

You decided to date that individual prior to that diagnosis and then when it happens you dip?

thats part of committing to someone. And she should receive every bit of scorn that comes her way.

Well they were dating, not married. How much commitment does she actually owe? And who's to say how long he'll live? You say it's a short while but it could end up being years. Not to mention she is still experiencing mental/emotional trauma by watching someone she cares about dying in front of her. It's not nearly as simple nor easy as you seem to think.

Nasty_Nitro posted...

Well its good enough for me maybe im too basic to start a family? I can live with that.

Oh that's certainly fine. If you don't want kids, cool. But you were trying to make it seem like you had big things going on, so having a kid would infringe on that. I know plenty of people with kids who still do what you do. More, in fact, since they also travel domestically and internationally.

Nasty_Nitro posted...

City of Atlanta has some pretty awesome bars and clubs. I really like going out now that im married its actually way more fun and social i used to be so focused on attracting a woman now its literally just hang out and vibe. I dont drink anymore so i usually take blunt breaks and hang out with new people. I also dont have to worry about an uber or DUI because I dont drink.

Im also working on my creative pursuit which is a sci fi novel. But also basic is still poppin

I've been living in Atlanta since '94, so I know. Hell, I used to bartend in Buckhead. What you're talking about is pretty average here.

And "basic" is literally not "poppin" by definition lol

Nasty_Nitro posted...

im married, work from home and have fun going out to bars yeah id say thats poppin.

That actually sounds incredibly basic to me.

Supersex420 posted...

lol, I like writing though... I guess you have to enjoy that as well

Right. It's more about which format you enjoy than one being objective better/worse than the other, imo.

Supersex420 posted...

Can be avoided or mitigated... With mods, which are not DMs.

Nah, I'm good. Plus I prefer more interpersonal interaction and why write when I can just speak?

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

All of this.

s0nicfan posted...

I doubt anybody's going to be pissed off by this

Lol oh yes, they definitely will be. You're acting like new characters don't get hate for "pushing an agenda/being woke/shoved down our throats."

It's not even necessarily about being "tired of her" or anything like that. As attractive as they are, there are other women within that same social circle just as attractive and some men have ZERO self-control.

Phoenixeater posted...

Being Greek or Egyptian doesn't equate to being black. I'm so sick of dumbasses believing otherwise.

It doesn't preclude it, either.

These films just really aren't the same without Paul Walker. He was truly the heart and soul of the franchise. I haven't liked a single movie since his passing.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

Marvel hasn't said or done anything yet.

HornyLevel posted...

The news of multiple victims broke like 2 hours ago.

Everybody dropped him already. Disney is gonna look horrible holding the bag with him. This is Disney. Not WBD, who has a reputation for shit like that.

They also don't have to announce anything till they've reshot the show. And there were already rumors from 2 weeks ago that they might be doing reshoots.

Like you said, this is Disney. You don't think they would know of any potential other victims coming forward before the story broke? You think they'd risk the bad publicity for one second longer than necessary? They may let him go but I doubt they do or reshoot unless the charges stick.

HornyLevel posted...

There's no way Disney is releasing Loki with any sign of Majors in it.

If that was the case then they'd already have dropped him. They're clearly waiting to see how the trial/charge plays out.

HornyLevel posted...

Viola Davis? Huh? She's never been in the MCU.

MC_BatCommander posted...

They were thinking of Alfre Woodard, who was in Civil War and Luke Cage as two completely different characters.

You're both correct and my bad for the error/brain fart.

MC_BatCommander posted...

Michelle Yeoh has also played two different characters, granted her character in Guardians 2 was more of a cameo. She's in Guardians 2 and Shang Chi

True I forgot about her

And to be clear, I don't think they will (or should) cast Idris as Kang. Just saying they could and audiences would figure it out.

Blue_Popo posted...

Who gets recast to play 2 roles in the same franchise...please give me an example

And dont give me cg alien to seeing their faces. Im talking you see their faces and its the same face

The MCU had already done this twice, actually. Once with Minerva/Circe and the other is with Viola Davis.