Lurker > nicklebro

Back in my day we had to prove we were 18 before we could watch porn. We did this by clicking a button that says "I am 18 or older". We were some crafty lads back then I'll tell ya.

---

Now you can't call me a sigless user.

Kitt posted...

I mean, it's possible that she's telling the truth, but I find that hard to believe lol

She gave him the old double excuse, that's a definite sign she's lying.

---

Now you can't call me a sigless user.

Zeeak4444 posted...

well a lot of them work for Amazon and actually do the things that allow amazon to provide you with a large consumer surplus.

I thought this topic was about his divorce when I came in but reading the topic now I dont understand how you could have this opinion. If he donated 1% to increasing the pay of all his workers there would be a substantial upside to a shit ton of people (not to mention the effect that much money dispersed to people who would spend it would have on the economy) with very little downside to Bezos himself, if any.

So, speaking to someone against these types of things, can I ask why its seen as such a negative thing to suggest distributing wealth would be beneficial?

Because you're stealing money from someone who worked to earn it. Now asking how much of his income should be taxed is a way different story than asking how much his net worth should.be stolen. Of course free money to working people would be beneficial... To them. But that doesn't make it right.

Now if you wanna change this question from "how much money should he be forced to give away?" To "how much money should he give away?" Then that's a different story. I think it'd be incredibly selfish and borderline evil to have $100 billion and not spend a nickel on helping other people/improving the world somehow. But in no way should it be illegal to do so.

We shouldn't try to legislate morality.

---

Now you can't call me a sigless user.

Raikuro posted...

what does romance have to do with what makes your dick hard?

... Lol well for some people, nothing I guess.

---

Now you can't call me a sigless user.

COVxy posted...

I think you're taking your very specific circumstance and trying to fit a label to it, rather than see if the circumstance fits the label.

You had romantic feelings for someone you're not sexually attracted to. It's weird, but it happens sometimes. I don't think there's a specific label for it.

But everyone I've talked to about it has said the same thing. It isn't just bi+ trans like you said.

But I do agree that there's likely no accurate label for whatever the fuck happened to me. It's actually not entirely accurate for mentonsay that I developed feelings for him before attraction, I guess the feelings were just the first thing I acknowledged and accepted, since that was actually easier to comprehend and process than the fact that I found him sexually attractive. If that makes sense.

---

Now you can't call me a sigless user.

DarthWendy posted...

So they just cropped up a term for "I f*** anything that moves" ?

No.

COVxy posted...

Bisexuality for people who feel the need to broadcast that they don't discriminate against the transcommunity.

No again. That's what I thought it meant originally, but now I see that it means you can develop romantic feelings for anyone. I'm still not attracted to any trans people, or really even any other guys. At least to the point of being willing to have sex with them. Tbh I am not even sure that I truly fall under this category, I just don't know what else to call it.

---

Now you can't call me a sigless user.

It was entertaining. And that's all I ask for when I watch a movie.

---

Now you can't call me a sigless user.

mustachedmystic posted...

Alphabet people you say?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QMxkevtel-k

Got it from Chappelle

---

Now you can't call me a sigless user.

MC_BatCommander posted...

It's essentially an attraction to people regardless of their gender identity or biological sex.

boxington posted...

that you can feel sexual attraction to someone regardless of their gender identity/expression, iirc.

like, someone who's bisexual might only be into cis-males & females, but someone who's pan doesn't necessarily have those hold-ups.

Ok so these match up with what I've come to understand as well. Well the reason I ask is because *when* I guess I'm pansexual. I'm assuming most people here don't remember me since I've rarely posted the last couple years but yeah, I've been just a typical straight guy for my entire life with absolutely no attraction to other men or trans people or anything other than females.

But then a few months ago I met a guy, hes a pretty flamboyant gay dude and we just became good friends, then really good friends, and then out of the fucking blue I had to admit to myself that I was developing feelings for him. It was weird cuz I developed feelings for him before I developed a sexual attraction towards him. I didn't know this could happen to anyone and definitely never thought it could possibly ever happen to me. I mean I've always been a staunch supporter of all the alphabet people (LGBT etc) and been super open minded, not to mention met a lot of gay guys who were interested in me, but I'd never even come close to thinking I might be anything other than straight.

I want to be sure everyone knows this isn't some kinda joke or anything like that, I'm being 100% honest. But I can't blame anyone who's skeptical of that cuz I didn't think it worked like that at all.

---

Now you can't call me a sigless user.

So the definition and what that would look like in actuality. Kinda need to clear something up and idk anyone who would be able to give me a definitive and accurate answer.

---

Now you can't call me a sigless user.