Vlado posted...
lol, GS, Drake directly called out Butz, who supported SBell's action. Care to apply simple logic, please?
Care to yourself?
Gatarix posted...
Now, if someone is refusing to pull their weight around the office to a big enough extent that it's hurting office productivity, and you talk to him about it and he refuses to change, I think going to the boss is fair.
Wait... that sounds awfully familiar to exactly what Bell did, probably because it is. And if Drake agrees with this then that means... he's completely on your side! Yep! This logic is flawless!
And Tim called out SBell on whining in this thread for hours, while at work, that actually someone else wasn't being productive. After taking the time to journal their activities, no less. Yeah, sure sounds like he doesn't agree with SBell simply out of spite.
You keep telling yourself that, especially since the dude pretty much admitted to it on the same page lol.
The latter IS 100% correct about you and me, however.
I'll be honest: my first impression of you was not a great one (and believe-it-or-not, this topic isn't helping! Crazy, right?), but I assure you I would not be "afraid" to side with a "monster" aka a user I wasn't fond of if he or she was correct.
Thing is Vlado, in this topic, you were never correct. The more you expanded on your reasoning, the worse your initial argument became. You continued to argue that Bell took the worst possible solution to this problem. While I do not believe it was the best, the actual worst solution is the one you're advocating the most: to do absolutely nothing about it at all. Tell me Vlado, if Bell's action had a slim chance of achieving a desirable change, but yours would achieve nothing, how could Bell's decision be worse than yours?
--
Courtesy of fr0q: http://img.imgcake.com/gencardjpgha.jpg
Courtesy of Pun: http://img861.imageshack.us/img861/4738/genesissaga.png