I'm pretty sure the argument he was making is that if you're against everyone paying for individuals, it is cheaper (and thus closer to your ideal, albeit only kind of) to pay for birth control rather than to pay for unwanted pregnancies.
This is a non-sequitir. If I'm against everyone paying for individuals, the "societal cost" is irrelevant. If everyone pays for themselves, unwanted pregnancies AND birth control cost ME the same amount, zero.
--
SmartMuffin - Because anything less would be uncivilized - http://img.imgcake.com/smartmuffin/barkleyjpgde.jpg
http://dudewheresmyfreedom.com/