LogFAQs > #978800868

Katanablade posted...

You dont hear of many british born people (if any) going around the streets of the UK unprovokingly throwing acid or alkaline over a woman and her children, like an asylum seeker did recently. So yes, some crimes and atrocities are unique with them

Perhaps, but then:

Countries will give more rights to people that were born in that country, its just the way it is

So should interracial marriages go back to being illegal since that's just the way it was for a long time (especially Alabama not waving said law until 2000)?

Yeah if a person gets a pass cause of status, how is that not seen as immoral? Just feels like a variation of a cop viewing crimes committed by a black person as worse than a white person committing them.

Edit:

And those that are saying "there is no middle ground on abortion", they are doing exactly what militant vegans do, just come back with rhetorics that just appeals to their own sensibilities.

That's the thing though you speak of the site highly cause of the middle ground while acting as if say Freedom of Speech and Ideas should be absolute, but:

1. Either as formalities or rules we are taught not to interupt our elders or peers just cause, as well as keeping silent in environments like when there is a public speaker or in libraries.

But no one would deem it immoral to break those rules if there is an emergency going on?

2. If we should be cautious about thought policing, then why is identity policing like say racism not given the same concern?

Cause at the very least no one disputes the idea of a person's race being beyond control, right?

3. And yeah just treating bigotry in general like an opinion, as if it's akin to hating particular sodas, movies or pizza toppings. Kind of like saying concerns of bigotry and victims are trivial.